- Joined
- May 31, 2024
Pure speculation and, yes, it's countered by legal docs that say the kids did not know about drugs.
So, perhaps, a kid was more concerned about the polycule - unable to make out the drugs - but the adults could do so.
The questioning was about knowledge of what drugs are. This was to assess whether the kids were doing drugs. A 12-year-old with intimate knowledge of what marijuana looks like, how to smoke it, etc, is a candidate for use assessment. Same for a 9 y/o exposed to cocaine. If they knew what it was, it changes the risk assessment. CPS was strictly assessing the children for their health and safety.
Nick wants us to believe everything was about him so he twists everything into being a way to accuse him of wrongdoing. In fact, they never needed it as he recorded himself coked out and drunk while the kids were home.
The County prosecutor/CPS did an excellent job of separating the prosecution from the kids welfare. They very deliberately made it so that no child could ever blame themselves for dads conviction. They weren't going to ever testify for the state so no incriminating statement were needed nor were they attempted.