Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
I still can't get over that this egotistical maniac, who thinks drugs are cool and he should be allowed to do them around his kids, actually thought that giving lectures on drugs would be something he could do to satisfy his probation.

I know that was never 100% confirmed, but damn if I don't believe it. That's so Nick
People laugh, but the universe makes much more sense, when viewed as a multiversal reality TV series.
 
That Megan Fox supposedly made a comment likening Michael Bay to Hitler, and Steven Spielberg told Bay to fire her from Transformers 3 for it. She was then blacklisted from Hollywood for a while.

Or so the Hollywood tabloids claim:

[ link omitted ; critique about the MF from the Nick-R-verse omitted ]
Tbh, I said “I don’t remember the last time”

That was because the example you mention as well, that sounds like a thirteen in a dozen. It ain’t no Rachel Zegler. Thát Megan Fox basically had her moment and learned that not being unnecessarily loud about stuff makes for easier living if you’re at her level of wealth.

I can respect that, it’s why I think it deserves the distinction. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Man who has never taken a case to trial speculates what a juror might think, despite never facing one.

As a Balldo historical aside, the "death" of Lawtube as a thing a few years ago was I as recall Nick doing a long, unhinged rant with his lawtube buddies on-stream about how talking about what jurors might think was incredibly stupid and Nick hated it more than anything.
 
As a Balldo historical aside, the "death" of Lawtube as a thing a few years ago was I as recall Nick doing a long, unhinged rant with his lawtube buddies on-stream about how talking about what jurors might think was incredibly stupid and Nick hated it more than anything.
I interpreted that as him feeling intellectually inferior to some of his Lawtube colleagues who probably understood jury psychology better than him.

It's true he has never taken a case to jury trial.

But that's okay, despite the fact somebody like Sean has... he eats sandwiches. Get rekt sandwich eater!
 
I interpreted that as him feeling intellectually inferior to some of his Lawtube colleagues who probably understood jury psychology better than him.

It's true he has never taken a case to jury trial.
Or he lost every single mock trial in college because he never understood that he comes across like a condescending know-it-all prick, alienating every jury.
Just imagine Nick talking down to a witness on the stand "nooooooo! askhually Aaron ate my goooooooo, so you must acquit me!"
 
It’s odd watching Aaron run the room, he’s talking over stupid April, telling his stories, chatting up Kayla, and shutting everyone up just so she can speak. It’s fucking hilarious to watch Nick shrink after every comment he can muster gets completely ignored or derided. All of them are just watching Aaron
Aaron runs the room, but it's a bit of a "in the land of the blind the man with one eye is king" type'a thing, IMO. The entire conversation had the energy of two cringey frat bros who had just gotten in new "for now" relationships with a couple of pass-around girls. It's not something that you should be involved in when you're in you 40's and married to said pass-around.
 
You know, I was in total disbelief when the news dropped that Aaron got away with a misdemeanor and $50 fine. Now it all makes sense.

Also, if Aaron got 5-6 nude images in discovery, plus the one he took that fateful night, we may need to reevaluate the market price. KNU is really only about $8.
Was the fine for sharing the one picture he took or for all of them?

Now hear me out, you might ask yourself what the fuck does it matter? they're still pictures of Qayla. To that I say what matters is the authorship and intent. If the picture shared --the picture that ended up in the $50 penalty is solely the one Aaron took, while the others entered in discovery weren't assigned a monetary value, then it can be inferred that what is actually worth $50 isn't Qayla's naked body depicted either via photograph or other means, but Aaron's very own photography and subsequent sharing.

As such I conclude that a KNU is actually worthless, i.e. valued at $0. What should be valued at $50 are Aaron's photography skills (or lack thereof, for all we know his picture might be so bad it warranted a fine) and the act of sharing it.
 
Last edited:
Aaron runs the room, but it's a bit of a "in the land of the blind the man with one eye is king" type'a thing, IMO. The entire conversation had the energy of two cringey frat bros who had just gotten in new "for now" relationships with a couple of pass-around girls. It's not something that you should be involved in when you're in you 40's and married to said pass-around.
Almost sounds like a mid-life crisis…only have to throw in a Mustang. But otherwise it can also sound like two men who never held down a real job or had real responsibilities except entertaining the kids whilst a woman takes care of said kids.
But that would mean that drug (ab)use would come with “symptoms” like complaints about the kids going hungry or wearing smelly clothes.

So as long as we don’t see that, should be a-okay
 
Was the fine for sharing the one picture he took or for all of them?

Now hear me out, you might ask yourself what the fuck does it matter? they're still pictures of Qayla. To that I say what matters is the authorship and intent. If the picture shared --the picture that ended up in the $50 penalty is solely the one Aaron took, while the others entered in discovery weren't assigned a monetary value, then it can be inferred that what is actually worth $50 isn't Qayla's naked body depicted either via photograph or other means, but Aaron's very own photography and subsequent sharing.

As such I conclude that a KNU is actually worthless, i.e. valued at $0. What should be valued at $50 are Aaron's photography skills (or lack thereof, for all we know his picture might be so bad it warranted a fine) and the act of sharing it.
He shared one photo. The others were provided by Nick to the police when trying to figure out which pic it was (or something - I guess Nick had ideas about where Aaron got it that apparently didn't include "took it when you weren't there, dummy"). Aaron would see them in discovery because Nick was dumb enough to intervene and provide them to the police. They were in Nick/Kayla's possession.
 
It's Friday!
Let's see how "The inventor of lawtube" and "social media expert" Nick Rekieta is doing against poor little Josh, the autist with no social skills that's censored off every major platform.

Surely Nick's got way more views and it isn't even close
Screenshot_20250502-151236.webpScreenshot_20250502-151304.webp

Oh no. Better luck next time, balldo!
 
How Kayla looks when the virgin Balldo references his love of blackface:
View attachment 7308612
View attachment 7308614
View attachment 7308616
versus how Kayla looks when Aaron tells a story about being a wigger singing Ja Rule:
View attachment 7308601View attachment 7308604View attachment 7308603

(timestamp around 18:00)

It’s odd watching Aaron run the room, he’s talking over stupid April, telling his stories, chatting up Kayla, and shutting everyone up just so she can speak. It’s fucking hilarious to watch Nick shrink after every comment he can muster gets completely ignored or derided. All of them are just watching Aaron.

@25:45 Kayla says April is prettier than Nick is, so Balldo sneers “Fuck you” to her face like a seething faggot, then tries to save it with a meek “later…”.
Love the thumbnail Elyssa clips put on.

It’s like an artwork you could title: “The alpha Chad vs the humble corner cuck.”

IMG_1671.webp
 
He is busy waging war on the haters on Twitter and occasionally makes a joke about fucking the witness, or laughs about a joke made by a viewer about fucking the witness.
Wow, that's so funny. I think he literally wants to fuck the witness though, he has type.

Gotta catch 'em all.
That's what Kayla said at Hedonism II. Ash caught 30 Tauros (S1 EP35, banned outside of Japan) in the safari zone.
Guess how many bulls Kayla caught at Jamaica's safari zone (hedonism II)? :really:

What does a Kayla evolve into? Is there an Alolan Kayla?
She can only evolve if there are 5 black bulls in the same party and in front of Skelly. Kids needed tutorials to find out how this rare specimen evolves.
 
It's Friday!
Let's see how "The inventor of lawtube" and "social media expert" Nick Rekieta is doing against poor little Josh, the autist with no social skills that's censored off every major platform.

Surely Nick's got way more views and it isn't even close
View attachment 7308930View attachment 7308932

Oh no. Better luck next time, balldo!
Oof, Nick! The autist with no social skills has mogged you by over 175%
And Rekieta is in the middle of a highly popular trial grift! Imagine the numbers once he's back to his inter-trial boring shit!
What are you gonna do cuckold? Bible streams? Another round of Wagyu cooking?
 
He shared one photo. The others were provided by Nick to the police when trying to figure out which pic it was (or something - I guess Nick had ideas about where Aaron got it that apparently didn't include "took it when you weren't there, dummy").

Presumably Nick wouldn't have actually HAD a copy of the actual photo, because it was obviously taken in a private, intimate moment between Aaron and Kayla.

Now God Forbid I ever find myself in such a situation but if I imagine myself having done so, I can't conceive of ever sending a copy of that picture to her husband. What for?

"Here's a picture of your wife's tits!"
"Yeah, we've been married 20 years. I've seen them before."

The whole thing just smacks of Rekieta doing his exhibitionist thing once again.
 
Instead of doing his stream, Nick is fantasizing with the Beggie Monster on Twitter, circle jerking over imaginary gotcha scored against the Farms.
"they dismissed that one count about child neglect, so it never happened!", which is why they took away the kids for 6 months and did not let them return due to the house being "unsafe" according to the judge, partially due to a positive cocaine test of an, at the time of the incident, 8 year old child.

What a winner of a trad dad.

1746214806164.webp
[Archive]
 
Back