Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 54 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 72 16.1%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 150 33.6%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 105 23.5%

  • Total voters
    447
I think Josh's alogs desperately want to be seen as super serious people who should be taken super seriously, regardless of how many cocks and testicles they have sliced off of themselves. If Liz Fong-Jones starts rubbing shoulders with someone like Greer they would have a really hard time arguing they are not lolcows, and I doubt retards like Greer could keep the secret very long if Consent Accident tried to play behind-the-curtain puppetmaster.
Not going to happen.

Russ once had legal help, he also had actual friends. Over the years he's managed to alienate and otherwise cut ties with every friend, co-worker, and family member he ever had. He's so convinced of his perceived knowledge and greatness that he would never "rub shoulders" with anyone, ever again. Re-read the first 100 pages of this thread and you'll see how he cut ties with people one by one, until he was alone.

@The Great Citracett is more succinct-

 
Not going to happen.

Russ once had legal help, he also had actual friends. Over the years he's managed to alienate and otherwise cut ties with every friend, co-worker, and family member he ever had. He's so convinced of his perceived knowledge and greatness that he would never "rub shoulders" with anyone, ever again. Re-read the first 100 pages of this thread and you'll see how he cut ties with people one by one, until he was alone.

@The Great Citracett is more succinct-

I'm aware.
 
I’m genuinely surprised none of Josh’s many alogs have taken RG under xir wing and helped him avoid making so many disastrous errors.
Josh's gaylawgs wouldn't be of much use because most are even dumber than Russ and generally only good at dogpiling. They've only had success at sabotaging the Farms and Josh's revenue streams because they incessantly spam these places until they get annoyed enough to submit.
 
I think Josh's alogs desperately want to be seen as super serious people who should be taken super seriously, regardless of how many cocks and testicles they have sliced off of themselves. If Liz Fong-Jones starts rubbing shoulders with someone like Greer they would have a really hard time arguing they are not lolcows, and I doubt retards like Greer could keep the secret very long if Consent Accident tried to play behind-the-curtain puppetmaster.
I'm pretty sure LFJ is the only 'big time' lolcow enemy Null has left in any case. There are a lot of people who hate him but most of them are about as consequential as a wet fart. Vordrak would like to think he's big time but basically people rarely remember he exists anymore. And Donny Long is about to spend the rest of his life in jail.
 
But enough about DSP.

I think it's a mistake that IFP means you don't pay anything at all to file a lawsuit. Four hundred smackers is a lot for a poorfag like Russ me, so IFP can reduce it by 80% or whatever, that seems reasonable to me. After all, it's been proven that people will do shit they don't care about or even want to do if it's free, but if you charge them a nominal fee, like a quarter or even a nickel, substantially fewer people will do it. Think of how many times you were just about to do something you thought was free and then found it wasn't, and didn't, even if the cost was negligible. When it comes to lolsuits, you're coming to the government and asking it to use its power to right some grave injustice done against you, something so grave you simply must spend hours of your time writing up documents and telling people about it at length. If you aren't willing to dip into your hooker Starbucks latte fund to cough up $50 to file your case, perhaps it's not important enough for a bunch of legal bigwigs to spend tax dollars on.
But muh write to undress greevances and sheeeeit.
 
The first week post-conference call begins.

Anyone think we are going to see plightsfiling from Russ in the next couple of days, or that he was intimidated by the shit kicking he took from Judge Bennett?

I'm thinking an appeal to the 10th circuit is forthcoming, under totally incorrect premises, hoping his bigger court daddy will come to his rescue as they have before. I don't think it will come out the way he hopes this time, but who the fuck knows with the 10th.
 
I’m genuinely surprised none of Josh’s many alogs have taken RG under xir wing and helped him avoid making so many disastrous errors.
As uh, funny as it would be to finally have them form Autism Voltron, it’s never going to happen. Part of the reason we document anyone is their fundamental inability to just plain get along with other people. Not only would Russ not want to share or cede his thin veneer of feeling like he’s marginally in control, but anyone else involved would likewise have no ability to meaningfully cooperate with anyone else. Just part of what makes them lolcows.
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Screenshot 2025-05-12 172510.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-12 172521.webp


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
View attachment 7352512
View attachment 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
Except for the fact that, as we all know [and as both Russtard and The Court should know], "the material" is not and never has been posted to this website, but to a Google Drive.

The only "material" posted here has been a link to said Drive.

Page 6.

[P.S., Russtard has made no effort - to my knowledge; correct me if I'm wrong - to have the Google Drive containing "the material" terminated.]
 
If there's no plight-splaining and no response to the motion to dismiss I think it's as good as him throwing the towel in.
I think it's funny that the one place where he could make a well thought out, well researched, well worded argument would do wonders for his case is the one place he refuses to do it.
Rather, convincing rural Nevada that allowing him to own and operate brothels or butting in on sex trafficking issues is his Iwo Jima.
So much wasted time and energy. Trying to convince a rock to become water would produce better results.
 
[P.S., Russtard has made no effort - to my knowledge; correct me if I'm wrong - to have the Google Drive containing "the material" terminated.]
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
Per his own words, that is because they would have complied and made the lawsuit moot. Per his own words, he is suing because Null made fun of him
View attachment 7224888
 
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong, but does that not constitute.... what's the term the kiddies are using nowadays? "Failure to mitigate"?
 
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
"In a lawsuit against KiwiFarms" may have held appeal for some at one point. "Asked Google to remove copyrighted material" just don't hit the same.
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
View attachment 7352512
View attachment 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
On one hand this could fuck over Sony and save the Internet. On the other it could get obliterated, as it never should have existed to begin with. Interesting.
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
View attachment 7352512
View attachment 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
The Kiwi Farms Saves the "Capital-I" Internet, Again!: or "How God Used a Federal Court's Retardation to Fuck Over The Copyrightists via Divine Orchestration" - A book by Gueselle Reer
 
Back