Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 130 38.0%

  • Total voters
    342
- Nick has a handwritten letter from Aaron where he admitted to all the bad things he had done. He had it, but no one knew he had it. He could have shown it at trial, and he implied it would have been very effective at discrediting Aaron. He still has it.
In other words Nick, who was not trying to act like a cult leader, was having Aaron handwrite cultish self-criticism letters which Aaron agreed to because he's that much of a cuckold.

Not really beating the cult allegations there, Rekieta.

Nick knows the poster well enough that it did not seem like a joke because they did not joke a lot in their posts.
But he STOPPED reading his thread in December 2022! How can this be?
 
"Inappropriate behavior" by someone associated with (the county?) that "was around" made his kid uncomfortable in ways that "would infuriate people if I disclose the details, and at some point I may". The guardian ad litem said the child was lying and that they would remove the children from family foster care.

Sounds like we need the case unsealed to expose a diddler in the system.
 
If you told Nicky's story of peer pressure to a child they would tell you that "there's no way someone is that stupid, is that one of those anti-drug PSAs we watched at school?". He's below a third grader in the totem pole of cool.
Nick's streams OUGHT to be used as anti-drug PSAs.

Nick had previously argued that school anti-drug programs made drugs sound cool. And to be fair (since I am roughly the same age), I wouldn't say they made sound drugs sound cool, but they were kinda lame. Really limp wristed. We had Nancy Reagan telling us to "Just say No," and that's pretty weak.

You need to scare the SHIT out of kids. You could play Requiem for a Dream in the classroom, or Nick's Cokestream. Yeah, with the latter they'd have to endure "Anime sucks cope and sneed," but that would probably get less parental complaints than "ass to ass" I figure.
 
My bet is that one of the inlaws or extended family who is somehow in the employ of the state, even if not directly as a part of KCHH (the local CPS equivalent) who talked with the kids and suggested that "they might want to stay with the grandparents and not want to go home".

And the daughter reported this, Nick freaked out and spun it as "CPS is trying to tell my kids to say they do not want to come home".

This is 100% speculation, but it would fit perfectly with the story that Kayla's stepfather has tried to get her to leave Nick and move back in with her parents. (I think @Melty Butter had some info on that timeline)
 
Last edited:
- Nick has to be careful about how he tells the story because there are 2 people that want to be 'gone' and have left the internet. Having his private life made public was traumatic. He never wanted it to come out. He does not want to do that to others. If he does tell those stories, he will plan it out in advance to protect their privacy.
Hi Drex.
 
So my takeaway from the summaries posted thus far is that he's not actually arguing he's technically innocent of the possession charge, but that the evil gooberment and witnesses played dirty.
He seems to be arguing that he's only guilty by the letter of the law, but that he didn't actually do anything that bad and that the evil government and Scandinavian prudes at his church are actually the bad people for fucking with him when he had a good thing going on. Oh, and Sean because he's fat.

Notice what he hasn't said (according to the highlights)—anything about the search being unconstitutional, the warrant being bad, or anything else that came up months ago when we had the Barnes crew trying to cover for him. Weird how all of his full-throated arguments from back then have been totally dropped, huh?

Edit: Though I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to touch on them during his public stream because he's reading this thread and realizes that not bringing up any of the constitutional issues makes him look like he was just flailing back then.
 
- Nick will show audio and video from his case to show how the police procedure works and all the tricks they use. Nick was treated with undue hostility by the lead investigator (Quin Pomplun)
Sounds like he wants to be first to release (edited, trimmed portions of) the bodycam footage so he can get his narrative out before the Kiwi Farms branded raw footage drops.
-Nick will show how cocaine and metabolites get into hair samples. He has studies he can show. It has not been proven that his daughter was exposed.
How many manchild-hours have already been spent debating the metabolites here? I'm sure he will bring something compelling and new to the table.
 
The best thing Nick could do is show up and talk about Law like nothing happened, ignore everything else. But he's a Lolcow so that's impossible for him, he can't help but focus on his own drama, and he's a narcissist so has to try to control the narrative (even when it's impossible)
But what would be the point? He is not a legal lawyer anymore. Being a lolcow is what he is and forever be at this point.
 
Notice what he hasn't said (according to the highlights)—anything about the search being unconstitutional, the warrant being bad, or anything else that came up months ago when we had the Barnes crew trying to cover for him. Weird how all of his full-throated arguments from back then have been totally dropped, huh?
It's almost like that bullshit was total moron shit and he completely lost on it because it was retarded.

Remember how that Boss Baby looking bitch ass fucking whore Barnes insisted it was totally the best argument of all time and how anyone who was pointing out how completely fucking retarded it was was wrong?
 
I imagine it very likely was "uncomfortable" for the Rekieta children as sitting down at a dinner table with an entire family present without one parent being strung out on drugs and the other passed out in their bedroom on benzos would be a bizarre occurrence for them.

But not to worry they're back to dinner with their cokehead father crying about his ex-boyfriend.
 
But what would be the point? He is not a legal lawyer anymore. Being a lolcow is what he is and forever be at this point.
All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.
 
It's almost like that bullshit was total moron shit and he completely lost on it because it was retarded.

Remember how that Boss Baby looking bitch ass fucking whore Barnes insisted it was totally the best argument of all time and how anyone who was pointing out how completely fucking retarded it was was wrong?
It absolutely was retarded, as anyone who ever read and dealt with a warrant/Franks argument said at the time. But Nick can't admit it was retarded. Even if he did, it would be couched as him saying that you have to do everything possible in legal proceedings even if they have a low chance of success. Or that they were good arguments but his counsel was bad. We'll never hear Nick say "yeah, my Fourth Amendment rights weren't actually violated and the warrant was completely good." Part of his cope is that he doesn't have to take responsibility for the crime if he can contest the basis for the search and seizure.

Of course, Nick is totally free to prove me wrong and admit that he was flailing at the time. But I think everyone knows that will never happen.
 
All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.
And in fact, he's probably keeping that one in his back pocket (no, not that one) in case the PO tells him to get a job.
"I am getting a job, Officer, I just need to take these CLE credits in Vegas to get back in good standing!"
 
All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.
I'd would be really funny if he went through the trouble to get it back, and (if) the cyber crimes stuff would prove he violated attorney client privileges, got fucked over and suspended anyway.
 
I imagine it very likely was "uncomfortable" for the Rekieta children as sitting down at a dinner table with an entire family present without one parent being strung out on drugs and the other passed out in their bedroom on benzos would be a bizarre occurrence for them.
nick-cooking.webp
 
Back