Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
Nah, it's simpler than that. Hardin asked for it because Greer said it was easily accessible, and he'd readily provide it, and that it materially proves the facts of his case.
Stop twisting his words against him!!!!!
Maybe I'm just being a stickler but doesn't this violate the "don't help Greer you faggots" rule? He still technically has another day to get the document so why give him tips?
Well, we're rapidly reaching the point where Russ is too retarded to help.
He doesn't want to pay that either, and I fully expect a similar motion submitted to the court around this time next week begging for them to reconsider the thing that was already considered and did not go in his favor.
I honestly believe that sanction will inevitably lead to more sanctions. I don't necessarily know the how or why, but the only thing he's done recently that wasn't pants-on-head retarded was paying the filing fee. That was retarded too, but for completely different reasons.
I though the deadline was the June 5th.
Bold of you to assume deadlines mean anything to Russ when he can pull out the trusty "excusable neglect" power word.
June 3rd.

His further mewling that his "savings" is "strictly for business" reinforces my suspicion that it is actually owned and controlled by Mom and Dad. A safety net to tey and prevent their adopted retard from living in his car again. But it almost certainly comes with restrictions on its use. Dear Old Dad likely told him "no more lawsuits!" And he can't touch the money for lawsuits or hookers. (And we know this, unless he lied to the court again regarding $5000, because he hasn't spent it on hookers)
Oh wow. That makes sense and completely tracks with Russ's behavior. He includes unwitting people in his shenanigans for everything else and loses his shit when they're made aware. I can easily imagine him being desperately afraid to ask his mom/dad to pay for this shit and thinking filing this motion would help delay that action. He could kinda pay on his own occasionally, like the $400 filing fee, but that well is typically dry.

Like everything else, he waits to the last minute (or after) before doing something he was supposed to do, but he's remarkably never been bitten in the ass for it. Usually, you stop doing it after facing reprocrussions but that clearly hasn't happened, be it in school or court. You'd have figured something would have happened since he's done it in this case dozens of times, but nope.

Though this time, it feels different. He's already been scolded for this specific item. He's already received an extension for this specific item. Whether he's malicious or plainly retarded, this specific item could and should have been resolved MONTHS ago if he wanted to. If there's one highlight for the mountains of other times where Russ chose to ignore court processes, this is it. The fact that he's still trying to fight tooth and nail over something that no one would have been aware had he not referenced it justify his plightsperging is LOL.
Forget delays or sanctions, we are at the point where Russ is admitting to potential crimes with every new filing.
Stop twisting his words!!! He didn't mean them!!!
 
Honestly, I'm almost on the side of Mr. Hardin simply ignoring it and filing his status report at 12:01AM on the 4th saying "Greer has not provided a copy of the requested document."
I don't agree you want to make sure everything is in order when you file something like that.

You want it to be argued perfectly so that anyone who doesn't know the facts of this case will agree with your filing.

This is why the judge gave Hardin a week to file a status report.
 
Please do not post every single new filing in the Community Happenings.
>MFW I go to Community Happenings to identify the infringing poster so I can leave a comment on their profile making fun of him and it's not there.
images (8).webp
 
I remember him "proving" it once by showing a chopped and cropped and redacted prescription for an antidepressant.

He tried to crop and edit the prescription to make it look like it was prescribed for PTSD caused by Taylor Swift but ended up accidentally doxing his parents' address on the bottle and revealing he was basically given a trial size of the lowest possible dosage IIRC.
You're half right, he submitted a printout from a mental health service (link, go to PDF page 69, not including a screencap because the resolution consistently ends up terrible) as "proof" Taylor Swift gave him PTSD when all it says is that a girl he was texting with had stopped responding, he had improved his moods via an unspecified assignment, that he "wanted his trauma symptoms to be validated" (this is a verbatim quote), and that he agreed to contemplate revenge vs. working things out when it came to Taylor Swift. The report mentions meds but they are unspecified and the wording implies that Russ' prescriptions were written by somebody other than the person doing his counseling.

ETA: The only 'proof' of PTSD is the billing code but that could easily be because that is what he self-diagnosed when he first made an appointment or because it was the least bad fit for "narcissistic whackjob can't accept his celebrity crush isn't interested". I watch my insurance statements like a hawk after they screwed up the reimbursements a couple times, and the charge codes somehow manage to be hopelessly generic and borderline inapplicable at the same time.
 
Last edited:

Shame how this anxiety wasn't present when he harassed Erika.
 
Screenshot_20250602_143633_Files by Google (1).webp
So uhh, wouldn't this money need to be distinctly under the LLC and not Russ's? I'm not sure how all that works. Like if someone can claim to be poor as fuck (to the point of being able to claim IFP status) while dumping all their money into the LLC? I'm sure there's fine line as to not be blatantly commiting fraud, but business expenses are supposed to be drawn from the business and not the person.
Normally you want to keep your business and personal finances separate. Accountants hate it when you mix the two because it makes handling your taxes a nightmare.

What I'm curious about is how Intimate Dealings LLC is structured. If he's got investors and partners, I have to wonder about the legality of him using his business's funds to pay for his lolsuit.
 
Normally you want to keep your business and personal finances separate. Accountants hate it when you mix the two because it makes handling your taxes a nightmare.
I'm mostly curious whether he could finagle a situation where he legitimately could argue his "reserved for business" funds can't be included in his personal funds. That is, if he was competent and all that.
What I'm curious about is how Intimate Dealings LLC is structured. If he's got investors and partners, I have to wonder about the legality of him using his business's funds to pay for his lolsuit.
I doubt the LLC extends beyond the application, the website, or as a reference for brothel presentations.
 

Shame how this anxiety wasn't present when he harassed Erika.
Poor Courtney. Imagine having to sit alone in a room with this creep for sixteen hours. Was this the same therapist that he posted about how attractive she was?

If ever a man needed a male therapist, it’s Russ.
 
I'm mostly curious whether he could finagle a situation where he legitimately could argue his "reserved for business" funds can't be included in his personal funds. That is, if he was competent and all that.
It can exist, but piercing the corporate veil can go both ways. You can trry to hide shit in LLCs, but the government isn't entirely stupid.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: HackerX
If your are pro se, it is actually possible for the court to decide you are literally too retarded, as in actually too stupid, to prosecute a case?

>MFW I go to Community Happenings to identify the infringing poster so I can leave a comment on their profile making fun of him and it's not there.
View attachment 7445989
UM probably jannied it.
 
If your are pro se, it is actually possible for the court to decide you are literally too retarded, as in actually too stupid, to prosecute a case?
Being labeled a vexatious litigant can be a mercy for the pro se retard, especially if they get in this deep.

Remember "vexations litigant" isn't "can't file pro se anymore" - it's just "any pro se bullshit must be signed off by a judge first".
 
Being labeled a vexatious litigant can be a mercy for the pro se retard, especially if they get in this deep.
There needs to be a new category to describe detrimentally retarded litigants for their own benefit. Russ is more retarded than he is vexatious and removing the possibility of receiving sanctions in the future is for his own good.
 
Back