US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That study is kind of BS to me. They had them read a super anachronistic text that was the opening scene setting bit of a longer work. They had them sentence by sentence out loud try to translate it into modern English to explain what was going on and had a twenty minute time limit. I don't think I could do it in twenty minutes out loud and I don't think that means I can't read.
To be fair and transparent on my end, There's a myriad of other posts about it and examples of broken information parsing but it's all twitter posts and I am loathe to link to social media too often unless it's to point and laugh because the formatting of it all gives me a spiritual hemorrhoid.

A lot of them couldn't even parse a single accurate iota of meaning out of the declaration of independence and other similar examples of historical documents.
Despite even being allowed to refer to it on hand and in some cases were even allowed access to their phones and the internet during the whole thing.

Edit: Found it again to at least drop an example. Again, one sentence. The first sentence.

ParseIssue1.webpParseIssue2.webp
 
Last edited:
They had them read a super anachronistic text
The twenty minute time limit is bullshit but this is not the reason. If you're an English major this shouldn't be 'super anachronistic'. It's really not something I'd expect a high schooler to have trouble with.

The reason the time limit is bullshit is because it's a lot of text if you're supposed to actually line-by-line recompose it in modern English. Forty or sixty minutes would've been fine.

Edit: I thought the writing seemed familiar. I've never read the Bleak House by Dickens, but Dickensian works are not 'super anachronistic'. They're much easier to comprehend than Shakespearean English or the K.J.V.
 
I would call that protowoke. It's a refusal to acknowledge irrationality, stupidity, and the enjoyment of hatred. It's a very dangerous mindset that is still running a lot of the West.
That's not protowoke. Wokeism isn't about refusal to acknowledge irrationality, stupidity and the enjoyment of hatred. Wokeism is irrationality, stupidity and the enjoyment of hatred. The woke don't think 'Oh, if only we could all understand each other, we'd all get along'. No, they don't want to understand their ideological opponents, they want to bully them into accepting their narrow worldview on a small selection of topics, typically race, gender, sexuality and climate change, with no room for nuance, debate or criticism, or no concern for deeper issues.

For that reason alone TNG is not even 'protowoke'

And the left do acknowledge irrationality, stupidity or the enjoyment of hatred. It's just that they either disingenuously deny those things, or try to argue that those things are justified because the people engaging in them are oppressed. They'd argue that the ANC in South Africa have the right to kill the white farmers and confiscate their land because the white farmers oppressed them all those years ago, for example.
You saw the same shit with that awful animaniacs reboot. “We were always political!” Yes, you always made political and cultural jokes, but you weren’t hyper lefty and Republican bashing.
Yeah, that annoyed me too. Like you say, they made political and cultural jokes, but they weren't sharp like that, you know? They were just gentle jabs, it was a kids' show. They made fun of Democrats and Republicans almost equally, they took the piss out of Bill Clinton almost constantly.

They could never do anything like that now because they don't know how to approach political topics without propagandising them
 
They were under strict time pressure and going line by line. The way people read is more holistic than that. You sometimes won't comprehend things in paragraph one until you get to the later context in paragraph three. My approach to something like this in real life would be to read the whole sample first, not go line by line. Under time pressure and without the greater context, they guess and sloppily try to figure it out.

Listen, we can quibble about some details here but at the end of the day the idea that this study proves they can't read is obviously not true. It's sensationalized journo-science.
 
Listen, we can quibble about some details here but at the end of the day the idea that this study proves they can't read is obviously not true.
I want to be optimistic too, but it's not looking too good with the other examples on hand even if we're not laser focusing on the ye olde lit.
Especially with the people responding or understanding on par with this.

Man Horse.webp
 
Okay you have twenty minutes from now, record yourself to prove you can read.
problem is that they couldn't comprehend this

1748184270755.webp
'There was mud everywhere such that it would appear the Great Flood had just ended, and it wouldn't be so surprising to see a dinosaur walking around.'

I didn't need to take two years of college as an English major to be able to parse that sentence the first time I read it.

I reiterate, these niggers can't read.
 
'There was mud everywhere such that it would appear the Great Flood had just ended, and it wouldn't be so surprising to see a dinosaur walking around.'

I didn't need to take two years of college as an English major to be able to parse that sentence the first time I read it.

I reiterate, these niggers can't read.
So that's a no then, you aren't going to prove you can read? You have 16 and a half minutes left if you want to give it a shot.
 
I recently binge rewatched TNG and I was really struck by the repetition of the plotline where war and/or destruction of the Enterprise almost happens because of a misunderstanding but once everyone understand each other they all behave like rational actors and everything is peachy

I would call that protowoke. It's a refusal to acknowledge irrationality, stupidity, and the enjoyment of hatred. It's a very dangerous mindset that is still running a lot of the West.
That's mainly a result of Roddenberry being an uber-idealist who believed humans could become so rational that children would one day accept the death of a parent without shedding a tear.
The pilot of DS9 was basically the writers of that series calling Gene out on how implausible that mindset is.
 
You seem to have failed to read the portion of the instructions where you need to be doing this out loud and you need to do the whole text.
You failed to read:
The reason the time limit is bullshit is because it's a lot of text if you're supposed to actually line-by-line recompose it in modern English. Forty or sixty minutes would've been fine.
but please continue to have an autistic pants-filling fit over the clear fact these people cannot read at the level that they are supposed to be at for a collegiate English course.

Yes, they absolutely should not be having reactions where they think the section about 'big whiskers' is referring to a fucking cat, or that Dickens was describing ambulatory fossils slouching uphill like some necromancer was at work.

You're being retarded.
 
Cross-posting from the True Crime thread, Transgender edition thread. TL;DR- stereotypical Reddit Troon stabbed his wife to death.
1748185404812.webp

Several political-related notes to the topic: https://www.themainewire.com/2025/0...previously-hosted-ask-a-trans-woman-anything/ (archive)
Reya N. Jasmin, 36, a transgender-identifying New Hampshire man, is facing charges for allegedly stabbing his wife to death on Sunday in an apparent murder-suicide attempt. He had previously headlined the local library’s “Ask a Transgender Woman Anything” event.

No need to ask a transexual “woman” why the penchant for violence. We know the answer: they are psychotic monstrosities.

The initial press release [from the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office] referred to Reya Jasmine as a man, without giving his name, while subsequent press releases began referring to the alleged murderer as a woman.

The liberal establishment is also psychotic, which explains why it has been ramming transsexualism down the throats of humanity.

An autopsy conducted on Margaret Jasmin’s remains found multiple stab wounds and confirmed that her death was a homicide.

Fortunately, a child living in the home — evidently Jasmin’s 9-year-old son — was reportedly uninjured.
The Attorney General’s press releases … appeared to intentionally conceal the fact that Jasmin is a transgender-identifying male.

Note that the New Hampshire Attorney General is a Republican, so another "muh principles" faggot who coddles troons even in murder cases. These are the same subhumans who pearl clutch about "muh democracy," "muh decency" and "Trump is taking over the GOP."

Regarding the “Ask a Transgender Woman Anything!” event,
The event seemed to be at least somewhat directed towards children, based on a post from the library showing a display of books, including LGBTQ children’s books, set up for the event.

Not long ago, we watched horror movies about psychopaths who dressed up as women and committed ghastly crimes. Thanks to neoliberalism, we don’t need to watch horror movies anymore; we are living in one.
https://x.com/BigMKilo/status/1925947275559198954
https://xcancel.com/BigMKilo/status/1925947275559198954

1748184957298.webp1748184998587.webp
 
Back