Ana Valens / Anastasia Catherine Wythe / Phil Wythe / Philip Stephen Wythe / @SpaceDoctorPhD / @acvalens / @ac_valens - MtF transtrender extraordinaire, formerly a freelance "journalist" for The Daily Dot; but now works for VICE, SJW, professional liar and social rouser, CatParty's favorite blogger

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

I wouldn't be surprised if there was other shit like that in Ana's old "journalist" articles. I don't hate myself enough to go look, though.

I'm trying to archive every single one of his articles through the Muck Rack profile. I'm in October 2020 now. Lot of complete slop written for The Mary Sue, but plenty of giantess/lesbian/futanari fetish stuff, or "your app for women is failing trans women", "Cyberpunk 2077 bad for trans representation" and so on. Scrolling through the headlines+synopses on Muck Rack will make it significantly easier to locate what you're looking for, but you need to register an account to move past the first few pages.

Why did the Boston Globe give a platform to a SWERF? (archive)

Her concerns about kids watching porn during the pandemic are misguided.

This is another more recently deleted article. Active on Feb. 10, 2025, gone now.

Hacking//Hustling: Operations Security (OPSEC): An Introductory Overview (archive)

We live in an age of increased surveillance and censorship. Social media is a bastion for fascism. Abusers target sex workers, queer users, and people of color and prey on them without fear. Whorephobes and bigots alike use our vulnerability to their advantage through social manipulation, doxxings, and swattings. It has never been a more dangerous time to be a marginalized person online. And our first line of defense is operations security.

LOL

Medium: Don’t Judge A Girl For What’s Between Her Legs (archive) - Another classic.

 

[The Token Ethnic]

27 minutes of coping and seething

Aside from repeatedly saying "um," Phil doesn't address his POCD or his unsettling fan fiction. He claims, "it's not okay to harass a transwoman/journalist like this," and is asking other trannies and chasers to defend him just so that he can return to social media. Nice try framing this as VTuber Gamergate, buddy.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Why did the Boston Globe give a platform to a SWERF? (archive)

Good find! Two paragraphs from the article in which Ana says it's fascist to worry about exposing kids to pornography:

But Dines’ approach to dealing with this fabricated moral panic is frightening. SWERF rhetoric has far more in common with fascism than feminism, and Dines’ courses promise to rob young people of their ability to appreciate adult material when they come of age by conditioning them to avoid porn and associate it with shame and disgust. In feminist journalist Judith Levine’s (highly controversial) 2002 book Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex, Levine reveals sexual predators are more likely to come from households where sexual material was less common at home, not more.

“Evidence of the harm of exposure to sexually explicit images or words in childhood is inconclusive, even nonexistent,” Levine wrote. “Interviewers of sex criminals including child molesters reveal that the children who eventually became rapists were usually exposed to pornography less than other kids; if they’d seen the same amount, the exposure had not occurred earlier in life than the other children’s.”

Let's dig in a bit more into the book Ana Valens is glowingly quoting. Here's an article reporting on a panel Judith Levine did about her book in 2002, soon after it was published:

In many other countries and cultures, the belief that children are naturally non-sexual is less prevalent, Levine said. Sometimes this understanding can be exploitative... however, it can also be empowering. Levine cited the Netherlands, which allows children as young as 12 to engage in sex with adults.

Another quote:

"I'm a Foucauldean about it: We talk about sex all the time, we talk about children and their sexuality only as a problem," [Levine] said."

So her views align with Foucault, who campaigned to lower the French age of consent and was credibly accused of sodomizing prepubescent boys in Tunisia.

Ana (the man who supposedly has POCD and is terrified of being a pedophile) read Levine's book, agreed with it, and made sure to glowingly endorse the author's thesis in public.

But maybe I'm just cherry picking author quotes out of context, and the content of the book is different? Well, here's a long online review of Harmful to Minors. It's from the Anarchist Library, so it's not exactly a conservative critique. Even trans-friendly anarchists side-eye Levine for her glowing approval of pedophiles (bolding is mine below, italics are in the original):

Another source [Levine] cites in support of the same claim (“intergenerational sex has often been considered normal”) is William H. Davenport, “Adult-Child Sexual Relations in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” in The Sexual Abuse of Children: Theory and Research, vol. 1, edited by William O’Donohue and James H. Geer. Just looking at the table of contents, the second chapter of this volume is Theo Sandfort’s contribution, titled “The Argument for Adult-Child Sexual Contact: A Critical Appraisal and New Data.” I wonder if she read this chapter, and if she did, what she thought of it — and did she see any red flags about repeatedly citing Sandfort’s other work as credible science? Did she not notice that Sandfort was on the NAMBLA list of recommended readings?[3] Was she unaware of his most infamous works written explicitly with the goal of influencing policy toward abolishing the age of consent[4] or did she just not see it as compromising to his credibility on other matters?

Here's where it gets interesting. It's our old friend, John Money:

Some of the scientific theories that form the basis of Levine’s body of evidence include the long-debunked theories of actual sexual abusers like John Money. For example, Levine discusses Money’s theory of “childhood sexual rehearsal play,” and presents it as scientifically valid consensus. Levine doesn’t directly cite Money as a source concerning the theory of “sexual rehearsal play,” but the sexologists she does cite are evidently influenced by him: it was John Money who pioneered the theory.[5]

Let's take a quick look at a few of the academic works produced by Theo Sandfort, who Levine references approvingly throughout her book (and which in turn, Ana Valens publicly endorsed):



Sorry to get so deep into this, but it's important to see the amount of effort a generation of "academics" put into laundering their desire to fuck little boys. The lasting fruits of their efforts include Money's theory of "gender identity," the careers of people like Judith Levine, and Ana Valens.

 

[Broken Wrd]

Anal Violence evidently caught a Twitch ban

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/0SVre

 

[oh no im late for school]

Sorry to get so deep into this, but it's important to see the amount of effort a generation of "academics" put into laundering their desire to fuck little boys. The lasting fruits of their efforts include Money's theory of "gender identity," the careers of people like Judith Levine, and Ana Valens.

on the subject of john money, here's one of my favorite 80's snl skits which is, given the current climate, unfortunately evergreen

 

[Mystery Enigma]

Longtime lurker here. I've seen a lot of the discussion around POCD regarding this individual and as someone who (very unfortunately) has dealt with OCD I thought I'd give my two cents. POCD is a real subtype of OCD. It's not a separate diagnosis, nor are any other OCD subtypes, but it definitely is a theme the disorder can take on, as it can literally make someone obsessively worry over anything. I've never dealt with this theme of OCD in my personal experience (and I certainly hope I never do), but if you look at OCD forums online you'll see plenty of people with cases of it.

That being said, this person clearly does not have POCD. If they really did, well for one, they wouldn't be this public about it online, and would instead be completely ashamed of it. But more importantly, people who actually have this OCD subtype are petrified of the idea that they could be a pedo and will do anything and everything to ensure they aren't (through compulsions). This almost certainly would not involve them actually getting off to loli shit and "ageplay", they would be horrified at the sheer idea they could be aroused by such things. I can't say whether or not Phil actually has OCD but if you're actually jacking it to that stuff on a frequent basis and openly admit to it then that just straight up isn't OCD, like it's just not. That's like if someone who has OCD obsesssions over burning their house down actually burns their house down. They seem like they are just legit into fucked up shit and are using POCD as a way to not admit it, which in my opinion is extremely insulting and harmful to people who ACTUALLY suffer from this theme of OCD.

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Longtime lurker here. I've seen a lot of the discussion around POCD regarding this individual and as someone who (very unfortunately) has dealt with OCD I thought I'd give my two cents. POCD is a real subtype of OCD. It's not a separate diagnosis, nor are any other OCD subtypes, but it definitely is a theme the disorder can take on, as it can literally make someone obsessively worry over anything. I've never dealt with this theme of OCD in my personal experience (and I certainly hope I never do), but if you look at OCD forums online you'll see plenty of people with cases of it.

That being said, this person clearly does not have POCD. If they really did, well for one, they wouldn't be this public about it online, and would instead be completely ashamed of it. But more importantly, people who actually have this OCD subtype are petrified of the idea that they could be a pedo and will do anything and everything to ensure they aren't (through compulsions). This almost certainly would not involve them actually getting off to loli shit and "ageplay", they would be horrified at the sheer idea they could be aroused by such things. I can't say whether or not Phil actually has OCD but if you're actually jacking it to that stuff on a frequent basis and openly admit to it then that just straight up isn't OCD, like it's just not. That's like if someone who has OCD obsesssions over burning their house down actually burns their house down. They seem like they are just legit into fucked up shit and are using POCD as a way to not admit it, which in my opinion is extremely insulting and harmful to people who ACTUALLY suffer from this theme of OCD.

I'd also point out - no one with OCD tends to say they've been "cured" of it. People with OCD tends to learn to handle their OCD and curb their worst impulses. But getting rid of it, and just moving on like it's a bad cold that's gone? Yeah, no Phil. He's just a pedophile.

 

[Mystery Enigma]

Yeah, and also OCD is treated usually through ERP (exposure-response prevention) which involves exposing you to the things that trigger you without doing compulsions, and I honestly don't think any (sane, you never know nowadays) OCD therapist would recommend someone with POCD to indulge in degenerate pedo porn as an exposure. "But my ageplay fetish triggers my POCD" no it fucking doesn't bro you legit are just a kid diddler.

 

[Postal_Rat]

Yeah, and also OCD is treated usually through ERP (exposure-response prevention) which involves exposing you to the things that trigger you without doing compulsions, and I honestly don't think any (sane, you never know nowadays) OCD therapist would recommend someone with POCD to indulge in degenerate pedo porn as an exposure. "But my ageplay fetish triggers my POCD" no it fucking doesn't bro you legit are just a kid diddler.

I feel like at it's core whatever a therapist uses for exposure therapy has to be something that triggers the compulsion without justifying it. If some one suffers from germ based OCD I doubt the correct treatment would be to dunk them in a cesspit, because the correct response is very much I am covered in germs and I need to wash and scrub and cleanse. If a person is purposefully looking at material designed to arouse pedophiles it is perfectly natural for that person to think "I might be a pedophile".

 

[The Lawgiver]

I somehow forgot that this bitch was the tranny garth despite knowing both were trannies until recently when i got reminded of their existence via the coverage of the shit going down on the recent MATI, and then made the connection skimming recently active threads. jesus fuck I forgot just how depraved this piece of shit is lmao. I MEAN OUTSIDE THE FUCKED UP BREEDING FANFIC SHIT.

 

[whatsupwthat]

Lmao Phil got banned from doing his erp ASMRs.
Also, he sure did quickly give up writing in 3rd person and pretending like it's someone else managing his account
(a)

 

[Bill's Due]

Longtime lurker here. I've seen a lot of the discussion around POCD regarding this individual and as someone who (very unfortunately) has dealt with OCD I thought I'd give my two cents. POCD is a real subtype of OCD. It's not a separate diagnosis, nor are any other OCD subtypes, but it definitely is a theme the disorder can take on, as it can literally make someone obsessively worry over anything. I've never dealt with this theme of OCD in my personal experience (and I certainly hope I never do), but if you look at OCD forums online you'll see plenty of people with cases of it.

I have to push back REALLY HARD against this.

Kirsche (the VTuber this pedophile is going after) actually did a deep dive and full article on this after reading about Anal Violence's pOCD claim. From what she learned, this variant is not in the DSM V and is something that is being pushed as a "real" thing by one doctor and some people he works with. We read through all of it and it genuinely made us want to glowpost in her chat.

Everything you said in your post feels like a copy-pasta of what that article said. I know you didn't copy the article, but I'm just saying to us as we read through the article explaining it, it really made no sense. And the proposed treatment for it just made us glowpost more.

Look, the problem here is we already have to deal with people trying to rebrand their pedophilic selves as "MAP"s. I think there was some old Vice or Guardian (both left wing rags) article from the early 2010's that they tried to coin the term "Virtuous Pedophile" (pedos who never touched a kid, allegedly) to describe "good" pedophiles or some bullshit like that. Then you got the hebe/epheb/etc distinction some people try to justify. Which, if you were a person living in the 1500's where people died at the age of 30, you MIGHT have an argument, and MAYBE the 15-17 range might be arguable (and if and only if the other party is around the same age), but considering how a lot of teens are still mentally immature as fuck due to social media brainrot that doesn't fly in this era. It's the whole "you give an inch, they take a mile" thing (or the slippery slope, but the slope is real). That's why we make a hard cutoff of 18 years old because that is societies best gauge as to when at least enough of your brain has developed to be able to make *some* decisions on your own. Any coomer degenerate like Anal Violence can justify exceptions by saying shit like "Well, when I was 17, I had my pp touched by a troon who was in his 30s and I came out fine, so what's the problem with pOCD?" but even if there is a supposed "valid" reason, that doesn't suddenly make the 99% of other times where this shit traumatizes the kid acceptable in a moral society.

That's why there is so much pushback against trying to turn this into some "softer" thing that can be treated. The risk to children is too high to even go down that road. It also doesn't help that there's a high rate of recidivism if the kiddie diddler is ever let go. And you are already aware that that kind of abuse continues the "cycle" where the child grows up to turn into one themselves and/or troons out.

It would make it much harder to pin down degenerates like Anal Violence if he can just blame it on pOCD, even though he wrote a goddamn article about getting off to kids in Fall Guys making his nasty shit vibrate.

 

[clipartfan92]

https://bsky.app/profile/acvalens.net/post/3lpgqeqpjwk2o (archive.ph)

 

[Punished Neco]

'I have no issue with my work being read out on stream, which is why I quote retweeted someone's post where they called for reporting Kirsche's stream for sexual content'.

Acting like people are stupid, we all saw them repost the calls to report the stream, why is Phil trying to act like they didn't do anything to encourage it?


"I do believe the goal here is a total deplatforming of my content from the Internet"

The irony is lost on this one.

 

[behindyourightnow]

From what she learned, this variant is not in the DSM V

It's not in the DSM-5 because it's a type of OCD, and OCD is already in the DSM-5. You won't find "contamination OCD" (the well-known type where people wash their hands constantly) in there either because it is also already a type of OCD. The "OCD" category covers all of the different types, and they have the same diagnosis criteria and are treated in the same way.

Also if they ever do include subtypes I am going to demand they add a subtype where you compulsively point out that it's called the DSM-5 not the DSM-V, because I definitely suffer from that

and is something that is being pushed as a "real" thing by one doctor and some people he works with. We read through all of it and it genuinely made us want to glowpost in her chat.

Article on POCD by researchers from the University of Indianapolis

Article on POCD by researchers at Louisville OCD Clinic

Article on POCD by researchers at Harvard Medical

Article on POCD by psychiatrists at Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte in Portugal

Article on POCD by a bunch of Spanish, French, and American researchers

Article on POCD by researchers at Anxiety Treatment and Research Clinic in Hamilton, Ontario

Boy, this "one guy" sure gets around a lot. Truly an international man of mystery.

 

[AMHOLIO]

I think Phil doesn't actually believe Kirsche is a nazi, or at least, didn't at the start. I think he got mad that a real woman specifically spoke out against him, researched any possible reason to cancel her, then stretched like Mr. Fantastic across a huge room to cancel her and jump hard onto the belief that she is a nazi to justify hating her and canceling her. WOMAN HURT ME - PHIL SMASH!

That's why now he's acting as diplomatic as he can. He doesn't feel remorse of course, just wants others to stop canceling him and doesn't care about the irony. Please, he did not do anything wrong, someone who hurt his ego did.


Also, can you guys make a debate thread elsewhere on POCD? Might as well since the conversation has expanded past Phil.

 

[Nobody Important]

I think Phil doesn't actually believe Kirsche is a nazi, or at least, didn't at the start. I think he got mad that a real woman specifically spoke out against him, researched any possible reason to cancel her, then stretched like Mr. Fantastic across a huge room to cancel her and jump hard onto the belief that she is a nazi to justify hating her and canceling her. WOMAN HURT ME - PHIL SMASH!

That's why now he's acting as diplomatic as he can. He doesn't feel remorse of course, just wants others to stop canceling him and doesn't care about the irony. Please, he did not do anything wrong, someone who hurt his ego did.


Also, can you guys make a debate thread elsewhere on POCD? Might as well since the conversation has expanded past Phil.

Yeah I agree. I'm 100% sure he would have written an article on Rima or Elara if Kirsche hadn't wandered across his sights; GamerSupps apparently endorses them and VAllure.

I think he wanted to flex his princess wand and get a major VTuber sponsor to follow his wishes, and lost interest when it didn't work that way.

 

[oh no im late for school]

View attachment 7378200
'I have no issue with my work being read out on stream, which is why I quote retweeted someone's post where they called for reporting Kirsche's stream for sexual content'.

Acting like people are stupid, we all saw them repost the calls to report the stream, why is Phil trying to act like they didn't do anything to encourage it?

View attachment 7378199
"I do believe the goal here is a total deplatforming of my content from the Internet"

The irony is lost on this one.

'what an absolutely narcissistic toad. "i'm a public figure" he types with his own fat fingers while twisting every which way to declare himself the real victim™ making sure to cap it off with perpetuating the larp of not being the one tweeting it out' - onilfs

 

[Broken Wrd]

'what an absolutely narcissistic toad. "i'm a public figure" he types with his own fat fingers while twisting every which way to declare himself the real victim™ making sure to cap it off with perpetuating the larp of not being the one tweeting it out' - onilfs

I'm more afraid that there might actually be someone that is a beta orbiter or Phil that would actually do this.

Odds are that there isn't - but I shudder to think of what decrepit degenerate might fit the bill.

Sleep well.

 

[reinigen]

https://bsky.app/profile/acvalens.net/post/3lpmwqo7ewm2b

https://archive.is/iuwJp