Culture ‘Everybody’s Replaceable’: The New Ways Bosses Talk About Workers - Step it up, stop complaining—and make way for AI. CEOs are no longer lauding employees as the talent.


Illustration: Daisy Korpics/WSJ, iStock, Pixelsquid

By Chip Cutter
May 11, 2025 11:00 pm ET

Corporate America’s long-running war for talent sounds more like a war on the talent these days.

Not long ago, bosses routinely praised workers as their most prized asset, so much that some hoarded new hires before having enough for them to do. Today, with a giant question mark hanging over the economy, executives are pulling no punches in saying employees need to work harder, complain less and be glad they still have jobs.

“Work-life balance is your problem,” Emma Grede, co-founder of the shapewear company Skims and CEO of clothing label Good American, said this month. After recently cutting more than a 1,000 jobs, Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol said remaining corporate staff needed to step it up and “own whether or not this place grows.” JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, in a profanity-laced internal meeting, told employees lamenting a return-to-work mandate that he didn’t care.

“I’ve had it with this kind of stuff,” he said. “I’ve been working seven days a week since Covid, and I come in, and—where is everybody else?”

The shift in tone marks a shift in power now that companies are shrinking their white-collar staff. With jobs harder to find, many workers are seeing perks disappear and their grievances ignored.

im-11595565.webp
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg News

The latest episode happened at a contentious all-hands at Uber last month. The company had just changed the requirements to get a monthlong paid sabbatical to eight years of working at the ride-hail giant, from five years. A decision to require people to work at least three instead of two days in the office also drew complaints. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi suggested those unhappy with the changes deal with it.

“We recognize some of these changes are going to be unpopular,” he said in comments originally reported by CNBC. “This is a risk we decided to take.”

How much more license do bosses have to talk tough to staff? Take the outrage in 2023 when the head of furniture company MillerKnoll told staffers worried about bonuses to “leave pity city.” That comment, made in a video call, immediately went viral, sparking days of headlines and worker backlash. CEO Andi Owen quickly apologized, and said her comments were insensitive.

After the Uber town hall, on the other hand, Chief People Officer Nikki Krishnamurthy issued a memo saying the company would speak with some staff for being disrespectful in voicing their displeasure.

Workers like Donnie Donselman, who recently worked for a technology-services firm, can sense the new power dynamic. As he applies for new tech jobs, the 47-year-old has noticed that many companies now want applicants to do so many tasks, a position is essentially “three jobs” in one.

im-76424449.webp
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi recently said some of the changes implemented by the company will be unpopular with employees. Photo: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg News

“They want it all,” he said.

In his job search, he tries to suss out the culture of a company because he has noticed the tough-talk language from CEOs and finds it worrisome. “All you’re doing is putting fear in people, and you’re not going to get good results from that,” said Donselman, who lives near Lexington, Ky.

Behind CEOs’ more brusque tone lies a disconnect between employees and executives, said Michael McCutcheon, an adjunct professor in applied psychology at New York University and an executive coach.

Some employees are operating like it is “still 2021,” when they could name their demands because of labor shortages and a surge in worker resignations, he said. Now bosses face a global trade war and sinking consumer confidence and feel they must ask more of employees to survive.

“This is a matter of pragmatism,” McCutcheon said.

President Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk have helped set the more-aggressive tone in their bid to slash the federal workforce.

“Everybody’s replaceable,” as Trump put it shortly after the inauguration. Musk called his February demand that federal workers email what they accomplished that past week a “pulse check” to prove they did any work.

im-65081242.webp
Tobias Lütke told Shopify employees that the company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job. Photo: Dustin Chambers/Bloomberg News

Advances in generative AI also play a role. Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke recently told employees that the e-commerce company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job. Other business leaders are warning their staff to adopt more AI—or else.

“AI is coming for your jobs. Heck, it’s coming for my job too. This is a wake-up call,” Micha Kaufman, CEO of the freelance marketplace Fiverr, wrote in a staff memo last month. Those “who will not wake up and understand the new reality fast are, unfortunately, doomed.”

Employees will someday have their moment in the sun again, said Charles A. O’Reilly, a professor of management at Stanford.

“When the market turns around, and job opportunities are plentiful, then CEOs will start to talk more about how important employees are, and employees will take advantage of it, ” he said.

For now, though, some executives say fewer, not more corporate staff, will help them run more efficiently. On Thursday, Match Group, which runs dating apps Hinge and Tinder, became the latest company to say it planned to thin its managerial ranks in sweeping layoffs. About one in five managers will be cut, and Match’s CEO, Spencer Rascoff, told investors the company is stepping up efforts to cut costs and rewire the organization to focus on its products.

“We lit a fire under the team here,” Rascoff said.

Source (Archive)
 
every single useless fatcat making life worse for the common man.
It’s never the useful people saying this stuff is it? The guy doing specialist historical building restoration doesn’t talk like this. Neither do people who build bridges or drive buses or deliver the post or clean hospitals. People who DO stuff and MAKE stuff see what their labour does.
It’s only ever the CEOs of knicker companies, or useless startups or multibillion dollar corporations.
Useless fuckers the lot of them. Tobias looks like something eldritch hollowed him out, put his skin on and is hoping the workers won’t notice.
 
You aren't wrong, but I've dealt with lots of executives over the years in my line of work, and most of them are unfathomably retarded.
The biggest blackpill that you realize if you spend any part of your life doing any kind of big 4 consulting work, is that most of today's C-suite are all fucking morons who are only there because their families are rich and daddy paid for him to go to an ivy league in the eighties so there you go that's why he's CEO of your $5 a share downmarket company and not you.

America has largely been powered for a while now by the pilfered wealth of the outcome of world war 2. But now we're at that third-generation inheritance point where the current crop of leaders were all the YEA WEL MY DAD OWNS A DEALERSHIP! people when they were kids, who as adults faffed around while being tasked with running our economic engines. And they're making stupid decisions. Like sending all our money to thirdies to make all our plastic crap and to be our disposable keyboard-peckers.

Oh but daddy work-forever was great, so his retard kid must be great too, right? Look, he went to Penn!
 
This is MUCH better than pretending some mega-corp gives a fuck. Have you ever been in a 100+ person "We're family!!!" meeting? Fuck that.
Worse: I have been in a small diversity meeting at my public sector job. The speaker kept talking about diversity and niggers. She was white, most everyone in the room was white. Two of my jeet coworkers kept going "And India too!" they were the only ones who liked it. The funny thing is she pissed off my Lebanese friend by calling him Arabic and he kept responding. "NO! NOT ARAB! I'M MARONITE!" And she kept repeating it over and over until she gave up with him.
 
Man all these Nu-Industry Startup CEOs look the same - like terminally indoors bugpeople without a glint of humanity in their cold, glassy gazes.

Take them all out back and shoot them in the head. If you don't make something I can touch with my hands - you aren't a useful productive member of society.

Take all the bankers and usurers and hedge fund managers out back and do the same with them too.

Every year that goes by, I can empathize more and more with the Communist revolutionary desire to just fucking murder every single useless fatcat making life worse for the common man.
Based. I adopt this learned member's considered submission in whole and commend it to the House.
 
No. No it cannot.
It’s still got progress to make, but people can already use AI to write code with little experience. Here’s how things will go:
  1. Americans who learned to code get replaced by Indians who “learned” how to code and will take slave wages.
  2. Indian coders get replaced by American AI experts that can use AI to do the work a sweatshop full of Indians used to do for the price of the hardware and electricity required to run it.
  3. Cloud-based AI gets so good that Indian AI experts are hired to replace the Americans again.
  4. AI becomes so effective at performing tasks on basic prompts that you no longer need AI experts to manage AI workload and all the Indians again lose their jobs with no replacement since the upper level management of the company can just tell AI what they want it to do.
If you do anything at a computer, the clock is ticking for your job.
 
Lmao, Executives really are the new French nobility, aren't they? They'll really think they're untouchable until they get dragged out of their mansions by their hair and Luigi'd.

I wonder if the United Health CEO thought he was invincible too, right before those bullets ripped through his spine anyway.
Every year this sketch becomes more and more relevant.
 
On the other hand... I don't think they realize how much the average customer is starting to hate AI.
I think it's also the influx of 'AI will replace you and this is why it's a good thing' type articles and listicles that add to it, people are starting to associate AI more with a dystopian future then a bright and sunny one.
A friend who works in sales says that the second pretty much any customer gets a whiff of AI, they're gone.
When he was asking customers about it, he said pretty much the unanimousresponse was: "If these assholes can't even be bothered to do their own advertising and handle their own customer service, why should I think they'd give a shit about me?"
I see a lot of this in other places: 'If they can't be bothered to put in their own effort, why should I be bothered to care about their product?'
 
It’s still got progress to make, but people can already use AI to write code with little experience. Here’s how things will go:
  1. Americans who learned to code get replaced by Indians who “learned” how to code and will take slave wages.
  2. Indian coders get replaced by American AI experts that can use AI to do the work a sweatshop full of Indians used to do for the price of the hardware and electricity required to run it.
  3. Cloud-based AI gets so good that Indian AI experts are hired to replace the Americans again.
  4. AI becomes so effective at performing tasks on basic prompts that you no longer need AI experts to manage AI workload and all the Indians again lose their jobs with no replacement since the upper level management of the company can just tell AI what they want it to do.
If you do anything at a computer, the clock is ticking for your job.
Brilliant!

You missed a point:

5. Companies start going out of business because all of the AI-replaced workers cannot afford to buy anything.
 
Wait! Companies at one point thought employees were irreplaceable?! This is certainly news to me!
It was during the age of the boomers and gen X, when local and regional businesses still existed as viable careers. When every job is owned by a global company, one employee is like a penny in a piggy bank: you don’t want to lose it, but you’re not going to sweat it if you do.
 
Back