Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
But so was he really heard saying "I can remedy that"? Could be he missed another test and they told him he's over the limit for fucking around.
In the course of explaining to the audience why he was leaving he muttered "so I can try to remedy that" or something to that effect without saying what "that" was.
 
How hard can not doing mountains of cocaine be. Most of us go decades without any problem.
Remember, Nick insists he’s not an addict and doesn’t even have an addictive personality (as he reaches for his 30th hit of nitrous within an hour of waking).
 
I could see there being some combination of him being willfully ignorant about how long alcohol metabolites are detectable for/believing that he's figured out the timing of his tests well enough to goose the system.
But Dr. Feelgood the convicted felon on Quora told him it was easy!
 
Hey @Null is Rekietas fear of god this morning related to the bodycam? just trying to rule things out
I'm guessing no because I don't know why they'd call him about that or why he'd immediately have to drive somewhere. If they're required to notify people with an interest in the footage (like people in it), they'd probably do it in writing and with instructions on how to challenge it.

I think it's something he had no idea was coming (although if it is a piss test he damn well should have the goddamn mental midget).

Also he looked genuinely shocked. He already knew about the bodycam footage and the possibility of it getting out. I think he would have just gone into his usual "YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY BULLSHIT LYING" and "THREW IT ON THE GROOOOOUND" mode had it been something like that.
 
Last edited:
Nick resurfaces to bitch about our Dishonest and False stories about his blue fingers.
Screenshot_20250529-230351.webp
 
Last edited:
It could be as simple as this dickless faggot pretending that youtubing is a job so his PO has had to watch him and in the process seen the blue fingers and the antics and thought, "you know, this seems a lil big sketchy"
Hope so anyway.
Remember his cokehead video was a central part of the warrant and so forth. Even after the original child abuse reporting.
 
Nick is likely drinking those 2 oz whisky bottles if he is trying to hide it and measure out what he could drink should he be called in at a certain hour. He’s likely betting on Quora, pro-addict subreddits, and ChatGPT to guide him on when he can drink.
Ethyl glucuronide is the metabolite produced by alcohol used in probation tests. Get shitfaced on Friday, drink a lot of water and stay sober Saturday-Monday and piss clean Tuesday.

Ask me how I know!

The problem is ETG production varies wildly based on metabolism. Some people can drink a handle and not piss anything dirty, others can use some hand sanitizer and get popped. An easy probation violation to fight but my PO gave me a pass on the first fuckup.
 
Is it possible that Nick’s story about “throwing drugs in the car with the child” has opened the door to new charges or even violated his parole?

If he publicly admitted to possessing illegal drugs that weren’t part of his original conviction, and provided specific, verifiable details about when, where, and what he possessed, then prosecutors and CPS could initiate a new investigation. That admission could potentially lead to fresh criminal charges under Minnesota Statutes § 152.025.

Under Minnesota law, each drug type and each act of possession can be prosecuted as a distinct offence, even if they occurred simultaneously. His prior conviction for cocaine doesn’t protect him under double jeopardy, nor does it bar new charges so long as they fall within the three-year statute of limitations. They may not even need physical evidence which is obviously long-gone, as Nick has outright admitted to concealing the crime.

TL;DR – Nick’s drug-bragging could very well have landed him in hot water.
Didn't see the story clipped in the thread.
Nick says that when he got pulled over he had a bullet of coke on him. He's says he 'craftily' ditched it in a spot near the door handle with the cop noticing but not catching on:

Note he does constantly look back and forth during this, so he may be trying to brag about a bullshit story.
@Null What are the chances of getting the dashcams at minimum? It would be interesting to know if Nick was driving his kid around with coke at the ready.
 
Back