I'm not religious so I may not understand the full context, but I would still argue that it's in reference of you as the individual, not you as in the reference to your family. It's one thing to lose your coat in a lawsuit, it's another when it extends to your wife and children.
I bought the regular one for the memes and tried it just out of curiosity, it's actually pretty good. More flavor than spicy; it's spicy but not too spicy. If you've been on the fence about trying some, I'd encourage you to give it a try. Reasonably priced, too. It's more expensive than regular store-bought hot sauce but not by much.
Wives and children were a bit of a secondary concern for most of the early church fathers, who were mainly bachelors. I don't think they thought of it much, aside from some basic "husbands love your wife as Christ loved the church, wives be obedient to your husbands" stuff. Paul recommended staying single.
Is this the right point to call time for Karl's Any% speedrun of destroying his own career? Or was the right moment when the judgment was final?
Basically, all Christian acts only apply to other Christians. All the early church founders and the latter books of the New Testament affirm this. If they've seen Christ and rejected Him, we have zero moral or civic reponsibility to them.
Bullshit. The entire point of the "Good Samaritan" story Christ told was that it is your duty to do what you can to save even your hated enemy.
Wrong. WRONG.
Judgments are not "penalties and fines," which are an entirely different subject. Some judgments are dischargeable. Some are not. I don't think Jobst's judgment is dischargeable.
I did read Confessions of Saint Augustine ages ago and he seemed reasonably pragmatic, but I don't remember much of it.
That's not abnormal. The reason Jews are so good at banking is because the prohibition of usury only extends to other Jews while other religions prohibit it and have to rely on tithing or taking portions of assets. Islam is incredibly manipulative with that, as well as any laws to do with outsiders as they basically justify any action against non Islams as justified.
Two very important questions: Who's going to be retarded enough to take Karl Lobst on in a case where he's trying to discharge the debt he owes his previous quack lawyer, and how much more money will this somehow make him owe Billy?
So far as I know, Lobst was paying his lawyers up front. He certainly paid them a lot, not sure if he still owes them. Currently, he owes Billy a fuckton, and a lot of that is for Billy's lawyers.
Your people have such a beautiful language.
