Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
2 things, first one, he still has an iPhone as per this signature, for those that were debating the autocorrect saying he has a cheap android. Second, "do not contact me or Waylon again" so... your dad is still good to go? 😂 1000056334.webp
 
2 things, first one, he still has an iPhone as per this signature, for those that were debating the autocorrect saying he has a cheap android. Second, "do not contact me or Waylon again" so... your dad is still good to go? 😂View attachment 7393943
Again with the "have" language lol, what a retarded fishlipped faggot. If he does file for it I cannot fucking wait for the transcript. It'll be the funniest shit since Big Dick Andrew v Tomlinson. Imagine being the judge having to listen to this drooling harelipped retard explain how submitting public records requests is SCHTALKING.
 
The real answer? He keeps killing hookers and stealing their cash like in Grand Theft Auto.

Earlier in the thread, I made reference to the Thomas Perry book that I'm currently reading. This is the plot of that story. A hit man is going from town to town to carry out his jobs. In order to stay below the radar, he seduces sex workers becoming their boyfriend. Then, after he's done the job, he puts a bullet in the back of their skull and takes off with their cash which he then uses to live off while planning his next job.

The Boyfriend, Thomas Perry.

I haven't read all of his 25 novels yet, but of the 12 or so that I have read, every one has been a cracker. Better than Michael Connolly, for my money. Less formulaic with much more interesting plots.

I will note that Hardin has very recently repeatedly raised issues that could eventually become ripe for appellate review, despite having let them slide in the past, including (rather daringly) the actual Article III judge of the case having quite literally violated the rules himself.

As annoying as this case must be for null (and it annoys the fuck out of me and it's costing me nothing, so I can only begin to imagine how infuriating he must find it) it has to be a major source of interest and entertainment for Matthew Harding. I suspect most litigious people have a touch of the lolcow about them, but Russell really is a cut above most in his insanity. His history of litigation is a really rich tapestry of madness. While he's obviously striving to get the best possible outcome for his client in this case, surely he must be as entertained by it all as we are?
 
Maybe he can republish it the same way Nicole Brown's and Ron Goldman's families did with OJ Simpson's book If I Did It.

He can add addendums to the book to include the police reports about his stalking conviction and that unfortunate incident at his high school which led him on the path to suing Taylor Swift. Then he can sell the Kiwi Edition of Why I Sued Taylor Swift and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious, and Crazy.
Coukd probably write a long foreword about how broken copyright is. With an afterwords by Hardin about the case.
 
Any party wishing a different result than they got at the trial court level has to challenge it at the appeals court level. If Russhole appeals, I would imagine a cross-appeal would be very likely unless the outcome was entirely favorable to the defendants.

I think the sanctions award is definitely appealable even on an abuse of discretion basis, and also agree it is definitely not worth appealing. Unless Russhole appeals in which case we're already talking appellate bucks and why not at that point.

N.B. Filing fee for an appeal to the 10th is $605 ($500 at the time Greer filed his, under the prior fee schedule). Was he (validly) IFP when he filed his (October 2021)? He would've had to move for it at the district court, and if he did, they'd certainly have granted it, given he was IFP in this case.
 
Hopefully the Nevada Secretary of State will be reviewing the originating papers for "ID NV LLC", Nevada Business ID: NV20253353842, for the willful violation of NRS 239.330 by Mr. Russel Greer for knowingly making a false declaration as a result of the intentionally deceitful and deficient information provided with regard to the listing of the name of a managing member.

How awful would it be for Crusty Rusty to be banned by the SoS from forming or managing any corporations in the state of Nevada for a number of years?
 
Last edited:
I'm borderline surprised that useful mistake hasn't been complained about by name yet as someone that is secretly driving around Nevada and Utah with a baseball bat looking for him.
I'm just surprised he hasn't noticed the Private Investigator I've had tailing him for the last 2 months.
 
I'm quite disappointed Greer didn't prod District Judge Barlow into rescinding his incredible 80% off deal by trying to negotiate, and yet again got to delay a process for several months with no consequences whatsoever. The new deadline is totally real this time, because failing it "may result in additional sanctions".

Reminder:
- The $1,000 amount is based on the Judge's gut feeling
- Is clemency based on the IFP status that has since been removed
- Ignored Hardin's billed hours for this specific subject (which Null did pay, >$5,000), and did not follow any logic as it should have (something "lodestar", ask AnOminous)
- The Defense right to answer the decided sanction before it was applied was also ignored

I'm not sure if it would have been too impractical for the judge to change the amount, or if he just don't care. I remember this thread was day dreaming about Greer complaining resulting into a bigger and proper sanction amount when it was first issued.

Null previously indicated he would not appeal this sanction because it wouldn't make sense financially, and he also has no trust in the neutrality of the appeal court. So the only shot at rectifying this specific sanction would be if Greer appeal, right? Would the appeal court only look at the specific topics being appealed or scrutinize the entire lawsuit?
There are other Sanction Motions now to be ruled on. Part of the reason Barlow reduced it (besides he pulled it out of his ass before reading Hardins bill) is it was Greers first time being sanctioned.

But the Recalcitrant behavior continued. And more Sanctions are on the table. It's taken months of court action to finally make it clear to Greer to stop fucking around about that first sanction.

The second and third Sanctions will likely be decided by Bennett. Who was clearly pissed at what Barlow did. Chances are if further Sanctions are ordered he will include enough wiggle room to make the defense whole with regard to the first sanction bullshit.
 
Extract of the Winnemucca City Council meeting video from 6 May 2025, containing Russhole's agenda item and response from the owner of the Scott Shady. I have enhanced the audio for (attempted) clarity.

If anyone finds this useful (i.e. @The Great Citracett, @Potentially Criminal etc), have at it.

EDIT: Watch this version instead (h/t @A Pleasant Disposition for cleaning up the audio some more)

 
Last edited:
>"For the record, I've never met the guy. We exchanged two emails and that was it, so..."
>"Well, no one here has met him either."


You gotta feel bad for the hotel owner who had no clue about any of this debauchery. Absolutely insane that this was the "emergency meeting" conflicting with this litigation. Hearing that the city council had been proactively trying to contact him for months, if not years, to dissuade him from even pulling this stunt has to be the cherry on top.
 
Extract of the Winnemucca City Council meeting video from 6 May 2025, containing Russhole's agenda item and response from the owner of the Scott Shady. I have enhanced the audio for (attempted) clarity.
Remuxed version for increased audio clarity (focused on greer clarity, not council members)
 
Last edited:
Back