Lorkhan187
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
Yeah i have so many issues with the argument and the argument he made was basically what you outlined. Turned frustrating because it started turning to one of semantics where because the code says "A Jedi was permitted to kill in self-defense - but only if there was no other option. To conquer aggression, even in combat, a Jedi must have explored every other option, including surrender, before resorting to using lethal force" Mace broke that when he went to finish off Palpatine (somehow) and that also somehow validates the argument that the jedi are corrupt and not as good as they're really portrayed to be. Which was a midwit take and has always been a midwit take in a setting where good and evil is quite literally quantified and observable. Alongside the argument the sith are better than the jedi because most jedi are inhuman for trying to ignore all emotions (which also isn't accurate)I hate this take so fucking much. Pacifism does not mean lie down like a bitch and take it. It doesn't mean you can't take a life if said life will go on to do more damage and has already attacked you. It means you don't start shit, you try other methods first, and then if that fails you fucking finish it.
One of the best quotes I remember from one of the people that worked on these was that pacifism is not just taking the other cheek, it's the ability to defend one's self and others. They have those sabers for a reason; that reason being that when talks won't work or if harm is to be done, you fucking end it.
What's next? Is Obi Wan supposed to anime talk Maul to death after he fucking killed Qui-Gon? Was he supposed to take that fucker in?
Awful take made by idiots who don't get that pacifism doesn't mean being a wall eyed cow fit for slaughter begging for its life. This is the same tard take the acolyte tried to gurgle about the Jedi before whining that they're the villains. You know, as written by the rape assister.