If someone suddenly got a hold of the entirety of Kiwifarms, including account information, it would be difficult to tie this account to me personally. You are basically a "well the government knows everything so no harm in giving them more" type. In some parts of the internet they call people like you "nigger cattle."
Schizotheory but I believe the Tor network has gotten faster because governments and other data oriented institutions have set up favored nodes to make it easier to unravel the traffic and it's no longer mostly comprised of mostly volunteers and their personal servers. I think it's still far more effective for privacy and anonymity than almost everything else.
The government might be watching therefor you shouldn't care about a law that makes sure they definitely are.
@Hunter Hearst Helmsley is someone we can all love. And that other HHH is actually okay sometimes, too.
the part that comes right after that that you conveniently left out was "would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest" which in layman's terms means if it's porn.
Ignoring the rise of home schooling, part of being a parent is keeping tabs on what your child is doing when they're not around.
There are people who believe Michelangelo's David to be pornographic.
so you never lied to your parents as a kid?
But the people who fear monger about the ID for porn don't offer any solutions, just sci fi tales of the future where the internet requires an ID just to make a simple google search. It just seems unreasonable to me. It would be one thing if someone had any idea of an alternative to the ID requirement for porn but most of the time the people arguing against it are clearly just seething that their porn will be harder to access.
We do.
Why would a child want to lie to their parents?
I love you fatpacks!
based off the books i read about it, it was primarily due to the church's practice of polygamy and the threat of Mormons being more loyal to the Church than to the usa. im not a scholar ofc.
were you born an adult or something
It's far too vague, and SCOTUS has waffled back and forth on how strictly it was meant to be interpreted for decades. Whether something is "obscene" in their view practically comes down to whether they had a good bowel movement that morning. The standard as defined is useless.
Jesus wept, the fucking rustfags have infiltrated everything, haven't they? Do you honestly expect people involved in the premier troon language are going to possibly resist the urge to put tracers of some kind into TOR for certain "naughty places" (like KF, not for anything like CSAM, which they want to continue accessing)?
Yes. I came out of the womb wearing a three piece suit, a resume with 12 years of experience, and smoking a corncob pipe.
I think it's easy to say "well porn is bad so who cares if the gooners have to dox themselves to goon" but it sets a precedent of the government forcing ID requirements to access a site. Purchasing prohibited items is requiring ID to access the items, not the sites. And let's be real, the law is ineffective, if anyone wants to get around it then they will use a VPN. Kids can find free VPNs without issue, I know I did and I used them in school to play games, students were always ahead of the IT department, even if it meant using basically malware to play the shittiest games imaginable. Gooners will do the same.
There was much more going on. The Mormon cult was founded by an 19th century version of Chris Chan. A proto lolcow cult uprising literally occurred. And an official declaration of insurrection and disloyalty has never been rescinded by the "church."
For real though we have had three different tests since the foundation of the country for what qualifies as Obscenity and we still haven't found one that produces relatively predictable results at trial. One of the more interesting arguments for the unconstitutionality of Obscenity laws is that it's often not even possible for the defendant to know if they are guilty and that they therefore can not prepare an adequate defense.
