Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[h3catoncheries]

Look at this lying sack of drool: "ooh I just asked him if I could and bizarrely now they claim I violated the Stay order".
And again with the bullshit "oddly they are continuing Discovery by autonomously uncovering public information in spite of the stay".
What a disgusting gremlin.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Surprisingly succinct for Greer. But comlete bullshit. He never read the order and was barely listening in the hearing.

Greer had months to seek this information. He should have attempted to determine who these people were before adding them to the case. He had months to request this before Discovery was stayed. His inability or failure to plan HIS CASE does not obligate the non moving party to assist him.

Not just relatively succinct but also highly subdued. It feels like the steam has been taken out of his strides.

 

[Apostle Sneed]

So let me get this straight—he filed a motion to clarify whether discovery was stayed and to modify the order, then, before the judge could respond, he emailed the clerk to request a subpoena just to see if they’d allow it to go through?

I guess he lives by the motto "It's better to ask forgiveness than to get permission"

 

[Post Reply]

When did the court say that? That would be a good thing to have quoted if it were real.

 

[Allied-Mastercomputer]

What are you confused about?

Hold on, gotta rub my two brain cells together for a bit.

-Fake subpoena filed by Greee June 5th (added to docket June 5th)
-Motion for clarification filed by Greee June 5th (added to docket June 6th. Filed after subpoena is issued and Hardin asks the court to”what the fuck?”)
-Motion for sanctions filed by Hardin June 5th (added to docket June 5th. Mentions motion filed by Greee that was as of yet unseen)

The timeline is getting a bit screwy for those of us without Pacer accounts.

Also, I don’t know if this post might be relevant to these events or not…

Just let him explain.
Clerks never seem to do anything correctly.

 

[RodgerDodger]

It's not just a motion for clarification though. He also requests that the order be modified so that he can serve the Does. I think Hardin does need to respond to that (which means he will rack up another sanctions item for attorney's fees).

Agree. Let's add another 2 hours to the bill. Hardin should fight Greers attempt to modify the Discovery order aggressively. The Plaintiff's non stop incompetence is itself prejudicial to the defense and results in greatly excessive costs. Which plaintiff has long declared is his goal.

 

[DavidS877]

-Motion for sanctions filed by Hardin June 5th (added to docket June 5th. Mentions motion filed by Greee that was as of yet unseen)

Mr. Hardin's motion for sanctions arrived late yesterday, I assume Mr. Greeeeeeee emailed him a copy of the clarification motion at the same time as he emailed the clerk which was dated in the early afternoon Utah time or maybe not.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He also requests that the order be modified so that he can serve the Does. I think Hardin does need to respond to that (which means he will rack up another sanctions item for attorney's fees).

Fair enough.

So let me get this straight—he filed a motion to clarify whether discovery was stayed and to modify the order, then, before the judge could respond, he emailed the clerk to request a subpoena just to see if they’d allow it to go through?

I think its the other way around.

Hold on, gotta rub my two brain cells together for a bit.

-Fake subpoena filed by Greee June 5th (added to docket June 5th)
-Motion for clarification filed by Greee June 5th (added to docket June 6th. Filed after subpoena is issued and Hardin asks the court to”what the fuck?”)
-Motion for sanctions filed by Hardin June 5th (added to docket June 5th. Mentions motion filed by Greee that was as of yet unseen)

The timeline is getting a bit screwy for those of us without Pacer accounts.

Also, I don’t know if this post might be relevant to these events or not…

So what exactly do you not understand?

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

I am in awe.

"Defendants said that discovery was stayed and now they're complaining that I violated the stay by trying to subpoena defendants to do new discovery. Plaintiff Greee finds that bizarre! How is it that Defendants can look into alleged lies that Gree has stated to the court? What does it matter if I was sending emails during a hearing? I can't shut down my life and not build brothels while Hardin refuses to let me prosecute this case with his millions of emails and complaints! Besides, what does "stay" really mean? Gree respectfully requests for the judge to spell out what has been told to Plaintiff multiple times already but this time say it in a way that either allows Gree to get what he wants or doesn't punish him as that would make me sad"

This judge deserves EVERYTHING coming to him after humoring this slack jawed faggot for this long just because this site is a meanie poo head site.

 

[somevan712]

"Your Honor, please let me do whatever I want. If I'm not allowed to then please change the rules."

 

[Allied-Mastercomputer]

So what exactly do you not understand?

Whether Greer filed his motion for reconsideration before or after the subpoena. Now I see that his emails support the fact that he filed a motion after his subpoena and after Hardin began to ask questions. More as a, “better to ask for forgiveness not permission,” kinda deal.

 

[Some dude]

View attachment 7464715
"Your Honor, please let me do whatever I want. If I'm not allowed to then please change the rules."

"Motion to undo the thing that already happened"

We're all in a fucking time loop.

 

[Harvey Danger]

If nothing else, Hardin needs to request the judge issue an Order To Show Where The Fuck I Said That.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Whether Greer filed his motion for reconsideration before or after the subpoena. Now I see that his emails support the fact that he filed a motion after his subpoena and after Hardin began to ask questions. More as a, “better to ask for forgiveness not permission,” kinda deal.

He submitted the subpoena first, yes

 

[DavidS877]

View attachment 7464758

If nothing else, Hardin needs to request the judge issue an Order To Show Where The Fuck I Said That.

I have the sneaky suspicion that Greee did not read the transcript, did not read the written order and had tuned out at the end of the hearing because it was almost whore o'clock when the judge recapped his decisions.

 

[Professional Noticer]

Subpoena is invalid

What the actual fuck is happening in this trial/court? It's like there is a tranny on the side of Greer trying to screw Null or there is an intern that just accepts shit without looking at it.
They really just went like "Yes, NULL HAS A SUBPOENA, WE HAVE A REAL CASE" to "oh whoops sorry, nvm, our retarded intern made a mistake, disregard that".

I'm happy with the good news but I'm a bit baffled that this shit is going on for years. Even the judge seems to have had enough of Greer.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I have the sneaky suspicion that Greee did not read the transcript, did not read the written order and had tuned out at the end of the hearing because it was almost whore o'clock when the judge recapped his decisions.

Greer felt what the judge ruled instead of hearing or reading it. It was real to him, damn it!

 

[RodgerDodger]

Mr. Hardin's motion for sanctions arrived late yesterday, I assume Mr. Greeeeeeee emailed him a copy of the clarification motion at the same time as he emailed the clerk which was dated in the early afternoon Utah time or maybe not.

Greee has not been greee-mailing Hardin his motions when he does the Clerk. This is Improper and it is something Hardin has already brought up in his existent sanctions motions.

 

[DavidS877]

What the actual fuck is happening in this trial/court? It's like there is a tranny on the side of Greer trying to screw Null or there is an intern that just accepts shit without looking at it.
They really just went like "Yes, NULL HAS A SUBPOENA, WE HAVE A REAL CASE" to "oh whoops sorry, nvm, our retarded intern made a mistake, disregard that".

I'm happy with the good news but I'm a bit baffled that this shit is going on for years. Even the judge seems to have had enough of Greer.

This court is dealing with probably hundreds of cases, a subpoena request is bog standard and unless they have some way to put a blinking red tag on the file in the system it's simply going to be issued, it's not the clerk's job to go through 300+ docket entries to see what the status of discovery is.

 

[obsdj]

View attachment 7464758

If nothing else, Hardin needs to request the judge issue an Order To Show Where The Fuck I Said That.

And as we all know the judge said no such thing BUT, in (grrrrr) fairness, Hardin's ORIGINAL motion for stay of discovery (ECF 245) was:


But for anyone who paid attention at the hearing and/or read the order after the hearing (which leaves out Dipshitforlips), the judge opted to stay discovery in a different way: Pending ruling on the motion to dismiss. But with Greer, what he thinks, assumes, and feels is more important than what a judge actually says and orders, so here we are.