Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Nick thinks that good parenting is staging fake interactions with his neglected daughter to make himself look better while showing her face publicly (something he accused pedophiles of wanting) and showing that he still isn't giving her clean clothes.
Nick's daughter wandering into view multiple times because he cannot be bothered to a lock a door tells me exactly how seriously he took the security of his coke stash, or how locked the bathroom door was with four naked adults behind it.
 
We can only hope for a MNPublicRecords post during Nick's "This Little Piggy" set tonight to save this event from absolute fail-aids dead air nontent.

Deliver us from darkness, o' blessed leaker.
Due to the fact that Sean, Meme Copium and Aaron himself parroted this 70 pages thing combined with the fact that MNPublicRecords seems to not be in contact with anyone for these drops, I think the three of them fell for a troll.
Or to put it blatantly, there's no 70 pages. They fell for a gayop or a just a lame troll.
I honestly doubt the guy who was so paranoid they'd take photos of a console screen to print, and then scan, and then turn into one image would approach these guys for "drip feeds".
 
Aaron's text about his kids is sad and concerning, but without the context of a conversation, nor the state of Aaron at that point in his life, I'm not going to condemn a guy for it. Nor will I praise him for it. Aaron claims to have moved on with his life, and all evidence seems to point to that direction.
Yeah, that's pretty much my position too. I gave what I felt was an obligatory "shame on you" for that one message about the kids, and then I moved on.

I mean, it's clearly not the choice he ultimately ended up going with, so it's not as gigantic deal as they want to make it out to be. Moral of the story: Stay away from drugs and degeneracy. It'll rot your brain and cause you to say and do stupid shit.

None of what happened last night is what I would consider an epic own against Aaron. Hopefully the Dabbletards plunge the knife in Nick's back, like we've all been waiting for. They'd actually be somewhat useful and funny, for once, if they did that.
 
@Potentially Criminal
Is there a case for a revenge porn charge if it's a topless picture of a man shared without their consent?

Personally I would think it's silly to file charges for that but it would *also* be fucking hilarious for Nick to be charged with it.
I don't see it. If the case against Aaron was a miscarriage of the law, this would be an even bigger misuse of the of the law.

You'd also be now having to seek prosecution in Nevada and not MN
 
Always use Signal and enable auto deletion for all messages after 72 hours, that way people can't go and quote your touchy-feely messages about wanting your wife back to shame you on stage at a Las Vegas NAMBLA event.
No. Rewind the tape further.

Don't do drugs. Don't do degenerate things like swinging.

There you go. Much simpler. Obviates absolutely everything else.
 
This guy knows his kids and family members will see this shit some day and he doesn't care a bit. Gotta own the Steel Toe, no matter how grimy they come off from the texts alone

It just stays being amazing how vindictive Nick is toward someone who did nothing specifically directed at him. Sure, his wife fell in love (ish) with Aaron (duh, that's the whole danger of swinging/ swapping); and Aaron eventually said y'all crazy, I'm out, but otherwise what did Aaron do to him? Nick is a grown man, made his choices, and fafo.

OK, Aaron has also spilled tea, but glass houses, stones, etc. And he spilled as much about himself as about Nick.

Oh, yeah, Aaron likely spoke/ did speak to LEO when asked, right? But Nick has been much more scathing about all the prudes and church and family members who reported him, so if that happened, it didn't seem to originate with Aaron.

Nick, on the other hand, has made it a mission to ruin Aaron's show and reputation (whatever you think of either of those, he's still trying to worsen both). Nick very eagerly pushed criminal charges against Aaron (fair, though his offering 3, 4, 5, 6 different nudies of Kayla to LEO/ the prosecutor trying to make it happen is hilariously desperate and revealing, npi); he has shown up to harass Aaron during his streams, and he is "special guesting" at a fucking convention of Aaron-haters offering up selected cuts of Aaron's romantic musings. He's obsessed and deranged, all because someone just walked away from him.
I know Nick had a stiffy while talking about Aaron's goo lapping, but I bet at least 50% of the sad fat men in the audience did too.

No doubt about it. This was ERP. And what is funnier (and weird) is that she was telling Nick a story that she knew would get him hot. So, we now know that Nick gets off on having men, and Aaron specifically, taste his semen. GAAAAAAY

Especially his girl children.
This is how he treats the women he purports to love. He exposes Aprils intimate texts, and he exposes his wife Kayla to the whole world knowing that she got off on fucking Aaron Imholte of all people.

It is statistically predictable what his daughters adult relationships will look like. Grim.
Men like Nick should never have children, especially not girls. And yes, 100%, girls growing up with a narc dad who does not respect women are absolutely set up for personal and relationship struggles.

As one therapist I once heard explain it, when girls are neglected by their fathers, they are vulnerable to having a higher propensity to seek out their father in other men once they are in/after adolescence - which means higher potential for very dysfunctional and codependent situations, and over-preoccupation with romantic relationships, but with a deficit in the sense of self required to find a healthy mate/ relationship.
 
As one therapist I once heard explain it, when girls are neglected by their fathers, they are vulnerable to having a higher propensity to seek out their father in other men once they are in/after adolescence
Maybe this was all a master plan by Nick to have his daughter date a coke dealer in the future so he won't have to drive so far to get it.
 
It just stays being amazing how vindictive Nick is toward someone who did nothing specifically directed at him. Sure, his wife fell in love (ish) with Aaron (duh, that's the whole danger of swinging/ swapping); and Aaron eventually said y'all crazy, I'm out, but otherwise what did Aaron do to him? Nick is a grown man, made his choices, and fafo.

You say it yourself, but Aaron hurt his ego, and that may never be forgiven.

What is more incredible to me is that Nick managed to hide this facet of his character so well for so long. It truly is a testament to the dangers of partisanship for those who liked Nick and the causes he used to support. I have taken the warning well to police the allowances made for people in questionable situations.

Agreed....this is honestly the kind of shit that gets printed out and included in a Christmas card to all of April and Nicks friends and family member.

I had a humourous thought of a 'Missing You' greeting card with a pile of cocaine on the front of it...

Maybe I'm going crazy, but initially didn't Nick say that Aaron ate his cum out of April's pussy? (I hate that I had to write that sentence)

Now April is saying it was on her chest?

The only aspect of this fabricated tale that Nick finds important to keep consistent is 'Aaron is a LOOOOOOSER!'.
 
The first time I ever actually watched a stream with Aaron was on the day of the arrest. He was on the podcast with Brennan and I think Zumcock. I went back in the stream for some context about who these guys were and what the fuck was going on as this was my first exposure to the Dabbleverse.

I remember they were arguing about how taking sponsorships on a podcasts was for losers who couldn't get advertisers like in radio or something insanely retarded along those lines. It was bizarro world. Here were a group of 40-50 year old losers arguing about how a dead medium, talk show radio, was on some noble ivory tower compared to podcast shilling.

Now shilling mansape trimmers and raycon headphones is gay as fuck, but who fucking cares about radio? I knew I had touched on some supremely stupid. Thankfully I didn't know how deep it went or I might not have followed this saga as I'd gotten sick of Rekieta during Weeb Wars and had stopped paying attention to him before he ever hit it big with trial streaming.

It's just a bunch of aged boomers who think Howard Stern and O&A were the pinnacle of media, based their entire existence and personalities around these two things, all while talking about it like they're still relevant in this day or age. Gossiping about literal whos.
 
@Potentially Criminal
Is there a case for a revenge porn charge if it's a topless picture of a man shared without their consent?

Personally I would think it's silly to file charges for that but it would *also* be fucking hilarious for Nick to be charged with it.
I don't see it. If the case against Aaron was a miscarriage of the law, this would be an even bigger misuse of the of the law.

You'd also be now having to seek prosecution in Nevada and not MN

Nevada includes only women's (not men's) nipples as a body part for an intimate image for revenge porn purposes.

"Intimate image":

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, includes, without limitation, a photograph, film, videotape or other recorded image which depicts:

(a) The fully exposed nipple of the female breast of another person, including through transparent clothing; or

(b) One or more persons engaged in sexual conduct.

2. Does not include an image which would otherwise constitute an intimate image pursuant to subsection 1, but in which the person depicted in the image:

(a) Is not clearly identifiable;

(b) Voluntarily exposed himself or herself in a public or commercial setting; or

(c) Is a public figure.

(Added to NRS by 2015, 2233)
NRS 200.770.

As an aside, naked men are covered by the sexual conduct definition, if the exhibition is "lewd":
3. "Sexual conduct" means sexual intercourse, lewd exhibition of the genitals, fellatio, cunnilingus, bestiality, anal intercourse, excretion, sado-masochistic abuse, masturbation, or the penetration of any part of a person’s body or of any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal opening of the body of another.
NRS 200.700. I would hope that "lewd" is interpreted broadly but did not research.

The statute itself (NRS 200.780) is not a strict liability crime, unlike the misdemeanor crime in MN. In NV, it appears only* as a felony level and requires an intent to harass, harm, etc.:

2024 Nevada Revised Statutes​

Universal Citation:
NV Rev Stat § 200.780 (2024)
Learn moreThis media-neutral citation is based on the American Association of Law Libraries Universal Citation Guide and is not necessarily the official citation.
PreviousNext


1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a person commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image when, with the intent to harass, harm or terrorize another person, the person electronically disseminates or sells an intimate image which depicts the other person and the other person:

(a) Did not give prior consent to the electronic dissemination or the sale of the intimate image;

(b) Had a reasonable expectation that the intimate image would be kept private and would not be made visible to the public; and

(c) Was at least 18 years of age when the intimate image was created.

2. A person who commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

3. The provisions of this section do not apply to the electronic dissemination of an intimate image for the purpose of:

(a) A legitimate public interest;

(b) Reporting unlawful conduct;

(c) Any lawful law enforcement or correctional activity;

(d) Investigation or prosecution of a violation of this section; or

(e) Preparation for or use in any legal proceeding.

4. A person who commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is not considered a sex offender and is not subject to registration or community notification as a sex offender pursuant to NRS 179D.010 to 179D.550, inclusive.

(Added to NRS by 2015, 2234)
*as far as my quick research found. I didn't go looking beyond this specific crime.

Related to nothing specific to Aaron's photos, but a topic of general discussion in various threads, there's also a bill as of 2/25 to expand criminal liability to include AI/generated images.
 
Nevada includes only women's (not men's) nipples as a body part for an intimate image for revenge porn purposes.
The activity was directed at Minnesota and both parties are Minnesota residents. I don't see why long-arm wouldn't apply. Not that it really matters. This isn't a crime by itself under either state's law, in all likelihood.
 
Nick is coping over his showing at the event and still talking about goo...

1746898876364.webp

L | A
 
You say it yourself, but Aaron hurt his ego, and that may never be forgiven.
Well, yeah, I was just kind of pulling it apart (and forgot to give a conclusion sentence :lol: ). It's clear that Nick wholly puts himself as the central point around which the world orbits. Or, in narc terms, no one else is really human or really matters: even if these types can be sentimental, it's always truly all about themselves; they worry (sometimes) about others because of the impact on them. He wasn't standing up for his wife's honor with the RP effort; he was exacting old and new revenge for wounds to himself.

I have taken the warning well to police the allowances made for people in questionable situations.
It's a valuable lesson to learn.
Finally, Nick serves a purpose.

The activity was directed at Minnesota and both parties are Minnesota residents. I don't see why long-arm wouldn't apply. Not that it really matters. This isn't a crime by itself under either state's law, in all likelihood.
Procedure, schmocedure. :biggrin:

Maybe this was all a master plan by Nick to have his daughter date a coke dealer in the future so he won't have to drive so far to get it.
The sad thing is that this is only a slightly hyperbolic ( :optimistic:) concept.


Nick is coping over his showing at the event and still talking about goo...

View attachment 7344785

L | A
He's so stupid.
 
I'm still mad that they haven't been taken as wards of the state.
It would be a much better life than being stuck in this miserable den of perverts, but with the barely-a-slap-on-the-wrist Nick ultimately, received, they still somehow have custody. They are young enough they'd be adopted by prospective parents, but even with risks of living in the orphanages, it can't be much worse than this.
They dont need to be wards of the state as much as they need nick to grow the fuck up and be a good father figure to them in this turbulent shit where their family is now a freakshow and everyone has access to their parents’ nudes and/or mugshot. I think the last thing they want or need is for their father to continue to make a spectacle out of them.
 
Back