Careercow Alyssa Mercante / beerandfeminism / kombitchaTEArex / High Heeled Gamer / hayy GIRL hayy / uhLyssa15 - From failed sex worker to failed clickbait journalist. A far-left racist narcissistic abusive smug feminazi. Stalks her targets and their families, DEI & SBI activist, alcoholic junkie, threatens gamers & YouTubers to public fights and then lawsuits.

Should this thread be moved to Beauty Parlor?

  • Total voters
    473
  • Poll closed .
RodgerDodger said:
Somehow we are now a part of this? SmashJT is referencing this thread today.
Click to expand...
This is clever. Using the summary and our commentary to discuss the case means they can present it as "commentary by others" and they are just discussing the opinions. Insulates them to a certain level from the conclusions made.

Also, I legit laughed at this.
"Also, WIX is owned by Israel I think, not New York."
"Oh, so that is why she hates it!"

lol

[EDIT] I am still watching it and the Toasty person is super annoying. Open Mic, clicking on her low quality mega loud mechanical keyboard that seems to be positioned perfectly to be recorded and just keeps typing away while other people talk. And when she talks she is super dumb.

[EDIT2] Jeff Tarzia is making some dumb statements about the Mitchell v. Jobst case and claims to be "happy to live in the US". Which is a crazy opinion to have for someone who made a video about the lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Nanashi no kiwi, Coo Coo Bird, PetiteFeet and 6 others
Gobermental Supervisor said:
Yes, and there is still a big logical leap from "cam girl" to prostitute sucking dick on the side for extra cash.
Click to expand...

I agree. Though a surprising number of women seem to make that leap in real life. One of the major reasons why porn stars do those tours and personal appearances is so they can also charge huge sums by allowing customers to pay to fuck their favourite porn stars.

Obviously not all porn stars/cam girls make the leap from displaying their bodies for money to having sex for money. But enough of them do that I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that they've probably done a bit of proper whoring on the side. But you may be wrong if you make that assumption.

In short, if you date a girl and she tells you, 'It's OK. I was just a cam girl. I didn't actually suck dick for money.' she probably sucked dick for money. I get that some men are happy to date her and take her word for it. I'd pass myself though.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Pimozide, Nanashi no kiwi, byuuWasTaken and 8 others
No, Alyssa. Rape jokes are not okay. But hypocritically, if people like your simps spam rape jokes toward people and their families that you hate, you're okay with it.
1745266898402.webp

It's called the consequences of your own actions.
And Welsh Boon, Alyssa is not going to have sex with you for being a cuck reporting on her "haters".
(Archive)
1745267261996.webp

It's going to take more than demanding an "apology" to forgive you for the pollution you created and won't take responsibilities for your own actions.
(Archive)
1745267599583.webp1745267620445.webp
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Cactuar King, Nanashi no kiwi, Joe_Welch and 10 others
DragoonSierra said:
Saying Alyssa is defamation proof is a bad argument.
Click to expand...
It is a legal phrase.

THE LIBEL-PROOF PLAINTIFF DOCTRINE
Courts are increasingly facing the problem of libel plaintiffs who challenge published statements that do not in fact damage their already sullied reputations. These cases have given rise to the so-called "libel-proof plaintiff doctrine," which bars relief to such plaintiffs as a matter of law. [...] Libel claims pursued in the issue-specific context present the question whether previous publicity [...] have so tarnished the plaintiff's reputation that he should be barred, as a matter of law, from receiving a damage award. (Source: Harvard Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 8 (Jun., 1985), Page 1909)
Click to expand...
It is by now a well known and often used standard in defamation cases.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, Prokhor Zakharov, REGENDarySumanai and 3 others
Gobermental Supervisor said:
It is by now a well known and often used standard in defamation cases.
Click to expand...
And it's well known for rarely working. I think it's a reasonable argument in this case but I'm not a huge fan of such arguments in general.

The reasonable belief argument is better.

Unfortunately the jurisdictional argument may be the best and would be the most boring outcome, although it opens the possibility this dumb whore sues in California which has an older and more tested SLAPP law.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Nanashi no kiwi, Joe_Welch, Billy Bong and 1 other person
AnOminous said:
And it's well known for rarely working. I think it's a reasonable argument in this case but I'm not a huge fan of such arguments in general.

The reasonable belief argument is better.

Unfortunately the jurisdictional argument may be the best and would be the most boring outcome, although it opens the possibility this dumb whore sues in California which has an older and more tested SLAPP law.
Click to expand...
True, but remember that we have only seen the Memorandum of Law, not the actual Motion to Dismiss.
I expect there are more arguments in there, this is just the supporting cast of cited laws and explanations.
 
RodgerDodger said:
Somehow we are now a part of this? SmashJT is referencing this thread today.
Click to expand...
I'm still surpised she threw that address and speculation into the lawsuit all willy nilly, she had other people situated in NY state that she could point fingers to, no need to try this random tatic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back