Now an F-35 is going to be dropped next.
View attachment 7379176
Here's another great example of how far the media is reaching for Trump optics losses right now.





These headlines paint a very clear picture:
What Trump said is simply not true, the claim that "India offered going down to 0" is incorrect.
So what does that mean?
-Did India actually offer to go down to 10%?
-Did they offer to cut some to 0 but keep others in place?
-Is the Hindi term for 0 different than the English one (indians love to remind me that they invented the 0 concept)
By clicking any of the articles we see this big
"but" that the media is referring to without explicitly mentioning:
"they haven't officially signed a deal yet".
As if the term "offer" is only an accurate description when we're at the stage of "hardline ink on paper no chance of turning back."
If this qualifies as a "but" in the headline, then basically every headline about any non conclusive event should have a "but" in it.
-Progress being made on inner city kids becoming engineers...
but they're not yet.
-Kamala leading in polls,
but she hasn't won yet.
-A bunch of people stormed the white house,
but nothing really happened.
-Right winger says mean things online,
but hasn't done anything yet.
-China offers to be a US alternative,
but we all know damn well every country in the region would sooner side with Saruman.
-In this leftist University everyone is accepting of this trans person,
but no men seem to be dating them.
I'm so tired of the news.