Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
What is this sorcery?!?!

View attachment 7375399

Kurt has 6.8k live views!

But... but... he has a micropenis... and stuff!

This MUST be more government corruption at work!
Nick's a reverse sonichu medallion because everyone he hates becomes successful and everyone he supports is cursed to remain in obscurity as a failure
 
Isn't the biggest sticking issue with the bodycam release just Nick's kids faces? Technology can fix that.
I'm not a legal expert, but I thought Nick having it sealed was just for his trial.?
Once that was over the public has a right to it, especially if Nick lied and made damaging claims to people involved who made statements to the police before the arrest no?
Referring specifically to Kayla's family, cps, cops, church members, even Aaron.
 
What is this sorcery?!?!

View attachment 7375399

Kurt has 6.8k live views!

But... but... he has a micropenis... and stuff!

This MUST be more government corruption at work!
Nick is kicking himself hard that he can't manage weekend evening streams anymore, self-cucking out of primetime views.
 
if they don't turn it over it won't be out of recalcitrance but simply that they believe they aren't allowed to.
I'm not a lawyer, but that's been my read of the MN law. Unless they can prove there's a public interest in having the footage released (such as wide-spread rumor of misconduct), it's not coming out.

It's compounded by the county going, "Oh sure, six grand!" at the start, but I'm assuming that was typical government employees being typical government employees.
 
Isn't the biggest sticking issue with the bodycam release just Nick's kids faces? Technology can fix that.
I'm not a legal expert, but I thought Nick having it sealed was just for his trial.?
Once that was over the public has a right to it, especially if Nick lied and made damaging claims to people involved who made statements to the police before the arrest no?
Referring specifically to Kayla's family, cps, cops, church members, even Aaron.
I would be completely fine with any footage of kids not even being blurred, but completely cut.
No one gives a shit about seeing the kids, we care about the seeing the situation that lead to one of them being exposed to drugs.
 
It's difficult to say which one is more brain damaged at this point, but I don't think Austin and Nick are really too far off in terms of stupidity (which makes this whole gay inter-thread rivalry even stupider, if you ask me). Five years is a long time for Nick to get through without acting like a fucking idiot.
Nick and Austin are two sides of the same coin. I'm sure that Nick would scoff at being compared to a crack user like Austin but that is just a pathetic cope.

Both have destroyed their lives. Both streamed it out live to the world. Both can't make the necessary changes and face the reality of the shit they have done to themselves and other. And both are supported and protected from consequences as much as possible by families that also don't want to face reality.

At least with Austin, I don't feel bad for a bunch of kids dealing with this shit.
 
Professional Reply Guy
Archive/Link
2025-05-17T22:20:51,314300041+02:00.webp
 
No the painting stays the same age, it's Balldo who shrivels up and melts.
Now that I think about it. The AI generated Thumbnail...

e didn't had such cool and expensive camera, would we be able to see his bugarsugar so easily? I'd say that one investment was actually good for
How does anyone listen to this guy? I can't believe how miserable he is to listen to. I struggled to get through this clip.
My theory is, its a fake dono like others have said.
That or remember Melton gets a cut of any donations that go through too. Not sure if its 10% 30% or what. But he's just giving himself money back either way.

The gloss was already seriously starting to wear off, but the really glaring moment was when they had a stream the night of the fatal filing that torpedoed the case, smugly drinking and jacking each other off, only to submit a sloppy, half-assed filing after the deadline.

That was before Sam Johnson had even looked at the notary signatures and realized it was physically impossible for Ty to have taken them all on the same day while physically present, as he signed under oath that he had.

I think he should be given some kind of Lifetime Achievement Award, maybe a recurring Balldo-themed memorial award, and anyone who gets that award is disqualified from LOTY. This award should be strictly for past LOTY winners.

I really also think back to back LOTY wins should be banned.
I agree with Nick being awarded the "Lifetime" award if he gets 1st place, which automatically gets him disqualified and the actual LOTY going to another
The Hat Trick is upon us. After that I agree he should be ineligible and should just be an award himself.
No one can compete. If they admit that and just create a special Balldo Award I'm fine with that.
 
there is an interesting person assisting us, who is significant
Aaron wouldn't be interesting as help

The term he used was "interested party" to be more precise, if that makes any difference:



Taking into account everything he's teased so far, the most likely scenario seems to be that April has expressed willingness to consent to the release or already has, for three main reasons. First off it best fits the need for someone to run to the Spicer/Willmar area in person for her to sign pertinent paperwork that might have been impractical to coordinate remotely in her case, in stark contrast to something like delivering a written request or fee payment to a county office, which Hardin should have been allowed to FedEx straight from his office. Secondly she better fits the term "interested party" in that she has pre-existing legal rights pertaining to the footage, unlike EWU who just happen to be interested in seeing it like any other member of the public. Perhaps EWU could add some financial contribution and some relative air of legitimacy to a joint request to the county and as a co-plaintiff in any subsequent declaratory action, but their impact would stop there.

Thirdly and most importantly, it's very telling where he emphasized how he now knows that even in the "worst-case situation" he's going to get at least some of what he wants and the "damage is already done" there no matter how hard Rekieta tries to stop it or undo it, and instead all that remains up in the air is whether he gets all of what he wants in the best-case scenario. This likely alludes to a downside that hasn't been discussed much here or at least hasn't been widely accepted by the most optimistic here: even if April gives her full consent and even if she can't or won't enforceably rescind that consent, the county would be likely to redact any portion of the footage in which she does not personally appear, if not also redact portions in which she personally appears but the privacy interests of non-consenting parties are implicated, such as anything depicting the interior of the home. This problem could be easily overcome by her simply forking over a flash drive of the complete unredacted footage that would have been sent to her attorney in discovery from her own criminal case where there is no publicly filed protective order prohibiting that disclosure, but an NDA and/or some legal advice about any tort liability pertaining to the Rekietas' privacy interest must have hindered that option or else you'd think Null would already have gotten the footage that way, so for the time being county redactions limited to the scope of her consent can be expected.

Even after those redactions there would still be what April said in police questioning outside the home, which was damaging enough that Nick's omnibus motion prematurely sought to have it excluded from trial evidence, so it's still "significant" as stated and would technically be enough to win the bet with Ralph as well, but it would still take the written demand to the county and any subsequent litigation to obtain the vast majority of the footage that April's consent arguably cannot control.

That said, it's still at least possible that all of the above could fit one or more of the sheriff's deputies consenting to release of whatever small portion of the footage their consent can control, which you'd think would go against department policy generally but might have warranted an exception here because of all the misconduct that Nick was dumb enough to allege or insinuate over the past year.

It's also at least possible that Aaron could have been considered (or could still become) an "interested party" capable of "significant" assistance but in a different way: although he's not on the list of people who can consent to even partial release, a request for the footage could benefit from an affidavit from him regarding the effect of Nick's repeated public insinuations that Aaron may have planted the drugs, dosed the daughter, etc., which the footage would be needed to dispel. Moreover if it is true that he is preparing for any kind of legal action in the near future, then his attorney could conceivably use a subpoena to obtain at least some relevant portions of the footage, such as footage of the confiscated weapons and loose cartridge to the extent relevant to showing whether there's an objectively reasonable enough concern for physical safety to justify an HRO, or even footage of the drug search to the extent relevant to the low likelihood of his access to the drugs' location for purposes of showing harassing intent in an HRO case or showing a false statement in a defamation case, or even a broader portion of the footage to the extent relevant to defending himself against any defamation counterclaim from Nick that in any way implicates Aaron's past statements about the state of the home, etc. This still seems to be the absolute least likely possibility, however, for all the reasons previously discussed ITT about why he has held off from taking any legal action at all.
 
Last edited:
Rekieta Report / Weekly Roundup / Peak & Concurrent Views

1747515170883.webp
- Peak Concurrent Viewers -
WeekPeak Viewers% Change from Previous Week
12/05 – 18/052,214−69.3%
05/05 – 11/057,219+22.3%
28/04 – 04/055,901+76.3%
21/04 – 27/043,347
- Avg. Concurrent Viewers -
WeekAvg. Viewers% Change from Previous Week
12/05 – 18/051,597−15.2%
05/05 – 11/051,883−10.8%
28/04 – 04/052,112−10.8%
21/04 – 27/042,369
On average, RekietaLaw lost approximately 257 concurrent live viewers per week over that 4-week period.
If trends continue, in about 6.2 weeks, RekietaLaw will be livestreaming to no viewers.
1747515534492.webp
His channel subs are getting decimated, with 6k subs lost this year so far.
When do you think we'll get the Sub-400k gift?

Verdict:
The RekietaLaw channel direction still working its way through Dante Alighieri's Rings of Hell, with no foreseeable escape.

the most likely scenario seems to be April has expressed willingness to consent to the release or already has, for three main reasons. First off it best fits the need for someone to run to the Spicer/Willmar area in person for her to sign pertinent paperwork that might have been impractical to coordinate remotely in her case, in stark contrast to something like delivering a written request or fee payment to a county office, which Hardin should have been allowed to FedEx straight from his office. Secondly she better fits the term "interested party" in that she has pre-existing legal rights pertaining to the footage, unlike EWU who just happen to be interested in seeing it like any other member of the public.
This would be unironic balldo-pocalypse, and I hope your on the money
 
Last edited:
As for the Lolcow hall of fame (or whatever we call it) it needs to be officiated by Josh or someone official to induct members. Having a democratic election for it would be too much like two separate categories of LOLOTY
Should have had a 10 for 10 years last year for the 10th anniversary like the nba had its 50 for 50 lists and 75 for 75 years lists.

1. Christian Weston Chandler
2. DSP
3. Ralph (Or maybe the sektur)
4. Nick (Or maybe the Baldoverse)
5. Sargon
6. Patrick Tomlinson
7. Daniel Larson
8. Cyrax (or maybe BMJ, he can be the Damien lillard)
9. Anisa Johma
10. Destiny/Hasan/Ethan/Keffels or whoever is determined the dumbest political streamer not named Carl Benjamin

I'm sure I'm missing some big ones off the top of my head, and the order is a forever debate, but Sargon is top 5 and ill die on that hill.
76j48a4o8vg91.webp
 
Jewsh is vagueposting on the bodycam footage on today's special MATI (due to the stream cutting out yesterday) saying "legal notices have been sent out, and positive things are underway" and "as a little teaser, I have received a positive development from Harden that there is an interesting person assisting us, who is significant".

Chat on Kick immediately speculates it is EWU Bodycam
It is reasonable to assume Jewsh's mysterious forum user to Spicer request was not the retrieval of the bodycam footage, but to deliver a demand to Spicer authorities.
My Fell For It Again badge is freshly polished and my clock is set to a countdown of exactly two more weeks. Let's go.
 
You are correct that it's very interesting that OLPR is making interrogatories to Nick. I imagine that's not particularly good. I think every other complaint he's ever gotten ended up with summary dismissal.
This stopped being true a long time ago. He appears to have had to respond to complaints on at least 2 separate occasions including when he insulted Schneider on stream.

- The text makes it sound like Aaron is going to sell his current home, buy Nick's second home temporarily (note the wording "for now") for April to live in ("the stress of [her] buying one right now"). Everything about buying the house sounds as if Aaron and April are separated.
- The wording "house situation" seems to imply that something to do with april has created a regrettable for Nick that needs to be quickly resolved. (NIck was of course already likely in foreclosure on the other house)
Correction: I agree it does sound like he's being a simp for someone already gone. Aaron WTF, you thought about selling your house and buying Nick's so April could live there? And you & your kids would live where, exactly?
Aaron explained nearly a year ago what happened. Nick offered the opportunity to Aaron and April to buy the second home for $350,000, which he initially described as a great deal (he started calling it a rip-off even at that price after the listing photos got revealed, it subsequently sold for $380k). The plan was for Aaron to sell his house in St. Cloud (which was in his sole name) and purchase Nick's second Spicer home and put it in both Aaron and April's names.

April then ran out of Nick's house while Aaron and his kids were there and took all of her belongings out. Aaron said that April still wanted to buy the second house, but initially only they would only live together as "friends" and they would decide later if they would stay married or not (this may not be exact, but close enough to what he said). Nick has since specified that April moving out occurred on April 7 2024, meaning this text would be from the day after it happened.

It seems Nick wanted to double dip; after selling his home for $350k to Aaron and April, April would then be entitled to half of the house after they divorced, since it would be in both of their names. April did him a massive favor by leaving him before this happened.
 
That said, it's still at least possible that all of the above could fit one or more of the sheriff's deputies consenting to release of whatever small portion of the footage their consent can control, which you'd think would go against department policy generally but might have warranted an exception here because of all the misconduct that Nick was dumb enough to allege or insinuate over the past year.
I think the most likely officer would be Pomplun. Not only has Nick lied about and defamed him the most of any of the cops, he's also retired.
 
Back