US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Free college courses...for actual college credit? Or just free information which you can already get from a million other sources?
It'll be uniparty propaganda. "Here's why the evil orange man is a horrible person for demanding we stop selling American education seats to Foreigners, hosting domestic terrorists, and illegally discriminating against White people and Asians."

They're probably going to try and use the "credibility sink" effect.

See, 1000 people claiming orange man is wrong about X is good! But 1000 people claiming "snopes says that's false (even when Snopes is full of shit)" or "Harvard says trump's a dictator" is even better, especially after millions of people have propped up the credibility of those institutions. If they can sink an infinite amount of credibility -- even from their ideological opponents -- into something and then claim ownership of that credibility (via entryism, subversion, et cetera), well.

That's the credibility sink tactic in a nutshell. Get everyone to agree something is a credible source, then subvert it for your ends so your idiot brownshirts can claim that credibility for themselves.

Correct. It was made with normal people in mind, not jews.
Every other country in history warned us, and we still didn't think they'd do it to us. Amusing.

Isn't that just who Hasan Piker is?
Yes, most of Breadtube is operating under this model, or a related one. Watch out going forward for discount wish dot com versions of stuff like Critical Drinker, who has spicy takes but "ultimately didn't hate the film, go see it" or what have you.
 
another thing - @Chuckwagon 's post and paying attention to the volkswanderung period in general should make a person give some thought to white ethnogenesis.
Do future readers a solid and link it rather than say how awesome it is?

Yep, the native Irish landholders were completely dispossessed and destroyed by the Tudors (who targeted mainly the Gaelic nobility) and again in the English Civil Wars (this time targeting the Hiberno-Normans, the descendants of Norman knights who had gone native). Ireland at this time was in the grip of the Protestant Ascendancy, which explicitly aimed to reduce the Irish to serfs completely at the (nonexistent) mercy of the empowered Anglican aristocracy (and to a lesser extent, their mostly Presbyterian Scots-Irish footsoldiers, who also got a raw deal but one that was less shitty than the one handed to Irish Catholics, comparable to how poor white enforcers & employees were obviously better-treated by Southern planters relative to black slaves).

As late as 1870, 97% of the land in Ireland was owned by absentee English landlords who didn't even live in Ireland. And that was after some emancipatory reforms made by the British once they decided it might've looked a little bad to keep being mega-cunts to the Irish right across the sea when they were fully getting into their Victorian humanitarian phase & sinking slaver ships throughout the Atlantic or characterizing the Tsar of Russia as a cruel despot lording it over an empire of slaves and imprisoned nations (presumably Russian lampooning of the British treatment of the Irish whenever London tried moralizing to them about the plight of their own serfs, the Poles, etc. was the 19th-century precursor to Soviet accusations of 'you are lynching negroes!' every time a 'Murican started talking about their famines or the Great Purge in the Cold War).

There was definitely a racial & religious element to it all though. The idea that the Irish weren't 'really' white was definitely not unique to America, it was very much in vogue in Britain as well and the stereotype of the Irish back then was not some redheaded hottie or fun leprechaun: it was that of dark-haired, thuggish, bestial and superstitious Papist savages who yearned for a return to the Dark Ages in-between drinking themselves to death and breeding armies of children with FAS, and the enlightened Anglo aristocrat would be shocked & offended at the suggestion that he was of the same stock as them. The Irish founding myth of descending from 'Milesians' who came from Iberia was reappropriated by the Brits to form theories like this famous one:

Scientific_racism_irish.webp

The famine was further used by Protestant missionaries as an opportunity to convert Catholic Irish to the new, ascendant church. Don't want to starve? Great, just forsake the last scraps of your heritage and you can have this soup. Suffice to say, 'souper' remains basically the Irish equivalent for race traitor/Uncle Tom/hanjian/etc. to this day. The Great Hunger was 1000% an English op to genocide the Irish, whether physically or spiritually, I don't think Sir Charles Trevelyan and those above him in the British government particularly minded either way.

Tl;dr the more one reads about Anglo-Irish history, the harder it gets to fault the Irish for wanting to get the Brits to fuck off by any means necessary and to dissociate from the English identity being pushed on them so rabidly, whether it was by becoming more Catholic than the Popes or reviving their ancient Gaelic language. (You can and should, however, still blame them for thinking turning to Communism was a good idea starting around the mid-20th century.)
It's still a matter of scholarly debate, but the most popular & enduring theory about the origin of the Huns (who kickstarted the Migration Period) is that they were originally a Turkic nomadic tribe called the Xiongnu who established an empire stretching from eastern Kazakhstan to Mongolia & western Manchuria, got their asses kicked by the Han dynasty, and then fled westward to avoid further buckbreaking by both the Chinese and their own former subjects (such as the proto-Mongol Wuhuan). Eventually by the mid-4th century they ended up moving into the Ukrainian steppe, where the Goths actually had a settled kingdom already; then they buckbroke the Ostrogoths, chased the Visigoths into Roman history, and the rest is history. Another branch of the Xiongnu also fled south and established the Hephthalite or 'White Hun' Empire in modern Afghanistan & the neighboring 'Stans, becoming a pain in the ass for the Sassanid Persians and Gupta Indians for even longer than the 'Black Huns' were for the Roman world.

Also the fall of the Romans had less to do with the barb migrations themselves, and moreso 1) endless civil wars & corruption death spirals and 2) an inability to assimilate said barbs as they had done many other peoples before, not helped by the chaos in 1). The Romans allowed barbarian tribes like the Visigoths to stay together as one unit, basically forming their own ethnic enclave in Roman territory, and to preserve their own power structure (kings, warlords, their own Arian priests for those tribes which did convert to that heretical sect of Christianity, etc.) which obviously prevented them (in fact, actively disincentivized) from assimilating into Romanitas and accepting Roman rule in the long term as peoples like the Gauls, Britons, Greeks and Syrians already had. Probably a lesson in there that's still applicable for modern America. Worth noting that the Germs who did assimilate, like Stilicho (a Vandal) or Aetius (probably a Goth, and the guy who beat Attila), actually proved enormously helpful to Rome in its twilight years and had a good chance at saving the Western Empire if they hadn't been killed by, respectively, the conniving Senate and the paranoid, incompetent Emperor Valentinian III.
 
In DEI related news, American Airlines is collaborating with a company that has an explicit "90/10 Rule" which means 90% of their brands are "Black-and Brown-owned."

American Airlines gave passengers this note confirming the collaboration:
View attachment 7410562
Makes you want to pop the emergency exit door at 40,000 feet.
 
In DEI related news, American Airlines is collaborating with a company that has an explicit "90/10 Rule" which means 90% of their brands are "Black-and Brown-owned."

American Airlines gave passengers this note confirming the collaboration:
View attachment 7410562
Isn't American Airlines the best airline to fly compared to Spirit?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
The Romans allowed barbarian tribes like the Visigoths to stay together as one unit, basically forming their own ethnic enclave in Roman territory, and to preserve their own power structure (kings, warlords, their own Arian priests for those tribes which did convert to that heretical sect of Christianity, etc.) which obviously prevented them (in fact, actively disincentivized) from assimilating into Romanitas and accepting Roman rule in the long term
wow. whoa. you're telling me that letting in a quasi-hostile ethnic group and not forcing them to assimilate is bad for the empire? like fuckin' somalis? i think we know what happens when you don't

Based Teddy Roosevelt:
There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all ... The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic ... There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.
 
The fun answer: the golems are attacking their creators.

The real answer: leftists see Palestinians as poor, oppressed victims of Israeli neocolonialism. Of course they say nothing about Chinese neocolonialism in Africa, but that's irrelevant. There is a lot of Chinese and Middle Eastern money in American universities stoking these ideas and it coincides with existing hatred for Jews that's been around on the Internet as long as the Internet has existed.
It's just the programming malfunctioning.

The basic programming is brown good white bad. The thought process doesn't get any more complex than that. Brown good. White bad.

Well, the problem becomes that Jews have worked very very hard as the "oi vey, we're just fellow whites, goy!" thing over the past century, such that now the NPC doesn't see Israel vs Gaza as the 1000 year blood feud between various ethic tribes of sandniggers, they see it as the poor oppressed browny wowny freedom fighters fighting off the eeeeeeeeeevil white people oppressing them. And while as dumb as camel shit (even for inbred sandnigger camel fuckers), the Palestinians did eventually figure out how to pull the "I'm a poor, poor oppressed minority!" lever that works on the left in the west.
 
Correct. It was made with normal people in mind, not jews.
George Washington's letter to the Jews


The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.

It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my Administration, and fervent wishes for my felicity. May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.
 

A small, tight-knit group in former President Joe Biden’s inner circle was running the White House like a “politburo,” and they were the “ultimate decision-makers” as Biden’s health and cognitive function continued to decline, according to the authors of a bombshell new book.

This group, dubbed the “politburo,” included a coterie of seasoned political veterans, including Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti and Bruce Reed — but also family members such as first lady Jill Biden and the president’s son Hunter, the authors of “Original Sin” claim.

Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain was at times part of the “politburo,” as was former senior adviser to the president Annie Tomasini. Also on the “politburo” was the first lady’s former top adviser and “work husband,” Anthony Bernal, whom The Post previously reported created a toxic workplace environment.
 

A small, tight-knit group in former President Joe Biden’s inner circle was running the White House like a “politburo,” and they were the “ultimate decision-makers” as Biden’s health and cognitive function continued to decline, according to the authors of a bombshell new book.

This group, dubbed the “politburo,” included a coterie of seasoned political veterans, including Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti and Bruce Reed — but also family members such as first lady Jill Biden and the president’s son Hunter, the authors of “Original Sin” claim.

Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain was at times part of the “politburo,” as was former senior adviser to the president Annie Tomasini. Also on the “politburo” was the first lady’s former top adviser and “work husband,” Anthony Bernal, whom The Post previously reported created a toxic workplace environment.
So which one had control of the Autopen? Remember that there was a leak a few months back about the other staffers being terrified of one of the staffers that basically was "acting president"? (You see this in other lefty circles, where one sociopath will just browbeat the others into submission, often by accusations of violating identity politics dogma.) That is to say, it was heavily implied he directly signed things (with the autopen) that he thought the president "should support."

I maintain if Trump gets evidence of this we're immediately in constitutional crisis mode cause no one is going to know what the hell to do. Roberts will want to just go on the record as not having gone on the record and ignore it to death, I'm sure.
 
Back