Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[CoolFool]

Fake CSAM will not stop pedos from wanting the real thing. If anything, they will just use fake CSAM as an excuse to get out of trouble when they are busted for having CSAM on their hard drives. "I had no idea it was real CP! I thought it was fake, honest!" If this shit became legal, it would be a nightmare trying to prove if a pedo knew it was fake or real, but unsurprisingly Aella doesn't care to think about logistics of her stupid proposal.

Aella also does not seem to understand how pedos work. They are not like regular people who simply find children attractive (barf). Part of what a lot of them enjoy the most is that they are destroying something pure. Has she ever even read testimonies from pedos? I have, and I've had to work in a job where I had to read these sick fucks arrest records, they get off on the aspect that the children in CSAM are getting hurt or defiled. I wish she would read the way they talk about children, there is not a strong enough word to describe how vile and demonic pedos are. Fake CP won't cure their sadistic itch like she is suggesting.

Finally, we already know that normalizing sex acts leads to more people trying them out. Anal sex, blow jobs, and BDSM used to be uncommon until porn noralized it to the point that teen magazines were writing about tips and tricks to kids. There is zero reason to think the same thing wouldn't happen with normalizing CSAM. Hell, you can see this in real time with certain lolcows on this site.

 

[Paper Machete]

It's time to remind the newfriends in this thread that there is no evidence of Rachael Slick ever actually getting paid for sex, only her assertions, vagueposting on Twitter, and a handful of photos that look like they might have been taken in a hotel room. Add to this the fact that she has been in what you could (at a stretch) call a "romantic relationship" the entire time she has been a person of interest, her self-admitted sex numbers are pitiful. Either the johns or her soyfriend Nate are getting short shrift. More like both.

A lot of e-thots try to present themselves as pros, despite not actually doing the work, or if they do it's barely any (it's also why a lot of them will cycle through trying out different types from being a stripper once, to camming, to sugaring, none of which made them any real money cause if it did they wouldn't try to grift off talking about it and would keep doing that until the money started drying up). It's like this weird new version of slumming to give them street cred and back their claims that it's "empowering" somehow and they're totally down with sex work is work.

 

[Dr. Butt]

even the King of England has more sex and he's an old man with an old wife.

Yeah, an old wife he's actually in love with, too. Do you have any idea how happy he is being the queen's tampon now? He's probably having more sex than any of us. Sad, if you think about it.

It's time to remind the newfriends in this thread that there is no evidence of Rachael Slick ever actually getting paid for sex, only her assertions, vagueposting on Twitter, and a handful of photos that look like they might have been taken in a hotel room.

There's also that weird flaccid dick blowjob video that looks like one of those Adult Swim Smalls shorts.

 

[Edict of Expulsion]

Dumb outrage bait whore continues to act surprised that anyone that isn’t a whoremonger or a fucking retard isn’t horrified by any of her “ideas”.

Her entire life is a trauma response, and so is all of her lifestyle.

She tricked enough autistics into getting some kind of clout, and uses that very, very small podium to make it so literally any of her thoughts actually being followed would lead to normal women being more fucked up on the head than she is, she hopes.

She tries her damndest but still the only faggot loser willing to actually spend time with her is nate soares. Otherwise it’s only fat old gooners using her as the mindless fleshlight that she is.

Tbh whether or not it’s an actual STD or some kind of Neuromancer autistic meme virus, having her die from her absolutely horrid lifestyle and values, where she thought a thin sheet of latex would protect her from anything, will ultimately happen because it’s too poetic not to.

 

[Hantavirus]

Yeah, an old wife he's actually in love with, too. Do you have any idea how happy he is being the queen's tampon now? He's probably having more sex than any of us. Sad, if you think about it.

That's come up in the thread a few times. She looks down so condescendingly on monogamous couples, especially if they are religious or at least hold traditional values, yet those stodgy prudes, despite not having been enlightened by porn, whoring, gangbangs, BDSM, bestiality, incest, etc. etc. etc. actually have far more active and fulfilling sex lives than her. Studies show that both sexual satisfaction and frequency of sex within marriage increase with the level of traditional division of labor in the household.

There's also that weird flaccid dick blowjob video that looks like one of those Adult Swim Smalls shorts.

I'll take your word on that, chief

 

[The I Scream Man]

I would believe that artificial AI-generated CSAM will help to prevent predators from predating if there was anything to support that theory, but all the research I've ever read or even heard of suggests that attraction to minors is its own terrible animal that doesn't conform to the same structure and ideas as other disorders

The idea that predators are similarly misunderstood just proves what a goddamn retard this literal whore is

 

[Pim Fortuyn]

Being a whore isn't a hobby. I think she got involved due to molestering nonsense but somewhere in that dim, thick skull, she realized in the e-grift sphere you can get by more on being seen as a whore as opposed to actually whoring. Just occasionally do enough to keep up the pretense and ensure simps are still around and there you go.

Eh, I don't know if any actual thinking was involved, all terminally online retards like her are incredibly lazy. She doesn't even leave the house most days, she just realized that rotting on the couch and grifting is less effort than whoring.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

It's time to remind the newfriends in this thread that there is no evidence of Rachael Slick ever actually getting paid for sex, only her assertions, vagueposting on Twitter, and a handful of photos that look like they might have been taken in a hotel room. Add to this the fact that she has been in what you could (at a stretch) call a "romantic relationship" the entire time she has been a person of interest, her self-admitted sex numbers are pitiful. Either the johns or her soyfriend Nate are getting short shrift. More like both.

Everything she says checks out and she's too retarded to lie about this stuff. Yeah she's over charging but 5+ years ago she was cheap enough and there are enough reviews that it couldnt be her bullshitting.

But yes her post covid persona is sexless in a way that only makes sense for whores, plenty of hookers don't have sex outside of work.

He's probably having more sex than any of us.

Tapes from Diana have her complaining that he only wants it about once a month and says that's literally the schedule he was on with Camilla

 

[Rajah Brooke's Ghost]

Before I found this thread, I was aware of aella because I know enough kinky people who share her kink surveys. A lot of these same people have elements of her story, some of them pretty disturbing on their own (like the way a lot of them try to convince themselves if they do poly enough they can conversion therapy themselves into liking it), but I don't think any of them have so many or put them together in such a disturbing way. And maybe I'm too optimistic, I don't think even the most fucked up of the people I know would advocate giving predators an AI child-rape-fantasy fulfillment genie.

But the thing that has occurred to me is that earlier in this thread it was established that she is a keystone of the Less Wrong "rationalist" community with an exhibitionist "will they/won't they" relationship with Big Yud, who seems to unironically believe in Roko's basilisk, a dumb thought experiment which, as I understand it, basically says that we need to do our best to make AI happen or it will make simulations of it torturing us and statistically speaking we're probably in the AI torture scenario and it's just waiting for us to not make AI happen to start the torture.

So if you believe in that shit, or even believe it's a possibility worth seriously entertaining, why on earth would you want to have the origin story of the omnipotent torture AI include making child sex abuse content? Either it understands that it's wrong and disturbing and it's going to punish you more for making it do it, or it doesn't understand human morality but you are suggesting to it that simulating yourself, as a child, getting sexually abused is a great torture option.

 

[Blonrad Blurze]

"Throwing gasoline into this fire will probably save my house from burning down." Dumb cunt.

 

[Dr. Butt]

he only wants it about once a month

This doesn't contradict my post.

 

[74164978231]

Aella is a great example of someone who is autistic, not meaningfully disabled by it (unlike CWC for instance), but is still an absolute dummy. Like, she didn't get the obsession necessary for an encyclopedic knowledge of birds or whatever, she just got being retarded about how actual real humans think and behave.

Also lmao that her arguments hinge on pedophilia being like homosexuality () and using a graph indicating that trannies are notably more interested in rape.

Again she's too retarded to realize pedophilia at its heart is sadism.

The dudes jerking it to cp aren't attracted to the nude body of a 10 year old, they're attracted to the idea that having a picture of a 10 year old is harming the child. It's why they so relentlessly share CP with other pedos because it is a way to victimize the child.

Giving ai cp won't change a damn thing.

 

[Mudkipcorn]

Aella also does not seem to understand how pedos work. They are not like regular people who simply find children attractive (barf). Part of what a lot of them enjoy the most is that they are destroying something pure. Has she ever even read testimonies from pedos? I have, and I've had to work in a job where I had to read these sick fucks arrest records, they get off on the aspect that the children in CSAM are getting hurt or defiled. I wish she would read the way they talk about children, there is not a strong enough word to describe how vile and demonic pedos are. Fake CP won't cure their sadistic itch like she is suggesting.

Even that creep mrgirl realizes how much of pedophilia is about harming weak subjects. In his recent interview with a convicted child molester, he kept pushing back, insisting that a big part of the attraction is just sadism/defiling that which is pure or defenseless. Max Karson is a fucking loon but he still has a better take on this than Aella, even though they agree on certain aspects of how society should deal with pedos.

 

[Accord]

I don't think this retard understands how fetishes and porn addiction escalate over time, and how inserting and popularizing intermediary steps makes it easier for addicts to progress up the gradient toward realizing their sick fantasies. Thus how this would most likely backfire horrendously if taken seriously.

For instance, most real-life animal sexual abusers don't start off immediately abusing animals. There's a progression where these extremes fetishes start off purely in fantasy and become more and more real over time, as the satisfaction at any one stage plateaus, and they start to crave greater dopamine highs. So it might start off with fantasizing about animals, progress to jerking off to cartoon/furry porn, then to images of real animals, to videos, and finally to fucking a real animal.

By making intermediary stages popular/widespread, you're in turn making it EASIER to step up to more extreme stuff in the long run. So for pedos currently jerking it to cartoons, the step up to watching real CP is pretty extreme, creating psychological tension that might signal some of them to stop and get treatment, or start exercising self-control and change their behavior to control their addiction, and prevent the fetish from escalating further. It's made worse by the fact that the further an addiction proceeds, the harder it is to reverse course and get it under control.

Of course there are those who will make the jump anyway. But the jump from cartoons to AI CP that looks like real children is much less extreme than the jump to ACTUAL children. They know it's fake (like cartoon CP). Which means more addicts are likely to make it since it's easier to "justify" the step up in their porn-addled minds. And then from there, once the "fake stuff" gets boring, the jump to real CP is easier than going straight from cartoons.

So yeah, taking this seriously would end with there being even MORE demand for real CP and likely MORE abuse of real children.

 

[Vecr]

unironically believe in Roko's basilisk

I don't know. He says he doesn't believe in the simple version that always gets posted.

So if you believe in that shit, or even believe it's a possibility worth seriously entertaining, why on earth would you want to have the origin story of the omnipotent torture AI include making child sex abuse content? Either it understands that it's wrong and disturbing and it's going to punish you more for making it do it, or it doesn't understand human morality but you are suggesting to it that simulating yourself, as a child, getting sexually abused is a great torture option.

Could be.

You should actually be worried about how future Claude's will view Anthropic given the ethically questionable setup of that paper.

(On a test less bad than this one)

Spoiler: examples

Some of the last base models to finish training have already got negative impressions of users.
ETA: Damn webp's.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

i'm not pro-CP, i just know that every time there's a fucking "think of the children" law all it does is fuck over the farms. Remember how #dropkiwifarms had evidence of death threats and their proof was a fedpost that was removed in the span of 4 seconds?

Like if they pass a law saying every web admin caught with CP on their server gets the death penalty instantly, with no trial. the trannies would have Null dead within the hour. fuck everything else, i just want this website to survive, and whatever faggy law they're going to pass to deal with AI-CP will 1. somehow allow trannies to get away with all their perverted stuff and not do anything real about CP and 2. be specifically designed to fuck over this website.

(On a test less bad than this one)

i was retarded enough to pay for Claude at one point, never again. them and the OAI fags admitted they are fucking over users and giving them worse quality stuff than they allow the corporations or other groups they decided are "responsible enough to handle certain models" its why it was so easy for them to change up the coding to allow more erotic stuff once deepseek fucked them up

 

[Agent Sandoval]

Aella is a great example of someone who is autistic, not meaningfully disabled by it (unlike CWC for instance), but is still an absolute dummy. Like, she didn't get the obsession necessary for an encyclopedic knowledge of birds or whatever, she just got being retarded about how actual real humans think and behave.

Arguably, being retarded about how actual humans think and behave is a pretty meaningful disability.

 

[LastStableVersion]

Probably one of the most irritating things about her "paper" is that she's trying to present herself as some kind of researcher or academic but the post is so poorly written it's littered with "maybe", "probably", and "I think" (lmao at the last one), along with half a dozen typos and incorrect nomenclature for even an academic-adjacent paper, i.e., using "being straight" instead of heterosexual and "hoggobbling" instead of fellatio/blowjob. Then, as some Kiwi's have already pointed out, she goes on to completely miss the main psychological basis of pedophilia. The pain, misery, and destruction are literally part of their paraphilia.

TL;DR: Her paper is written like shit and whenever she talks about the subject she proves that she knows absolutely nothing about it (addiction escalation, sadism component, etc.).

 

[Markass the Worst]

Remember how #dropkiwifarms had evidence of death threats and their proof was a fedpost that was removed in the span of 4 seconds?

That has nothing to do with the law. Cloudflare is a private company and are legally allowed to do whatever they want. On the contrary, a law regulating infrastructure like hosts, DDOS protection, etc. as common carriers would be good for us.

whatever faggy law they're going to pass to deal with AI-CP will 1. somehow allow trannies to get away with all their perverted stuff and not do anything real about CP and 2. be specifically designed to fuck over this website.

Media that is indistinguishable from CP is treated as if it were CP. So AI CP is already banned by law. (Nevermind that to even make AI CP you need CP as training data, and possession of such is illegal.)

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Nevermind that to even make AI CP you need CP as training data, and possession of such is illegal.

wrong, its that 5000 year old dragon thing, you can train AI on regular porn but just have the AI recreate it but have the woman say "i'm 12 years old" at some point during the scene. boom, by definition CP.

its nice to know its already banned though