US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I struggle to think of something gayer than trying to talk down to someone with a newer join date on a gossip forum than you.
Its possible It was on me for how I constructed that thought but good golly Ive seen about 3 different takes on it that are all different and so far removed from what I was trying to say

Im just going to try to clear it up, the WHOLE point im trying to make is that if the powers that be want to they have the ability and the backing to remove any content they want from the internet AND ON TOP OF THAT stop your ability to reorganize online, the farms issue is a bad example because that was public pressure/capitalism at play not some top down silencing effort.

NIST has the power and ability to hardware ban ANY forward facing server from DNS at the click of a button, hell there are only 13 PRIMARY DNS servers, you could remove whole NATIONS by closing their connection to their associated root server, this goes double for any host or service provider, and even for local vendors. There is so many ways the angry pixies we use to talk on the internet can be taken away.
 
now has elon said anything or has he been put on permanent time out by his shareholders?
He's just been retweeting passive aggressive shit from people saying "The BBB doesn't have any favors for Elon in it!" and "Trump is mean to Elon :( ". He's a bit pathetic right now. Funny enough though it looks like SpaceX had a launch today and he's been Xeeting about that too, I guess Elon shutting down SpaceX to own Trump didn't age well.
 
“Marissa” Rothenberger, a biological male, just single-handedly led Champlin Park to a 6-0 shutout to win the Minnesota Girls’ State Championship.

View attachment 7465238

“There are real problems in girls and women’s sports, trans kids playing isn’t one of them.”

Every single Democrat voted to strike down protections in girls’ sports.

View attachment 7465240
Hope letting that troon play was worth losing federal grants.
 
This exactly, Massie was actually one of the few guys I liked in congress to an absolute abject mongoloid retard. He went from principled small government guy to a never trump faggot who desperately wanted Desantis to win, and he's salty Desantis got his shit pushed in.
Interesting, I never knew he was a DeSantis fanboy. Was this due to any deeper connection that you are aware of or is it a straightforward ideological alignment? Or does Massie just really hate Trump? I appreciate you and @Fishmalk Observer answering my question.

Edit to quickly add: I was a little surprised DeSantis didn't do any better in the 2024 primary. I didn't think he would win, but I expected him to perform better.
 
"Elon criticizes congress, not Trump
Trump then attacked Elon personally"

Elons reply "Exactly"


No Elon, Trump said you were pissy about EV credits and that he could end your Government contracts. He didn't attack you personally, he attacked your business.

If you can attack his work trying to get a bill passed, why the hell can't he turn it around on you?
You're just mad that you spent a lot of money on the campaign, not realizing that you weren't buying Trump.
 
Its possible It was on me for how I constructed that thought but good golly Ive seen about 3 different takes on it that are all different and so far removed from what I was trying to say

Im just going to try to clear it up, the WHOLE point im trying to make is that if the powers that be want to they have the ability and the backing to remove any content they want from the internet AND ON TOP OF THAT stop your ability to reorganize online, the farms issue is a bad example because that was public pressure/capitalism at play not some top down silencing effort.

NIST has the power and ability to hardware ban ANY forward facing server from DNS at the click of a button, hell there are only 13 PRIMARY DNS servers, you could remove whole NATIONS by closing their connection to their associated root server, this goes double for any host or service provider, and even for local vendors. There is so many ways the angry pixies we use to talk on the internet can be taken away.
Not even Russia has gotten their Internet disconnected. Calm down. The situation is bad, but if the situation was that bad, Null would be talking about it every fucking day.
 
Mistakenly deported Salvadoran native Kilmar Abrego Garcia is on his way back to the United States where he will face criminal charges for allegedly transporting undocumented migrants within the U.S., according to sources familiar with the matter.
Is it only the Democrat base that is still buying that?
 
@SIGSEV got what he deserved. Josh got a court order. He honored it. That has always been a site rule. That nigger glowposted way too hard.
Not saying I agree or disagree with that take but if you believe that (witch I respect) please explain what made what he said not free speech


But this is just fine to post

This isent a gotcha or anything, Im curious from your perspective what the difference was. Im kinda a free speech purist but even I agree you have to draw the line at direct threats of violence but even there you run into issues of jokes, social commentary, and just raw free speech being important.

Is it ok to make a cartoon in a news paper about blowing up an elementy school full of students? Is that a call to violence or is it art? Bill Waterson would say its art, and art is protected right? But art isent even enumerated in the bill of rights as a protected right so how much more should speech be?
1749239639611.webp

Hope im making my point well and not trying to make you feel you should agree with me or feel wrong, its a HIGHLY COMPLEX issue and I feel constructive and respectful discourse isent just important but necessary
 
Bannon is correct. The Defense Production Act could take over SpaceX. There is nothing "illegial" about it. Its more of a wartime law, but it is still law. If musk wants to fuck with the military putting satelites in orbit, something Space Force no doubt would take issue with, they WILL take over, and Musk can do nothing.
 
Not saying I agree or disagree with that take but if you believe that (witch I respect) please explain what made what he said not free speech
as I understand the criteria are:

>statement of intent
>specifying location
>specifying time

Sam Hyde doesn't fall under that because he never specified a time
 
Not saying I agree or disagree with that take but if you believe that (witch I respect) please explain what made what he said not free speech


But this is just fine to post

This isent a gotcha or anything, Im curious from your perspective what the difference was. Im kinda a free speech purist but even I agree you have to draw the line at direct threats of violence but even there you run into issues of jokes, social commentary, and just raw free speech being important.

Is it ok to make a cartoon in a news paper about blowing up an elementy school full of students? Is that a call to violence or is it art? Bill Waterson would say its art, and art is protected right? But art isent even enumerated in the bill of rights as a protected right so how much more should speech be?
View attachment 7465396

Hope im making my point well and not trying to make you feel you should agree with me or feel wrong, its a HIGHLY COMPLEX issue and I feel constructive and respectful discourse isent just important but necessary
Im not going to argue speech with you. Josh got a court order. He followed it. Failure to follow it would result in termination of the site. If you are so mad, talk to dear feeder. Also Sam Hyde did that in another country and immediately booked a flight back home, in which time the law couldn't catch him. Sam got away with it by being lucky and quick on his feet. Glowniggery on a plain text website in the aftermath of Jan 6 was not a smart move. Sig got what he deserved. Then came back. Then got banned again for being fucking retarded. Now he's Onion farm's problem.
 
I guess the people in control are just as fucking wild as anyone else.
that's no mistake. the people that rule over you work very, very hard to make you think they're different or special in some way. they're just people. they have the same vices and weaknesses that every other single human does

I struggle to think of something gayer than trying to talk down to someone with a newer join date on a gossip forum than you.
that's why i talk down to people with older reg dates than me. the future is now, old fag
 
Bannon is correct. The Defense Production Act could take over SpaceX. There is nothing "illegial" about it. Its more of a wartime law, but it is still law. If musk wants to fuck with the military putting satelites in orbit, something Space Force no doubt would take issue with, they WILL take over, and Musk can do nothing.
That would end up being a highly controversial issue though, that almost certainly would make Elon and the Democrats team up, and the Democrats will be completely vindicated for a lot of people. They would probably even make a movie about it. I think it's a moot point because I don't think SpaceX shareholders would allow it to get to that point in the first place after all this time and progress being made, though I'm no expert on the topic.
 
Friendly reminder more Americans died on 9/11 than D-day, in our collective conscious it was some "herculean sacrifice" but in reality it was mid '44 and the Russians had the Germans on the ropes, we came in when we did so that we could "save" some parts of Europe from soviet "liberation".
It is very true our losses were low compared to the Soviets, stated that in my original post. Matter of fact, about the time of D-Day the Soviets launched Operation Bagration, which badly hurt the Germans, want to say it pretty much wrecked Army Group Center. They also launched an offensive in the East to take pressure off us during the Battle of the Bulge.

The Soviets lost about 27,000,000 dead, military and civilian, of all causes during the war. The USA lost just over 400,000 military and a few civilians. The UK's losses were about 500,000 military and civilians, this is off the top of the head.

Been reading WWII history over 60 years myself.
 
Cancer fucking hurts, so he's likely been on painkillers and maybe even a few anti-anxiety drugs which can make you loopy. That's why he had so many handlers, that's why Hunter was with him in the White House, that's why Jill followed him around everywhere: Joe Biden had cancer the entire time he was president and everyone who knew covered it up. Democrats pulled another FDR on the whole country.
This is exactly what I think. And, even if it's not true, it'll soon become "common knowledge" and enter into the history books as the factual reason Biden couldn't function in public. Won't matter if he really DID have dementia, in 20 years everyone's going to KNOW it was due to cancer treatment...
 
Im not going to argue speech with you. Josh got a court order. He followed it. Failure to follow it would result in termination of the site. If you are so mad, talk to dear feeder.
1749240517592.webp1749240558778.webp
are you ok boss? Im neither mad nor questioning nulls decsion im asking you defend you position on free speech, if you dont wanna do that its ok I just wonder what your doing on a US politics thread if you wont wanna talk about your thoughts and opinions on US policy.
 
That would end up being a highly controversial issue though, that almost certainly would make Elon and the Democrats team up, and the Democrats will be completely vindicated for a lot of people. They would probably even make a movie about it. I think it's a moot point because I don't think SpaceX shareholders would allow it to get to that point in the first place after all this time and progress being made, though I'm no expert on the topic.
It depends. I just browsed my twitter timeline man. Elon is getting shit on hard. He has crashed out. I do not think that many people would give a fuck. That said, the shareholders as you mentioned will proably win out in the end before that becomes a problem.
 
View attachment 7465470View attachment 7465476
are you ok boss? Im neither mad nor questioning nulls decsion im asking you defend you position on free speech, if you dont wanna do that its ok I just wonder what your doing on a US politics thread if you wont wanna talk about your thoughts and opinions on US policy.
This fucking dude uses the light theme. Boo this man. Boo!
 
Back