We do.
Why would a child want to lie to their parents?
I love you fatpacks!
based off the books i read about it, it was primarily due to the church's practice of polygamy and the threat of Mormons being more loyal to the Church than to the usa. im not a scholar ofc.
were you born an adult or something
It's far too vague, and SCOTUS has waffled back and forth on how strictly it was meant to be interpreted for decades. Whether something is "obscene" in their view practically comes down to whether they had a good bowel movement that morning. The standard as defined is useless.
Jesus wept, the fucking rustfags have infiltrated everything, haven't they? Do you honestly expect people involved in the premier troon language are going to possibly resist the urge to put tracers of some kind into TOR for certain "naughty places" (like KF, not for anything like CSAM, which they want to continue accessing)?
Yes. I came out of the womb wearing a three piece suit, a resume with 12 years of experience, and smoking a corncob pipe.
I think it's easy to say "well porn is bad so who cares if the gooners have to dox themselves to goon" but it sets a precedent of the government forcing ID requirements to access a site. Purchasing prohibited items is requiring ID to access the items, not the sites. And let's be real, the law is ineffective, if anyone wants to get around it then they will use a VPN. Kids can find free VPNs without issue, I know I did and I used them in school to play games, students were always ahead of the IT department, even if it meant using basically malware to play the shittiest games imaginable. Gooners will do the same.
There was much more going on. The Mormon cult was founded by an 19th century version of Chris Chan. A proto lolcow cult uprising literally occurred. And an official declaration of insurrection and disloyalty has never been rescinded by the "church."
For real though we have had three different tests since the foundation of the country for what qualifies as Obscenity and we still haven't found one that produces relatively predictable results at trial. One of the more interesting arguments for the unconstitutionality of Obscenity laws is that it's often not even possible for the defendant to know if they are guilty and that they therefore can not prepare an adequate defense.
You dont really have to go that far.
No. The Mormons actively fought against the United States. They thought that they could form a new zion out in the territories of the USA secured from France and Mexico.
Its open source. You can look at the code. If trannies really put shitty code in, you have the ability to fork it
Remind me again what's wrong with forking and improving the existing implementation? Sounds like the standard "ooooh new toy let's rewrite for no reason!" bullshit rustoids are hung up on.
The entire Internet isn't porn. Euros already blocked off everything not a 5-eyes fed honeypot over speech.
That argument usually leads to the coomer talking about medical anatomical figures being porn. At that point they just need to be shot because they're on the verge of becoming a serial killer.
"because 1 person thinks a statue is porn that means there's no consensus on what porn is whatsoever" actual retard cope and not the standard of the policy. if you show 99% of porn videos to 99% of people there will be no question if they're porn.
do the majority of people view it as pornography? Does it actually show sex? outside of sexual arousal Is it otherwise useless?
that seems like a retarded argument and can be applied to many crimes.
The whole i know it when i see it.
