💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 159 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 279 39.5%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 95 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 174 24.6%
  • Total voters
    707
Kipersonapiscesotter said:
What would proof be? 15 months after the fact my kid told me the nanny let them try a beer? That she paid them 75 dollars to chug energy drinks?
Click to expand...
Nick literally told us he couldn't have given his kids cocaine because that's just a waste of good cocaine. Every single cope and lie he tells goes against every previous cope and lie. Don't forget that drugs are both horribly traumatizing, so much so that he cant even bring a case against the Nanny in fear of triggering the kids PTSD, and something that's just funny and weird and awesome.

Hes decided that actually the farms were right all along, he's putting his sins on the Nanny (while minimizing of course), and now he pretends at righteous fury ("but lets not prosecute her ok?"). He really thinks this ends with Aaron taking him back, everyone claps and then the credits roll. The fear and stress is fueling into a major crashout.
 
Himedall All-seeing Waifu said:
Those people moved on years ago. WeebWars is dead.
Click to expand...
They're actually still going after Vic, if you can believe it. I check in on the old WW thread every now and again. It still plods along at a slow rate.

However, I think they've largely given up on Nick. He's doing a fine job destroying himself. Plus the critics Nick has to deal with these days are way more effective than KV.
 
He's said before that it took 2 bad days that led to the coke stream. We've been on a run of several bad weeks now. Will the cam footage of his crack den push him over the edge? Every man has his limits of what he can take. And nothing can prepare you for the scrutiny of hundreds of thousands of strangers online. Each with their own knowledge and opinions.

He's for sure going to jail in August, by his own doing via his lies and antics online. He could have just agreed to go work a 9-5 somewhere and stay well away from the Internet. Everyone would have forgotten about him. This thread would have died long ago.

But he chose this path. He's all bullshit and lies in the public forum, and believe me he knows it. But when he went in front of the Judge he cowered like a pussy. Didn't say anything to the tune that he does on X or his streams. He still says how awesome drugs are, but doesn't have the balls to tell the court that. This is who this man truly is.

I see no downsides in Nick having an evening stream, drinking, taking drugs and just doing what he wants. Go out in a blaze of glory, watch the footage of your arrest along with us Nick. And tell us all about how you don't give a shit about your family and children, your home, life or morals. You don't. You hate everyone around you. You can now just be honest. It would be a huge relief for you.

You really have nothing to lose anymore. And no amount of lies pinning it on others will help. The normies know what you did, and we will all see very soon how bad the living conditions were. EWU is probably getting the footage also, along with all the other big names out there. If you think you're not going to get flooded with a ton of angry and concerned parents to your streams after it's out then you just aren't seeing the big picture. People hate it when children are forced into squalor and neglect by drug addicted neglected parents. They will seek you out. Just like the Ruby Frankes 8 passengers child abuse and neglect information and body cams did. You're fucked. It's game over. Your channel is probably getting deleted also.

So plan that stream, do what you really wanna do, say what you really wanna say for one last time. You're going to jail. You're scared but you know it's inevitable. It's not going to change you. Might as well lean into the fun on the way. One for the road old boy 🥃
 
Mordecai 3 Finger Brown said:
I'm just a tourist occasionally in the thread these days, but it seems like some of the nanny phonebooking from May 2024 wasn't archived in the thread, at least under the Holtberg surname.

View attachment 7390296

Couldn't get the LinkedIn to archive. Not sure if there's any changes because Fleetwood had it last May too.

View attachment 7390299
Archive
Ten year old Twitter that didn't seem to be archived.

View attachment 7390301
Archive
Abandoned alternate Pinterest account from a decade ago.
Click to expand...
This got me looking again and the only thing I turned up that I didn't see last year was an old youtube account with the nanny's name. Just has a music playlist and a pfp.
1747884944935.webp
 
Biggus McDickus said:
He's for sure going to jail in August, by his own doing via his lies and antics online. He could have just agreed to go work a 9-5 somewhere and stay well away from the Internet. Everyone would have forgotten about him. This thread would have died long ago.
Click to expand...
He has a fucking law degree. He could have logged off, practiced law, and lived a more comfortable life than most of the posters in this thread. But that wouldn't be enough for him.
 
Journoscum said:
If you're putting that information out there, you better have proof if you don't want to get the shit sued out of you. Doesn't he record everything? That's all I can think of.
Click to expand...
No. His story makes no sense. His nanny called him drunk, but rather than firing her or documenting it, he waited until she resigned a week later? Good luck explaining that to a jury.

Or at least 15 months later a child randomly said "Chaney let us drink beer and paid us to drink energy drinks!"

Nick lies. When he isn't blatantly lying he is muddling narratives. We saw this with the Frank's muh watermark stuff.

I'll give an example. A few years ago my daughter, inadvertently, took a swig of vodka that she thought was water. Immediately spat it out, crying, etc. In Nick's World this would be I gave my child vodka.

Just what was the scenario where the children drank energy drinks and beer? If it did even happen, I doubt very much it was actually sinister.
 
Biggus McDickus said:
So plan that stream, do what you really wanna do, say what you really wanna say for one last time. You're going to jail. You're scared but you know it's inevitable. It's not going to change you. Might as well lean into the fun on the way. One for the road old boy 🥃
Click to expand...
Honestly, it’s hard to find much fun with Rekieta compared to other lolcows like Ralph, MovieBob, or Quinton (not a very good lolcow but he was my first so I have some nostalgia for his crash out)

I really want to see that body cam footage but afterwards, I’ll probably entirely check out on Rekieta, unless he makes the front page again. The nanny shit truly shocked me. I really didn’t think he could sink lower, and at this point, I don’t know if I can bear to see what happens next
 
Phil Leotardo said:
The more I debated with Rekieta, the more familiar I became with his argumentative tactics. At the outset he counted upon the ignorance or short memory of his viewers, but when he got so entangled that he could not find a way out, he played the trick of acting as a casual drunk or a clown who couldn’t be expected to take things seriously. Should he fail, in spite of these antics, he would feign confusion, claim he didn’t understand the counter-arguments, and then bolt away into another digression—usually some irrelevant legal trivia or juvenile ranting about someone’s goo.

He would lay down truisms and legal platitudes; and, if you accepted these, he would apply them to other situations of an entirely different nature from the original point at issue. If you pointed this out, he would dodge again, never allowing himself to be pinned down to a single precise claim. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on him, one’s hand grasped only liquor-soaked bluster and half-jokes that slipped through the fingers and reassembled a moment later into a smug facade of certainty.

If, on occasion, he was forced to concede a point—because of pressure from others present—and if you thought, at last, some ground had been gained, a surprise awaited you the next stream. Rekieta would be utterly oblivious to what had happened before, repeating the same nonsense with even greater confidence. And if you reminded him of his prior defeat, he would pretend astonishment and swear that the opposite had been proven. He could remember nothing—nothing except that he had been right all along.

Sometimes I was left dumbfounded. I did not know what amazed me more—the endless tide of his verbiage or the clever way in which he dressed up falsehood as insight, corruption as charm. Gradually, I began to hate him.
Click to expand...

Here are a few common Nick copes with subsequent analysis to complement your post:

"What do you want from me?"
Nick says this to make people think he is engaging with them when he is actually looking to shift the focus off of himself and onto others. Nick then usually forces the idea that this person needs him to do something ("why do you need me to do this?") thereby imagining himself in a position of power. Nick can then deem them to be unreasonable, entitled, or just dismiss them out of hand.

"Why do you need my approval?"
This comes up when Nick wants to disagree without providing/defending his position. He seems offended that someone would try and convince him of their position on a given subject or dare to ask him to defend his own position. Nick apparently decides that it must be because he is so important and the other person must NEED him to agree. An egotistical loaded question similar to the one above designed to shift focus off of himself and onto others.

"Why do you care?"
This is yet another way that Nick tries to shift the focus off of himself and onto someone else. Of course people are free to care about whatever they want, but Nick's goal is to place the person in a position where they think they need to explain themselves to him. Again, Nick can then deem them to be unreasonable, entitled, or just dismiss them out of hand.

"I don't know what you/anyone is talking about."
When backed into a corner, Nick will restart the conversation by either denying that there is a problem or feigning ignorance. He will ask for clarity ad nauseum so that the conversation cannot progress to the point where Nick has to explain himself.

"You can't know everything."
While true on it's own, Nick seems to use this generalization to project ignorance onto others on a specific topic (while usually exempting himself through implication). This is because Nick would rather engage with what someone doesn't know than what they do know (for obvious reasons).

"All rumors are true, especially the fake ones, but seriously there's no point in defending yourself online because people are going to believe whatever they want to believe, and it's a waste to try and change anyone's mind".
Nick likes to rig certain conversations from the outset so that he feels correct no matter how it goes; if they believe him then Nick is right in his own way, and if they don't believe him then Nick is right as well. Pathetic self-soothing of a passive-aggressive narcissist.

TL/DR: Nick's primary tactic is to be as difficult to deal with as possible so as to induce incompetence in his opposition. He accomplishes this via narcissistic belligerence (especially when he feels threatened), malicious compliance, sabotage, devising his own definitions/interpretations of words, and confusing delusion for reality (Nick thinking that merely believing something is true makes it true).

All of these approaches are prone to backfire and either cultivate or reinforce a severe personality disorder. Nick's reliance on them is what makes him a top-tier lolcow. While Nick's spite and inability to learn from his mistakes make him not worth engaging with in a meaningful sense, he can at least make for a compelling dumpster fire.
 
Kipersonapiscesotter said:
No. His story makes no sense. His nanny called him drunk, but rather than firing her or documenting it, he waited until she resigned a week later? Good luck explaining that to a jury.
Click to expand...

This should have generated a welfare check of some kind. Either calling an adult relative to check on the children/nanny or calling the police to check on them.

Nick has claimed that he is in extra danger because he's been swatted. Yet, when he wasn't there, he was fine with drunk nanny potentially dealing with SWAT team.

Also, Nick is aware of needing a sober adult persent. He has stated more than once that when he is drinking or drugging, another adult is present that isn't doing these things. But apparently he was okay with drunk nanny being the only adult present. It's very clear that his only concern is whether he would get in trouble rather than the welfare of his children.
 
Journoscum said:
This nanny stuff is new to me, I'm stunned it wasn't featured. Let's just say Nick IS telling the truth (lol)
Click to expand...
If Nick is telling the truth, he admits he had a nanny who gave alcohol to his kids and he did nothing about it. He's literally admiting the very child abuse he has been constantly denying. And he's admitting that months after she left, he was so incompetent and pathetic that he was literally incapable of cleaning up his own home, what a worthless crackhead loser.

Nick has just literally admitted that he is such a worthless crackhead piece of shit that he was incapable of feeding his kids and cleaning up the home literal months after the nanny (for obvious and sane reasons) abandoned his crackshack, probably after he tried to rape her.
 
Nick complains constantly. On his show, on others shows, in his social media posts, & in his personal relationships. He’s been complaining, in his home, in front of his kids, for years. It’s easy to picture him name-calling everyone who reported him while in front of the kids with no self awareness. He’s modeling some very fucked up behavior.

Nick doesn’t make time for his kids when they interrupt his show, (I’m ignoring that one, obviously performative time that Nick purposefully had his daughter on the show a week or two ago, when people pointed out how horribly he reacted to her worried interruption a day prior, as it was obviously scripted bullshit.) He ignores his kids as a matter of course so it’s easy to picture them vying for his attention by imitating him, his complaints, & ease with lying.

It’s obvious that either his kid didn’t say shit about the nanny & it’s just another Nick story, or that the kid is modeling Nick’s behavior, complete with lies, in a (very sad) attempt to try & be like their dad to get his attention. Either of those things are easier to picture than Nicks bullshit story being real. He can’t even repeat it correctly, as the story he tells keeps changing.
 
AnOminous said:
If Nick is telling the truth, he admits he had a nanny who gave alcohol to his kids and he did nothing about it. He's literally admiting the very child abuse he has been constantly denying. And he's admitting that months after she left, he was so incompetent and pathetic that he was literally incapable of cleaning up his own home, what a worthless crackhead loser.

Nick has just literally admitted that he is such a worthless crackhead piece of shit that he was incapable of feeding his kids and cleaning up the home literal months after the nanny (for obvious and sane reasons) abandoned his crackshack, probably after he tried to rape her.
Click to expand...
If you parse it through the filter of "Nick's accusations are actually confessions," then he is in fact admitting that he's given his kids liquor, and paid them money to chug energy drinks (presumably because it's funny and weird?).
 
Angry Shoes said:
He has a fucking law degree. He could have logged off, practiced law, and lived a more comfortable life than most of the posters in this thread. But that wouldn't be enough for him.
Click to expand...
No, he couldn't have. He sort of tried, and he sucked.

And he's literally said that being a lawyer is too much work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom