Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[FatMan]

I know what you're referring to, but it's too late to help him. The deadline was yesterday.

Better safe than sorry. We can mention it after Hardin files the actual status report or the judge rules that ol' meltface didn't comply.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Hmmm? With regards to exhibit A. All of Greers "sealed" Las Vegas civil actions. I wonder how many of them Greer actually told Hardin about in response to the Discovery request?

If I recall correctly, none of the RO suits against KF members.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

I suspect something similar has happened to Greer

It has. He assumed the DJF lawyers were his buddies after they got the 10th Circuit case through. As far as they were concerned their work was done, they had a nice item for their resume, end of story.
Russ kept emailing them and copying them in on stuff absolutely confident that they were now his lawyers, for free, forever. When they said it was no longer pro bono and he'd need to pay proper rates, he got very upset and bombarded them with calls and emails. They eventually ghosted him.

The other possibility is that he'd have to use the actual correct address that he was giving Hardin a runaround over which would reveal to the court that he was lying about that and give even more cause for sanctions.

I think this exactly what's happened. Russ thought he was engaging in legal gamesmanship just like in the movies. He thinks he's always two steps ahead of everyone else despite years of evidence to the contrary.

 

[RodgerDodger]

It has. He assumed the DJF lawyers were his buddies after they got the 10th Circuit case through. As far as they were concerned their work was done, they had a nice item for their resume, end of story.

I have long suspected that DJF were being funded or subsidized by the RIAA or MPAA. They had no interest in Greer or his Plights. They were just fishing for an unremarkable case that they could quietly use to set a precedent. But would be unlikely to be sexy enough for SCOTUS to interfere.

 

[obsdj]

If I recall correctly, none of the RO suits against KF members.

From back in January:

Post in thread 'Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)'

Jan 14, 2025

Greer supplied this as his litigation history. He can't find any of the documents himself because he claims he lost all his electronics when he was evicted. Do we have everything related to this somewhere?

Russell Greer’s Litigation History Document:

2015:
Greer v. Walters:
Reno Small Claims
Outcome: Court sided with defendant because witness did not show up to court to verify a document witness had signed was his to prove fraud on the part of defendant.

2016:
Greer v. Swift:
SLC Small claims.
Outcome: dismissed Based on jurisdiction and duty issues.

2017:
Greer v. Grande...

• Null

• 
• 
• 

 

[RodgerDodger]

From back in January:

Post in thread 'Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)'

Jan 14, 2025

Greer supplied this as his litigation history. He can't find any of the documents himself because he claims he lost all his electronics when he was evicted. Do we have everything related to this somewhere?

Russell Greer’s Litigation History Document:

2015:
Greer v. Walters:
Reno Small Claims
Outcome: Court sided with defendant because witness did not show up to court to verify a document witness had signed was his to prove fraud on the part of defendant.

2016:
Greer v. Swift:
SLC Small claims.
Outcome: dismissed Based on jurisdiction and duty issues.

2017:
Greer v. Grande...

• Null

• 
• 
• 

So once again he failed to fully comply with Discovery and could not to be assed to even list the cases he filed while he was involved in this one.

He's such a vexatious plague on the court system that he can't even remember the cases that he filed or where he filed them days later.

 

[The Dude]

So once again he failed to fully comply with Discovery and could not to be assed to even list the cases he filed while he was involved in this one.

He's such a vexatious plague on the court system that he can't even remember the cases that he filed or where he filed them days later.

When you've filed or attempted to file as many bullshit frivolous lolsuits as Dildo Saggins, it becomes difficult to keep track of them all.

Edit: and those are just the ones he started on his own. That's not including all the ones he has attempted to insert himself into uninvited as a "concerned third-party" or whatever the legal terminology is.

 

[ConSluttant]

From back in January:

Post in thread 'Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)'

Jan 14, 2025

Greer supplied this as his litigation history. He can't find any of the documents himself because he claims he lost all his electronics when he was evicted. Do we have everything related to this somewhere?

Russell Greer’s Litigation History Document:

2015:
Greer v. Walters:
Reno Small Claims
Outcome: Court sided with defendant because witness did not show up to court to verify a document witness had signed was his to prove fraud on the part of defendant.

2016:
Greer v. Swift:
SLC Small claims.
Outcome: dismissed Based on jurisdiction and duty issues.

2017:
Greer v. Grande...

• Null

• 
• 
• 

Once again, solid proof that upstanding, solid citizen Russ has LIED in the course of this litigation. This is my shocked face.

 

[Grotesque Bushes]

Quoting the judge to the judge seems to be laying it on thick, but then again he DID say that he'll slap the tard if he won't provide his bullshit restraining order.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

If russ fails to deliver the RO application, would it be his first instance of failing to complete a court order regardless of how improperly conceived his reasons to not accomplish this task? there is a timeline somewhere out there where the judge orders greer to retain counsel at his own cost in order to continue his case.

 

[HackerX]

I have long suspected that DJF were being funded or subsidized by the RIAA or MPAA. They had no interest in Greer or his Plights. They were just fishing for an unremarkable case that they could quietly use to set a precedent. But would be unlikely to be sexy enough for SCOTUS to interfere.

They used Russ like a whore.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Quoting the judge to the judge seems to be laying it on thick, but then again he DID say that he'll slap the tard if he won't provide his bullshit restraining order.

No. It's quite fair to remind the Judge what he himself put in the record about what he intended to do. It helps them maintain consistency in their presentation of Justice.

Plus it also boxes them in. As they look like flaming idiots to any Judges or Courts above them that might have to at some point review the case, if they waffle.

It politely reminds the Judge what they themselves put on the table. So in this case asking for case ending sanctions is not an out of bounds defense request. It's what the Judge proposed.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I'm kinda surprised the judge didn't respond to Rusty's 11th hour motion for cost-shifting and other nonsense. I mean, there is nothing in there that shouldn't just be immediately slapped down, it has absolutely no arguments of substance. You think he's waiting for Hardin's status report?

 

[DavidS877]

If russ fails to deliver the RO application, would it be his first instance of failing to complete a court order regardless of how improperly conceived his reasons to not accomplish this task? there is a timeline somewhere out there where the judge orders greer to retain counsel at his own cost in order to continue his case.

I think he when he refused to pay sanctions the first time he didn't request a stay until after that was expired. He's well on his way to not paying them again.


I just checked, he did get his request for a stay in on March 11th and the sanctions were due on the 13th, even if the request for a stay was to the wrong judge. So he got the TardGuard Seal of Approval on that one.

 

[CEO of Gay]

They used Russ like a whore.

Quite the poetic karma, isn't it?

 

[break these cuffs]

I'm kinda surprised the judge didn't respond to Rusty's 11th hour motion for cost-shifting and other nonsense. I mean, there is nothing in there that shouldn't just be immediately slapped down, it has absolutely no arguments of substance. You think he's waiting for Hardin's status report?

I think he's told his clerk not to notify him of any updates to this case until 48 hours before a hearing.

 

[obsdj]

I'm kinda surprised the judge didn't respond to Rusty's 11th hour motion for cost-shifting and other nonsense. I mean, there is nothing in there that shouldn't just be immediately slapped down, it has absolutely no arguments of substance. You think he's waiting for Hardin's status report?

I think the judge is waiting until Hardin's June 30 deadline (when Hardin will respond to Greer's objection to the motion to dismiss), either unaware or uncaring that the longer he drags out the matters that are still open, the more new matters will appear before him because of Greer's bottomless fucktardery. I would love to be wrong about this. At the very least, there is zero fucking reason not to rule on ECF 234, the February (FEBRUARY!) motion for sanctions. Greer's retardo motions for show cause on Hardin and for a protective order against Hardin (299 and 314 respectively) are also ripe for being smacked down.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

I think he's told his clerk not to notify him of any updates to this case until 48 hours before a hearing.

That may be a new thing - maybe he went on vacation until June 10.

I do know that just before the motion to move the ocean he was slapping docket orders (no file) pretty damn fast; I think the fastest was four hours or so.

Then again, he can cheat with Greer; as the clerk can let him know he got another bullshit before the clerk puts it on ECF.

 

[Harm]

It'll be fun to learn the true nature of these "business funds" which Greer doesn't want to touch. Are they in a personal account, but he simply intends to use it for business? Is it in an actual business checking account under his company's EIN? Not sure which situation would be more advantageous for the litigation, but I hope it bites him in the ass. He's already seemingly admitted to "dipping" into it anyways, so it hasn't prevented him from utilizing those funds so far.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Please find attached a police complaint made on December 11th, 2018 (though the original complaint dates back to August) by Russell Greer against Joshua Moon in Utah. Despite Mr. Greer's assertions, the 2017 file he had referenced does not exist. The only changes made by me is the red censor bar on the first page, for obvious reasons. Everything else was redacted by the police themselves. Mr. Greer sought a restraining order, and criminal harassment charges against Mr. Moon.

Many thanks to the person who helped me in this investigation.

It appears that after Null declined Greer's first few DMCAs, Russ went to the police about it

I believe Russ is referencing these emails:

Thread '2018-02-03 - Russel Greer: "Remove my book"'

Feb 3, 2018

From: Russell Greer <russmark@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 11:07:08 -0700
Subject: Remove my book
To: legal@kiwifarms.net

Dear Joshua Moon:

As you may know, my book, Why I Sued Taylor Swift, is copyrighted with the United States Copyright Office. Therefore, you do not have permission to have it on your sure. Per your site rules, you remove things copyrighted with federal law. Per law, you are infringing upon my work.

Therefore, I am giving you three days to remove it from your site. If I see this email posted on your site, action will be commenced against you. There are...

• Null
• Replies: 155
• Forum: Take that off the god damn Internet!

• 
• 
• 

Thread '2018-08-05 - Russell Greer: "Final Cease and Desist"'

Aug 5, 2018

Subject: CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL: Final Cease and Desist
To: "legal@kiwifarms.net" <legal@kiwifarms.net>
From: Russell Greer <musicnmovieguy777@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 09:10:26 -0700

Dear Mr. Moon,


I recently talked to a police officer and he has asked me to request one more time for you to please remove all of my stuff from your website. Everything: pictures, contact info, etc. I am trying to be very polite and civil about this.

Oh and please don't post this. This is a private message and email.

Thanks so much.
Russell Greer

---

Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL: Final...

• Lorin O'Landry
• Replies: 148
• Forum: Take that off the god damn Internet!

• 
• 
•