Culture ‘Everybody’s Replaceable’: The New Ways Bosses Talk About Workers - Step it up, stop complaining—and make way for AI. CEOs are no longer lauding employees as the talent.


Illustration: Daisy Korpics/WSJ, iStock, Pixelsquid

By Chip Cutter
May 11, 2025 11:00 pm ET

Corporate America’s long-running war for talent sounds more like a war on the talent these days.

Not long ago, bosses routinely praised workers as their most prized asset, so much that some hoarded new hires before having enough for them to do. Today, with a giant question mark hanging over the economy, executives are pulling no punches in saying employees need to work harder, complain less and be glad they still have jobs.

“Work-life balance is your problem,” Emma Grede, co-founder of the shapewear company Skims and CEO of clothing label Good American, said this month. After recently cutting more than a 1,000 jobs, Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol said remaining corporate staff needed to step it up and “own whether or not this place grows.” JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, in a profanity-laced internal meeting, told employees lamenting a return-to-work mandate that he didn’t care.

“I’ve had it with this kind of stuff,” he said. “I’ve been working seven days a week since Covid, and I come in, and—where is everybody else?”

The shift in tone marks a shift in power now that companies are shrinking their white-collar staff. With jobs harder to find, many workers are seeing perks disappear and their grievances ignored.

im-11595565.webp
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg News

The latest episode happened at a contentious all-hands at Uber last month. The company had just changed the requirements to get a monthlong paid sabbatical to eight years of working at the ride-hail giant, from five years. A decision to require people to work at least three instead of two days in the office also drew complaints. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi suggested those unhappy with the changes deal with it.

“We recognize some of these changes are going to be unpopular,” he said in comments originally reported by CNBC. “This is a risk we decided to take.”

How much more license do bosses have to talk tough to staff? Take the outrage in 2023 when the head of furniture company MillerKnoll told staffers worried about bonuses to “leave pity city.” That comment, made in a video call, immediately went viral, sparking days of headlines and worker backlash. CEO Andi Owen quickly apologized, and said her comments were insensitive.

After the Uber town hall, on the other hand, Chief People Officer Nikki Krishnamurthy issued a memo saying the company would speak with some staff for being disrespectful in voicing their displeasure.

Workers like Donnie Donselman, who recently worked for a technology-services firm, can sense the new power dynamic. As he applies for new tech jobs, the 47-year-old has noticed that many companies now want applicants to do so many tasks, a position is essentially “three jobs” in one.

im-76424449.webp
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi recently said some of the changes implemented by the company will be unpopular with employees. Photo: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg News

“They want it all,” he said.

In his job search, he tries to suss out the culture of a company because he has noticed the tough-talk language from CEOs and finds it worrisome. “All you’re doing is putting fear in people, and you’re not going to get good results from that,” said Donselman, who lives near Lexington, Ky.

Behind CEOs’ more brusque tone lies a disconnect between employees and executives, said Michael McCutcheon, an adjunct professor in applied psychology at New York University and an executive coach.

Some employees are operating like it is “still 2021,” when they could name their demands because of labor shortages and a surge in worker resignations, he said. Now bosses face a global trade war and sinking consumer confidence and feel they must ask more of employees to survive.

“This is a matter of pragmatism,” McCutcheon said.

President Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk have helped set the more-aggressive tone in their bid to slash the federal workforce.

“Everybody’s replaceable,” as Trump put it shortly after the inauguration. Musk called his February demand that federal workers email what they accomplished that past week a “pulse check” to prove they did any work.

im-65081242.webp
Tobias Lütke told Shopify employees that the company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job. Photo: Dustin Chambers/Bloomberg News

Advances in generative AI also play a role. Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke recently told employees that the e-commerce company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job. Other business leaders are warning their staff to adopt more AI—or else.

“AI is coming for your jobs. Heck, it’s coming for my job too. This is a wake-up call,” Micha Kaufman, CEO of the freelance marketplace Fiverr, wrote in a staff memo last month. Those “who will not wake up and understand the new reality fast are, unfortunately, doomed.”

Employees will someday have their moment in the sun again, said Charles A. O’Reilly, a professor of management at Stanford.

“When the market turns around, and job opportunities are plentiful, then CEOs will start to talk more about how important employees are, and employees will take advantage of it, ” he said.

For now, though, some executives say fewer, not more corporate staff, will help them run more efficiently. On Thursday, Match Group, which runs dating apps Hinge and Tinder, became the latest company to say it planned to thin its managerial ranks in sweeping layoffs. About one in five managers will be cut, and Match’s CEO, Spencer Rascoff, told investors the company is stepping up efforts to cut costs and rewire the organization to focus on its products.

“We lit a fire under the team here,” Rascoff said.

Source (Archive)
 
On one hand, a ton of "White Collar" employees are worse than useless and there's a lot of fat to be cut.

On the other hand... I don't think they realize how much the average customer is starting to hate AI.

A friend who works in sales says that the second pretty much any customer gets a whiff of AI, they're gone. It's to the point where they had to rename their Live-Chat Bot to "Live-Chat Answering Service" and have it reassure Customers that it's just getting info to give to a real person.

It doesn't matter if it's a Live-Chat Bot, AI-generated advertising, or AI-enhanced product art. Customers are getting really good at sensing it. And the second they do, it sets off alarms.

When he was asking customers about it, he said pretty much the unanimousresponse was: "If these assholes can't even be bothered to do their own advertising and handle their own customer service, why should I think they'd give a shit about me?"
 
On one hand, a ton of "White Collar" employees are worse than useless and there's a lot of fat to be cut.
This is a management issue, not an employee issue. It is nearly impossible to fire a useless person in most workplaces for a variety of reasons. Coincidentally, this is also why it's so hard to find a new job. An employer wants to be sure you're not just more dead weight before giving you a shot. Turns out there's not really a good way of checking to see if anyone's a lazy useless fuck without actually watching them work for a while.

We'd all be way better off if competent workers were kept on board with generous raises and incompetent workers were either fired or kept at low wages until they quit. Unfortunately, it seems the most useless people have the habit of acquiring the biggest paychecks while they leech off of more useful people.
 
They actually are the nobility of the Washington Empire, Hubris is the word for this mess.
Even they ain't the true nobility, as they did some minimal work with their hands during their lives. The real nobility are the faggots who're descendants of the Mayflower assboles. Old world transplanted inbred blue blood aristocracy who inherited their wealth and power. Exceptions to the old world, old money are the political dynasties who got their hands dirty acquiring their power and wealth through the govt. Who get a pass on being filthy un-inbred commoners cause they know how to. have the willingness and done the killings to get their spot on the totem pole.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, just get out of there. Small and medium-sized businesses are hurting for good people at all levels and you'll be treated with a lot more dignity and respect in almost all cases.

You'll have to swallow your pride and accept you won't have the "prestige" of the former big-name employer that treated you like shit, but who has their resume engraved on their headstone? I did this and it was the best decision I ever made.
That's literally what I did. Walked away from a job because I was getting task upon task stacked on me with no recognition and no extra pay. Found a similar job, at a small company doing the same thing, for more money (cha-ching) and same benefits.
 
Unfortunately, it seems the most useless people have the habit of acquiring the biggest paychecks while they leech off of more useful people.
there are activist lawyers who love to sue employers on behalf of incompetent employees and there are activist judges who love to rule in favor of incompetent employees. everyone gets a raise and incompetent people never get fired. lay offs are the best way to fire retards without too much hassle
 
......"new"?
Yeah, this isn't new. I applied to work at a fast food joint maybe 8 years ago and during the interview, they seriously said employees were replaceable. Unprompted.

I didn't get the job, but didn't want it at that point, either. I later found out there were some weird drama issues at that location, which in hindsight makes sense if they're telling outsiders they basically don't give a shit about their employees.

I get it. I get the idea that employees are replaceable, and customers aren't, but you probably shouldn't be telling people that before you've even hired them. It puts them on notice they're in a potentially hostile environment.
 
Last edited:
At the last company I was at, the executives were a pile of idiots who ran it right into the ground by not closing stores that were losing money hand over fist, among other things. Not only would replacing them all with letting ChatGPT make all the corporate decisions have saved millions in their paychecks, it would've made smarter decisions as well.
This sounds familiar. The execs wanted to chase bigger sales but had no understanding about what that would do to the sales cycle. When their new pricing scheme inevitably started losing them customers (as they had priced themselves out of being competitive with smaller customers), they refused to budge on their new model. As a result, their pool of prospective customers shrunk, and each deal took far longer to close. They were losing money hand over fist and not understanding why a $100K deal was harder to close than a $10K deal. Line go down - that's bad! But surely it's the children who are wrong.
 
But AI is fucking garbage
You aren't wrong, but I've dealt with lots of executives over the years in my line of work, and most of them are unfathomably retarded. They make Trump look like the 4D chess genius the most MAGA person ever believes him to be. Imagine Shaneequa at the DMV. That dull-eyed look that is barely coherent of the existence of a wider reality. Take her, tell her she's in charge of a big company and will make millions a year for it, and you will on the whole wind up with something that isn't particularly different from what you will actually find in the C suite of a company. When, a week later, Shaneequa is already a petty tyrant trying to fire people because her sandwich order was wrong and making random proclamations that increase the load on the people doing the actual work and tanks the place's productivity, you have the same outcome as you'd get from any other CEO you'd care to name.
 
I know I'm not the first to say it but executive teams are far and away the most obvious candidate for replacement. They consume massive amounts of company resources compared to any employee, and their entire job is to consume information and fit it into a strategic vision; an LLM consumes information better than any human, and while it doesn't have any strategic vision, it's obvious enough that few executives do either; the hallucinations of a machine would likely provide equal or greater value
 
im-65081242.webp
Tobias Lütke told Shopify employees that the company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job
Man all these Nu-Industry Startup CEOs look the same - like terminally indoors bugpeople without a glint of humanity in their cold, glassy gazes.

Take them all out back and shoot them in the head. If you don't make something I can touch with my hands - you aren't a useful productive member of society.

Take all the bankers and usurers and hedge fund managers out back and do the same with them too.

Every year that goes by, I can empathize more and more with the Communist revolutionary desire to just fucking murder every single useless fatcat making life worse for the common man.
 
Back