US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Trump is serious about cutting off Israel... That's a pretty big deal. Trump is very pro Jew and has been for most of his life. I mean when I watch the apprentice, he's letting em back out of tasks to observe holiday's and getting offended at perceived racism.

The disrespect he received would have to be monumental. He's going to have a lot of problems going forward, but id be lying if I said I wasn't a bit glad. America is beholden to no one.
He was raised and lived in the most Jewish part of the country, so it probably influenced what he thought about Jewish people. I think a lot of it has to do with multiple things over the years. Trump was willing to be friendly with Israel on the condition that Israel was willing to help back, whereas Bibi thought they were just getting aid and wouldn’t have to give anything in return. The big thing was Trump despite everything being done to try and get him into it he didn’t go to war with Iran in his first term and I think that’s why in revenge Bibi became the first world leader to recognize Joe’s fucky win in 2020, since he knew Joe would still support him even with the anti-Israel bloc of the democrats. Then there was the fact that Bibi to my knowledge didn’t help out Trump at all during all of the lawfare bullshit and to my knowledge but I could be wrong on this didn’t even give sympathy for him although he wasn’t in office at the time. Add in the fact that Trump decided to sideline Kushner this time, the gold beeper which was likely supposed to be a threat, and then the whole signal bullshit, yeah there was a lot of bullshit.
 
The disrespect he received would have to be monumental. He's going to have a lot of problems going forward, but id be lying if I said I wasn't a bit glad. America is beholden to no one.
They were trying to use Walz and a few other cronies in the DoD to get the US pulled into a war with Iran. I'd be pissed too.
 
He's saying that if someone plans on shooting you in the face it's a valid proposition to consider shooting yourself in the face first, so that they can't shoot you in the face.

Because people who believe this shit have brain worms and are not rational actors.
You know that the feds have been cracking down on a specific category of porn on the internet for decades, and this didn't somehow create a nightmare regime, right?
 
If you're going to have firearms in a house with children, you need to teach them about respecting firearms. No ifs, ands, or buts.
It's a shame that those children had to go through all that, but I pin the blame squarely on the parents.
That video was infuriating. The number of times the kid is told to drop the gun and he doesn't made me start punching air.

You can see where the issue lies - the fact that that kid's father wasn't on the scene telling him, "You have 3 seconds to drop that gun or I will be stomping you into next week, son" shows where the problem is.

If that had been me, they would have had to taze my father to get him to stop beating me.
 
Last edited:
If Trump is serious about cutting off Israel... That's a pretty big deal.
hes not

how are you guys thinking that trump ending the war with the houthi based on their promises means not supporting Israel? the US was very clear that the Houthi were being attacked as part of an anti piracy operation. internet midwit influencers thought US attacking houthi has something to do with defending israel and now these same midwits think that the US completing its anti piracy operation means that israel is being cucked.

the simple answer is that the piracy operation never had anything to do with israel and all these mouthbreather influencers who told you US was bombing yemen for israel were wrong

They were trying to use Walz and a few other cronies in the DoD to get the US pulled into a war with Iran. I'd be pissed too.
i still cannot find anything solid on that and if you want to punish someone for being subverted by another nation, appointing them to be the US ambassador to the UN is not the way to do it.

re: war with iran

think critically for a second. the same mouthbreather influencers that convinced you that US was bombing Israel for yemen also convinced you that Israel was trying for a war with iran. Bombing Iran doesnt equal a war. Maybe the influencers are lying to you again?
 
You know that the feds have been cracking down on a specific category of porn on the internet for decades, and this didn't somehow create a nightmare regime, right?
You know that system doesn't openly declare it will require a system of verification that by logical necessity must include photo ID to operate, right?
The bill would pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn.
which would require pornographic websites to use age verification technologies to prevent children from being exposed to online porn.
Translation: you have to take a picture of your government ID to access a website.

Which much like 'fourteen days to flatten the curve' will very quickly spiral out into every website everywhere regardless of content on said site.

It'll be the death of pseudonymity/anonymity. To retards who think 'well they know who you are anyways!' is a valid counterargument, they at least have to put in the bare minimum effort to pretend you're worthy of a warrant to weaponize back-end information against you. With this, Shaniqua from the Bureau Of Internet Communications can see every website you've ever been to at a moment's notice without even the hint of the figleaf of 'due process'.
It's incredible that illiterates like yourself can, I assume, manage to operate webforums via text-to-speech alone.

Every single one of these bills has had buried within it the requirement for I.D. to access a website.
Which will be the foot in the door to require it for Internet access in general to 'protect the children'.
Which will absolutely include the forum you love to say racial slurs and post your spicy political takes on, you stupid fuck.

It's astounding how you people never want to talk about alternatives that have an equal opportunity to have an effect but don't involve making it easier than ever for the government to directly connect you to your online activities in a manner akin to how the CCP operates. You skip straight to blowing holes in your own feet.
 
It's incredible that illiterates like yourself can, I assume, manage to operate webforums via text-to-speech alone.

Every single one of these bills has had buried within it the requirement for I.D. to access a website.
Which will be the foot in the door to require it for Internet access in general to 'protect the children'.
Which will absolutely include the forum you love to say racial slurs and post your spicy political takes on, you stupid fuck.

It's astounding how you people never want to talk about alternatives that have an equal opportunity to have an effect but don't involve making it easier than ever for the government to directly connect you to your online activities in a manner akin to how the CCP operates. You skip straight to blowing holes in your own feet.
Why not save us all a lot of time and admit you like lolicon?
 
You know that system doesn't openly declare it will require a system of verification that by logical necessity must include photo ID to operate, right?

I have to show photo ID to buy a beer, a car, a house, and to vote. How is this fundamentally different? Plus, "you go to prison if you obtain this" is a lot more draconian than "you need photo ID to obtain this."

Which will absolutely include the forum you love to say racial slurs and post your spicy political takes on, you stupid fuck.

Racial slurs and spicy political takes are covered by the First Amendment and always has been. Obscenity isn't and never has been.
 
If Trump is serious about cutting off Israel... That's a pretty big deal. Trump is very pro Jew and has been for most of his life. I mean when I watch the apprentice, he's letting em back out of tasks to observe holiday's and getting offended at perceived racism.

The disrespect he received would have to be monumental. He's going to have a lot of problems going forward, but id be lying if I said I wasn't a bit glad. America is beholden to no one.
Whatever happened, I can only imagine someone either taking a threatening tone or losing their temper, and reminding Trump he's still just a goy.
 
It's astounding how you people never want to talk about alternatives that have an equal opportunity to have an effect but don't involve making it easier than ever for the government to directly connect you to your online activities in a manner akin to how the CCP operates. You skip straight to blowing holes in your own feet.
Nigga, I've already given my take on what to do
The only reason porn is allowed in the first place is because it's being wrongly interpreted as "speech" when nobody on earth sees a video of a girl sucking a cock as anything other than what it is, a video designed to illicit sexual arousal in the viewer which is the definition of obscenity.

even if you're gonna go by the standard of the fucking retard on the supreme court who came up with his retarded "I know it when I see it" standard and later the miller test, none of this stuff should be legal:
  1. Would the average person today think the work mainly tries to stir up sexual desire?
  2. Does the work show or describe sexual or bodily functions in an offensive way, according to state law?
  3. Does the whole work have no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
all of this describes internet porn to a T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pallas' Cat
I have to show photo ID to buy a beer, a car, a house, and to vote. How is this fundamentally different? Plus, "you go to prison if you obtain this" is a lot more draconian than "you need photo ID to obtain this."
Do you have to show your ID to drink beer in your own home?
How about to go get some shit out of your car from your driveway?
To get into your house?

No? Right, because you're in the privacy of your own home, presumably?
Racial slurs and spicy political takes are covered by the First Amendment and always has been. Obscenity isn't and never has been.
... are you serious with this shit?
Why not save us all a lot of time and admit you like lolicon?
You people actually do have brain worms holy shit.
every spergout over restricting gooner material
If there was a way to do it that didn't by necessity lead to a legal precedent being set wherein the government could begin demanding that you require showing ID to access websites in general I would be for it. As it stands, that's an impossibility.

Yet no matter how often nor clearly the logic of it is explained to you people, this Patriot Act tier 'so you love the terrorists, huh?' shit is your argument.

No, not wanting to make it even easier for the government to violate my basic constitutional rights without due process is not grounded in anything to do with pornography. Especially given that this isn't going to deter coomers as the entire point is to *check for ID* not *get rid of online porn*.
 
Last edited:
If I had a nickel for every spergout over restricting gooner material that ended with a red strikethrough of shame, I'd become a True & Honest Fan.
I'll make a deal with you: if this retard gets a red strikethrough, I'll gift you T&H. You deserve it anyhow.
You people actually do have brain worms holy shit.
Let's try this another way: are you now or have you ever been a consumer of lolicon?
 
How about to go get some shit out of your car from your driveway?
BUT MUH DRIVEWAY GOONSESSIONS

bro if you are goonin in the driveway I'm going to start to think we need the gooners licensed...

...so we can eventually round them up and send them to the camps.

Disclaimer: this is just a shitpost, not authentic A&N petulance and autism. you air legitimate concerns, even if you come close to acting like a coomer ballwasher a few times and use shitty metaphors.
 
Last edited:
Let's try this another way: are you now or have you ever been a consumer of lolicon?
No you fucking retard. But keep accusing people who do not want to give a foot in the door for the government to demand ID for websites hosting 'harmful content' of being coomers or pedophiles, it makes you look sane, reasonable, and not at all like a reskin of the 'well if you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of the Patriot Act for?' retards from the early oughts.

Understand that when I say this:
Which will be the foot in the door to require it for Internet access in general to 'protect the children'.
Which will absolutely include the forum you love to say racial slurs and post your spicy political takes on, you stupid fuck.
it's with the full understanding that the next thing immediately after that is to start using this foot in the door to crack down on perceived threats to 'unity' such as dissenting opinions, especially of the 'antisemitic' variety. There has been enough popular chatter about how people 'abuse anonymity online to spread hate' from both 'sides of the aisle' for this to be a realistic expectation of what will follow afterward.

Though none of this is going to be anything but lost on you fucking retards because, like leftists who want equally nonsensical policy put into place at the detriment of everyone against all logic, you will ignore any and all things said in favor of hurling accusatory language and proffering asinine non-arguments/emotional appeals to get what you want because your position is not based in anything resembling reason.
 
Back