Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[DSHK]

Can WE really be blamed? Idk how old you guys are, but this started way before I had a say. The “progressive” hellscape stuff started as the 1990s, watch movies from that time and you’ll already see modern talking points of these people forming, though at the time it centered more around homosexuals and the “old racist guy becomes progressive” trope as opposed to what we have now, Unless you were born in the 1970s at the earliest, I doubt you really have a say in the cultural direction.

Plenty of us weren’t even alive in the 90s, let alone old enough to make any real change. The only people who can be blamed are, of course, the boomers and Gen X. Millennials definitely contributed but they were also kind of raised into this so I’m not sure they were ever given a chance to know a different world to what was before. The only ones TRULY to blame, however, is those who advocated for this stuff and those who did not push back when it was small enough to be snuffed out.

We simply live in the aftermath of this societal nuke that we (or most of us, I’m sure a few of you are OLD!) never even saw fall. The best we can hope for now is for the pendulum to swing back, and hope it doesn’t make a trip back to the other side by the time our children grow up.

A good term for this progressive worldview is postmodernism which is the rejection of objectivity. It comes from the art world and postmodernists in that scene basically consider the artists desire to express himself and the meaning behind the art to be the most important thing and the quality of the artwork itself to be irrelevant, hence why modern art is so ugly that some believe its a money laundering scheme. Hence, there is no such thing as objectively healthy so we get "body positivity" and such. This applies to trannies/gender studies because the premise is that gender is the result of socialization rather than biology. These ideas originated in the 60s(the john money experiment was intended to test this theory) but somehow managed to escape the humanities department and have gone mainstream.

 

[Anasa Tristis]

Can WE really be blamed? Idk how old you guys are, but this started way before I had a say. The “progressive” hellscape stuff started as the 1990s, watch movies from that time and you’ll already see modern talking points of these people forming, though at the time it centered more around homosexuals and the “old racist guy becomes progressive” trope as opposed to what we have now, Unless you were born in the 1970s at the earliest, I doubt you really have a say in the cultural direction.

Plenty of us weren’t even alive in the 90s, let alone old enough to make any real change. The only people who can be blamed are, of course, the boomers and Gen X. Millennials definitely contributed but they were also kind of raised into this so I’m not sure they were ever given a chance to know a different world to what was before. The only ones TRULY to blame, however, is those who advocated for this stuff and those who did not push back when it was small enough to be snuffed out.

We simply live in the aftermath of this societal nuke that we (or most of us, I’m sure a few of you are OLD!) never even saw fall. The best we can hope for now is for the pendulum to swing back, and hope it doesn’t make a trip back to the other side by the time our children grow up.

Spoiler: Apologetic OT

Forgive my oversight there. Young fags are exempt. It was primarily your parents. And their parents and grand parents. Probably all the way back to the day we first stood upright. Homo sapiens has never really learned to stop, look around and say "This is good, let's try to stay here for a while." It's not in our nature.

 

[DSHK]

Spoiler: Apologetic OT

Forgive my oversight there. Young fags are exempt. It was primarily your parents. And their parents and grand parents. Probably all the way back to the day we first stood upright. Homo sapiens has never really learned to stop, look around and say "This is good, let's try to stay here for a while." It's not in our nature.

The difference is before the boomers previous generations made sure their kids had access to electricity, running water, paved roads and automobiles. Boomers idea of making the world better for the future was demanding that they not be held to any sort of social norms which were there for a reason as weve now found out the hard way.

 

[Mettaur]

Trannies love the idea of "cracking eggs" and grooming. Hell, I've been on the receiving end of it but I straight up told them "I know what you're trying to do, I will ask you to stop." They didn't stop, which is what peaked me to trannies.

They like this idea because you can't "uncrack" an egg. It's essentially implying they were trans their whole life and just needed to discover it. It frames it not as a choice, but rather a metamorphosis that they were inevitably always going to make. This is essentially a way of coping with their awful decisions as if it was always inevitable they'd look like a depressed hideous ghoul, it must be someone else's fault they don't like it.

Trannies also are subconsciously aware that if they don't fully control narratives and society they will eventually be ostracized. So they need to recruit as many soldiers in their war as possible. So coming up with cutesy euphemisms and encouraging them to do it just helps further their cause.

 

[AnZero]

They like this idea because you can't "uncrack" an egg. It's essentially implying they were trans their whole life and just needed to discover it. It frames it not as a choice, but rather a metamorphosis that they were inevitably always going to make. This is essentially a way of coping with their awful decisions as if it was always inevitable they'd look like a depressed hideous ghoul, it must be someone else's fault they don't like it.

Trannies also are subconsciously aware that if they don't fully control narratives and society they will eventually be ostracized. So they need to recruit as many soldiers in their war as possible. So coming up with cutesy euphemisms and encouraging them to do it just helps further their cause.

Tranny ideology solely exists because of recruitment reproduction. It’s sort of like how most pedophiles were raped as kids and they need to continue the cycle. Trannies know they cannot reproduce in the way a man and a woman can, so they need a new victim who will be the next in line. They know adults whose brains are solid and reasonable cannot be convinced that a man dressed as miku is a real woman, so they target 14 year olds with no strong parental figures, who spend all their days online, and convince them.

Tranny ideology only works if you are sexually engaged by it or if you are groomed at a young age. They need to target “eggs” (children, most of the time) to either convince them that Xhey are heckin valid, or to become troons themselves. With the internet and a generation of neglectful retarded soylennial parents (who will support this happening to their kids) the cycle is hard to break, and is why it needs to be rooted out at a ground level.

 

[Positron]

The idea of history having a right side originated in 19th century Marxian mysticism.

I'd say Hegel promulgated this idea, which many attribute to be a secular form of Christian eschatology. Marx of course subsequent drew from Hegel.

Bourgeois adventurists.

Or prolatariat larpers. Everyone who calls himself "working class" on social media is one.

 

[MongInTheMirror]

If I had to guess, proper real talk here, it's because autistic people tend to go along with things easier and get pulled into things more fervently. Like, the idea of a hyperfixation is very real and very documented. That and most autists tend to be weird loners that just want to be accepted, it makes them prime bait.

Trannies love the idea of "cracking eggs" and grooming. Hell, I've been on the receiving end of it but I straight up told them "I know what you're trying to do, I will ask you to stop." They didn't stop, which is what peaked me to trannies.

So, who's a better target to groom than somebody that might be desperate enough for friends and validation than the likely outcast that has the tendency to make certain things their entire life if it tickles the part of their brain that hyperfixates on stuff? You just say some nice words, pull them in by being fake nice or love bombing them, and if it takes, you've got yourself a loyal sycophant.

There's probably data out there but it's more of a social game that's hard to pin down numbers.

Speaking from experience with loved ones, I think it's also correlated to the most fundamental core characteristic of autism: the difficulty intuitively understanding non-verbal communication the way most of us do.

Aside from issues of hyperfixation & loneliness (both of which are very valid issues), I find that autists tend to be hopelessly impressionable because they simply can't detect any of the unspoken 'red flags' that would immediately indicate to the rest of us that someone is dissembling/lying, or just untrustworthy in general. I guess in simple terms, they have no bullshit detector, so they tend to take things at face value unless there are glaringly (and I mean GLARING, like an "I am a liar" face tattoo) obvious reasons not to.

 

[whiterock]

There’s a Cumtown episode where Nick Mullen talks about liking the idea of getting leg lengthening surgery just to experience horrific pain for some finite period of time and come out of it changed. I think he then goes on to say something similar about the idea of losing 500 pounds.
He’s (half?) joking but of the transitioners who do it for not-purely-sexual reasons it seems like there’s real appeal in directing a desire for struggle and experiencing discomfort that can be explained (transphobia, relationships, rotdog fell off) that gives purpose to their lives. The bonus is that you can never be done. If you skinned your penis and shaved down your jaw and you still want to kill yourself, the answer is always to keep trying.
It’s the good ol power process.

Spoiler: power process

as an aside I tried to google “power process” thinking that it was not a term coined by Ted Kaczynski and he just happened to talk about it, but it is a Kaczynski original. Which made the Google AI summary particularly funny- it added some shit from psychology today probably so as not to just plagiarize the Unabomber.

Relevant Tax:

Edited to add that I’ve seen them say this about Kaczynski a lot and never consider what that says about him and them. Man gets tortured as a teenager by the academic wing of the CIA, self admittedly resents women, briefly flirts with trooning out. Troonbrain fails to draw anything from this besides reinforcing that one should always troon out.

 

[toilet_rainbow]

Edited to add that I’ve seen them say this about Kaczynski a lot and never consider what that says about him and them. Man gets tortured as a teenager by the academic wing of the CIA, self admittedly resents women, briefly flirts with trooning out. Troonbrain fails to draw anything from this besides reinforcing that one should always troon out.

I’ve seen this “HRT will fix him/her” for people, real and fictional, that were either dysfunctional from abuse or simply non gender conforming, a lot. A lot of them also do it for Kurt Cobain because he *checks notes* wore a dress once. This line of thinking isn’t much different from a woman thinking that she’ll fix the bad boy by being a good girl, or a guy that thinks that he can make a lesbian straight by raping her. Only in the tranny case, it’s objectively worse because Theodore no longer even exists when they’re done with him.

On a similar note, it is not discussed enough that a lot of troons not only have forcefem/masc fetishes, but also love to “joke” about sneaking hormones into unsuspecting people’s food or forcing it into them to do just that. Just the latest example I saw tonight:

“I should just shoot a teenage girl with testosterone if she had even the fleeting thought of what it’s like to be a boy! It’ll free her more than realizing that puberty sucks for everyone!”



I don’t know how effective food contamination would be save for knowing how easy residual contamination is with T gel, and that oral estrogen exists. They “joke” so much about it, though, that can it really be called such and not yet another predatory fantasy?

 

[Syikeblade]

I'd say Hegel promulgated this idea, which many attribute to be a secular form of Christian eschatology. Marx of course subsequent drew from Hegel.


Or prolatariat larpers. Everyone who calls himself "working class" on social media is one.

Yup it stems from gnosticism, the oocult and various other religions.

 

[Sangria Nigger]

Cosmopolitan magazine was the pop bible for that. It was endorsing indiscriminate promiscuity (and the promise of liberation from practicing it) for women in every way imaginable two decades before the internet fired up

Homie of you think that Cosmopolitan was feminist or written by actual women I have a beautiful bridge to sell you.

 

[NuIItley]

but also love to “joke” about sneaking hormones into unsuspecting people’s food or forcing it into them to do just that.

Emphasis on the quotes between the word "joke", you cannot tell with troons whether or not if they're just "playing around" or if they're being 100% honest and serious whenever the topic of artificial hormones comes into play. They're not playing around by the way, I don't doubt for a second that they'd actually do this to unsuspecting victims if they had the opportunity to do so.

EDIT: I think it's important to note that NOWADAYS, trannies, and the whole concept of transgenderism as a whole, "reproduce" via predatory behavior. In this modern day and age, said "predatory behavior" usually sums up to child grooming through social media platforms/chat-boxes (most notably Discord). It'd make sense that this type of scenario would be commonly fantasized amongst the majority of troons so often - unfortunately, for the grand majority of these types of cases, the groomed victim eventually turns into a future groomer. I think it can be best described as a mind virus.

 

[Candidate No 7]

Ha ha, I didn't think the daft bastards would go ahead with their moobs out protests against the UK Supreme Court's judgement when the idea first circulated a few weeks ago, but no, they definitely don't have even the modicum of common sense necessary to see how awful this would look. And so...

Trans women protest topless outside Scottish Parliament (The National)

Amusingly The National has blurred the hormoboobs.

A GROUP of trans women have staged a topless protest outside the Scottish Parliament to denounce the recent UK Supreme Court ruling and confront what they see as the Scottish Government’s failure to respond with strength and solidarity.


The action at a rally on Saturday called on the Scottish Government to immediately appeal the ruling to the European Court of Human Rights.

Each protester appeared topless with a red-painted right arm, symbolising solidarity with anti-fascist feminist movements across Europe, including actions by groups such as Femen France.


Protesters also carried white roses, mourning what they describe as the death of transgender rights in the UK, and wore tape over their mouths to represent the censorship and silencing of trans voices in the legal process.

READ MORE: Labour minister and equalities watchdog sued over single-sex toilet guidance

One protester, Sugar, commented: “This ruling is not just a setback of humanitarian rights; it’s an act of erasure. It sends a truly saddening message that trans people’s fears, dignity and lives do not matter in the eyes of the Supreme Court. Trans voices were ignored in that decision. This kind of judicial disregard sets a dangerous precedent for the erosion of democracy and a descent into fascism.”

“We ask the Scottish ministers: Why have you rolled over? Why are you no longer standing up for one of the most socially marginalised communities in the developed world? This is still a Scottish issue. We urge you to use every available avenue to stand up and fight for your trans people.”



The Supreme Court ruling in April that said the words “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, following a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland.

The EHRC issued interim guidance following the judgment that said trans women “should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities” in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals, with the same applying for trans men using men’s toilets.



The protesters said the ruling was "fundamentally biased and leaves the door open for authoritarianism".

Sugar added: “Today’s protest is a public act of grief, resistance, and solidarity to highlight the hypocrisy of the ruling. If the Supreme Court can see these woman legally as men then they’ll have zero issue with them going taps aff.”

"Taps aff" is Scottish for "tops off" of course.

Photo posted by Euan Weddell/Sophie Molly on Xitter (he is the one holding the white rose up):

Spoiler: Courtesy spoiler

Checkmate TERFs, this will almost certainly catalyse a legal process that will ultimately give troons access to all toilets including the one in your own home.

EDIT: the quote tweets are a hoot.

 

[Positron]

"This is an act of grief".
Good grief! Women always expose their tits when they are griefing!!

 

[Candidate No 7]

"This is an act of grief".
Good grief! Women always expose their tits when they are griefing!!

This is so funny how they always try to be tragic and dignified and never even land in the ballpark next to that ballpark.

 

[Écho Öwl]

Force teaming at its finest.

Also, name my band.

 

[AMHOLIO]

sort of like how most pedophiles were raped as kids and they need to continue the cycle.

Disagree: most pedophiles lie. They say they were raped or molested as a kid to get sympathy (or even to pretend they had their sexual fantasy!), not because it happened. I'm sure it did for some, but there's a good chance that at least half of them developed it from good old fashioned genetics, epigenetics, and behavioral issues.

They know adults whose brains are solid and reasonable cannot be convinced that a man dressed as miku is a real woman, so they target 14 year olds with no strong parental figures, who spend all their days online, and convince them.

Disagree. They target anything that will listen. There's many examples of "you can actually be a girl if you want to! uwu" post out there aimed at anyone who would listen.

Cults target vunerable people. This means depressed people, anxious people, people looking for a cure for their general hatred of themselves, autists, people going through a big change like divorce, etc. This means their net goes beyond children and fetishists.
Remember this is a leaderless cult: no direction, just collective following of friends who do stupid shit therefore you must do it too. Many aren't thinking of kids, just whoever is out there. Some honestly believe it is imperative for kids because they were so upset with puberty and its outcome that they have to give to the youth. Also remember that that a lot of troons think everyone is like them and is one day away from realizing they were totally an egg all along. Having a low sense of theory of mind or just bad empathy can lead to thinking that whatever applies to you applies to other people.

Side tangent: culture wars. For those who still want to talk about it, make another thread for "who is responsible for trooning" or "why culture sucks now", because this is getting off topic. I came for fail troons, not speculation - we got other threads for the later.

 

[Sean Andalou]

... A lot of them also do it for Kurt Cobain because he *checks notes* wore a dress once. ...

Bob Hope and Milton Berle.


At that, they look better than a lot of troons.

---

Sorry about that.
Back on track.

Pooner says description is hurtful, even when using troon terminology.


Reddit -- Archive

Spoiler: Long rant.

TW, anatomical terms.

I've seen questions like "People dating cis men, what birth control do you use?" and statements like "You need to use contraception if you have sex with cis men" on this sub and similar spaces. I DO appreciate people spreading awareness about the need for birth control, but the way some of us say "sex with cis men" to refer to a specific sexual activity kinda rubs me the wrong way.

I do think it's totally fair if someone wants to describe their OWN sex life that way! Not everyone wants to say the specifics when discussing their sex life, and I respect that. I just don't like when "sex with cis men" is said in a way that suggests it means the same thing for everyone, i.e. vaginal sex.

We should be normalizing all kinds of sex. I think some trans guys starting their transition don't realize they have options for sex with cis men other than vaginal sex, and I don't think it helps when other trans people discuss sex with cis men as if that's all it is.

Also, you can have that kind of sex with people who are not cis men, and that should be acknowledged in the conversation when we're talking about birth control. I've seen trans men in relationships with trans women not realizing their partner could still get them pregnant while on estrogen, and therefore having PIV sex without taking precautions.

For the sake of better sex ed in the trans community, I think this language needs to change. Does anyone else think so?

Edit: I see the "you're too sensitive" crowd has found this post. I never said I'm angry at people using this kind of language or that they're ruining anyone's life. I'm just saying there are a few problematic implications with it and we can do better. If you're really that bothered by someone suggesting that a minor problem is worth addressing and that we can improve the way we talk a little, you should reconsider who is getting offended at the wrong things.

Key quote at end of rant.

For the sake of better sex ed in the trans community, I think this language needs to change. Does anyone else think so?

Her reaction to later comments edited in after rant.
It seems some pooners are way too touchy.

Edit: I see the "you're too sensitive" crowd has found this post. I never said I'm angry at people using this kind of language or that they're ruining anyone's life. I'm just saying there are a few problematic implications with it and we can do better. If you're really that bothered by someone suggesting that a minor problem is worth addressing and that we can improve the way we talk a little, you should reconsider who is getting offended at the wrong things.

Apparently there's a slippery slope.
The next thing you know you'll be calling pooners "women", and vaginal sex with cis men "normal".

 

[Écho Öwl]

The next thing you know you'll be calling pooners "women", and vaginal sex with cis men "normal".

I agree that there should be another term for piv sex when it comes to pooners. I suggest referring it to ‘sticking dick in crazy’ sex.

 

[Sean Andalou]

I agree that there should be another term for piv sex when it comes to pooners. I suggest referring it to ‘sticking dick in crazy’ sex.

Well, one flavor of it.
Plenty more men would stick their dicks in crazy than ever would with a pooner.