It's not about the good of porn, it's about the bad of what that kind of legislation means. When the government is able to restrict internet access based on purely partisan morality you're opening the door to that same standard being applied when those same libs you're trying so hard to own are in power and you can be sure they're going to do the same thing to you. When they petition for mandatory government IDs to access some things on the internet, it's not long before that gets expanded to include more and more content. Governments do not give up or restrict their power, they always expand and abuse it.
Last time he sperged out about this, it turned out that the “constituent” he was complaining about Massie refusing to meet was a lobbyist who didn’t even live in his district and had attacked him in the past.I was about to go to sleep. But then suddenly it occurred to me…
There are Jews in Massie’s district?! Appalachian Jews from rural Kentucky? I need to see this before I die
WHY IS YOUR TEXT TINY
Okay, look, I'll even admit this whole thing is correct. You are absolutely right on a technical level.
Being illogical is not the same as being a retard. Even retards are capable, if slowly, of following logic.
It does not 'look a certain way if not viewed from a technical level', it merely isn't unless you're a bad-faith actor and it is not different in substance from saying 'it looks like you're a closeted fag if you don't want gay marriage'.
Is in conflict with:
so pick one and stick with it if you want to continue this discussion. As it's just an extension of the paraconsistency you attempted to leverage to validate the viewpoint that there 'is a kernel of truth to it more often than not' in the first place.
Then how do you respond to people pointing out there are ways to verify identity without porn sites even having the data? Or will you shift the goalposts again?
Some of my posts are intentionally a little inflammatory and that was one of them. This is the Thunderdome, after all. My real, not-trying-to-be-cheeky response is here and, so far, no one's really responded to it or my points within. Take it however you like. I do not believe that pornography is the canary in the coal mine for free speech. When people say "requiring identification for online porn sites is a slippery slope to overbearing government control," but say nothing about requiring identification to do everything else, it makes me think they are either knee-jerk reacting to anything government, annoyed that their personal porn consumption will be inconvenienced, or - at the very worst - want kids to easily access pornography.
Internet regulations can already be abused dipshit.
For fucks sake man, that’s like finding out Santa isn’t real. Very disappointing. Could you imagine?
Dont you get it? Its because setting up parental controls and securing your network is too hard, too much time. Parents are quick to point out the societal rot but are too lazy and willfully ignorant or straight up retarded to do their one job, parent their own kids. Theyd rather have the same government who was fine with giving puberty blockers to kids to parent their own children. The boot licking is nauseating
I don't really follow a ton of cows to see that, mostly political ones. I think there were more than a few cases where people making pro-child porn arguments such as Vaush and Destiny were exposed as outright degenerates, but I'd argue that CP is indefensible in any form anyway.
I certainly did not say it was you illiterate fucking retard.
Because it's on the internet. That's the big thing.
But, there has been quite a bit of "discussion" about most of those points. Personally, I think the boot coming down on us all is absolutely inevitable, anyways, and no amount of REEEEEing here or anywhere else is going to do anything about it. But I don't have to like it. And I don't have to like gooners, either.
It would wipe for one thing the necessity of a warrant to weaponize your data against you and make it normalized for the government to have the capacity to, say, attach an AI to search with keyword detection for words like 'nigger' in any and all posts that are now attached to your real name with not even the figleaf of due process between you and suddenly, mysteriously, getting audited by the IRS every two years.
Wanna makes jews seethe eternally? One lone goy figured out how with this one simple trick!
While I do agree with you, the social decay caused by porn is exponentially faster and looks like it is worse than what the government can do in that time. The boogeyman that the "otherside is gonna do it to you if you do it", in reality, is fake and gay. They do this kinda stuff already and the nudges like this are less meaningful than you'd think. Because of that it does come down to the "good" of things in the end
So because the risk adverse tech companies could do something we as a society should be paralyzed in fear and just not do anything? Isn't that worse than trying to stand up for something and being wrong?
