Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 81 31.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 84 32.2%

  • Total voters
    261
Ralph versus Nick was some premium wigger on wigger violence.

We need to come together and heal the white trash community.
Well they did, as soon as Nick went mask off with his sociopathic narcissism, suddenly him and pig had a lot in common.

They’re the most autistic version of DeNiro and Pesci from Casino, the skinny talker and the short muscle dynamic.

Ralph’s even on track to get the bats.
 
The problem is, at the time, I thought it was just a cheeky joke — him treating that absurd internet drama with exactly the level of respect it deserved.

The real issue, however, is that he handles serious real-world matters in much the same way. And the troubling part is, he genuinely believes in this paltering logic. It wasn't a joke after all.
I think this is kind of a thing with a lot of online personalities. People in general assume a that most people have a reasonable functioning brain so when you see someone sperg out over something small or something in a similar vain you kind of just default to "I wouldn't sperg out like that, they are an entertainer, this is performative" It's only as time goes on you start to see that it's not a bit but they actually just deranged
 
I was glad to see comments about Nick's hair loss on the last page; because I have a question:

Is anyone else expecting this family-destroying, terminal fuckup to squander the last of his family's savings on hair plugs before serving his prison sentence, only to fail to turn himself in because he ODs during the bender he treats himself to as a "going away present" that manages to rack up sixty thousand dollars in debt? Or, more realistically, he whines that he fled because he didn't manage to OD?
 
Ralph versus Nick was some premium wigger on wigger violence.

We need to come together and heal the white trash community.
Nick's a bigger wigger

Ralph will occasionally TRY to go to rehab and admit his life's fucked. He fails every time, but he tries.

Nick will just say "I'm not sorry, drugs are actually harmless and things only went bad because of other people."
 
The way Nick and Aaron still white knight for April so fervently and treat her like she's an immaculate, abused teenage runaway really shows how delusional they both are. This is a grown woman who cheated on her husband for a married man, chose to do crack in a house full of kids, neglected her own children, and joined a fucked up dysfunctional sex cult where everybody did weird shit to her.

All because she's a moderately attractive woman whose standards were low enough to let them cum inside her.
Did you mean Kayla instead of April here?
 
Bro, his daughter tested positive for cocaine metabolites. There were drugs everywhere in his hoarder's lair. He still does not regret completely failing as a father, and he is still fucking up every day even further by continuing to get high and act as a complete embarrassment to everyone who has a close relationship with him.

Anything that vaguely resembles "doing the correct thing" would have started years before the police showed up at his doorstep and would never had led his family through the misery he brought them.
My point.
Nick estimates he could get $420,000 ($210,000 per person that viewed the footage) plus economic damages from the state for the bodycam viewings:
View attachment 7452872
innit weird that his defamation lawyer has him in the hole for about 500k? A bit of a koinkidink that Nick would want that much huh? Also, if he were to take this to litigation would he not need to enter the bodycam footage in as ebidance of what was actually shown? Or, if he were to tag either of the ladies with defamation suits would they not be able to use it as evidence showing everything they said was the absolute truth?
 
there aren't many people still thinking that Nick Rekieta is putting any care or effort into his lies anymore.
He's trying to overload everyone with his bullshit hoping to confuse and overwhelm you into just giving up, just like he tried to get the cops to give up searching his house for drugs by living in a hellish pigsty full of junk.
 
I was glad to see comments about Nick's hair loss on the last page; because I have a question:

Is anyone else expecting this family-destroying, terminal fuckup to squander the last of his family's savings on hair plugs before serving his prison sentence, only to fail to turn himself in because he ODs during the bender he treats himself to as a "going away present" that manages to rack up sixty thousand dollars in debt? Or, more realistically, he whines that he fled because he didn't manage to OD?
Rackets going to Constantinople for a hair transplant would be an interesting arc. No I will not use the Turk roach name for the city.
 
Also, if he were to take this to litigation would he not need to enter the bodycam footage in as ebidance of what was actually shown? Or, if he were to tag either of the ladies with defamation suits would they not be able to use it as evidence showing everything they said was the absolute truth?

It depends on the type of litigation he intends to pursue.

If he pursues a narrow case that the county made an administrative error in allowing two people to see the bodycam footage, he might get away with not having to enter the footage as evidence.

If he pursues a broad case against the county with high damages over issues like emotional distress, he is going to have to prove the damages and that would inevitably require entering the bodycam footage as evidence.

If he were to pursue defamation cases against the ladies, those sued would inevitably request the bodycam footage as part of discovery. It would have to come out. I also believe Nick has repeatedly now admitted that he personally has copies of the bodycam footage so the cooperation of nothing other than Nick himself would be required to obtain it.
 
"I did not vow perfect fidelity."

This slimy fuck is even reframing his marriage vow, it's incredible really. HELLISH.
Whatever he is doing to Kayla and April, remember this is how he treated his mother and/or father. You can be guaranteed he is working his parents with the decades-long experience that only a spoiled child of privilege can muster.
He has gaslighted Kayla and April, but I don't think his Parents and Family have actually seen the true state of his home towards the end of his drug binge, not just dishevelled, but a disgusting Drug-Den with Children stepping over booze bottles and bags of drugs. Evidence of Child Neglect. Even evidence of cross contamination between the drugs and the children.

I have no legal education, but I have experience with situations similar to the Rekietas, where medical workers treating a person who are legally a ward of the state or under guardianship of a family member needed a fast legal decision so they could be admitted to residential care home within 5 working days or the exact opposite.
In each case, where we made it in time for a courthouse to amend or cancel or release some legal *thing*, what mattered to the judge was "is this request reasonable" in the broadest sense of the word "reasonable", did we follow the correct procedure? Where we respectful and timely with the courthouse staff? Did we make our objectives clear in our application? And most importantly; did it make sense, did it *feel* right.
Perhaps I'm naïve and lack the Legal experience to see the woods from the trees, but our argument for the release of the Bodycam seems much, much more reasonable than Rekieta's counter argument.
 
Been browsing around Zitter and I'm convinced that Nick is making sock accounts. I've seen multiple accounts with no profile pics or any other tweets apeing his lying bullshit at people. I'm doing some more investigating.
IMG_0320.gif
“Where is your proof prude? I’ll sue you down to you last Balldồng!”

Sincerely Nick is a chimera of lolcows. At this point if he wins the triple crown then Patrick and Bossman deserve to get a small trophy as Nick assimilated them into his pulsating mass much like he would consume a Dorito.
 
Back