India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The Hun fears the Jew Klux Klan nigger cage machine
The original nigger cagers
IMG_6364.webp
I don’t know why they didn’t kill all of India.
 
Ukraine would be a very different story if Europe hadn't so thoroughly hollowed itself out to the point of being unable to meaningfully help at all.
Europe hollowed itself out because it was cheaper to deindustrialize than it was to maintain the current domestic industry. It's cheaper to rely on 2nd world nations to build shit for you and then have some almost fully automated specialized domestic industry to do the rest. Then they take a portion of the profits for social programs and industry subsidies to keep employment rates stable and people happy. This system only works if europe and the rest of the west maintained its control over the 2nd and 3rd world (shocker, it hasn't).
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mr. Racewar1488
The CIA did put crack on the streets as well as dismantled the civil rights movement. at the same time they also fucked up the KKK lmao. Anyways, you can look up unequal exchange and neocolonialism for further research if you'd like
Gay redditor trying to pretend like the black community hasn't sustained its own problems but instead that something that happened 70 years ago is still causing them to act like niggers
 
Europe hollowed itself out because it was cheaper to deindustrialize than it was to maintain the current domestic industry. It's cheaper to rely on 2nd world nations to build shit for you and then have some almost fully automated specialized domestic industry to do the rest. Then they take a portion of the profits for social programs and industry subsidies to keep employment rates stable and people happy. This system only works if europe and the rest of the west maintained its control over the 2nd and 3rd world (shocker, it hasn't).
Yeah due to communist scum like you who want a globalized economy instead of a western focused economy
 
I feel the same with the whole “he didn’t do nuffn” excuses being done whenever George Floyd #1283828 is killed by a police officer, just to see the body cam footage and actually he was acting like a stupid nigger (see below)
View attachment 7333121
View attachment 7333122
It was funny watching people push for police cameras only for it to backfire and show how niggers act in general
 
Europe hollowed itself out because it was cheaper to deindustrialize than it was to maintain the current domestic industry. It's cheaper to rely on 2nd world nations to build shit for you and then have some almost fully automated specialized domestic industry to do the rest. Then they take a portion of the profits for social programs and industry subsidies to keep employment rates stable and people happy. This system only works if europe and the rest of the west maintained its control over the 2nd and 3rd world (shocker, it hasn't).
your neovagina is leaking a bit there, tranny
 
If nuclear war happens, it will kill a LOT, it will irradiate even more, but it (unfortunately) won't exterminate the jeet race. There are way too many of them for that to happen in any conceivable way (unless they use all of their nukes in the most strategically organized way possible, which also won't happen, because they're retarded).
The rest of the world can make up for this shortcoming by allocating portions of their own nuclear arsenals to supplement the great cleansing.
 
By war effort do you mean mobilization and soldiers sent from or actual fighting? Because if you mean the latter, no conflict in history would qualify.
i say war effort to mean activity related to supporting a war. that includes mobilization, actual fighting, but also construction of fighting weapons, clothes, food for rations and building logistics.
 
Philosophically speaking, what is the percentage of countries in the world that need to be at war before it is considered a world war? Or is it simply the world was at war?
I think it only counts if they're all engaged in the same war . WW1 and 2 were called that because it was two huge alliances and their globe-spanning empires fighting each other. This is also why shithole countries fighting each other doesn't count, because shitholes don't have the power projection to wage war in distant theatres (unless you count diaspora gang violence).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV
I'm in agreement, but from a different angle. People want to pretend that they can predict the future based on the past, but history rhymes more often than it repeats. There's no interwoven alliance of opposed ideological powers with aspirations to global domination here. This is various economic hegemonic elites fighting over the last scraps of overtaxed and overleveraged systems, driving further and further instability. Conflict is mostly rising from opportunity within that malaise. Ukraine would be a very different story if Europe hadn't so thoroughly hollowed itself out to the point of being unable to meaningfully help at all. Ukraine would be a very different story if the US hadn't been so radicalized internally to cover its wholesale looting as to desire to turn inwards and stop giving a fuck about the world.

India and Pakistan can keep escalating here because none of the world really cares that much, they're too focused on their own self inflicted problems. This isn't a new front to a global cold war, this is another stage in some cycle of history that hasn't been meaningfully mapped yet, as the elements comprising it have never been at such a scale to do so much damage in their downswing.
Oh yeah to be clear, I don't think the cold war we are in (ie the west vs china/russia/iran some other spergs) is going to turn hot. I think this india pakistan shit will quite likely involve ground troops combating each other and could last for years.

I also think africa is going to have its mini civil war at some point and i wouldn't be surprised if china got into some spats with vietnam, the phillippines, and india.

The world has been waiting for this. Everything outside of NA/Europe/Australia were never meant to industrialize and advance to this level on their own. They went from being colonial territories, to being "free" but depending on the tits of white countries, and now the tits are shriveled up and dry. We're going to see how they hold up without the grown ups in the room and i don't think it will be well.

My predictions:
Sub-Saharan Africa: Shitshow
Middle East: Shitshow
Asia: Japan will be fine, China will survive but diminish in power, Some of the South asian dominos might get absorbed or collapses.
North Africa: Depends on if europe wants to bail them out and how willing they are to work together, otherwise shitshow.
Russia: Turtle up and wait to die.
Latin America: Hard to say, I don't think quite shitshow territory but diminished. Mexico might be the only winner due to US trade but i don't see it becoming a genuine power. A lot of the other Latam states will collapse and be absorbed and there will be chimpouts for sure.
 
I don't think you understand what communism is. This was caused by retarded capitalists who thought they could maintain their control over the 2nd and 3rd world forever.
Nigga if you are not a Dengist Maoist third worldist trans exclusionary nationalist fascist nigger exterminator gtfo commie (inb4 commie)
 
This was something that kept coming up in T.E.Lawrence's book about his time helping the Arab Revolt during WW1. Basically it came down to the Arabs were massive retards and the best you could do was kinda point them in a direction until they finally got interested enough, at which point they'd finally give it a go until they got too bored.
I’ve said for ages that Muslim fighting is just the new (American) Indian fighting (skirmishes at the fringe of empire, easily contained with tiny professional armies and some forts) and this sounds EXACTLY like the experience of cat herding Indians on campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapesputin
If the Pakistani response is to strike at only military targets (and they actually succeed in hitting those targets) it'll then depend on how India responds to those that'll determine if this escalates or not. They might just call it even after that, assuming Pakistan responds in kind at all.

If this is going to escalate into a proper conventional war, then it'll probably take a while to happen yet, maybe a month or three.
 
I've made good contributions to this thread.
View attachment 7333209
You sperging on and on about how niggers are actually muh victims of imperialism because you watch hasan and skimmed through Malcom X’s autobiography while shilling your pan African anti European bullshit is shitting up the thread. Europe won, Africa lost, Africa will always lose, there is no magic soil, and you are a nigger.
 
Last edited:
Back