Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
this probably also explains their approach to activism, there's no time to fight and time to party, everywhere is just the proverbial toilet
Yeah, I can definitely see this.
Dragon*Con had to oust a literal child rapist founder and then took the "after dark" track and made it into its own convention called Frolicon. I think that was the right move. Personally I don't have the type of autism that makes me go "table-top gaming and bondage sex go together like chocolate and peanut-butter" but apparently enough other people do.
I think that furry was always about breaking down boundaries. The boundaries between human and animal, the boundary between a cartoon for kids and one for adults, the boundaries between what's allowed and what's not. So now they've broken down so many boundaries that you end up with a dude dressed as a green neon husky-fox-wolf-robot hybrid wearing a diaper at a Hilton shouting "Free Palestine" while his polyamourous transgender girlfriend explains communism to his headmates, one of whom is literally Hitler.
It's like the whole fandom up and gave itself schizophrenia.
 
I don't have the type of autism
it does seem like combining two things you love is a symptom of autism
while it's odd i can understand it
1749223835756.webp


i agree most odd subcultures had an aspect of breaking boundaries to them, and furries are one such that is fully aware of it and prides itself in it
but that raises the question, are you breaking them to be subversive, or are you doing it because the boundaries stand in the way of something you don't want? if we took down the proverbial fence, would they be happy for the ease of passing through, or upset that now there's nothing to climb over?
if there are no boundaries, what is there to break?
i think society as a whole has suffered greatly from everything being out in the open, certain naughty things, concepts and subcultures, being forced into the light and made to be seen by the greater public ruined them, there's fun in the covert underground cultures being underground and there's cultural order in certain things being known but not mentioned, another issue with our world is the faux intellectual belief that everything needs to be known and said publicly which polite society is actively antithecal to, we as people can only exist with one another if we all have personal worlds that the general public isn't privy to
 
it does seem like combining two things you love is a symptom of autism
while it's odd i can understand it
View attachment 7464268
The line about pretzel-shaped brains had me guffawing. Thank you.
I think it also ties into the dorky excesses I mentioned above, and why so many autists end up adopting "landfill" as their personal style. Maybe the 'tism stops people from realizing that two great tastes don't always taste great together? Many of the autists I've personally known are like this, now that I think of it. Maybe it's also a child-like trait, little kids will say stuff like "I'm a firetruck ballerina SpongeBob". Maybe in autists that part of the brain never grows up?
 
I'm shocked a furry convention even does a fursuit parade at all these days. I know that fur-eh did something like this but you were expected to dance along to the music, outside in 35+ heat with humidity.
I can applaud a convention for making proper rules for it though. It's about time they made it a special thing to do, instead of letting everyone pile in. Also, if anyone wants to complain about poodling, i remember a few cons banning it outright before.
They have a lounge just for cooling off normally if you're in suit: if you can't handle walking in suit, then don't wear one.
 
This is far too much discussion than a furry parade deserves. Just lead them off a cliff and be done with it.
No convenient cliffs, but the river is right there. Those carpets are going to get SO heavy.
 
I think that furry was always about breaking down boundaries. The boundaries between human and animal, the boundary between a cartoon for kids and one for adults, the boundaries between what's allowed and what's not. So now they've broken down so many boundaries that you end up with a dude dressed as a green neon husky-fox-wolf-robot hybrid wearing a diaper at a Hilton shouting "Free Palestine" while his polyamourous transgender girlfriend explains communism to his headmates, one of whom is literally Hitler.
It's like the whole fandom up and gave itself schizophrenia.
This made my brain hurt and I hate that I could picture this with exact clarity.
 
Since I've seen people post several times in the last few pages, "what's poodling and how is that different from fursuiting?" let me take a moment to explain it to the non-furries here with some visual examples I grabbed off Google. There are generally four accepted tiers of fursuiting: Fullsuit, (Semi)Partial, Poodling, and Fetish.

Fullsuits are what most people assume of when they think furry: A head-to-toe outfit covered in fur.
1749290607581.webp1749290588253.webp1749290632854.webp

Partials consist of a head, tail, coverings for the hands and feet, but no bodysuit. Since this doesn't cover the whole body, most suiters in this tier cover up their skin with long sleeves and pants.
1749290751008.webp1749290779289.webp

There's also Semipartial (sometimes referred to as Minipartial), which is the same thing as a partial, just without any furry shoes/paws for the feet.
1749290848549.webp1749290872070.webp

Poodling is a Partial Suiter, but they're intentionally not covering up their arms or legs. It's not an issue of their sleeves being a little too short and accidentally letting a little bit of skin show, but a more blatant attempt to not even pretend they're committing to the character. It's not uncommon to see people in this tier admit to intentionally not covering up because they want to show off their bodies.
1749290240703.webp1749290320511.webp1749290499125.webp1749290926573.webp

Fetish is a suiter in any of the three mentioned tiers who is ALSO wearing anything that would automatically be inappropriate fetish gear in a general setting. Things like pup hoods, latex bdsm gear, diaper stuff, etc. It automatically classifies as fetish tier even if you're wearing other fursuit gear (or wearing too little, like only wearing skimpy shorts and no shirt). While fursuiting in itself is a fetish, not every fursuit is automatically a Fetish suit, though there are extremely obvious sexualized suits.
1749291062229.webp

(I'll save my fellow Kiwis' eyes. Look that shit up for yourself if you really must see it for some reason)


So basically, with Anthrocon's new policy, they're telling furries "If you want to participate in this year's fursuit parade, you need to be in the Semipartial tier or better, because we're explicitly going to refuse to let Poodle or Fetish Tier suits into the parade. We want a bare minimum on what's acceptable for a parade open to the general public." And again, this policy ONLY affects the parade, you're free to wear your suit however you want the rest of the convention. But because this is furries we're talking about, being told to cover up for the general public is RACIST and ABLEIST and PHOBIC and the Anthrocon staff want to murder immunocompromised indigenous transgender people of color or whatever the fuck it is they're screaming about today.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't, though.

The con is July 3rd.

Imagine my surprise, though, when a bunch of furries seem incapable of growth and change.
Thank you for the correction. I had read several comments complaining about the flag rule in relation to pride month. Silly me for taking those Twitter/Bluesky posters at their word. The fact that they're extra upset about no flags because pride month, when the con doesn't even happen during pride month, is just amazing.

Of course this could easily just be because the people complaining don't know when the con is because they were never going to attend in the first place.
 
Last edited:
A head-to-toe outfit covered in fur.
Not quite covered in fur, but made from fun fur. No clue why people think it's made of rug shag, seeing as they sell the same material for doing trim on jackets, making stuffed animals, ect.

Cheap fun fur is shit to work with and often falls apart, which is why you only see it on cheap, poor quality suits. It's only good for like, Christmas decor trim and stuff otherwise.
 
Regarding Anthrocon, especially since it's geared to older anthros and by older anthros, and since it pertains to this question regarding the sweltering summer:
I find their "issue" quite simple. Why not organise their parade and, essentially, their conventions 6 months later/earlier? Late November/Early December. You could say "Thanksgiving and Christmas, too crowded and difficult to manage", well, fine, how about January? The "anthrosuits" or whatever seem like the perfect excuse to cover yourself with in the colder air of somewhere of the East Coast, or even the fresh and damp air of West Coast.

Seems like a nothingburger to me, and an excuse to get retards to parade around and sweat like dumbshits.
 
Back