US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I miss the days where Presidents of either party could be spoofed, satirized, or poked fun at without it devolving into partisan hate.
In Current Year there is art depicting the leftists as heroic "decent human beings" with "diversity", and Trump depicted as demonic and Trump voters as literal demons. Also, that art is likely not meant to be ironic. I do not think the "politically correct" of the decades before Current Year got that deranged and cult-like, whether it be hippies against Nixon nor Democrat voters against younger Bush. I think "social media" readily available on "smartphones" and "social engineering" from MSM and Big Tech is to blame.
 
Any niggas (including you) know if the Soviet female snipers thing is bullshit?

Spanish allegedly had a lot of woman guerillas too during the Peninsular War.
The Spanish Civil War had those and Franco had a general who was loosely aligned with his faction rape them with Moroccan mercenaries and played the rapes over Republican Radios to demoralize them.

The big thing with the Spanish Civil War as I’ve read it was that the Nationalists (Franco) typically could be negotiated with and even if you got beaten they had some justice system. The Republicans (not a uniform faction, basically anarchists, socialists, Communists, and Utopians) didn’t have any one authority to go to. They had utopian ideas of militaries without hierarchy (fucking failed) and so a neutral citizen would just get robbed by them and have no one to turn to.

There was actually a neutral women’s faction that gave aid that eventually sided with the Nationalists due to the Republicans being incredibly difficult to work with and insanely ideologically retarded. The women’s faction was fairly Catholic and the atheist communists and Anarchists would rape and enslave them with the justification that they were needing of it.

The women in the Soviet Union as fighters is exaggerated, but a lot of them served and saw some combat due to the dire straits the Soviets were in. They reinforced positions that were mostly safe, but a few were vanguard on some positions, iirc. The bigger thing was Soviet women being the infrastructure for the Soviet war machine. They did a lot of work. Even the laundry women worked hard as shit until the US properly started giving them shit.
 
all good, I know were on shitpost forum.
I will look into sythian? sounds very interesting I love historical accounts of cool shit like that. My question was very literal and straightforward. Although I kinda meant in the context of the "modern day" (when niggas had guns and shiet) but I won't move goalposts.


In an attempt to add to the thread I saw this

https://youtu.be/GWmB0F7FjQs?si=sRY_3TCAt1uuaufy
I FOUND IT, Im not crazy, dont belive those doctors

Khosrau's Better Antioch

Fucker did EXACTLY what I said he did, he was Sassanian not Scythian
 
all good, I know were on shitpost forum.
I will look into sythian? sounds very interesting I love historical accounts of cool shit like that. My question was very literal and straightforward. Although I kinda meant in the context of the "modern day" (when niggas had guns and shiet) but I won't move goalposts.


In an attempt to add to the thread I saw this

https://youtu.be/GWmB0F7FjQs?si=sRY_3TCAt1uuaufy
Scythians were about where more recently circassians were. Semi Slavic Dothraki horse lords dwelling east of Crimea and north of the Caucasus .

That was the borderlands of what the Romans mapped


Circassians:
IMG_8171.webp
@StudMccool of course a Persian dynasty would flex like that
 
Last edited:
I FOUND IT, Im not crazy, dont belive those doctors

Khosrau's Better Antioch

Fucker did EXACTLY what I said he did, he was Sassanian not Scythian
Fucking sick that is stunnting on MFs

So i'm retarded and can't figure out how to embed properly but that video I linked is about California collapsing into the sea do to lack of underground water. Its from that lady that called out academia for doing nothing busy body work for grants and free cash
 
To be fair, where has the "Jews control everything" narrative gotten us? Sure. We know about it now, but nothing has been fixed or changed. If anything, it made things a thousand times worse for us because now you have an entire generation of Zoomers and Millenials whom once they seize power from Boomers, will say Fuck Israel. Which might sound great, but they've also simultaneously defacto embraced Palestine and Islam. They're going to let Sharia Law walk right through the front door because they've only been taught to hate the Jews. That guy who killed that couple didn't shout "Death to Israel!", did he? No. He shouted "Free Palestine!". Do any of these protestors call for severing relations with Israel? Sure in private. But their signs all say Free Palestine. They've all embraced Palestine to spite the Jews. Meaning they're embracing Islam to spite Israel.

That's not a good thing. The youth need to be taught to hate Islam more or we'll wind up like Europe.
The problem is young people increasingly fail to understand subtlety and tact.
 
Well duh I like these guys better look at the cool swords
All horse lords do sabers. Shit, even the Poles have their szablas. The tradition carried all the way into the world wars. I think the marines still at least recently got sabres for their dress uniforms?

IMG_8172.webp
@Dammit Mandrake! the Russians extinguished the Circassians in the late 1800s. Some treachery and shit
 
Progressives never stop progressing. Cutting edge shitlibs go even beyond polyamory. Now they have relationship anarchy (archive):
1748017513001.webp
Simply put, relationship anarchy is the application of anarchist principles and philosophies towards interpersonal relationships. It cannot be separated from its ties to anarchism, both historical and contemporary. While polyamorists may form relationships in very similar ways to relationship anarchists, polyamory is not inherently political and tends to emphasize “personal choice” as the guiding principle for how relationships are conducted. Yet without those deeper, political roots, polyamory tends to default into “coupledom” and other rule-based formations that are perpetuated in Monogamism, and that RA outright rejects. Relationship anarchists often view polyamory as an extension of monogamy, only extending many of the same beliefs and values systems to multiple partners.

For instance, polyamory may still contain hierarchies around who are “primary” or “secondary” partners, which RA views as unethical.
Forget being faithful to your spouse; even having a primary partner is “unethical.” Neoliberal ethics can be described as the diametric inversion of morality.
 
In Current Year there is art depicting the leftists as heroic "decent human beings" with "diversity", and Trump depicted as demonic and Trump voters as literal demons. Also, that art is likely not meant to be ironic. I do not think the "politically correct" of the decades before Current Year got that deranged and cult-like, whether it be hippies against Nixon nor Democrat voters against younger Bush. I think "social media" readily available on "smartphones" and "social engineering" from MSM and Big Tech is to blame.
It's usually utterly hilarous as they paint us a demons by their standards but end up usally making us look badass.
QV2OUDQTKFBGNFP66EFERUXPDE.webp
 
lol, please attempt it. I’d love videos of international dark skinned students interacting with the local Chinese population.
Last time didn't go so well


On December 24, 1988, two male African students were entering their campus at Hohai University in Nanjing with two Chinese women. The occasion was a Christmas Eve party. A quarrel between one of the Africans and a Chinese security guard, who had suspected that the women the African students tried to bring into the campus were prostitutes and refused their entry, led to a brawl between all the African and Chinese students on the campus which lasted till the morning, leaving 13 students injured. The brawl included other African students besides the two stopped by the security guards
By this time, Chinese students from Hohai University had joined up with students from other Nanjing universities to make up a 3000-strong demonstration that called on government officials to prosecute the African students and reform the system which gave foreign students more rights than Chinese students. On the evening of December 26, the marchers converged on the railway station while holding banners calling for human rights and political reform. Chinese police managed to isolate the non-Chinese students from the marchers and moved them by force to a military guest house in Yizheng outside Nanjing. The protests were declared illegal, and riot police were brought in from surrounding provinces to pacify the demonstrators, which took several more days
The Nanjing protests were groundbreaking dissidence for China and went from solely expressing concern about alleged improprieties by African men to increasingly calling for democracy or human rights. They were paralleled by burgeoning demonstrations in other cities during the period between the Nanjing and the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, with some elements of the original protests that started in Nanjing still evident in 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, such as banners proclaiming "Stop Taking Advantage of Chinese Women" even though the vast majority of African students had left the country by that point.
 
Back