Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 69 10.3%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    671
I genuinely can't tell if the whole "$30k in expenses" bit is meant to imply that she was embezzling the funds by inflating/exaggerating grocery costs, but he's previously admitted that she would give him itemized receipts for these expenses, so it's a non-starter of an issue.
Nah, it's just a way to make himself look better and the nanny worse. He essentially reimbursed her for miscellaneous expenses that come with raising kids (his example is if one of the kids wanted fast food after soccer practice or something) as well as groceries and the like. It's not really a "nanny expense" and more of a "child expense" where the nanny just so happened to be the one to make the purchase. There's no reason to even bring it up other than so that he can technically say "I paid my nanny $90k a year to get drunk on the job and abuse my children."

Edit: there may have been some amount of "tipping" so to say. I.e., when the nanny took one of the kids out to McDonald's, she got herself a small fry. Rekieta may have just included the price of her fries in the reimbursement because why not. When I was in high school and had my license, my mom would ask me to drive to Target to pick up a few things, and she would sometimes cover the price if I wanted a soda or ice cream or something small.
 
@AltisticRight,

No disrespect, but the way Nick keeps finding new lows, you got about as much chance of people here stopping the calls for him to kill himself already as Null has getting 100% of the site userbase to properly thumbnail their images.

I've avoided it myself, but the man is truly infuriating, vile, and evil.

He saw Ian or Karl might actually steal the LOTY from him, so he's doing a great effort to remain the lolcow champion 3rd in a row, he wants to be the Ayrton Senna of kiwi farms.
How dare you! You apologize to @Third World Aristocrat right now! That man is a national treasure of Brazil. Lol.

He could also drive a high performance vehicle way better than Nick.
 
I genuinely can't tell if the whole "$30k in expenses" bit is meant to imply that she was embezzling the funds by inflating/exaggerating grocery costs, but he's previously admitted that she would give him itemized receipts for these expenses, so it's a non-starter of an issue.
If I had to guess it's Nick trying to hide how much his coke and hookers habit was costing

Either to Kayla or the grandparents
 
@AltisticRight,

No disrespect, but the way Nick keeps finding new lows, you got about as much chance of people here not telling him to kill himself as Null has getting 100% of the site userbase to properly thumbnail their images.
You may as well try to get @AnOminous and the rest of the Boogie thread to stop telling him to die. That ship has sailed. And wishing Nick death is a lot more charitable than wishing him eternal torture as he deserves.
 
The nanny really should get in contact with Montegraph's lawyer and have another defamation suit drawn. He seems fairly competent and hates Rekieta enough to work for cheap.

She probably won't, but my God it would be fucking hilarious.
It's not like she'd have a difficult time proving damages on account of Nick running his (literal) dick licker admitting he's trying to get her fired.
 
@AltisticRight,

No disrespect, but the way Nick keeps finding new lows, you got about as much chance of people here stopping the calls for him to kill himself already as Null has getting 100% of the site userbase to properly thumbnail their images.

I've avoided it myself, but the man is truly infuriating, vile, and evil.


How dare you! You apologize to @Third World Aristocrat right now! That man is a national treasure of Brazil. Lol.

He could also drive a high performance vehicle way better than Nick.
Never!

file_00000000fe24622f8de581241aaa4b62.webp
 
30k probably also includes other things than just food and snacks. Like clothes, school supplies and so on. Does Nick or Kayla look like parents that do that sort of shopping every single time? 5 growing children go through surprising amount of clothes. And then if you add up even more discretionary spending like toys... I can really see that total hits 30k knowing the spending habits of Nick at least...
 
If you were genuinely a concerned father and that accusation were true, you’d probably be relieved she disappeared as quickly as possible—not lamenting her departure.

And as for contacting her employers about this obvious lie... What a fucking pile of human trash.
:really:Nigger fried his brain so bad he doesn't even remember shit he said 5 minutes ago. Nick is probably so gonzo he wouldn't remember the nanny's name if he didn't have her paperwork or contact saved in his phone. 20 CoachCoins says he's still hoping he can add her to the Balldo-cule
Their son was probably conscious of the fact that the Nanny was the paid replacement parent and resented her employment.
I'd say a good chunk of the kids were probably aware the nanny hated her life working at Chez Balldo. Kids pick up on a lot more than adults figure.
During this period, despite only being paid $4k a month and the children being offspring to a millionaire, she paid them $75 to drink energy drinks, even though she'd be the one who'd have to then take care of these children who've been fed energy drinks. Nick somehow never noticed his children randomly acquiring $75 apiece. What she gained from this is wholly unclear. In addition, she supplied the children with alcohol, possibly stolen from Nick himself. Again, knowing that she would have to be the one to take care of the then inebriated children. He only finds out years later when, with no evidence, one of his neglected children tell him these tales.
See, I can't play along. None of that shit makes sense, even when you try to run it through the junkie "logic" filters. We know Nick's lying, Nick knows Nick's lying. Who is he trying to convince? The wine aunts and coombrains
A kid having a sip of beer is a big deal, harmless, not a big deal, OK if it happens in the 1980's and/or in Texas, the biggest deal in the universe, (most importantly) alright when Nick does it. Glad I learned new stuff today.
I don't think Nick's version of events happened at all. All of this new Nanny defamation arc just comes off like a compulsive liar trying to dig themselves out of a hole of lies with more lies.
that still watch him?
 
I don't think Nick's version of events happened at all. All of this new Nanny defamation arc just comes off like a compulsive liar trying to dig themselves out of a hole of lies with more lies.
Nick did not expose his kids to drugs, alcohol and degenerate behavior.
It was the NANNY all along!

1747771665137.webp
 
The nanny really should get in contact with Montegraph's lawyer and have another defamation suit drawn. He seems fairly competent and hates Rekieta enough to work for cheap.

She probably won't, but my God it would be fucking hilarious.
Given all the friends Nick has made over the last year, I suspect the Nanny could crowdfund her legal warfund in half the time it took Monty.
 
Back