What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

One of the more interesting /x/ skizo theories
View attachment 7316534
Oddly enough this post shows up in the 4plebs archive when searched for but the thread has been deleted; https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/27446742/#q27467949
There's also this interesting book I came across recently, no less written by a Jewish professor and rabbi.
Pob.webpPob 2.webp
The infamous Black Masses were rumored to also involve sacrifices of infants for their blood. A mixture of old Greco-Roman Bacchanalia practices and Abrahamic black magic. Telluric practices authorities, both Chruch and pre Church always failed to completely stamp out.

Taken from Tracy Twyman's Baphomet book.
Ttb2.webpTtb1.webp
It's all Jewish blood rites in the end, with the idea that you're receiving something positive through the practice of said ritual. Whether it's "sacred" = christian/white magic or "profane" = occultism/black magic. You're supposed to receive the holy spirit through the injection of Jesus's blood (wine) and flesh (bread).
precious-blood-angels-collecting-blood.webp
Now Gurdjieff posited that the Apostles literally ate his flesh and drank his blood to receive his "holy spirit" - to form a mafia esque blood brotherhood pact with him. Is this where their supposed power to heal came from?
 
Last edited:
I know that this is barely even a conspiracy theory anymore because of how many people suspect it to be true but…
My country has recently entered into the “parents selling their children to traffickers for the price of a shitty used car” stage of societal decline and I am more sure than ever that international child trafficking is real and pervasive
Sounds Ukrainian, but your English is perfect. I assume Eastern Europe because I think any MENA, Asian, or LatAM wouldn't need disillusionment regarding child trafficking. I would hope the Rus don't find themselves in such a situation.
 
One of the more interesting /x/ skizo theories
View attachment 7316534
Oddly enough this post shows up in the 4plebs archive when searched for but the thread has been deleted; https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/27446742/#q27467949
Porphyria on Wikipedia | A
image_2025-05-04_192602483.webp
Aversion to sunlight, resulting in blisters, blood cures, it's very 🦇
image_2025-05-04_192726798.webp
I'm not saying there's a flaw in the provided cloud chart; such a cumulonimbus cloud can be found on the image search under the term handily. However, the go-to image of such a cloud has classically been the one I just posted, so I have to wonder what aesthetics or leanings have driven certain authors or educators to these disparate selections.
There's also this interesting book I came across recently, no less written by a Jewish professor and rabbi.
View attachment 7318627View attachment 7318626
The infamous Black Masses were rumored to also involve sacrifices of infants for their blood. A mixture of old Greco-Roman Bacchanalia practices and Abrahamic black magic. Telluric practices authorities, both Chruch and pre Church always failed to completely stamp out.

Taken from Tracy Twyman's Baphomet book.
View attachment 7318618View attachment 7318619
It's all Jewish blood rites in the end, with the idea that you're receiving something positive through the practice of said ritual. Whether it's "sacred" = christian/white magic or "profane" = occultism/black magic. You're supposed to receive the holy spirit through the injection of Jesus's blood (wine) and flesh (bread).
View attachment 7318637
Now Gurdjieff posited that the Apostles literally ate his flesh and drank his blood to receive his "holy spirit" - to form a mafia esque blood brotherhood pact with him. Is this where their supposed power to heal came from?
 

Attachments

There's also this interesting book I came across recently, no less written by a Jewish professor and rabbi.
Pob.webpPob 2.webp

Gotta love the "it's literally historical fact BUT if you make it known some people will exaggerate it so we need to censor it", that doesn't lead to antisemitism at all! No it doesn't look like a bad cover up at all, not at all Mr Hebrew sir!
 
Gotta love the "it's literally historical fact BUT if you make it known some people will exaggerate it so we need to censor it", that doesn't lead to antisemitism at all! No it doesn't look like a bad cover up at all, not at all Mr Hebrew sir!
The book overhypes it. The central takeaway is that some Ashkenazi Jews in Italy may have used powdered blood as a folk medicine. Toaff uses confessions that were extracted with the use of torture as proof of this.

The biggest issue with this is that Jews don't consume blood because it is biblically prohibited. Another issue is that this wasn't unique to Jews, medical cannibalism was a known thing and people would drink the blood of executed prisoners to cure epilepsy.

No one actually reads the book, they just hear that it "confirms" that Jews sacrifice children for blood and that's good enough.
 
Sounds Ukrainian, but your English is perfect. I assume Eastern Europe because I think any MENA, Asian, or LatAM wouldn't need disillusionment regarding child trafficking. I would hope the Rus don't find themselves in such a situation.
The disillusionment isn’t because I’m naive or that I’ve never heard such things before. On the contrary, I live in a place where it’s always (as long as I’ve been alive at least) been pervasive. But the thing is, in the past usually it happened through kidnapping. Now mothers are just selling them outright
 
The disillusionment isn’t because I’m naive or that I’ve never heard such things before. On the contrary, I live in a place where it’s always (as long as I’ve been alive at least) been pervasive. But the thing is, in the past usually it happened through kidnapping. Now mothers are just selling them outright
Ah, SA. That explains the english. Sorry to hear that man, especially if it's not just the nigger moms selling kids - which they did before you guys ever showed up anyway. Fun fact, there's a theory that the Beasts of the Field referred to in all those bible passages include niggers, since the beasts do things that typical wild animals can't:

Leviticus 26:22

"I will let loose among you the beasts of the field, which will bereave you of your children and destroy your livestock and reduce your number, and your roads will become desolate."

Ezekiel 14:15

"If I cause wild beasts to pass through the land and they depopulate it, and it becomes desolate so that no one may pass through because of the beasts..."

I've seen, worked with, and conversed with enough ethnicities that I'm a literal White supremacist, as in 'the paler your skin is, the more supreme you are among the subspecies.' That includes Mongols, Japs, Koreans, a lot of Chinese, etc. Whenever I run into pale Persians or pale Lebanese or pale Mexicans, they're always better then their non-pale counterparts. The Mormons were right, the darker your skin, the more sinful your past. I don't know if there's just multi-millennia of genetic pressure where the most shit, stupid people are consistently pushed to the equator and acquire a tan or what, but it's an iron rule. Shame we all forgot it.
 
Eating blood wouldn't cure tay Sachs
Whether it did or it didn’t isn’t the point. What people believed and did is the point. Witches dont exist and we still burned thousands of people as witches. Albino body parts don’t have magical powers but albinos still get killed for them.
If people believed blood or tissue cured something then they’d do it. There are many examples of this, like mumia for example
The question is not ‘would it cure tay sachs?’ It’s ’did people use blood in ritual or medicine ?’ The answer to the latter is clearly that in some cases, yes they did.
 
There's no treatment for tay sachs that involves blood transfer. The closest we've gotten to a cure is in Massachusetts.

https://www.umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2022/02/first-gene-therabut for-tay-sachs-disease-successfully-given-to-two-children/

They're looking at bone marrow transplants as an idea.

Eating blood wouldn't cure tay Sachs
There you go mixing up words to hide what you are saying, yet again. Pilpul at work.
The book overhypes it. The central takeaway is that some Ashkenazi Jews in Italy may have used powdered blood as a folk medicine. Toaff uses confessions that were extracted with the use of torture as proof of this.
Yes they found exsanguinated dead children in the houses of jews, who admitted to killing the kids and draining their blood and revealed information known to no one else through torture. Proving it true and proving you will do anything to protect jews, no matter how guilty.
The biggest issue with this is that Jews don't consume blood because it is biblically prohibited.
Jews don't believe in the Bible, pedo.
Another issue is that this wasn't unique to Jews, medical cannibalism was a known thing and people would drink the blood of executed prisoners to cure epilepsy.
"Oy vey how can you blame jews for killing kids. Everyone was doing it!" No everyone wasn't murdering kids for their blood you fucking faggot.
No one actually reads the book, they just hear that it "confirms" that Jews sacrifice children for blood and that's good enough.
Except it was posted here just now for anyone to read, so stop pretending like you've got secret knowledge when you've never read it yourself otherwise you are lying about the contents to promote your pedophile agenda.
 
There's also this interesting book I came across recently, no less written by a Jewish professor and rabbi.
View attachment 7318627View attachment 7318626
The infamous Black Masses were rumored to also involve sacrifices of infants for their blood. A mixture of old Greco-Roman Bacchanalia practices and Abrahamic black magic. Telluric practices authorities, both Chruch and pre Church always failed to completely stamp out.

Taken from Tracy Twyman's Baphomet book.
View attachment 7318618View attachment 7318619
It's all Jewish blood rites in the end, with the idea that you're receiving something positive through the practice of said ritual. Whether it's "sacred" = christian/white magic or "profane" = occultism/black magic. You're supposed to receive the holy spirit through the injection of Jesus's blood (wine) and flesh (bread).
View attachment 7318637
Now Gurdjieff posited that the Apostles literally ate his flesh and drank his blood to receive his "holy spirit" - to form a mafia esque blood brotherhood pact with him. Is this where their supposed power to heal came from?
I’m going to be quite honest about my view on the “blood rituals” thing. It would really help the case if a confession could be found that didn’t involve some level of horrific torture.
BUT, the information you posted about that genetic disease and how blood is essentially the cure for it is was pretty damn interesting. That’s not the kind of thing that you discover very often
 
There's no treatment for tay sachs that involves blood transfer. The closest we've gotten to a cure is in Massachusetts.

https://www.umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2022/02/first-gene-therabut for-tay-sachs-disease-successfully-given-to-two-children/

They're looking at bone marrow transplants as an idea.

Eating blood wouldn't cure tay Sachs
I mean, I’m not going to pretend that I understand this medical paper but they definitely have tried it before. I think based on my limited understanding that the conclusion is as “destroying a dying child’s immune system with invasive chemo therapy and pumping them full of umbilical cord blood isn’t worth it to prolong their lives for a year or two”
Only around 3 out of 150+ ended up pulling through. So in terms of effectiveness it’s probably not great

A simple google search would tell you that your first statement is false
 
A man's neighbour borrows his kettle and upon its return, the man complains to his neighbour that the kettle is now broken. Outraged, the neighbour exclaims that the kettle is not broken, he didn't borrow it and that it was broken when he took it.

This is known as "Kettle Logic" - when any one argument might be an acceptable counter but put together they contradict each other. Which brings me to:

The biggest issue with this is that Jews don't consume blood because it is biblically prohibited. Another issue is that this wasn't unique to Jews, medical cannibalism was a known thing and people would drink the blood of executed prisoners to cure epilepsy.
Jews don't drink blood, Jews aren't the only ones that drink blood, drinking blood is helpful.

Anyway, time to break out my favourite image once more:
sperging.webp
 
The question is not ‘would it cure tay sachs?’ It’s ’did people use blood in ritual or medicine ?’
The X post that I was replying to specifically said that Jews cure tay Sachs through a procedure in Israel where they use umbilical blood to replace all the blood in the body of someone afflicted by it. This cure simply doesn't exist.

Did people use blood in ritual or medicine? Of course but the central takeaway of the post is about a specific procedure that doesn't exist.
BUT, the information you posted about that genetic disease and how blood is essentially the cure for it is was pretty damn interesting
It's also a lie. This procedure doesn't exist.

I'm not going to reply to @Bonesjones post because the guy is a schizo who thinks that Muslims, Catholics, and Druze are all secretly Jews. You can't really argue with that level of delusion, it's like wrestling a pig. Even if you win, you're gonna be covered in mud and miserable while the hog is happy that you sunk down to its level. Only thing I'll say is that if you read the copy of blood passover that's linked, you will see that my assertion is correct.


It would really help the case if a confession could be found that didn’t involve some level of horrific torture.
This is such an old trope that the Catholic Church has said on multiple occasions that Jews don't do this and stop bothering them about it.

Pope Gregory X's letter about it:

Gregory, bishop, servant of the servants of God, extends greetings and the apostolic benediction to the beloved sons in Christ, the faithful Christians, to those here now and to those in the future. Even as it is not allowed to the Jews in their assemblies presumptuously to undertake for themselves more than that which is permitted them by law, even so they ought not to suffer any disadvantage in those [privileges] which have been granted them. Although they prefer to persist in their stubbornness rather than to recognize the words of their prophets and the mysteries of the Scriptures, and thus to arrive at a knowledge of Christian faith and salvation; nevertheless, inasmuch as they have made an appeal for our protection and help, we therefore admit their petition and offer them the shield of our protection through the clemency of Christian piety. In so doing we follow in the footsteps of our predecessors of blessed memory, the popes of Rome Calixtus, Eugene, Alexander, Clement, Celestine, Innocent, and Honorius....
Inasmuch as the Jews are not able to bear witness against the Christians, we decree furthermore that the testimony of Christians against Jews shall not be valid unless there is among these Christians some Jew who is there for the purpose of offering testimony.

Since it happens occasionally that some Christians lose their Christian children, the Jews are accused by their enemies of secretly carrying off and killing these same Christian children and of making sacrifices of the heart and blood of these very children. It happens, too, that the parents of these children or some other Christian enemies of these Jews, secretly hide these very children in order that they may be able to injure these Jews, and in order that they may be able to extort from them a certain amount of money by redeeming them from their straits.

And most falsely do these Christians claim that the Jews have secretly and furtively carried away these children and killed them, and that the Jews offer sacrifice from the heart and blood of these children, since their law in this matter precisely and expressly forbids Jews to sacrifice, eat, or drink the blood, or to eat the flesh of animals having claws. This has been demonstrated many times at our court by Jews converted to the Christian faith: nevertheless very many Jews are often seized and detained unjustly because of this. We decree, therefore, that Christians need not be obeyed against Jews in a case or situation of this type, and we order that Jews seized under such a silly pretext be freed from imprisonment, and that they shall not be arrested henceforth on such a miserable pretext, unless—which we do not believe—they be caught in the commission of the crime. We decree that no Christian shall stir up anything new against them, but that they should be maintained in that status and position in which they were in the time of our predecessors, from antiquity till now.

Even in the case of Simon of Trent which is usually considered the slam dunk case, the Vaticans investigator was prohibited from visiting captive Jews to interview them and he wasn't able to view court records.

The Pope at the time issued this papal bull which essentially said the trial is done but don't attack Jews for this.

Sixtus, servant of the Servants of God. To our venerable brother, Johannes bishop of Trent,
greetings and apostolic benediction. Divine piety has made us solicitous to provide for the
safety of souls and to ward off danger to the extent possible. Some time ago, the praetor1
of
your city of Trent, whose fame precedes him, opened an investigation against some Jews then
dwelling in your city who were said inhumanely to have murdered the Christian child named
Simon. He carried out the investigation as the gravity of the affair demanded, and as was
incumbent upon his office, and those found guilty he condemned to the ultimate penalty. But
many people began to complain loudly; and in various locales, they began to interpret the
matter with considerable suspicion. We, in order to remove all such suspicions, and in such a
manner properly to perform our pastoral duty, and so that the truth should be made known to
the faithful, have diligently had examined and inspected the closed2
transcript [of the trial]
held by this praetor against the Jews. This transcript, protected by our seal, was sent to us by
you and your [official]. The examination was carried out by a number of our venerable brothers
Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church, and also archbishops, legal experts, and the auditor
of trials of our apostolic palace.3
They met frequently, and after examining with great care each
phase of the trial, they reported to our consistory that the trial itself had rightly and properly
been concluded. We, accordingly, sharing the sentiment of our brothers [just mentioned]
regarding the account [of the trial], commending as well the zeal and diligence of your
brotherhood in God [Hinderbach], nonetheless, wish and enjoin upon your brotherhood that
in the pious devotion now commenced, you do not allow, following the decree issued in the
General Council by our predecessor Pope Innocent III, of blessed memory, anything illicit to be
done that might result in injury to God or contempt of the Apostolic See, or which might be
perceived as potentially and inexcusably contravening canonical sanctions1
. And the
observance of this injunction we entrust to your conscience, concerning which we trust in God. You must carefully ascertain that no Christian, on the pretext of the foregoing matter [of
Simonino] or for any other pretext, barring the judgment of an earthly power, should presume
to kill, mutilate, wound, or unjustly extort monies from them [the Jews], or prevent them from
observing their rites, permitted by law. In addition, we wish and enjoin upon your authority,
that you apply all diligence, to restore the children of the condemned Jews, to their baptized
mothers, along with their mothers' dowries, wherever they may now be held. Those who
oppose this decree or rebel against it will feel the weight of ecclesiastical censure and other
[pertinent] laws. This letter is effective notwithstanding other apostolic letters or prescriptions
in contradiction. Dated at Rome, at St. Peter's, in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord, one
thousand and seventy eight, the twelfth of the Kalends of July, in the seventh year of our
pontificate.


Jews don't drink blood
Yes

Jews aren't the only ones that drink blood
Pointing out that in the case of the claimed Jewish blood consumers that Ariel Toaff claims existed, it wouldn't have been only the Jews that consumed blood, this was normative at the time and I used the example of blood from executed criminals as an example of normative blood drinking.

The Jews didn't do it but if they did, it wouldn't have been singularly unique since the practice common at the time among non Jews.

Anyway, time to break out my favourite image once more:
Last time I argued with him he claimed that all Abrahamic faiths were secretly Judaism other than his specific branch of Christianity. He then called the secret Druze holy books a Jewish text.

I just don't know how to deal with that level of retardation. The guy is so retarded he claimed a piece of fried chicken is a sandwich. Also his pedophilic fantasies creep me out.
 
One of the more interesting /x/ skizo theories
View attachment 7316534
Oddly enough this post shows up in the 4plebs archive when searched for but the thread has been deleted; https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/27446742/#q27467949
I actually dived deep into this one and the accompanying theory that the myth of the vampire in eastern europe originates from jews migrating there and the supposed accompanying problems.

Issue is that all the jew-coded things in the vampire myth, like dropping a penny to distract them, jewish looks, vulnerability to the christian cross and jewish attire like wearing 6 pointed stars all originate from the united states in the 1910's and early film industry.

The Jews didn't do it but if they did, it wouldn't have been singularly unique since the practice common at the time among non Jews.
They didn't do it, but if they did, everyone did. Suuuuure.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying there's a flaw in the provided cloud chart; such a cumulonimbus cloud can be found on the image search under the term handily. However, the go-to image of such a cloud has classically been the one I just posted, so I have to wonder what aesthetics or leanings have driven certain authors or educators to these disparate selections.
Combination of iconic form and American bias. Anvil-head clouds are the tallest cumulonimbus that can form, as they reach all the way to the stratosophere. They appear readily in the huge storms that form over the American mid-west, while American media is heavily consumed around the world, so they will have disproportionate visibility and become representative of "storm cloud" in the minds of the general population. Pop science illustration leans heavily on emblematic imagery so it will point to an anvil-head and say "look, big cloud! Don't you fucking love science?!"

On a somewhat related note, it may or may not surprise you that, for all the public confidence about it, the scientific understanding of clouds and cloud formation, particularly in relation to electrical storms, is actually very fragile and limited. The isolated convective model can't explain features like red sprites or other upper-atmospheric lightning, for example. There's a large and growing body of evidence, particularly once the wider context of phenomena like earthquake lights, or electrical storms on other planets in the solar system are considered, that suggests electrical storms on earth are the result of current flows through the earth and across the atmosphere to space, with the visible storm itself being an effect of electrical discharges rather than the cause of them.
 
They didn't do it, but if
Let me make it clearer. There are two Jewish groups here:

General Jewish population (doesn't consume blood)
Toaff's hypothetical small group of Italian Jews that consumed blood as folk medicine

The Jews (general population) didn't do it but if the small group of Italian Jews that Toaff describes did, it would not have been unusual for the area since in that area a lot of non Jews also consumed blood.
 
I'm not going to reply to @Bonesjones post because the guy is a schizo who thinks that Muslims, Catholics, and Druze are all secretly Jews. You can't really argue with that level of delusion, it's like wrestling a pig. Even if you win, you're gonna be covered in mud and miserable while the hog is happy that you sunk down to its level. Only thing I'll say is that if you read the copy of blood passover that's linked, you will see that my assertion is correct.
No you won't reply because I'm absolutely correct and you are just a pathetic coward.


This is such an old trope that the Catholic Church has said on multiple occasions that Jews don't do this and stop bothering them about it.
So you admit the Catholics side with jews over Christian children? Whoops.
Pope Gregory X's letter about it
Then you post proof.
Even in the case of Simon of Trent which is usually considered the slam dunk case, the Vaticans investigator was prohibited from visiting captive Jews to interview them and he wasn't able to view court records.
Why would the Catholics need to interview anyone when legal authority already covered it? Just pedophiles covering for pedophiles.
The Pope at the time issued this papal bull which essentially said the trial is done but don't attack Jews for this.
"The pope sided with jews but they totally aren't on the same team"
I Googled oral circumcision and there's a hundred pictures proving you wrong you pathetic pedophile.
Pointing out that in the case of the claimed Jewish blood consumers that Ariel Toaff claims existed, it wouldn't have been only the Jews that consumed blood, this was normative at the time and I used the example of blood from executed criminals as an example of normative blood drinking.

The Jews didn't do it but if they did, it wouldn't have been singularly unique since the practice common at the time among non Jews.
Cope you fucking faggot.
Last time I argued with him he claimed that all Abrahamic faiths were secretly Judaism other than his specific branch of Christianity. He then called the secret Druze holy books a Jewish text.
You posted proof of Catholic authority working with jews over Christians. Good job you prove me right yet again in your own hubris.
I just don't know how to deal with that level of retardation. The guy is so retarded he claimed a piece of fried chicken is a sandwich. Also his pedophilic fantasies creep me out.
Old Jewish guys sucking baby dicks? Not worthy of notice. Someone pointing it out? Total pedophile. Good job projecting.
Let me make it clearer. There are two Jewish groups here:
There's one group of jews and they should all be killed, hopefully starting with you.
 
The channel owner claims it was originally uploaded in "the 2000s" but was accidentally private until 2022, when it was unprivated. The problem is that the video was clearly not unprivated, but uploaded in 2022. The video's description is odd, quickly mentioning the privacy setting situation before describing a sermon he wrote for a Sunday service during a "scout trip to Shiloh battlefield".
The thing is, if I recall, if you upload a youtube video initially as private, its upload date is indeed when you first make it public or unlist it. I'm actually going to double-check to make sure this is the case but I recall it happening to me.
I was right. Yesterday I uploaded a vid private and today I made it public. The date changed from May 4th to May 5th.
 
Back