Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
Regrettably I will also be working and don't think I can tune in, so I will be watching this thread intermittently. Godsneed and I hope there's some funnies.

If Russ appears with his camera (I assume it's a requirement at least) I hope some artistic kiwis create some memorable imagery if something happens. Even if it's not a regular court appearance that doesn't mean we can't have some court sketches like the good old CWC days.
 
Yes, this is a classic case of the dog catching the car. It's his first time getting anywhere near this far in a court case, and he has no idea what he's doing.
I'll note that even with massive tard guarding, he still got sanctioned in discovery, the one phase of a lawsuit where if you fuck up in it, you are guaranteed sanctions. Most kook lolsuits get thrown out before the phase where discovery is an issue and fucking around with it results in mandatory sanctions.

Humpty & Dumpty LLC with their pro boner representation that resulted in this absolutely idiotic case dragging on for FIVE FUCKING YEARS and an imbecilic Tenth Circuit ruling that disgraces the entire circuit, basically got Russhole to the point where he can lose abysmally, having wasted everyone's time and money for half a decade about nonsense.
 
I remember before the last hearing someone posted a trick that lets you join the zoom meeting in the browser without having to download the desktop app. Anyone remember what it was?
 
I remember before the last hearing someone posted a trick that lets you join the zoom meeting in the browser without having to download the desktop app. Anyone remember what it was?
I don't, And wouldn't say so (Really, I don't) right now if I did. Not to suggest it would be you but somebody would do massively stupid things with that. Maybe catch the next one?
 
I remember before the last hearing someone posted a trick that lets you join the zoom meeting in the browser without having to download the desktop app. Anyone remember what it was?
You mean opening the link in a web browser? I'm not sure that's really a trick.
If you don't have the app there should be a link saying "Join in your browser"
You may have to click launch meeting a couple times before it pops up the Join in Browser link.
 
Schedule published. If you wish to virtually attend, do not be a retard. Use a respectable looking name to sign in. Do not have a bullshit profile picture. You are attending a court hearing, any attention drawn will be negative attention to the site. The site has a reputation of being reasonably well behaved when attending hearings, lets keep it that way. If you do anything to shit up the hearing, it will look poorly not on you, but on the site, and on Null. Its his ass on the line. Dont make things harder.
 

Attachments

Is anybody willing to take the effort to put together a PSA for those wanting to virtually attend the hearing tomorrow?
Don't: Record, restream or screenshot the meeting.
Do: take copious notes, bring enough popcorn, use a plausible but fake name(not Dave, that's just retarded), make sure your camera and microphone are off, if you're using a browser remember to un-mute the tab so you can hear, remember the timezone.
Read the court's information here: https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/zoom-hearings
There's a test link at the bottom of the page.
If you regularly use Zoom then either use a different device or make sure you're fully logged out.

The link as published in the schedule posted just now is here:
Greer v. Moon et al
 
Last edited:
If you do anything to shit up the hearing, it will look poorly not on you, but on the site, and on Null. Its his ass on the line. Dont make things harder.
Also if we can we will dox you and you will get your own halal thread.

Interesting that this hearing is the very last of the day, and at that, at 1:00 p.m. Generally, courts schedule hearings this way and the most potentially contentious hearings get put off to the end of the day. The court is apparently expecting a bunch of bullshit on this day.
 
Also if we can we will dox you and you will get your own halal thread.

Interesting that this hearing is the very last of the day, and at that, at 1:00 p.m. Generally, courts schedule hearings this way and the most potentially contentious hearings get put off to the end of the day. The court is apparently expecting a bunch of bullshit on this day.
I would imagine the other cases on the docket are being done by professional attorneys who don't want to waste their clients money on petty bullshit. Greer v. Moon on the other hand....
 
I don't, And wouldn't say so (Really, I don't) right now if I did. Not to suggest it would be you but somebody would do massively stupid things with that. Maybe catch the next one?
Its open to the public regardless. The only difference is viewing it in the browser vs in the desktop app. I just don't want to install bloatware on my machine.

If you don't have the app there should be a link saying "Join in your browser"
IIRC if you don't have the app it just give you a link to download the installer. They might've changed it but I thought I remembered having to do something special to join in the browser.
 
Its open to the public regardless. The only difference is viewing it in the browser vs in the desktop app. I just don't want to install bloatware on my machine.


IIRC if you don't have the app it just give you a link to download the installer. They might've changed it but I thought I remembered having to do something special to join in the browser.
I just tried it on their test meeting and after I clicked the join button a second time it popped up the "Having trouble? Join in browser" link.
 
I'll be working, write a good report men. Maybe someone run a transcription AI with their audio channel? I've seen it in HR teams with autotranscript software. Is that sticking with the rules?

Hopefully one of the parties can get a word in to the court to disable attendee voice/video unless selected. Behave yourselves people. Let's have another optics success like the Rekieta Omnibussin'
 
Last edited:
Back