US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Remember, when they say Net Zero, they don't mean the 1990s era "free internet" thing. They mean "we will undo the industrial revolution because our ecofascist cult of white liberal women and their simps says we're killing the earth mother and you will be forced live in neo-feudalist "15 minute" villages for the rest of your very short lives as penance." (They, of course, will be living on private islands flying around on private jets with AI powered robot slaves to tend to their every whim.)
That is all they every cared about climate change is and always was an excuse to reinstate feudalism, to create a new system on the bones of an old. One were the lives of middle and lower class are nothing but tools to be thrown away the second they pause. We Americand for the moment have seemed to dodge this outcome, but it seems as if the cucks up north have decided to embrace their new age. They want to kill millions on a global scale but they just don't want to say it like that instead they hide it in vague and positive-sounding words. Of course they won't be subject to their own policies, no whilst the least are force to eat roaches and possible themselves, they will dine on the finest meats. Whilst the fools who clapped and cheered them on are forced to live in tenets with beds of rocks, they will live in homes made of gold and quartz, sleeping on the softest beds ever made. And of course the socalist will cheer this on because they have abounded any meaning of that term they use to describe themselves.
 
Remember, when they say Net Zero, they don't mean the 1990s era "free internet" thing. They mean "we will undo the industrial revolution because our ecofascist cult of white liberal women and their simps says we're killing the earth mother and you will be forced live in neo-feudalist "15 minute" villages for the rest of your very short lives as penance." (They, of course, will be living on private islands flying around on private jets with AI powered robot slaves to tend to their every whim.)
I wish one of these libtard governments would actually put their money where their mouth is and impose annual decreasing caps on oil, gas, and coal consumption throughout the country. Germany came close. I would love to see Canada's government tell the whole country that they'll have to decrease petrochemical use 10% next year, and keep turning that ratchet until they're living in preindustrial conditions. The jeets would probably all go home, to be honest.
 
That's just wrong. English is in a class of languages that allow for information and instruction to move more freely and easily; largely free of cultural restraint, seeing as language is culture.

The other languages like Chinese are not bad for this, but English is better.
Can you post an example?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpergioLeonne
Can you post an example?
I don't really know shit about languages but it seems to me like English is extremely efficient at transmitting information compared to Asiatic ones. You have a tranime avatar so surely you have subconsciously come to this conclusion, while watching subtitled anime where the character goes:
"hup shi do go muh fugga ching chang chong chong gook gook mook spidook"

and then the English translation is:

"can I have some"
 
Yeah that Korean flight that hit the ground in the 90s. Or maybe it was the 2000s? One of those. Pilot ignored the copilot.

Funny that the helicopter in DC had a similar effect. This is English on DEI. :D
I was expecting a linguistic answer, but whatever.

You do know there are several flights involving only Americans where similar things happened, right? That was all part of the introduction of CRM I mentioned earlier. Investigators noticed the pattern across several different languages and cultures.

It seems you are trying to blame something on a certain region of unrelated languages when it should be blamed on something more fundamental to human nature. Korean and Chinese are nothing alike by the way.
 
Jewish Billionaire Pritzker news roundup:

JB Pritzker implores Democrats to fight Trump as the potential 2028 candidate visits New Hampshire
NBC News (archive.ph)
By Natasha Korecki
2025-04-28 02:23:22GMT

In an interview with NBC News, Pritzker says if Democrats reclaim Congress, they will hold the administration responsible if it has violated the Constitution.
nbc01.webp
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference Feb. 28.Eileen T. Meslar / Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker took a stage commanded by past presidential hopefuls Sunday and implored Democrats to forcefully resist the Trump administration while panning leaders in his own party for having acted too timid for too long.

As Pritzker denounced President Donald Trump in a speech to New Hampshire Democrats, he also accused Democratic politicians of embracing a “culture of incrementalism” that has led the party to be run over by Republicans, who are implementing an agenda that is counter to the left’s value system.

“It’s time to fight, everywhere, all at once,” Pritzker said. “Let’s start with something that should be easy to say: It’s wrong to snatch a person off the street and ship them to a foreign gulag with no chance to defend themselves in a court of law.”

Cheers rang out in the audience at that comment at the annual McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club state party dinner, which brought in the largest crowd New Hampshire Democrats have seen since 2020, organizers said — more than 800 people. The presidential race is three years away, but animated Democrats who jumped to their feet several times Sunday signaled a hunger to hear about challenging the Trump White House.

It was the first event in a historic early presidential primary state to host a potential 2028 presidential candidate — and in Pritzker, it featured a politician who has thrown down an early marker on how best to challenge Trump and the GOP, as different Democrats seek out different lanes in the early days before the next national election.

In an interview, Pritzker batted away the notion that he’s considering running for president, saying he has yet to decide whether he will seek a third term as governor in Illinois.

But he has long been seen as a member of the short list of 2028 contenders, and as a billionaire who has self-funded his political campaigns in the past, he is well-positioned to launch a campaign. The state party dinner in New Hampshire is a traditional stop for potential presidential candidates in the years before a campaign.

He has also been an early and consistent voice of opposition to Trump. In his state of the state address this year, Pritzker shifted to issue a warning about the administration’s actions, saying, “If you think I’m overreacting and sounding the alarm too soon, consider this: It took the Nazis one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours and 40 minutes to dismantle a constitutional republic.”

New Hampshire has long been the first-in-the-nation primary state in Democratic presidential contests. That changed under President Joe Biden in 2024, but Democratic leaders have said they would most likely revamp the calendar again before 2028.

Pritzker told the Democrats that he had never called for protests in the past but that he was now calling for “mass protests,” “mobilization” and “disruption.”

“Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.” Pritzker said.

In the interview, Pritzker went even further, saying that if Democrats reclaim a majority in the House, they should investigate the actions of Trump administration officials, including who accessed sensitive taxpayer data.

“We’re going to hold people responsible. They can’t just get away with what they’re doing right now,” Pritzker said. “Anybody that’s breaking the law, anybody that’s breaching the Constitution as a regular matter of the way they run their offices, those people all should be investigated if they are breaking the law. ... Think about the privacy of Social Security and Medicaid records and all of that DOGE went in and just breached, as if that’s OK. How about IRS records, right? I mean, all of that.”

Back in his speech, Pritzker said Democrats should blame their losses in November on a “lack of guts and gumption,” not on the party’s defense of Black people, transgender kids and immigrants.

“Voters didn’t turn out for Democrats last November not because they don’t want us to fight for our values, but because they think we don’t want to fight for our values,” he said.

He also took a shot at other Democrats' "flocking to podcasts," without singling anyone out. California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently launched his own podcast, which has generated some controversy inside the party.

"What I find ironic about the current conversation surrounding our party," Pritzker said, "is that the voices flocking to podcasts and cable news shows to admonish fellow Democrats for not caring enough about the struggles of working families are the same ones who, when it comes to relieving the struggles of real people, have been timid, not bold."

Pritzker Thunders Against ‘Do Nothing’ Democrats as He Stokes 2028 Talk
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Lisa Lerer and Reid J. Epstein
2025-04-28 15:00:04GMT

In a fiery speech in New Hampshire, the Illinois governor railed against both President Trump and what he called the “simpering timidity” among some Democrats.
nyt01.webp
“Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption,” Gov. JB Pritzker said in a speech on Sunday night in Manchester, N.H. “But I am now. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.”Credit...John Tully for The New York Times

Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois strode into a ballroom filled with top New Hampshire Democrats on Sunday and by the end of his nearly 30-minute speech had them ready to storm the political barricades against President Trump.

“It’s time to fight everywhere and all at once,” he told the group of Democratic activists, officials and donors, who jumped to their feet with hoots and applause. “Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.”

“The reckoning is finally here,” he declared.

For the Trump administration, of course, but also for his own party.

In the fight over the future of the Democratic Party, Mr. Pritzker has emerged as a leader of an insurgent faction calling for a full-throated, unflinching barrage of attacks on Mr. Trump, his Republican allies and their right-wing agenda.

His speech was a call to action more aggressive and comprehensive than perhaps any other by a major liberal figure since Mr. Trump took office, rivaled only by rallying cries from Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York on their Western tour. But unlike them, Mr. Pritzker set his stem-winding address in a state with a century-long hold on the nation’s first presidential primary contest — a striking statement on its own.

Mr. Pritzker, of course, rebuffed any suggestion that his appearance on Sunday night in Manchester, N.H., represented the opening bell of the 2028 Democratic primary race. He said he was focused on backing the party’s efforts in next year’s midterm elections.

Yet his appearance was likely to stir more speculation. Mr. Pritzker wears a triple crown in Democratic politics, simultaneously one of the party’s most prominent elected officials, most generous donors and most talked about 2028 presidential prospects.

“I’m one of the people leading the fight, and that is my role,” he said in an interview before his speech. “We’ve done an awful lot in Illinois, and we can be doing those things in other states.”

While other governors have made ham-handed attempts at reconciliation with Mr. Trump, Mr. Pritzker has turned his state into a bulwark of opposition to the administration’s crackdown on immigration, cuts to the federal government and tariffs on other countries.

nyt02.webp
Mr. Pritzker occupies a unique position in Democratic politics: He is one of the party’s most prominent governors, a top donor and a potential 2028 presidential contender. Credit...John Tully for The New York Times

He has done so as some congressional Democrats, including Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, have urged their party to be selective with their attacks against the president to avoid alienating independent voters who supported him. Mr. Pritzker, by contrast, wants his party to adopt a posture of zero accommodation.

“The main divide within the Democratic Party is not between left and right — it’s whether you think this is a constitutional crisis or this is politics as usual,” said Ezra Levin, a co-founder of the progressive activist group Indivisible. “Pritzker is really demonstrating what it looks like to lead an opposition party against the overreaching authority of the federal government.”

In recent months, Mr. Pritzker has preached a gospel of staunch resistance to some of the most engaged Democratic activists across the country, delivering the keynote speech at party fund-raisers in Illinois and Austin, Texas, and at an annual gala for the Human Rights Campaign in Los Angeles. Next month, he is set to speak at a fund-raising dinner in Detroit for the Michigan Democratic Party.

In his speech in New Hampshire, he criticized Democrats who have admonished the party for its perceived overreach as “timid, not bold.”

“Fellow Democrats, for far too long we’ve been guilty of listening to a bunch of do-nothing political types who would tell us that America’s house is not on fire, even as the flames are licking their faces,” he said. “Today, as the blaze reaches the rafters, the pundits and politicians — whose simpering timidity served as kindle for the arsonists — urge us now not to reach for a hose.”

While his targets went unnamed, there were obvious candidates: Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, the host of a podcast that has featured stars of the MAGA movement, and the Democratic strategist James Carville, who has argued for “a strategic political retreat” until Mr. Trump’s approval ratings fall.

“Those same do-nothing Democrats want to blame our losses on our defense of Black people and trans kids and immigrants,” Mr. Pritzker said, “instead of their own lack of guts and gumption.”

His comments reflected how, for now, Democrats are chiefly divided not over health care or other policy issues, but over the extent to which they should oppose Mr. Trump and his agenda.

While some party donors and consultants have urged moderation, Mr. Pritzker is tapping into the Democratic base’s visceral desire for a fight — and for a leader.

nyt03.webp
During his speech, Mr. Pritzker criticized what he called “do-nothing” Democrats who “want to blame our losses on our defense of Black people and trans kids and immigrants instead of their own lack of guts and gumption.”Credit...John Tully for The New York Times

“Voters didn’t turn out for Democrats last November — not because they don’t want us to fight for our values, but because they think we don’t want to fight for our values,” he said in his speech. “We need to knock off the rust of poll-tested language, decades of stale decorum. It’s obscured our better instincts.”

Neera Tanden, the president of the left-leaning think tank the Center for American Progress and a longtime fixture in Democratic politics, predicted that these early months of the Trump administration could reverberate into the 2028 primary contest. Voters, she said, won’t forget how potential presidential candidates behaved.

“People are going to remember how Democrats acted in this moment,” said Ms. Tanden, whose group hosted Mr. Pritzker this year. “At the moment when Trump was the scariest, what did Democrats do? Did they roll over? Make inroads to right-wing people or something? Or did they stand up and defend our principles?”

An heir to the Hyatt hotel fortune with a net worth estimated around $3.5 billion, Mr. Pritzker is one of the richest elected officials in the country — a position that has given him a measure of political independence because he is not as reliant on party donors.

In 2018, he transformed himself from a longtime donor who was a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s two presidential campaigns into a formidable politician in his own right. He has self-funded two campaigns for governor and spread his wealth to support Democratic candidates for governor and the state parties in battlegrounds — Wisconsin in particular.

In 2023, as he expanded his political brand, Mr. Pritzker established a political action committee called Think Big America, which spent millions of dollars backing ballot measures seeking to enshrine abortion rights into state law.

Even before President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s disastrous debate performance last year, Mr. Pritzker was talked about as the Democrats’ “break glass” nominee — a candidate able to fund a White House campaign at a moment’s notice.

Instead, he endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris and threw his party a joyous convention in Chicago, even commissioning for the event his own JBeers — craft brews bearing his initials.

Unlike 2024, the 2028 Democratic primary contest is expected to be crowded and wide open, with little deference for seniority or political experience. As the early jockeying quietly gets underway, some Democrats believe Mr. Pritzker could be a fierce contender with his billions and his deep party connections.

First, however, he faces a 2026 campaign for a third term as governor of Illinois. While he has made no official commitment, he is widely expected to run for re-election. The strength of his political power will also be tested in the Illinois Senate race, in which he has endorsed his lieutenant governor — who is expected to face several well-funded Democratic primary opponents.

People close to the governor say his current moves are driven not by a desire to position himself best in 2028, but by a sincere belief that Mr. Trump poses a dire threat to American democracy and the world order.

“I don’t think he’s crafting a persona around this,” said Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, a friend of Mr. Pritzker’s who was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee last year. “On some of the more authoritarian tendencies, I think JB feels very strongly on that. He finds it morally reprehensible, I think, where Trump ends up falling.”

Unlike other Democrats, who went through a period of mourning after the election, Mr. Pritzker was ready to fight Mr. Trump almost immediately. As worrisome results from Virginia began rolling into cable news networks early on election night, he shifted into battle mode for what he called Trump 2.0, according to a person briefed on the discussions.

Two days after the election, Mr. Pritzker told reporters that his administration “was not unprepared” for a Trump victory. The planning had begun months earlier as his state stockpiled abortion medication and prepared to sue the federal government.

And he issued a warning: “You come for my people, you come through me.”

Aides and advisers trace Mr. Pritzker’s activism to his family history and Jewish faith. His ancestors fled pogroms in Ukraine to make their fortune in the United States. He led the campaign to build the Illinois Holocaust Museum and has for years invoked the specter of Nazism to describe Mr. Trump — a political comparison that has divided some of his advisers.

“What we’re seeing right now is 1930s Germany; the only way to actually stop that from happening is to be very loud and vocal about the pushback,” said Anne Caprara, Mr. Pritzker’s longtime chief of staff. “That is what is motivating everything he is doing right now.”

JB Pritzker calls out ‘do-nothing’ Democrats for failing to push back against Trump
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Joey Cappelletti and Holly Ramer
2025-04-28 02:30:17GMT
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker sharply criticized fellow Democrats on Sunday for not doing enough to oppose President Donald Trump, drawing a clear divide between himself and other high-profile Democrats seen as future presidential contenders.

Pritzker delivered the keynote address at the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner, the latest and most high-profile in a series of speeches this year.

While Pritzker continued to attack Trump, he also focused on what he says are shortcomings in his own party, assailing Democrats for listening to “a bunch of know-nothing political types” instead of everyday Americans. Without naming names, he called out Democrats “flocking to podcasts and cable news shows to admonish fellow Democrats for not caring enough about the struggles of working families.”

“Those same do-nothing Democrats want to blame our losses on our defense of Black people, of trans kids, of immigrants, instead of their own lack of guts and gumption,” Pritzker said.

The second-term governor has yet to say whether he will run for that office again in 2026, but the billionaire Hyatt heir has been laying the groundwork for a potential presidential campaign for years.

Notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, another high-profile 2028 contender, said on his podcast recently that the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador and detained at one point in a notorious megaprison, was a “distraction” from issues such as tariffs. Newsom also said on his podcast’s inaugural episode that he opposes trans athletes competing in women’s sports.

Polling suggests immigration is Trump’s strongest issue and that a majority of Democrats also oppose trans participation in women’s sports.

Pritzker on Sunday night said it was no time for Democrats to be in despair.

“Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption, but I am now,” he said, stressing that the party “must castigate them on the soapbox and then punish them at the ballot box.”

Pritzker has already spoken this year at the Human Rights Campaign’s Los Angeles dinner and is scheduled to headline a Minnesota Democratic dinner in June. He drew national attention in February when he used part of his joint budget and State of the State address to draw a parallel between Trump’s rhetoric and the rise of Nazi Germany.

On Sunday, Pritzker again invoked his Jewish faith, criticizing Trump’s efforts to deport foreign students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. He called on Trump to “stop tearing down the Constitution in the name of my ancestors,” a line that drew a standing ovation from the crowd.

But Pritzker was also adamant in calling out the “do-nothing Democrats,” asserting that while the party “may need to fix our messaging and strategy, our values are exactly where they should be.” He added, “We will never join so many Republicans in a special place in hell reserved for quislings and cowards.”

Lou D’Allesandro, who retired from the New Hampshire State Senate last year after five decades in public service and met Pritzker in Chicago years ago, said the Illinois governor “has all the ingredients to make it to the big time.”

“He’s very quick on his feet, very gregarious,” he said. But any Democrat who wants to win in 2028 has their work cut out for them, he said.

“They’ve got to reintroduce themselves to the grassroots,” he said. “They’ve got to let people know Democrats care about them, or they’re gonna be in big trouble.”

Last year’s featured speaker at the McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club dinner was Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who went on to become his party’s vice presidential nominee.

The annual event is especially significant among state Democratic fundraisers given New Hampshire’s historic role holding the nation’s first presidential primary, though Democrats last year moved South Carolina ahead at the behest of former President Joe Biden.

The first 100 Club dinner was held in 1959 to promote the presidential candidacy of John F. Kennedy. In 2020, speakers included 10 Democratic candidates for president.

Pritzker’s speech in New Hampshire drives presidential campaign buzz
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Maeve Reston
2025-04-28 14:10:28GMT

The Illinois governor drew wide applause as he urged Democrats to abandon efforts to compromise with “a madman” when he spoke in a key state on the road to the 2028 presidential nomination.
MANCHESTER, N.H. — In a fiery address to New Hampshire Democrats on Sunday night, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker condemned what he described as President Donald Trump’s “authoritarian power grabs” while also blasting the “do-nothing” Democrats in his party — stating it is “time to fight everywhere, all at once.”

The billionaire Democratic governor repeatedly brought the crowd to its feet with acidic attacks on the morals and ethics of the president, adviser and top donor Elon Musk, as well as members of the president’s Cabinet. He slammed their efforts to dismantle government programs that the most vulnerable Americans rely on and said the Democratic Party must “abandon the culture of incrementalism that has led us to swallow their cruelty.” It is time for his party, he said, to “knock the rust off poll-tested language” that has obscured “our better instincts.”

Pritzker was most searing in his condemnation of what he cast as the Trump administration’s infringement on the rights enshrined in the Constitution, stating that it should be easy for Democrats to say, “It’s wrong to snatch a person off the street and ship them to a foreign gulag with no chance to defend themselves in a court of law.”

“Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now,” Pritzker said to a standing ovation accompanied by whistles and cheers from the audience. “These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace. They must understand that we will fight their cruelty with every megaphone and microphone that we have. We must castigate them on the soap box and then punish them at the ballot box.”

Calling out Trump’s “xenophobia” and thirst for power, the Illinois governor said Democrats must “stop thinking we can reason or negotiate with a madman.” His hope, he added, is that Republicans who enable Trump “feel in their bones that when we survive this shameful episode of American history,” their portraits will be relegated “to the museum halls reserved for tyrants and traitors.”

Turning to his own party, Pritzker argued that Democrats have spent too long listening to voices who “would tell you that the house is not on fire, even as they feel the flames licking their face,” and called out politicians “whose simpering timidity served as a kindle for the arsonists.”

Nearly six months after Kamala Harris’s loss to Trump in the presidential election, the 2028 Democratic contest has no obvious front-runner. While Pritzker and the other likely contenders have demurred on questions about their White House ambitions, Democrats nationally are frustrated with their leaders in Washington and are looking for a new standard-bearer to chart the direction of their unpopular party.

New Hampshire Democrats are also eager to reassert their historical role in vetting White House aspirants. Joe Biden and his allies in the Democratic National Committee essentially bypassed the state in 2024 by stripping its first-in-the-nation status to make South Carolina first on the nominating calendar as they tried to shore up Biden’s reelection prospects.

Pritzker’s speech at the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s annual McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner marks the first major appearance this cycle of a 2028 White House hopeful in a pivotal early primary state, drawing an audience of more than 800 people for the party’s annual fundraiser.

In a 2028 field that is likely to be dominated by governors, Pritzker has positioned himself as one of the most forceful and consistent critics of Trump’s actions while pointing to his record in Illinois as a template for improving the lives of working-class voters.

While other governors took a wait-and-see approach in the early weeks of Trump’s term, Pritzker said, local law enforcement officials in Illinois would not cooperate with the Trump administration’s massive deportation operation, except if it involved the removal of convicted violent criminals. He condemned Trump’s pardons of Jan. 6 rioters and barred more than 50 people from Illinois who had been granted pardons or commutations by Trump from being hired by state government, calling their conduct “disgraceful.”

Pritzker, who is an heir to the Hyatt Hotels fortune, has been an outspoken critic for months about how the Trump administration’s cuts are affecting veterans, early-childhood education and seniors. He has also been sounding the alarm about the GOP’s potential Medicaid cuts, which he said could cost a million people coverage in his state. He is bullish about the Democrats’ chances of regaining power in 2026 and beyond.

“I think we’ve got the best argument of all about who can rebuild the country and rebuild these programs after the Republicans tear them down,” Pritzker said in an interview. “From day one of [Trump’s] administration, it’s been a steady drumbeat of attack on constitutional norms and on programs that are really important to some of the most vulnerable people in our society.”

One of Pritzker’s advantages among the potential White House aspirants is his ability to swing at Trump from a solidly blue state where the legislature is controlled by Democrats. From the outset, he took a more combative approach than other potential rivals such as Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan and Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Democrats who represent narrowly divided states and initially emphasized their interest in bipartisan collaboration with Trump.

Pritzker also has not faced the same kind of constraints as other top contenders such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who was one of Trump’s top antagonists in 2024 but now needs Trump’s cooperation to help him secure the nearly $40 billion in federal disaster aid that he has requested to rebuild Pacific Palisades and Altadena after the devastating fires in January.

Governors from both parties, who are responsible for balancing their state’s budgets, are facing challenging economic headwinds because of Trump’s tariffs, his administration’s layoffs of federal workers and the potential loss of a critical safety net for many poor and disabled Americans if the GOP-led Congress makes deep cuts to Medicaid — a program that is funded jointly by the federal and state governments.
Facing a president who is both punitive and transactional, governors such as Whitmer have been testing the powers of quiet diplomacy with Trump.

While seated next to Trump at the black-tie dinner for governors at the White House in February and in two subsequent White House meetings, Whitmer has intensely lobbied Trump and members of his administration to invest in a fighter mission at the Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Macomb County, Michigan, noting its strategic position at the international border.

The Air Force had been slated to phase out the A-10 aircraft at the base. But while addressing Selfridge during their recent Oval Office meeting, Trump told Whitmer in front of the cameras that he thought “we’ll be very successful there.” And he is planning a visit to Macomb County, where the base is located, on Tuesday to celebrate his first 100 days in office.

Though manufacturing in Michigan could be harmed by Trump’s tariffs — with about 20 percent of the state’s economy tied to the auto industry — Whitmer also walked a careful line on that issue in a recent speech in Washington. She said she shared Trump’s goals of making “more stuff” in America and “bringing good-paying, middle-class manufacturing jobs back home,” adding that she was “not against tariffs outright.” But she argued that it is illogical to use the “tariff hammer to swing at every problem without a clearly defined end goal.”

Whitmer was rebuked by some Democrats who believed she gave too much latitude to Trump. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, another likely contender for the White House in 2028, called Trump’s tariffs “reckless” and responded directly to Whitmer’s speech by arguing on social media that “the ‘tariff hammer’ winds up hitting your own hand rather than the nail.”

Newsom ensured that California was the first to sue the Trump administration over the economic impact of the president’s tariffs, arguing that Congress was “sitting there passively as this guy wrecks the economy.” And Shapiro recently toured businesses and industries in Pennsylvania that would be most impacted by the tariffs, accusing the president of creating chaos and confusion with his policies.

Pritzker, for his part, said Sunday night that the country’s small businesses “don’t deserve to be bankrupted by unsustainable tariffs.”

And he did not show any restraint in taking on members of Trump’s Cabinet in sharply personal terms. He charged that Trump has a secretary of education “who hates teachers and schools” and an attorney general “who hates the Constitution.”

He reserved perhaps the harshest attacks for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“Autistic kids and adults who are loving contributors to our society don’t deserve to be stigmatized by a weird nepo baby who once stashed a dead bear in the back seat of his car,” Pritzker said of Kennedy.

He alluded to Hegseth’s troubled history with alcohol and the allegations of sexual assault against him, and argued that military service members don’t deserve to be told they can’t serve in certain roles because they are “Black or gay or a woman” by “a washed-up Fox TV commentator.”

Pritzker also suggested that Trump’s crackdown on protesters on college campuses in the name of antisemitism is a farce. The Ukrainian American governor, who is Jewish, spoke of his own ancestors’ history fleeing Russian pogroms in the 1880s.

“Let me say this to Donald Trump: Stop tearing down the Constitution in the name of my ancestors,” he said. “Do not claim that your authoritarian power grabs are about combating antisemitism. When you destroy social justice, you are disparaging the very foundation of Judaism.”

Top White House aide says Pritzker's call for mass protests 'could be construed as inciting violence'
Chicago Sun-Times (archive.ph)
By Mary Norkol
2025-04-29 03:57:10GMT

President Donald Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller cited assassination attempts and criticized the destruction of property as a protest tactic, saying it “sits directly adjacent to attacks on humans.”
President Donald Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller took aim at Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, accusing him of inciting violence after he called for mass protests against the Trump administration.

Pritzker made his remarks Sunday at the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner. He criticized Trump but largely focused on the shortcomings of his own party — calling some “do-nothing Democrats.” He urged more action against Trump in the midst of mass layoffs in the federal government, sweeping tariffs and mass deportations.

“Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption, but I am now,” Pritzker said, stressing the party “must castigate them on the soapbox and then punish them at the ballot box.”

In response, Miller cited assassination attempts and threats against Trump and said “the destruction of property sits directly adjacent to attacks on humans.”

“His comments, if nothing else, could be construed as inciting violence,” Miller said when a reporter asked about Pritzker’s remarks. “This war that Democrat governors and mayors are waging against federal law enforcement. I mean, this is nullificationist behavior. This is secessionist behavior.”

Pritzker responded to Miller’s claims Monday, defending his comments and saying Miller misrepresented his speech.

“He wasn’t listening to my speech at all,” Pritzker said. “I called on people to take out their megaphones and the microphones, to stand up on soapboxes and get to the ballot box in order to defeat the people who were trying to take so many things away from the American people.”
 
I was expecting a linguistic answer, but whatever.

You do know there are several flights involving only Americans where similar things happened, right? That was all part of the introduction of CRM I mentioned earlier. Investigators noticed the pattern across several different languages and cultures.

It seems you are trying to blame something on a certain region of unrelated languages when it should be blamed on something more fundamental to human nature. Korean and Chinese are nothing alike by the way.
You kept replying to me and I wanted to talk to someone. They haven't had much sci-fi talk today and Canada is more boring than Red Dwarf.
 
The boomers mind is one that is stuck trying to relive the past of being a “brave rebel against the system” and because the media has told them of how evil orange Hitler is they view any slight against him no matter how damaging it will themselves as a victory be use ethey are fighting facism just like the old days

IMG_0823.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The outcome was South Korea remained in place, which was the USA's objective. You should switch to water and take an hour break.
my pappy used to say you cant drink all day if you dont start in the morning

Never mistake inebriation for what can be attributed to autism my friend (Chuds Law)

More to the point in relation to modern day policy, have you seen info that makes you feell good about the coming ground OP? genuine question as ive only seen bits and peices so far, US seems like it has a couple admirals/generals that are deeply against the continued striking as apparently se are hitting WAY more civvies that originally expected, biggest example is when we dumpsterted that migrant detention facility cause on a few satmaps it looked like a bunch of "militants". Source

Doubt its from any sense of humanity or anything on their end but just knowing that someone will catch the blame for this when its all done and the dust clears to count the dead, same reason we never directly assisted in bombings of Gaza.

We need to bring these fuckers to the negotiating table and find out what it will take for them to stop, I know its cucked but its their neck of the woods and they are playing their cards pretty smart for a bunch of stone age upstarts, we wouldent let Iran send missiles to gaza via the panama if for some reason geographically that made sense you know? They see it as their right to use their territorial waters to deny free trade access as a tool to gain political or economic concessions and I have to admit if the shoe was on the other foot I know Id see that as Americas right to do so if you were talking about OUR territorial waters.

Its very complicated, I understand right to travel is important but in theory we woulnt just allow ANYONE to use the Panama canal if we are at war right? well like it or not the houthis see themselves at "war" with the people aiding Israel. Also I hear you breathing loudly and smacking your keyboard from here, calm down, im not defending the Houthis ideology or any of that shit, just being pragmatic and approaching this like a statesman might rather than a general, we either annihilate all of them (even Hitler was able to do that when he tried and he gave it the OLE COLLEGE TRY BELIEVE THAT) (Dont anyone say nukes, your going to irradiate the most trafficked shipping lane in the world to not even kill half)
or we find a way to coexist in this spinning rock without assuming the other party has all the intellectual and moral aptitude of a warm turd.

I think when we stand before our creator he will be most critical of us about how we treated our fellow man when it was easy or convenient to see them as somehow not created by the same divine and perfect being that gave ourself life.

"Why did you hate my son so callously in life my child? Did I not make it so over and above the top clear my highest precept was kindness and forgiveness? Perhaps you saw yourself as so infallible that all else must be wrong by comparison, that no culture or people might have the light lest they had stolen it from you? Perhaps you simply let hate rule your heart and dident even consider how the high road may have allowed YOURSELF to find some peace? Perhaps you simply dident care and felt it was all so beneath you why even consider it, does the man for a walk notice the ants he treads on? much less pity them?"
 
There wouldn't have been a war if this had been the case. After the war, he murdered about 300,000 civilians to solidify his control.
he literally convinced French puppet Bao Dai to abdicate in the fallout of WW2 in August 1945, so as soon as the pacific theater was concluded. He was the leader as they resisted French and British colonial authority. He was officially recognized by the west at the Geneva conference in 1954, though the conference also partitioned Vietnam.

If the south Vietnamese preferred to be backed by America, they saw an advantage in it. That’s not the same thing as genuinely believing that Diem was legitimate, and that’s why there was so much Viet Minh/Viet Cong collusion in the south.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Flea Man Marbles
Back