Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 24.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 79 30.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 83 32.2%

  • Total voters
    258
i dont understand what rekieta was saying on the female horse podcast. bodycam footage of criminal arrests is FOIAable in the United States of America. unless it's somehow different in Minnesota, which, im not a lawyer, but then again neither is he, I've FOIA'd bodycam stuff before on a felony case, and they withheld it until post sentencing and then simply charged me for their processing and editing fees to blur any victims. am i missing something here or is this crack ghoul just once again a complete fucking retard?
Under Minnesota Statutes, such data is generally nonpublic until the investigation is closed or the case has been resolved in court.
Even then, certain footage may be redacted, withheld, or delayed due to privacy concerns.
Any footage of the children should be (and I agree needs to be), censored entirely. They are victims. The adults are not.
Even more then, Nick will fight tooth and nail when notified of the request. Only with heavy legal pressure will Null get it released.
 
It is different in Minnesota. It’s been talked about before back when the body cam first came up.
so im just glancing at it here, and it is in fact under "Minnesota Government Data Practices Act" which is obviously a separate entity for the state, but im skimming over the prerequisites and it reads exactly the same to me as what i had to cover when i FOIA'd the footage i mentioned above. nothing in the rules suggest that the public won't have access to this so long as the proper fees are paid to blur any kids or unrelated persons on said footage. but i really dont get how this guy thinks april or the state would need to bamboozle him to obtain this. seems like a pretty open and shut records request if you ask me

edit - it made perfect sense to me while the case was still ongoing to withhold said footage. any time something that is being used in an ongoing case is requested anywhere they automatically shut it down afaik.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Chode
Null definitely has something tangential to the footage, or the footage in an incomplete/skewed form. The part about there being no going back stumps me though, that wording seems deliberate. Just going to spitball some predictions:

Police dashcam footage from outside the house
Body cam footage from a cop that didn’t enter the house
Heavily edited footage that somehow can be released
Someone who was there/has access to the footage describing it

Nick’s bluff theory doesn’t sit right with me, it’s far too airy.
 
I was sitting in my car having a smoke in the parking lot of a Dallas Hilton when I heard. Where were you when Nicky Got Arrested?
I found out from a friend of mine who fucking hates this site, but posted a link to a tweet in a discord server mentioning it, and immediately rushed here to see it pinned on the homepage and couldn't believe my shock.
 
Null definitely has something tangential to the footage, or the footage in an incomplete/skewed form. The part about there being no going back stumps me though, that wording seems deliberate. Just going to spitball some predictions:

Police dashcam footage from outside the house
Body cam footage from a cop that didn’t enter the house
Heavily edited footage that somehow can be released
Someone who was there/has access to the footage describing it

Nick’s bluff theory doesn’t sit right with me, it’s far too airy.
Maybe they took photos of the inside of the house for evidence
 
btw to clear up some stuff
  • We have two Minnesota attorneys willing to represent us in this for nothing except any travel expenses, which I can pay out of pocket.
  • We will probably win fees for these attorneys if we do have to sue because we have gone through "the process" to establish we are in the right as firmly as possible.
    • Pro bono attorneys are still entitled to reasonable fees if awarded fees regardless of how much they are paid, if anything.
  • It is currently unknown to me, if they do deliver the footage, if I will have to pay for their time to redact the footage, or how much that will cost.
    • The clerk had previously spitballed us $5000 in estimated cost for the forensic team's time to redact the footage, however
    • The situation has changed substantially and I don't think it will take that much time or cost that much anymore, but
    • The footage we receive will be redacted -- I think only to censor minor persons though.
    • I am still committed to donating any leftover money from the $6000 to a charity. My current pick is the Zero Abuse Project.
  • We had to wait a full year because one of the things we were waiting for was the adjudication of the criminal case, which is now over.
P.S. I have not touched that $6000 in the year I've had it.
lolcow checking.webp
 
Nick Rekieta Karaoke - MEMBERS ONLY!
View attachment 7398210
I think if Nick shows this to the judge, he could probably knock a year or two off his probation.

Edit: Missed his ballad for April at the end:
View attachment 7398537
I just did a double Van Gogh.

I can imagine our wife hearing this from downstairs and deciding to chug the rest of the pill bottle.
 
Rekieta calling himself "fun" "a ton of fun" and so on is a new high of creepiness to me. I keep thinking of the serial killer facial expressions he makes to the camera when pretending to be a father. Like when he held up the gray-white vomit plate.
I hate his whimsical way of describing his degeneracy. He's been doing it since the start and it's disgusting.

His zoom display name is the CEO of Tomfoolery because he's just a goofy, funny guy that does wacky things like give his daughter coke, bring strange women into his house to fuck, and drive his kids around drunk! So silly!

Why does he use a balldo? Not because he broke his dick and can't have normal sex anymore! It's because it's funny and weird! It's hilarious to have to use a sex toy to make your wife cum because your dick doesn't work anymore!

Why did he make people come on his stream in their underwear? Not because he's an exhibitionist pervert that wants to goon 24/7, it's just freaking funny, bro!

Anyone that thinks that's fucked up and should be stopped just hates fun and has no sense of humor!

He's too much of a pussy and a snake to just say what he's actually doing and why. He has to package it up in goofy retard speak like he's a clown (a literal one. He's definitely one metaphorically). If anything he probably gets off on toeing the line without saying what he's really doing.
 
Last edited:
Back