USA Cardinal Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV - HABEMUS PAPAM

By Joshua McElwee May 8, 20251:20 PM EDTUpdated 4 min ago

1746725209591.webp
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost poses after being elevated to the rank of cardinal at the Vatican, September 30, 2023.

VATICAN CITY, May 8 (Reuters) - USA Cardinal Robert Prevost was elected the new pope and leader of the Roman Catholic Church on Thursday and has taken the name Pope Leo XIV a senior cardinal announced to crowds in St. Peter's Square.
L|A
 
Fuck you faggot. Take your gay Prot propaganda elsewhere.

So true! Guys this is actually His Holiness' burner! We have a Kiwi pope!

See above. Lizard Pope = Leo XIV.

Enjoy hell Protestant.

I got the opposite impression. That quote seemed like he was trying to not step on the African bishop's toes.
Enjoy endless spics, niggers, Jews, Muslims, and jeets, Catholic.
 
Any chance God's church could take a moment to address these people and say "Hey, God gifted upon you free will and the ability to be a force of change in your world. Try using that to bring change and betterment to your own communities, rather abandoning them to move to other communities a full continent away- especially if all you're going to do is strain the services of and bring violent organized crime to those communities."
God was also explicit what should be done to help the poor and needy which the church provides regardless of the situation or background. Should we go against scripture in order to fulfill political goals?
 
God was also explicit what should be done to help the poor and needy which the church provides regardless of the situation or background. Should we go against scripture in order to fulfill political goals?
The difference is that these things are godless and barely even human. If you think God would want us to import Somalians who rape and murder and just be fine with it, you're out of your mind. It's like thinking God would want us to help mosquitoes.
 
God was also explicit what should be done to help the poor and needy which the church provides regardless of the situation or background. Should we go against scripture in order to fulfill political goals?
Controlling the borders and thus sovereignty of a nation state is not a partisan political goal, it is one of the most basic functions of a civilized and functional society that protects the interests of its citizens. The only ones who treat it like a partisan political goal are the ones who want open borders and endless migration for their own economic or ideological goals.
 
The difference is that these things are godless and barely even human. If you think God would want us to import Somalians who rape and murder and just be fine with it, you're out of your mind. It's like thinking God would want us to help mosquitoes.
Controlling the borders and thus sovereignty of a nation state is not a partisan political goal, it is one of the most basic functions of a civilized and functional society that protects the interests of its citizens. The only ones who treat it like a partisan political goal are the ones who want open borders and endless migration for their own economic or ideological goals.
So both of your answer’s is Yes, we should go against what is written in Matthew 25 because Somalians are stinky. I’m no fan of mass immigration but blaming the church for doing what it does (charity) is ludicrous when it’s your own countries policies that are the main contributors to and why they’re here
 
Show me one lick of evidence in Scripture that these subhuman apes are part of God's kingdom and that he would want our children to be raped and murdered by them and I'll wash the feet of every Mexican tranny. These things, much like animals, aren't given the same grace as humans.
 
Why do popes take a new name anyway? Is it a nod to the Simon/Peter thing?
Its because the first pope to change his name was Mercurius and having a pope named after the roman god mercury isn't a good look for the head of Christianity and it just stuck. The last pope to use his real name was Marcellus II in 1555 whose reign lasted less than a month.
 
Show me one lick of evidence in Scripture that these subhuman apes are part of God's kingdom and that he would want our children to be raped and murdered by them and I'll wash the feet of every Mexican tranny. These things, much like animals, aren't given the same grace as humans.
Galatians 3:28 states that their is neither Gentile nor Jew for we are all one in Christ Jesus. Their is a difference between immigrants and criminals but you have hardened your heart, like Pharoah did, to mean that they are one in the same

You act more like a Jew than the Jews did after Jesus’ ascension, I pray that you read the sacred scriptures and convert to Christianity
 
Show me one lick of evidence in Scripture that these subhuman apes are part of God's kingdom and that he would want our children to be raped and murdered by them and I'll wash the feet of every Mexican tranny. These things, much like animals, aren't given the same grace as humans.
Scripture does state that yes, we are all God's children, as men were made in God's image, and as Christ himself said "as what you did to the least of you, so you did to me."

Unfortunately far too many people of both the religious and secular persuasion have taken these teachings to mean that there really is no difference between an illiterate peasant from a violent war-torn country who follows a religion that commands him to conquer or kill all non-believers, and Todd and Jane the lovely middle-class couple from suburbia.

Having basic universal compassion and showing decency towards others regardless of who or what they are shouldn't mean rolling out the red carpet for everyone or rolling over for them.

Their is a difference between immigrants and criminals
Considering most "immigrants" that people are wailing in pity for are the undocumented transient economic migrants who enter nations illegally, in most cases no, there isn't.
 
Last edited:
Serious Question, if the pope was to go against scripture and say we should kill and deport every nonwhite, would you become Catholic? Is that the only thing keeping you back from considering it?
Holy shitballs, what is this fucking retardation? This disingenuous strawman is so fucking stupid no one should even dignify it with a response, except maybe to call you a faggot and tell you that your shits all retarded.
 
Holy shitballs, what is this fucking retardation? This disingenuous strawman is so fucking stupid no one should even dignify it with a response, except maybe to call you a faggot and tell you that your shits all retarded.
Why? Are you pro-immigration for non whites now? The other guy doesn’t seem to be. I’m only asking for a clarification, no need to be a sperg
 
This pope supports foreign hordes raping our children, beating our women in the streets, depressing the wages of our men, destroying our culture and history, and replacing us demographically. Until I hear "I'm sorry for our role in murdering Laken Riley," fuck the Catholic Church. Martin Luther was right. I am so fucking sick of smug Catholics thinking their theology is perfection, that God gave them the capital C Church specifically, and that they are incapable of making catastrophic mistakes. If you support this man, you want my people dead.

BTW here are a list of examples from him specifically:
 
This pope supports foreign hordes raping our children, beating our women in the streets, depressing the wages of our men, destroying our culture and history, and replacing us demographically. Until I hear "I'm sorry for our role in murdering Laken Riley," fuck the Catholic Church. Martin Luther was right. I am so fucking sick of smug Catholics thinking their theology is perfection, that God gave them the capital C Church specifically, and that they are incapable of making catastrophic mistakes. If you support this man, you want my people dead.

BTW here are a list of examples from him specifically:
You’re the guy that got bullied into posting his hand on the Catholic thread saying the same thing, I don’t believe you’re that serious of a person
 
While I am indeed a filthy prot (catholic kiwis, feel free to ignore my post or give me a garbage can and move on), and ergo not my monkies not my circus, I am disappointed, at least with what we know so far. Whether you like or dislike the catholic church, it has been pretty much indisputably a force for Christian good across the world for centuries, and to see it start to lean progressive is tragic.

One derision I will throw out is it appears to me that most Catholics really either support this trend, or do see it, but just throw up their hands and say "oh well, we must submit to Rome" as though their hands are tied and they cannot do or change anything.
 
Back