Debate Indigo Plateau on artistic value of poop porn

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Brme

kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 14, 2025
Does art need to be coherent for it not to be censored?
Some ways it may be censored:

1. It being deemed as lacking "serious artistic value" and therefore "obscene" by some shrink
Look up the story of girlspooping.com and you'll see the story of people being arrested, having their cameras stole... sorry, I mean confiscated by those who are never gonna be our equals and we are not entitled to disagree with because they are entitled to respect by their age and practice of the LAWWW(👅😮, literally a WORD), had their footage CENSORED (which is the REAL form of idea theft, not some sensitive FAGGOT POET MARTIAL's belief in pLaGiaRiSm (they KIDNAPPED MY PRECIOUS WORDS!!!! WAAAAAHHHJJJJJ)), and had to pay fines for....

filming willing women using the bathroom, private home bathrooms, and showing the poop.
@Indigo Plateau is poop porn what you meaned by manic art?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
I guess poop porn could be manic art since it is outside normal tastes.

First, I think the concept of "serious artistic, literary, scientific, or political value" has no place in a courtroom as these are all so subjective unless you believe conservative university professors' narrow definitions of these terms.

As for poop porn, it doesn't have to be the kind where you smear it on yourself and eat it. It can also be the kind where a person poops in the toilet, on a plate, or on a puppy pad. We can see the poop, the consistency, the texture.

It can be artistic since poop can be art.

It can be scientific since some folks with this fetish are fascinated by the processes that make the poop. It's an extreme form of objectification where a functioning body and/or its processes turn a person on, which may come with with a vore or "endosomatophilia" fetish as well. The fact that it used to be her food, as well as how her digestion, absorption, fecal size, etc., all are part of it. Maybe she'll tell you what she ate in the last day to several days (it seems only a minority of women poop at least once a day), comment on the smell, or dissect the poop with her fingers (or maybe with gloves on).

Literary value: What are you, a prudish English teacher? Does a story need a clear plot?

Political value: FUCK THE SYSTEM!

You can do this for ANY media!

I personally draw the line at child porn and media that was intended to be private shared publicly. These should be addressed with a constitutional amendment with everything else, including copyright violations, being fair game. I believe we need a voluntary copyright system that institutions can opt into.
 
As for poop porn, it doesn't have to be the kind where you smear it on yourself and eat it. It can also be the kind where a person poops in the toilet, on a plate, or on a puppy pad. We can see the poop, the consistency, the texture.

It can be artistic since poop can be art.
I listen your detail response. I ask more detail on what beauty you see in poop. Why poop? When you start liking poop?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
Never did I ever say I liked poop, just that I understand the mentality of some folks who might.
Then when did you start understand mentality of poop porn lovers? Also why you say this most autist fetish? What autism you see in poop porn loving?
 
It can be scientific since some folks with this fetish are fascinated by the processes that make the poop. It's an extreme form of objectification where a functioning body and/or its processes turn a person on, which may come with with a vore or "endosomatophilia" fetish as well. The fact that it used to be her food, as well as how her digestion, absorption, fecal size, etc., all are part of it. Maybe she'll tell you what she ate in the last day to several days (it seems only a minority of women poop at least once a day), comment on the smell, or dissect the poop with her fingers (or maybe with gloves on).
specifically the really biology-centric forms of it.
I listen. Your point of biology gives me thought. Are foot doctors foot fetishists? Are gynos vagina fetishists? Are breast doctors breast fetishists? Attention to an object is different from attraction, no?


Literary value: What are you, a prudish English teacher? Does a story need a clear plot?
Do all story need reading?

Political value: FUCK THE SYSTEM!
What system? And why fuck it? You want system to have a child? I joke and not.

You speak anti-censoring, you understand censored people. I respect understanding. I disagree with example made. Art is art without people seeing. Same with stories. If i made a book, no one read it, but they banned it. Just being banned can make one read it. If not censored, book continue invisible.

System continues being system. Grows big, continues growing. Instead of censor, they divide you into different place. You feel free but not. Paradise prison. Use your example, poop porn place made, becomes industry, becomes system, now censoring anti-poop porn. You understand?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SNEED.EXE
You look like this and say this
Poopjak.webp
>it's a bit nutty THOUGH
 
You're never going to win a discussion about artistic integrity. Either side. Anyone who even thinks about defending poop porn as having any is one of those, "if art is something the observer has to find value in then anything can technically be art," types and I'm not seeing anything to persuade me otherwise here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brme
You're never going to win a discussion about artistic integrity. Either side. Anyone who even thinks about defending poop porn as having any is one of those, "if art is something the observer has to find value in then anything can technically be art," types and I'm not seeing anything to persuade me otherwise here.
Win not goal, only more words to laugh at.
 
Back