US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No you fucking retard. But keep accusing people who do not want to give a foot in the door for the government to demand ID for websites hosting 'harmful content' of being coomers or pedophiles, it makes you look sane, reasonable, and not at all like a reskin of the 'well if you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of the Patriot Act for?' retards from the early oughts.

Understand that when I say this:

it's with the full understanding that the next thing immediately after that is to start using this foot in the door to crack down on perceived threats to 'unity' such as dissenting opinions, especially of the 'antisemitic' variety. There has been enough popular chatter about how people 'abuse anonymity online to spread hate' from both 'sides of the aisle' for this to be a realistic expectation of what will follow afterward.

Though none of this is going to be anything but lost on you fucking retards because, like leftists who want equally nonsensical policy put into place at the detriment of everyone against all logic, you will ignore any and all things said in favor of hurling accusatory language and proffering asinine non-arguments/emotional appeals to get what you want because your position is not based in anything resembling reason.
And you're a fucking moron. Free speech is not the same as obscenity in case law. You either aggressively don't want to understand the legal difference because you're too prideful to admit you're a retard, or because you don't want to lose free and easy access to porn.
 
The problem with the whole excuse of "regulating or banning anything leads to a slippery slope of problems" for not doing anything is that we are already on a very slippery slope of problems from certain things not being regulated or banned. Things are actively going wrong and it needs to be fixed and Libertarians complaining about "muh small government" don't offer any solutions, they just want to feed the problems the US has.
People live in groups, so they have a baseline level to ensure the health of the group on a personal and societal level. Anything else is a cope.

I think I have a bias on this, as I was raised by people that weren't exactly ready to be parents. It ended up being a variety of people in my community that didn't have the "job" of raising me but helped me during the worst parts of my childhood. I find the manchild boomer "fuck you got mine" mentality of people like Day of the Cope disgusting because of this. They don't actually want to answer the awkward question of "what if the parent is unfit to parent" and let groomers and psychopaths take the empty slot, which then causes society to rot as a consequence. They enjoy Adult Neverland too much to even think about it.
 
Anyone advocating for Real ID online is fucking retarded. Remember, kids. The thing you advocate for can (and most likely will) be used against you.

View attachment 7346663
If making porn a little harder to access is the downfall of American liberty, I will eat my left shoe.
what's wrong with requiring ID to access porn websites again
It makes it harder for children to access porn.
 
Anyone advocating for Real ID online is fucking retarded. Remember, kids. The thing you advocate for can (and most likely will) be used against you.

View attachment 7346663
Not to mention any government system will be both more expensive and less effective than just solving the problem yourself. It takes all one ONE afternoon to look up how to do some network level blocking for pornography, there are entire guides, resources, open source softwares and step by step plans you can find and download to make it exceedingly hard for anyone on a network you control to get any sort of porn.

If the argument is people won't bother, won't try, or are too stupid for it, I'm not buying it. Parenthood is an obligation, not a option, and I've seen retards who don't know the first thing about the internet set up entire IPTV DVR setups to steal every streaming service they can find, and do so over a weekend.

And the cold truth is that if you are such a shitheel parent that you'll let them live off in the goon cave for 14 hours a day, banning porn isn't going to fix or save that kid. Stop trying to shift responsibility for families onto government, it never goes well.
 
whats wrong with what the pornhub ethicist suggested?

work with manufacturers to implement a flag on every computer to denote if it's owned by a minor or adult, set it by default to minor, any porn sites automatically deny traffic from minor linked computers. You have to manually unflag your computer as an adult computer by pressing a button
 
whats wrong with what the pornhub ethicist suggested?

work with manufacturers to implement a flag on every computer to denote if it's owned by a minor or adult, set it by default to minor, any porn sites automatically deny traffic from minor linked computers. You have to manually unflag your computer as an adult computer by pressing a button
seems a lot harder and more invasive than just asking for ID
 
If governments cared about your kids being exposed to porn, they'd step on the necks of tech companies to add better features that easily let parents restrict what sites their kids can and can not use without having to use third-party services. But they don't do that. Because it's not about "protecting the kids". It's about being able to kick your door in an three AM because you said "fuck niggers" on some random website.
 
And the cold truth is that if you are such a shitheel parent that you'll let them live off in the goon cave for 14 hours a day, banning porn isn't going to fix or save that kid. Stop trying to shift responsibility for families onto government, it never goes well.

And this is the main fucking issue I have with idiots advocating for such bullshit regulations. They're too stupid to realize that this shit WILL be turned against them the moment they step out of line. We've seen this shit time and time again.

"DADDY GOBMENT SAVE US FROM OURSELVES".
 
If governments cared about your kids being exposed to porn, they'd step on the necks of tech companies to add better features that easily let parents restrict what sites their kids can and can not use without having to use third-party services. But they don't do that. Because it's not about "protecting the kids". It's about being able to kick your door in an three AM because you said "fuck niggers" on some random website.
no nigga i think adding ID checks on porn sites is about protecting children are you going around saying fuck niggers on porn websites or what
 
what about semi porn sites ie reddit which has huge porn subreddits

are you gonna trust reddit with your ID
You're assuming anyone here would use reddit to begin with.
no nigga i think adding ID checks on porn sites is about protecting children are you going around saying fuck niggers on porn websites or what
Than you're retarded.
But your signup date was already proof.
 
Back