US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The social contract died when Citizens United v United States came down in favor of the corpos. Larry Fink and his ilk were already the unofficial kings of the U.S but once that actually got enshrined as law it was actually literally Joever in terms of the United States being a real country.
Larry Fink had nothing to do with Hillary: The Movie. Citzens United was about whether the people who made the movie should go to prison because their company was a 501(c)(4) instead of an S-corp. Everyone who thinks it would be totally awesome and empowering to the people if the government had broad censorship powers over any communication published at an organizational level, including the ability to imprison people involved in producing or disseminating forbidden content, hasn't thought about the implications of that at all.
 
Last edited:
HOA's are the libertarians' most acceptable alternative to government because it is private, and voluntary. So you'll often find a libertarian crowd supporting HOAs as well because they don't consider it government because private entity=good.
This explains why they have a reputation for petty, power-tripping, and nonsensical leadership.
 
Nice to see that the Democrats' true colors of refugee status come to light with Trump's recent action of accepting Arikaner refugees. Everybody is up in arms because the refugees happen to be White, yet conveniently ignore the blatant racial discrimination that they suffer from. They're completely fine with flooding immigration with Somalians and Haitians despite themselves proving that they are incapable of assimilating into Western society.
 
Nice to see that the Democrats' true colors of refugee status come to light with Trump's recent action of accepting Arikaner refugees. Everybody is up in arms because the refugees happen to be White, yet conveniently ignore the blatant racial discrimination that they suffer from. They're completely fine with flooding immigration with Somalians and Haitians despite themselves proving that they are incapable of assimilating into Western society.
They import migitants who can't assmilte who will vote for them whilst they live in gated communities.
 
Nice to see that the Democrats' true colors of refugee status come to light with Trump's recent action of accepting Arikaner refugees. Everybody is up in arms because the refugees happen to be White, yet conveniently ignore the blatant racial discrimination that they suffer from. They're completely fine with flooding immigration with Somalians and Haitians despite themselves proving that they are incapable of assimilating into Western society.
Remember, 'replacement theory' on wikipedia is a 'right wing conspiracy thing or whatever.

The Great Replacement (French: grand remplacement), also known as replacement theory or great replacement theory,[1][2][3] is a debunked white nationalist[4] far-right conspiracy theory

It would be easier to say 'yeah it's just some kooks saying that' if it weren't constantly proven to be the case.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't really consider the scathing anti-white racism of the Dems as a sort of "coming to light" recent development. This has been a cornerstone of their platform for at least a decade and a half
I've only heard of the EO recently, despite it being published in February. I'm still trying to find the "why," I heard it had something to do with needing to outsource farming since they're deporting the Mexicans.
 
TLDR: Democrats will continue to win elections, but clown world is on its way out.
So long as the left doesn't develop some way to self-correct for malignant ideas we're just going to end up right back here.
I don't know, guys... Democrats made globohomo their zeitgeist for the past 10 years and refuse to let it go.
 
They were also bred to take direction. Independent thinkers were frowned upon
If that is the case then those slave owners must've not known what they were doing because niggers are also infamously bad at following orders. Violence is the only language they understand, that's why they are so emboldened to commit crime in areas with inadequate police enforcement.
 
Nice to see that the Democrats' true colors of refugee status come to light with Trump's recent action of accepting Arikaner refugees. Everybody is up in arms because the refugees happen to be White, yet conveniently ignore the blatant racial discrimination that they suffer from. They're completely fine with flooding immigration with Somalians and Haitians despite themselves proving that they are incapable of assimilating into Western society.
The are so wrapped up in their own fart smelling liberal American exceptionalism that they cannot possibly comprehend other parts of the world where their script and programming is wholly incompatible with the actual situation.
 
Isn't this just "go back to Africa" but in reverse? I'd figured the race zealots would be happy that the White people are being shipped to another country. Now Africa can be more Black. Also, what happened to those people that love to recite the Statue of Liberty tablet of "give us your poor...?" By their logic, this should be a win-win.
 
Extreme rock and a hard place situation for Scotus. If they rule against Trump on the injunction shit they essentially cede their own authority.
My concern is that with all this stuff, Trump's plan may backfire spectacularly.

He could have enforced existing laws and influenced Congress, which his party controls, to pass more stringent laws and immigration reform.

Instead he went nuclear with extreme enforcement, very showy, flaunting due process, reinterpreting old laws, and is handing the Dems opportunities for lawfare and daring the SC to show they have any authority to check him.

It's like DOGE. In the end it was an existing department and Musk was a temporary advisor. But he made of big show of renaming it and meming the whole thing and a lot of it is getting rolled back. Some of it is Dem judges, but other judges are just ruling against him on principle and to show they have authority.

He just lost the Alien Enemies case. Birthright citizenship is a huge swing...if he wins, great. If he loses anchor babies are the law of the land. Expect the mask to he off and NGOs sending people to 3rd world countries to convince pregnant women to come and give birth, paid for, and chain migrate their families in.

The fact that they are arguing the entire case on not that, but on the Judicial overreach in general is a risk. I was so tired of all the injunctions I wanted this, but it is an "all chips in" moment. If the SC rules against him, the Executive branch has no power...can't enforce laws, can't run and staff agencies. The Cabinet members will be figureheads who report to the President what their permanent, lifetime Deep State deputies do, as they will be the real heads of the agencies.
 
The social contract died when Citizens United v United States came down in favor of the corpos. Larry Fink and his ilk were already the unofficial kings of the U.S but once that actually got enshrined as law it was actually literally Joever in terms of the United States being a real country.
What gives me a gut-punch laugh about Citizens United every single time I think about it is all the pro-EU lefty Americans who hate it and don't realize that Germans, Austrians, and the Swiss have recognized LLCs (a GmbH in their law) as legal persons since the 19th century. Citizens United just copied the EU. It's also the favorite lefty amendment, the 14th Amendment, that is used in the US to justify this shit.
 
TLDR: Democrats will continue to win elections, but clown world is on its way out.
If anybody wants more evidence of this, a perfect example is how the "karen saying nigger" thing has played out.

After initially being covered by all the major sources, it was dropped within a day. The mainstream left is well aware the country has the fatigue.

Not a peep about it from CNN, MSNBC, even the Atlantic since the first couple days it happened. It has now been reduced to the realm of Essence, Peopleofcolorintech, and The Nation. With such desperately reaching headlines as:
screen (1).webpscreen (2).webpscreen (3).webp
In the 2017-2022 era this shit would have never left the news cycle. All of the "dive bar" tier news sites and subreddits and such would push it, then the retarded boomers that run CNN who don't know how easy it is to astroturf would think "oh my god! This is a big thing! This tweet from a hotep got an entire 5000 likes that's a lot! A basketball player is talking about it and kids still totally care about basketball! This is what the kids are into we gotta get on board with this! 100% of my black friends will abandon me and cancel me if I don't cover this!"

What we see above is that "dive bar" news sources are still trying to force this to happen using the strategy that worked so well for years, but the establishment left is not biting. Instead basically telling them to fuck off. There are 3 major wars going on in the world, the economy is being restructured at a massive level, nobody has disposable income and AI is changing the world, people don't have the patience for black people's victim complex and they don't want the news covering it.

YT comments on the most viewed video covering the incident btw:
YT comments.webp
They fact that google is allowing these to stay active is remarkable.

They're not setting the rules anymore, they no longer have a blank check, they are on the defensive, they're the ones trying to find which concessions to make and which things to hold firm on. Now is the time to find the niche between complacency and doomerism.
 
It's like DOGE. In the end it was an existing department and Musk was a temporary advisor. But he made of big show of renaming it and meming the whole thing and a lot of it is getting rolled back. Some of it is Dem judges, but other judges are just ruling against him on principle and to show they have authority.
That's why there are checks and balances with a President's authority to, well, prevent it from being a dictatorship.
 
Instead he went nuclear with extreme enforcement, very showy, flaunting due process, reinterpreting old laws, and is handing the Dems opportunities for lawfare and daring the SC to show they have any authority to check him.
What is the due process for an illegal violating immigrant law? The court hasn't said so beyond "24 hours isn't enough." So 36 hours.

Edit to add: Having the congress pass laws is a waste of time when current laws are adequate enough for the job. Besides any new laws can just as easily be struck down, or sent up to the SC as current laws.
 
Instead he went nuclear with extreme enforcement, very showy, flaunting due process, reinterpreting old laws, and is handing the Dems opportunities for lawfare and daring the SC to show they have any authority to check him.
Ridiculous. They would have done all that anyway and the result would have been identical.

Remember, the sole judicial principle on display in most of these cases is Orange Man Bad. The key tell is the obvious observation that if this were done by Obama there would be no lawfare. Only a midwit or a low-IQ nigger thinks this has anything to do with "muh chex and balances."
 
Back