USA Cardinal Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV - HABEMUS PAPAM

By Joshua McElwee May 8, 20251:20 PM EDTUpdated 4 min ago

1746725209591.webp
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost poses after being elevated to the rank of cardinal at the Vatican, September 30, 2023.

VATICAN CITY, May 8 (Reuters) - USA Cardinal Robert Prevost was elected the new pope and leader of the Roman Catholic Church on Thursday and has taken the name Pope Leo XIV a senior cardinal announced to crowds in St. Peter's Square.
L|A
 
Why do popes take a new name anyway? Is it a nod to the Simon/Peter thing?
The early Popes had a lot more traditionally pagan names, but when a man got elected literally named after a Roman god (Mercurius), he elected to rename himself after Peter because having the head of the church with a name honoring another religion was a bridge too far.
Eventually it became a trend of Popes with baptismal names too closely associated with pre-Christian Rome renaming themselves, then generalized to everybody, even if it's not a nod to paganism. Leo XIV's given name of Robert, for example, is just old Germanic for "shining renown" or the like, filtered through 2000 years of lingual drift.
 
Nonsense. My leader is Jesus.
I’m going to doubt that, you will be accounted for on the day of Judgement for not helping the sick and Homeless.
He's talking about how traditional Catholicism is good. If so he better learn Latin, because a true traditional Catholic would burn him alive for reading a King James Bible.
He spoke in Latin during his speech but you probably couldn’t understand it because if it’s not 3rd grade level English it probably all sounds the same to you.
Well that's a deal breaker right there.
No wonder his faith is so strong
 
Why do popes take a new name anyway? Is it a nod to the Simon/Peter thing?
The early Popes had a lot more traditionally pagan names, but when a man finally got elected literally named after a Roman god (Mercurius), he elected to rename himself after Peter because having the head of the church with a name honoring another religion was a bridge too far.
Eventually it became a trend of Popes with baptismal names too closely associated with pre-Christian Rome renaming themselves, then generalized to everybody, even if it's not a nod to Paganism. Leo XIV's given name of Robert, for example, is just old Germanic for "shining renown" or the like, filtered through 2000 years of lingual drift.
There's also a biblical reason for it. In Scripture, your name changing means you've been chosen by God for a special task; for example, Abram and Sarai became Abraham and Sarah, Jacob became Israel, Simon became Peter, etc.
 
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
-1st Timothy 2:5
I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Matthew 16:19.

Jesus was clear in placing Peter over the church as its leader acting in Christs name with all his authority. Why else would Jesus say that he would bind and loose in heaven what Peter binds and looses on earth?
 
I’m going to doubt that, you will be accounted for on the day of Judgement for not helping the sick and Homeless.
I don't need a guy from Chicago to tell me to help the homeless. The Bible made it very clear I should do that.

He spoke in Latin during his speech but you probably couldn’t understand it because if it’s not 3rd grade level English it probably all sounds the same to you.
If you're going to learn a dead language why not Hebrew or Koine Greek, the languages the Bible was actually written in?
 
In October 2024, Prevost voiced the need for greater conversations between each “episcopal conference” to discuss the blessings and apply them in a way that aligned with cultural differences across the globe as some countries still criminalize homsexuality.
Sounds pro-faggotry to me. Hell, almost everything written in that article is disheartening.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Strawb3rry
Jesus was clear in placing Peter over the church as its leader acting in Christs name with all his authority. Why else would Jesus say that he would bind and loose in heaven what Peter binds and looses on earth?
the apostles, peter included, were given a whole lot of special authority that was not passed down to people who held the same positions in the church as them. that power was invested in peter, not the office he held.
 
Jesus was clear in placing Peter over the church as its leader acting in Christs name with all his authority. Why else would Jesus say that he would bind and loose in heaven what Peter binds and looses on earth?
Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.”
-John 18:36

Jesus wasn't talking about creating a kingdom on Earth, he was talking about the Heavenly Kingdom.
 
The Catholics are going to cope and see the even more about how they totally are super conservative again. The Ku Klux Klan was ultimately right about the Catholic Church undermining nations. The Catholic menace is a real thing. He's a friendly reminder that the Orthodox Church we condemned absolutely every single person who ever even remotely entertained the ideas of Communists. The Catholics, on the other hand, embraced it through liberation theology.
Yes yes, the turbobased Orthodox, totally not known for being the absolute bitches of whichever state happened to be lording it over them dating back to the Byzantine Emperors. So formidably anti-Communist that they literally issued a declaration of unconditional loyalty to the Soviet Union to avoid getting buckbroken any harder by Stalin instead of accepting a martyr's crown.
We need to show, not in words but in deeds, that not only those who are indifferent to Orthodox Christianity, not only those who have betrayed it, but also its most zealous adherents, for whom it is dear as truth and life, with all its dogmas and traditions, with all its canonical and liturgical structure, can be faithful citizens of the Soviet Union, loyal to the Soviet government. We want to be Orthodox and at the same time recognize the Soviet Union as our civil motherland, whose joys and successes are our joys and successes and whose failures are our failures. Any blow directed at the Union, be it a war, a boycott, some kind of social disaster, or just a murder from around the corner, like the Warsaw one, is recognized by us as a blow directed at us.
And who, under the Tsars, went almost 200 years without a Patriarch because Peter the Great said so, instead being led by a 'Most Holy' Synod and a secular Ober-Procurator (both appointed by the Tsars in what must've been the closest Orthobro approximation to Anglicanism), and even being required to break the seal of confession to report seditious activity to their secular overlords. Ironic that the first time the Orthodox Church in Russia got to break free from such overbearing state control and get its own Patriarch again, was when the last Tsar was overthrown and the Communist persecutions were right around the corner.

Meanwhile the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople also went along with Ottoman rule and bowed to the Sultans with hardly a complaint for nearly 500 years in exchange for authority over basically all Orthodox subjects within that Islamic empire via the millet system. No doubt they would've sold out to the Catholics too, considering the entire existence of the Council of Florence, had the Crusade of Varna actually worked instead of being stomped by the Turks who did eventually gain their allegiance instead. The various Balkan kingdoms' churches were also basically extensions of their governments and governing ideologies (the Serbian Orthodox Church, for instance, were extremely supportive of WW1 and the Yugoslavist ideal, even sending out ideologue clerics like Nikolaj Velimirovic to broadcast such messages as far as the USA).

Say what you will about the Caths, at least the Catholic Church tries to not be the bitch of various worldly powers throughout history. In the same timeframe as all of the above, even after losing the Papal State and Rome itself to the secular Italian Kingdom, the Popes preferred to jump into an emo phase and refused to bow to their conqueror for decades, until eventually Mussolini made a concession and acknowledged the Vatican as its own country rather than a direct subject of the Italian state. And while liberation theology is a problem, at least it's one the Catholic authorities eventually recognized as such and pushed back against under JPII and Benedict (who in fact was one of JPII's enforcers against that Marxism-in-a-cassock charade back when he was Cardinal Ratzinger & head of the Inquisition). Meanwhile way too fucking many Orthodox priests sold out to the commies before the Iron Curtain fell and it wasn't just in Russia either, ex. something like 80% of Romanian priests were informants for the Securitate and 11 out of 15 members of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church's own Holy Synod were literal secret police agents).

(As a matter of fact I actually do like quite a few aspects of Orthodoxy and Orthodox history - certainly the moments where they aren't buckbroken thralls of their respective states - but come the fuck on, posts like this are straight up lobbing boulders from a glass house.)
 
I don't need a guy from Chicago to tell me to help the homeless. The Bible made it very clear I should do that.
You disparage the poor and needy because they are from a different country and scandalize those who do. The Bible talks explicitly what happens to those people
If you're going to learn a dead language why not Hebrew or Koine Greek, the languages the Bible was actually written in?
Fun Fact, if you are intelligent enough you can read and write in all three as many Popes and catholic philosophers have done. I’m going to bet you only have an English KJV bible in your house
 
Someone from Chiclayo says they know he had a lover. I won't spoil the sex, but you know.
Fuck you faggot. Take your gay Prot propaganda elsewhere.
Nigga, I’m right here.
So true! Guys this is actually His Holiness' burner! We have a Kiwi pope!
I am disappointed they did not choose @Lizard Pope
See above. Lizard Pope = Leo XIV.
I will say I'm glad I'm a protestant now lol.
Enjoy hell Protestant.
Sounds pro-faggotry to me. Hell, almost everything written in that article is disheartening.
I got the opposite impression. That quote seemed like he was trying to not step on the African bishop's toes.
 
the apostles, peter included, were given a whole lot of special authority that was not passed down to people who held the same positions in the church as them. that power was invested in peter, not the office he held.
If Christ renamed Simon to Peter (greek for rock), does that imply that the foundations of the church were shattered upon Peter's martyrdom?
 
Back