Careercow Alyssa Mercante / beerandfeminism / kombitchaTEArex / High Heeled Gamer / hayy GIRL hayy / uhLyssa15 - From failed sex worker to failed clickbait journalist. A far-left racist narcissistic abusive smug feminazi. Stalks her targets and their families, DEI & SBI activist, alcoholic junkie, threatens gamers & YouTubers to public fights and then lawsuits.

Should this thread be moved to Beauty Parlor?


  • Total voters
    473
  • Poll closed .
Great news Alyssa, you'll soon be permanently replaced by a person of color 🥳
20250420_132159.webp20250420_132427.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would personally like to see her evidence to support the factual claim that SmashJT caused her losing her job at Kotaku and organized the harassment. Because so far all I see is a lot of "man mean, QQ".
There is a lot of garbage in that lawsuit and she would have a much better chance if she would trim down the idiocy and just go with what has a slight chance of success.
This is the AMENDED complaint mind you, meaning that this was already a trimmed down version of what, probably, was an even more erroneous and vitriolic document, I genuinely believe that the lawyer himself is butthurt at SmashJT's mean mean comments, because otherwise, I don't see how you don't have any qualms having THIS in your professional record.
 
Great news Alyssa, you'll soon be permanently replaced by a person of color 🥳View attachment 7252599View attachment 7252650
I’ve been gaming for 30+ years and don’t recognize any of those. I do remember those shitty Prima guides from back in the day. They’re completely outdated. Not sure there is any monetary value in any of those. Perfect opportunity for Jeets to run those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oliver Onions
I’ve been gaming for 30+ years and don’t recognize any of those. I do remember those shitty Prima guides from back in the day. They’re completely outdated. Not sure there is any monetary value in any of those. Perfect opportunity for Jeets to run those.
Destructoid and The Mary Sue are pretty significant names.

Although neither is worth a single fuck.
 
Alyssa, for lack of a real journalism career, has taken work at a restaurant.

View attachment 7231229 [A]
I'd love to go to that restaurant and snap my fingers at her and shit, make a fuss over everything then leave one of those gag tips where it looks like a dollar but it's actually a mormon pamphlet on finding christ or whatever.
210fef81-994d-4867-a8ed-d84e39f90565_text.gif
 

Attachments

  • 210fef81-994d-4867-a8ed-d84e39f90565_text.gif
    210fef81-994d-4867-a8ed-d84e39f90565_text.gif
    587.2 KB · Views: 7
I love this. Mercante's entire argument is "Yeah, I'm a verifiable hunk of shit, but he didn't know that!"

Seriously, I think waiting tables will be good for her if she can get past the resentment. Actual work and making friends with real human beings is good for the soul. As awful as she is, I hope she finds growth and joy. I hope she becomes a better person.
 
I'd love to go to that restaurant and snap my fingers at her and shit, make a fuss over everything then leave one of those gag tips where it looks like a dollar but it's actually a mormon pamphlet on finding christ or whatever.
View attachment 7253118
I would leave a $0.05 tip with the cheeky note "Don't spend it all on one place ; )".
 
Ron Coleman has made a motion to dismiss


Screenshot_20250420-215828.webp


Edit: Im no lawyer, but I'm very confused as to why L-Lyssa filed an amended complaint instead of a reply brief.

Edit 2: My favorite bit
'Here the context is, of course, plaintiff’s own reputation with respect to chastity. And
considering the above, plaintiff cannot claim to have been defamed by being accused of
unchastity; plaintiff has rendered herself “libel-proof” with respect to chastity through her own
voluntary, public descriptions of herself and her moral standards. That is exactly what a libel-
proof-plaintiff is: one who is barred from asserting a claim for defamation because his
“reputation with respect to a specific subject may be so badly tarnished that he cannot be further
injured by allegedly false statements on that subject.” Guccione v Hustler Mag., Inc., 800 F2d
298, 303 (2d Cir 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091 (1987) (plaintiff was “libel-proof” as to
adultery because widely published articles were probative of the plaintiff’s notoriety for
adultery”). As a matter of law, plaintiff cannot claim to have been damaged because defendant
described her as something she has publicly not only claimed she is, but who has “owned” that
Alternatively, the Court can take plaintiff at her word and conclude that she is not chaste,
but is what she has said she is. And truth, of course, “is an absolute, unqualified defense to a
civil defamation action and ‘substantial truth’ suffices to defeat a charge of libel.” Henry v. Fox
News Network LLC, 629 F. Supp. 3d 136, 146 (S.D.N.Y. 2022).
In the context of plaintiff’s statements, those of defendant are readily perceptible as
tasteless but non-actionable polemic. Alternatively, as discussed above, plaintiff made herself
libel-proof on the subject of chastity. It is also possible that plaintiff said what she meant and
meant what she said; defendant spoke the truth and cannot be liable for defamation. Finally,
even if defendant’s descriptions of her conduct was itself mere kulturkampf rhetoric and could
somehow be shown to be empirically false, plaintiff’s comments appeared to be true – and were
thus not made with actual malice."
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back