Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Eugh. You have a husband. We have a word for that.

Though, hypocritically, I've been using "partner" among unknowns. If a woman hears me say "boyfr-" within 20 yards there's an 80% chance I'll get squealing and "OMG I ALWAYS WANTED ONE OF YOU AS A BESTIE!!!1!".

Once upon a wasted twenties, Young Sneed worked retail. Getting off of work at 9 pm but wanting decent food, and it being the aughts, subway was still alright. They even still had brown mustard. You need to be polite ordering a BMT before closing, so you get to know your sandwich artist.

Mine was a faggot. Black (not a nigger, but I suppose he's a niggerfaggot) with a rhinestone belt like all the girls at the time, and those weird pastel colored low rise pants. Funny. Knew how to handle meat, go figure.

One time he got going about women going to gay clubs/bars "to feel safe" then to annoy the fuck out of gay men who only wanted other men. I wish so bad I remembered it verbatim, but it's been nearly 20 years.

Anyway, tie an onion to your belt and listen to faggots: women are always women.
 
That brings an insight to women calling people gay and faggy if they don't swoon for them. Maybe they know too much.
Fag hags exploded in popularity with shows like Will and Grace. Women assume gays want to be their pet lapdogs and if they don’t, then they just hate women. Gays are just fashion accessories.
One time he got going about women going to gay clubs/bars "to feel safe" then to annoy the fuck out of gay men who only wanted other men. I wish so bad I remembered it verbatim, but it's been nearly 20 years.
Women can’t imagine not being the center of attention. Whenever women complain about gays, it leads back to that. If you don’t want to fuck them, you are still expected to be subservient to their desires.
 
Anyway, tie an onion to your belt and listen to faggots: women are always women.
Women without the appeal of sex are just some of the most worthless people alive. Their labor will never be equivalent to a man's when it comes to actual value, especially with all the literal nothing positions they take up. All of their money is spent on frivolous things they don't actually need, a surprising number of which is to look better than they actually are. Career women could die out overnight and society would actually be better for it because then there are less competition for wages and a use for the only thing of value women can provide: children.

Schopenhauer and Nightingale were brutally right.
 
Women without the appeal of sex are just some of the most worthless people alive. Their labor will never be equivalent to a man's when it comes to actual value, especially with all the literal nothing positions they take up. All of their money is spent on frivolous things they don't actually need, a surprising number of which is to look better than they actually are. Career women could die out overnight and society would actually be better for it because then there are less competition for wages and a use for the only thing of value women can provide: children.

Schopenhauer and Nightingale were brutally right.
Speaking of Arthur Schopenhauer, did he ever tell his mother to "STFU"? Or was that letter that she supposedly sent to him a fake?
 
Women have such a peculiar voice when they write posts on the internet. And when they're trying to argue or act snarky, it's the absolute worst. While men have their own quirks when doing the same things, women arguments are so absolutely insufferable. Not all of them, but if you're reading an online argument, there are just some things that scream that she's a woman just by the way she posts. Not just on a normalfag place like Twitter or Reddit, but even on places like the Farms or 4chan. Have you ever read through a thread with some kind of disagreement and you can tell one of them is a woman just based on how they argue? Because their very specific way of posting is irritating to the highest degree.


Women don't feel the need to be truthful, women are really passive and indirect with everything they do and say, women generally have a hard time understanding the struggles of life, women have an incredibly hard time with measurements and generalities and just defer to whatever they feel about something, women don't understand what is fair and isn't fair, and women aren't really serious thinkers to begin with. Their communication wont have the sharpness of mens and be mostly focused on getting the emotional reaction they want.
 
Last edited:
This is one of the things I hate the most about them: they fucking love plausible deniability. You should always, always trust your gut instinct over the words of a woman.
This is part of the reason women won't ever, ever, ever, ever, ever make the first move in dating situations. Even if you're a 0.00001% chad you're still going to have to do all the work until she 'surrenders'.
 
muh dependency.webp

It must be studied how women can take being coddled, protected, and absolved of any (dangerous) responsibilities for existing, then frame it as "oppression".
 
I remember back when women bothered to pitch feminism to men, there was an argument that a woman would never make a false rape charge because the process was so horrible for her. A lawyer would call her a slut in court, her whole sex life would be on display, and she'd probably lose. This was shortened to a sarcastic, "What was she wearing?" when anyone doubted a woman.

Look how far we've come since. A woman can make a successful claim against a man, with no evidence, for a 'crime' that happened three decades ago (Jean Carrol v. Trump). A woman can willingly enter into a sexual relationship with a guy, continue it past the supposed 'crime', sign an NDA for $200,000+, then violate the NDA and make a successful claim against a guy (Wallner vs. Gaiman). A woman can accuse a guy, directly contradict herself, then when the case is settled with no admission of wrongdoing you still have the celebrity sphere treating him like a criminal (Kesha vs. Dr. Luke). A guy can be found not guilty and still have his whole life cancelled (Justin Roiland). A woman can anonymously accuse a guy without even showing her face or proving she's a woman, and force the guy into exile (Virgil Texas).

A guy can be cancelled because he used his celebrity status to get women to send him nudes on Snapchat (Harry Sisson). "I thought I was your only groupie!" Give me a fucking break. It's truly annoying how many double standards women benefit from while telling you they're oppressed.
 
View attachment 7356981
It must be studied how women can take being coddled, protected, and absolved of any (dangerous) responsibilities for existing, then frame it as "oppression".
I don't even know what animu this is from but the original clip on X has thousands of replies from women seething, calling it rape, and ranting about incels.

It's probability one of the more revealing and sad things I've seen on the internet lately.
 
I really hate how it's basically impossible to find a woman on the internet who's not left wing outside of Facebook boomers and the huge personalities on YT. It's very easy to find men on all sides of the political aisle on any forum. But why the fuck is it so hard to find women who aren't crazy leftists on the internet? And keep in mind, you'll find men of all political stripes complaining about women both on here and elsewhere. They just express it differently depending on their beliefs. But every single woman has the exact same leftist, feminist complaints about men.

I really hate how easily they act like sheep.
 
Got another video about dating apps pushed in my feed. Same shit as the last one I posted here - regular looking dude gets zero results even on the paid version.
Imagine paying $100s to have your self-esteem destroyed :story: Bro isn't even bad looking, these apps are messed up.
 
Nearly all the women in my PhD program are SAHMs now.
That reminds me of how a Japanese medical school discriminated against women by lowering their scores.
A report into the university's enrollment policy released that day by a group of lawyers said the medical school did so because female physicians, "as they get older, engage in decreased activities as doctors."

Knowledgeable sources have said that the university set a female student intake ceiling of about 30 percent, and did so as it believed producing a higher percentage of female doctors would lead to a doctor shortage at affiliated hospitals because female doctors tend to resign or take long periods of leave after giving birth.
The reasoning is extremely sound though, all the time and resources that would be put into training these women would be wasted as they would prefer to raise their kids than work all day once they have kids. I wonder if any other sector struggles with a similar issue.
 
That reminds me of how a Japanese medical school discriminated against women by lowering their scores.

The reasoning is extremely sound though, all the time and resources that would be put into training these women would be wasted as they would prefer to raise their kids than work all day once they have kids. I wonder if any other sector struggles with a similar issue.

Well yeah, that's what sexism is, it's using sound reasoning when evaluating whether or not women should be in a particular role in society.
 
Back