US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's also this fiction that Italian and Irish immigration was good for the country, and it wasn't. It was a fucking disaster. We to this day have not managed to decisively deal with Italian organized crime or Irish corruption, which has done so much damage to both New York and Illinois that the latter state is basically no longer able to function.
Damn bro, really breaking out the vintage "fuck the irish" racism.
I'm no expert on how it was long time ago but I think you can safely say the UKucks are far worse now. Irish aren't even on my fucking radar for risk to america in top 5, I think it would be shit like troons, globohomo, mexicans, payment processor / bank fuckery, and soy city people who support all of that.

Anyway, speaking of irish, made me feeling like posting this.

 
It's very disappointing. How hard is it to not be a total degenerate? And how hard is it to not film such acts, especially when you know you're being surveilled and have people actively looking for ways to destroy you? This makes Glenn look completely coom brained.
Such a shame, isn’t it? I would’ve figured Greenwald was a normal gay into normal gay things, like putting his penis into poop or having a penis put into his poop. You think you know a person…
 
ICE flashbanged liberals trying to stop them from deporting illegals:
View attachment 7436926
Source (Archive)
Remember, an unspoken cornerstone of liberal belief is that they can protest you, which in their minds means preventing you from doing something you're allowed to do they don't want you to do (speak in public, for example) and the only thing you're allowed to do is cope and seethe at them. They are never, EVER, supposed to actually feel consequences for their actions.

Just Stop Oil would lose their shit and start crying their eyes out if in response to them destroying priceless art some guy just ran up from the crowd and broke their arm or something. Becuase they can do that, and your response has to be, at best, letting them do it and politely escorting them off the property to safety. You aren't allowed to punish them for it.

Consequences are for other people. Like those trying to express an unapproved belief or opinion in public.
 
I really don't know what to think. I don't really care tbh. I'm huge on digital privacy. The damage has already been done.

Obama, probably Biden, and Dubya laid the foundation of this shit. And when the former two expanded the digital surveillance state, no one in the media gave a hoot. They only appear to give a shit because its Trump doing it.
The good news is that it's a good thing.

The bad news is it's not for any reason you or anyone here for that matter is going to be capable of listing, I can guarantee you that.

The worst news is that you're defaulting to 'but they only care because its Trump doing it' which while accurate isn't a good default mode to operate in for anyone.
I would’ve figured Greenwald was a normal gay into normal gay things,
His last name is Greenwald.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: tehpope
A faggot is a faggot? Really!? Why I never!

Like, I wonder at what point do people realize all these "look at this sexual degenerate doing all the shit those icky Christians say degenerates do" doesn't work anymore as a form of blackmail. or reputation ruining tool?
The big open secret is that everyone at those levels is into weird sexual shit, (hell everyone in general, but that's beside the point) but the fact that those in power have to have this air of being better than the 'degenerate plebeians' is what continues to give the blackmail power. You're right, faggot is a faggot, big surprise, let's move on, that's how a normal person with a logical brain sees it, but the political system isn't normal, or logical.

It's still fucking gross, but a big deal? Like, who the fuck cares.
 
The generations don't work out quite so neat though. boomers started turning 20 in 1966, so a lot of Xers born between '66 and '80 were of Boomer stock. Many were not, but there's an overlap.

For example Michael J Fox's fictional 80s parents were both: Alex P Keaton's parents were hippie Boomers, but George and Lorraine McFly were Silents born in the 30s.

Likewise many Boomers birthed Millenials. That's not to say Gen X doesn't share the blame for Gen Y.
If you Google "Generation X celebrities" it paints a certain picture that may not be entirely accurate, but it's a decent enough sample.

Will Smith: 56, born 1968. His kids are 32, 26, and 24.

Neve Campbell, 53, born 1971. Her kids are 12 and 4. Please note she had her youngest when she was 49 fucking years old JFC.

Christian Slater, 55, born 1969. His kids are 25, 22, 5, and 1 years old lol.

Keanu Reeves, 60, born 1964. I would argue that he's actually a Boomer because the cutoff is 1965 imho. He doesn't have any kids, but his girlfriend had a stillbirth in 1999. If that child had survived it would be 26 years old.

Robert Downey Jr., 60, born 1965. His kids are 32, 14, and 12.

Honorable mention Gen X celebs: Winona Ryder, 53, born 1971, no kids.
Jennifer Aniston, 56, born 1969, no kids.
Brad Pitt, 63, born 1961, adopted kids so it doesn't count.

The point I am making here is that a good number of Generation X people are between 50 and 60 years old, and while some of them do have Zoomers and even toddlers, the vast majority of them have Millenial kids as their oldest, at least from their first marriages lol. If a Gen X married by 30 (which was very much a thing back then) and had 1 or 2 kids from their first marriage, they had Millenials, not Zoomers. When they have Zoomers, they're either pushing the leather egg barrier hard, or they got a younger 2nd wife.

Generation X were raised like animals and largely ignored. They were the first generation to have the majority of their mothers go to work, the majority from broken homes, after-school programs didn't exist yet, and daycare was a prototype. GenX kids went to relatives as little kids, and babysitters that weren't that much older than they were, or were left to their own devices. Their parents were self-centered shits who were more worried about their own happiness and pleasure than they were about their kids.

As a result, most of Generation X didn't have an example of good parenting to emulate. What they did have, they passed on to their kids--fast food every night, stfu and look at the screen, and don't marry, because it might fail, and somehow that's worse than not having a dad wtf. A good lot of them were raised by overworked single mothers who felt the need to ride the cock carousel more than they wanted to raise their children, and let their kids know it. No hippy dippy finger-painting and making cookies with Mom for Millenials on down. Gen X were terrible at parenting, because they were the result of terrible parenting.
 
Just Stop Oil would lose their shit and start crying their eyes out if in response to them destroying priceless art some guy just ran up from the crowd and broke their arm or something. Becuase they can do that, and your response has to be, at best, letting them do it and politely escorting them off the property to safety. You aren't allowed to punish them for it.
They were genuinely shocked when their later stunts were met with resistance and opposition despite police protection. The biggest reason they quit (they'll never admit it, of course) was that people were getting physical with the idiots. There are plenty of videos still circulating on Youtube of frustrated commuters on crowded London streets getting out of their cars and forcibly dragging the faggots blocking the roads off into the bushes to get them out of the way. The handful dumb enough to try to move back and block the roads again just kept getting dragged off (and punched here and there) until they stopped.

There was another incident where they went into a luxury car dealer (either BMW or Mercedes, I forget which) and glued themselves to the floor for one of their retarded protests. The dealership responded with a hearty "lol" and a "well, have a great night assholes!" ... then they closed the shop early, locked the doors and went home. Left the faggots glued to the floor all night long. The next morning they had the balls to complain nobody had left them buckets to shit in. They never tried that kind of stunt again.

Like you said, libtard protests only work (and only continue) so long as nobody pushes back. The moment someone does, they crumble and run. Even Antifa is like that, even in their strongholds where they have active government and police support. There's a famous video of a group of black bloc thugs with batons running up on a group of (much stronger) right-wingers on a Seattle street, where one wiry, scrawny shithead takes a wimpy swing at someone with his cute little baton, then eats a hard punch straight in the face, goes stiff as a board and falls over backwards unconscious. His "comrades" shouted a little bit (including some delightful "hey! What are you doing?!?!") but no one dared take another swing. The "protest" died down rapidly after that. They also famously retreat when they try to "invade" a suburb and half the neighborhood rallies and comes out swinging.

And never forget how Kyle Rittenhouse famously single-handedly put an end to the Summer of Love by ventilating two armed pedophile assailants and maiming a third on that street in Wisconsin. Nationwide, all the BLM riots immediately stopped (literally overnight) because word got around fast that they were no longer consequence-free and someone was willing to shoot back. It wasn't just fun-and-games, looting spree and arson party with no risks. Now it was "fuck around and find out."

That's why there should always be resistance at leftist protests. There should be a willingness to physically drag people blocking roadways and walkways, to throw a few punches to neuter posers acting tough to intimidate bystanders, and to drive through mobs blocking intersections. Remember several states have explicitly legalized that last one -- there's an exemption to vehicular manslaughter and vehicular assault charges now when you're surrounded by a mob and reasonably in fear for your life. Run the faggots over.

It only ever takes one knockout, one broken bone, one use of a protester as an ad-hoc speed bump, and/or one display of gushing blood from someone on their side to completely defang their protests.
 
The big open secret is that everyone at those levels is into weird sexual shit, (hell everyone in general, but that's beside the point) but the fact that those in power have to have this air of being better than the 'degenerate plebeians' is what continues to give the blackmail power. You're right, faggot is a faggot, big surprise, let's move on, that's how a normal person with a logical brain sees it, but the political system isn't normal, or logical.

It's still fucking gross, but a big deal? Like, who the fuck cares.
I care, I will never take anything Greenwald says seriously after seeing that footage. It's a very effective smear job, kudos to whoever released that video. Mission thoroughly complete.

I can't imagine thinking "so what? He likes to slurp up black man loogies off the ground while wearing lingerie. What's the big deal?"

We can't ban porn fast enough.
 
Fake how? I get the impression that he really is as sappy and naive as he presents himself, but I don't know much about the guy's personal life or foibles. All I know is his dad is a full professor at Drexel and that helped his academic career, but you don't get a tech research position at MIT if you're a bumbling idiot.
Read his published academic work and look at his career in academia. Then somehow out of the blue he starts a podcast and within months world leaders are guests on it, despite him having the charisma of white bread soaked in tap water, and not being a particularly brilliant scholar in his field.

Rogan spent years in the trenches building his show and he still doesn't have that insane level of guest pull. Heck, the first people I ever saw mention him being astroturfed were other academics.
 
The basic problem is rebuilding the coalition means dropping messages that alienate the people they're losing, and they can't do that. They have nailed their balls to the mast of a ship that is taking on water by spending the last few years declaring that everyone who isn't fully on board with "trans kids" is a Nazi. They've already put trannies in the government and done victory dances over it; they can't scale that back now.
forbidden.flower.man.webp
Never again.
I honestly meant to ask this question probably 1000s of pages ago, but just forgot. It's still relevant however.

Why aren't more Republican politicians calling out the democrats directly for just letting millions of undocumented people walk in freely? What fucking nation on this Earth do you know of that wasn't in the middle of a collapse like Rome just let millions of unvetted people walk through their borders? Besides Eurocucks with refugees of course.

It's so painfully obvious that it hurts. The democrats let all of those people in with the explicit goal of getting most of them citizenship down the line in the hopes that even a small fraction of them start voting for them. Even if only 10% of a few million people actually voted, that's more than enough to swing state and federal elections in your favor.

Yet I hear crickets from Republicans about this. Even Trump himself alluded to it, but quickly walked away from it on Joe Rogan's podcast. At least publicly call them out on it just to see what retarded excuses they give to defend against it. Saying "oh we didn't have congressional support" or "We just couldn't do it" won't work, considering what Trump has done since he's been sworn in.

Am I missing something important here? Is there a reason Republicans shouldn't do this?
Take it from the horse's mouth:
sabrosky.webpsabrosky baron of bangers.webp
Try to find a homosexual man fits the following criteria:

1) Isn't addicted to substances
2) Isn't a heavy porn user
3) Is not attracted to/dating boys young enough to be his son or men old enough to be his father
4) Is not attracted to twinks and likes actually masculine men his own age
5) Lives a monogamous lifeatyle, isn't interested in threesomes/open relationships/polyamory.
6) Isn't promiscuous
7) Has a stable and emotionally fulfilling personal life
8 ) Isn't permissive of any kind of degeneracy

It'll be hard work, as gay men like this exist in miniscule numbers and typically struggle to find acceptance and belonging in mainstream gay male culture. That is because homosexual desires are intrinsically disordered, and we should assume that nearly all gay men we meet are similar to Glenn in their sexual habits. This news is completely unsurprising to me. This stuff is the reason why homosexuality should have remained a completely private alternative lifestyle that should never have been mainstreamed and promoted to children the way it has been the past few decades, especially since modern gay movements are predicated on "born this way" and "we're just like you heterosexuals" mythology.
A few years ago, Null explained the connection between monkey torture and pedos on a stream, and the penny dropped for me:
faggot.webp
-Just as socially awkward, uncreative and weak as asians, but without the work ethic and mechanical knowledge.
-Just as lazy, incompetent, and stupid as blacks, but without the physique, coordination, and blind confidence.
-Just as hive like and conformist as hispanics, but without the genuine family values, fun, and sex appeal.
-Just as violent and self righteous as arabs, but without the suicidal courage.
-Just as entitled and needy as jews, but without the ability to guilt-trip Whites and blackmail fags to do their bidding.

The good news is that it's a good thing.

The bad news is it's not for any reason you or anyone here for that matter is going to be capable of listing, I can guarantee you that.
  1. Are you saying that Palantir [openly] spying on us is a good thing?
  2. What's the reason? --Alternatively, why won't anyone be capable of listing a reason?
 
I can't imagine thinking "so what? He likes to slurp up black man loogies off the ground while wearing lingerie. What's the big deal?"

We can't ban porn fast enough.
Hate to double post, but its got nothing to do with porn. Fags have spent decades telling us exactly what they are like. Most people simply refuse to listen. I'm just not shocked when a duck acts like a duck in other words.
 
The herds of homeless people that move up and down the I5 corridor have DESTROYED the wilderness and nature.

Worse, you catch one of these fuckers robbing your tool shed or garage and call the cops, the cops either never show up or tell him to leave or, at best, take him away in the car. Then, two hours later, he's "just looking" in your garage again.

They steal anything outside, rip out cables if they can, break into sheds and garages, and act like you're disturbing them for stopping them.

It got to the point it was better to give them a couple of whacks with a machete across the upper back than bother calling the cops.
Homeless people are fucking disgusting. Most are zoned out of their minds on drugs and they live in filth like animals, only concerned with chasing their next high, hobo sex, or what they can steal to support themselves. Their tents and encampment are messes surrounded by garbage, and they wreck and mess their surroundings while normies clean it up for them.

Good example is this video here. An absolutely insane and naive old man wanders like a tourist into a feral homeless community of squatters in an abandoned hotel/resort.
https://youtu.be/A60K29eGeF0?si=y_czL1mYO0TWTrpk

He tries to be nice to them and humanize them and remarkably doesn't get stabbed. But at one point he goes into the "home" of one guy and it's a sight to see. (40 min in). Now keep in mind this guy is there every day. He has no job. Nothing to do all day. He has a settled place to live, the owners and cops don't harass him. He has been there for months or years.

And it looks like a tornado hit. Junk and trash and debris strewn everywhere. If you or I were in a shitty place and had to make a camp or home we would clean it up. Organize it. Sort the useful things, throw out the trash. Make the most of what we had. Not this guy, or most of them. Through the haze of drugs and mental illness they can't do it. They choose to live like this.

This is why it's so hard to help them. People say "housing is a human right, we need to house the homeless!" But give them a pristine free house or apartment and in a month it will look like this.
 
The timing of the release of Greenwald's sex tape is just too perfect with his Tucker interview. Don't get me wrong, the guy is clearly a weirdo into gross shit, but both things can be true, this is a smear job, plain and simple.
🤔 ...instead of a smear campaign, maybe he was pulling a Kim Kardashian, and "leaked" his sex tape for attention? 'cause no one gave af about his Tucker interview.
 
Damn bro, really breaking out the vintage "fuck the irish" racism.
I'm no expert on how it was long time ago but I think you can safely say the UKucks are far worse now. Irish aren't even on my fucking radar for risk to america in top 5, I think it would be shit like troons, globohomo, mexicans, payment processor / bank fuckery, and soy city people who support all of that.

Anyway, speaking of irish, made me feeling like posting this.

Irish are all big pieces of shit.
 
Back