Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

[Nicholas Gurrmann]

View attachment 7470861
The pedophile conveniently forgot that the 4Chan hack back in April revealed that the site is run by troons.

You're mistaken. Lolifags love trannies, as long as they are into fucking anime children.

 

[Ayana Otonashi]

"no place here"
Where does he think he is? You don't see people try to claw back rage comics or megustas like they do pepes.
Imageboard culture wouldn't be where it is today without reddit or knowyourmeme.
View attachment 7471055

wojak and pepe were fucking mistakes btw

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Easy most pedophiles aren't actually busted with digital images of Lolli.

Not to defend these creeps, but completely mentally different disorder.

I think the original debate threat had someone going over the actual statistics but there's really very little link between the two things.

I don't believe there's "very little link" between pedophiles and lolicons, where are these "statistics"? There's probably only a tiny margin of autists genuinely only attracted to abstract character designs, I bet if researchers showed each group loli and then real girls to gauge their interest that there'd be a lot of overlap.

It's also a genuine waste of time for the government to go after the. inanimate objects because inanimate objects don't feel pain going after actual producers of CP is much more useful.
Also, I do love the people who say, you know, we should make all these things illegal. Yeah, that totally always works. Think of the children Yet people would use most of those laws to go after Kiwi farms.

I don't think they should arrest lolifags but that doesn't mean hentai shouldn't be banned and removed from every website, video game, etc. And it would work, really easily actually. Look how easy it was for "hate speech" to be weeded out of every website on the Internet outside of a few fringe sites like Kiwi Farms.

If wrongthink like "there's only 2 genders" can be so effectively purged then you can't convince me porn bans won't work.

Do I believe in banning porn Yes, all porn

You realize you just contradicted yourself, right...? You said it wouldn't work just a few sentences earlier.

However, I'm not going to ban certain drawling styles of people's Art. expression because I find something slightly distasteful

Wow, and you immediately re-contradicted yourself

showing his infant child porn he was working on.

He needs to be locked up for a long damn time and never be allowed around kids again, insanely degenerate.

Uhm, actually. Showing fetish porn to my baby child is educative and good parenting. How will he/she ever relate to his peers if he's not cripplingly addicted to porn by the time he enters kindergarten? You're all just a bunch of cave dwelling puritans that should have died along with the dinosaurs.

Did you just reinforce the fucking gender binary?!

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

I don't believe there's "very little link" between pedophiles and lolicons, where are these "statistics"? There's probably only a tiny margin of autists genuinely only attracted to abstract character designs, I bet if researchers showed each group loli and then real girls to gauge their interest that there'd be a lot of overlap.

If I had some photoshop skills, I'd use the book "Two Hundred Years Together", except it would say "'Two Teams' working for the same goal", and instead it would show the hanged troonjak.

There is a reason why people call them "lolitroons". They should be dealt it in the same way.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

You realize you just contradicted yourself, right...? You said it wouldn't work just a few sentences earlier.

Not at all porn is different than art, and if you cannot tell the difference, you are mentally slow.


Heartland Ellison is 100 percent correct when he says. that offensive art should be protected.
It's like when people look at Chicellini's Venus, that is not porn
Not a contradiction at all. People should be allowed to draw whatever the hell they want. But I am still reserving the right to judge you for it.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

If I had some photoshop skills, I'd use the book "Two Hundred Years Together", except it would say "'Two Teams' working for the same goal", and instead it would show the hanged troonjak.

There is a reason why people call them "lolitroons". They should be dealt it in the same way.

Never heard of the book but I'm sure it'd be funny lol.

View attachment 7471523View attachment 7471524

Not at all porn is different than art, and if you cannot tell the difference, you are mentally slow.


Heartland Ellison is 100 percent correct when he says. that offensive art should be protected.
It's like when people look at Chicellini's Venus, that is not porn
Not a contradiction at all. People should be allowed to draw whatever the hell they want. But I am still reserving the right to judge you for it.

I can't help but notice a distinct lack of those statistics you mentioned that I asked for, or maybe you posted them and I missed them because I'm too mentally slow lmao

One could easily argue porn is art, I just have no problem with censoring certain types of art anyway so it's irrelevant to me. Regardless, nobody wants to ban any and all depictions of kid characters dude, nobody would find your example images objectionable.

And no, you shouldn't be able to draw whatever you want. Porn in general shouldn't be drawn and child characters shouldn't be sexualized even if the content isn't explicitly pornographic (with rare exceptions such as Berserk, where Guts was raped as a boy, but you're not intended to get off on that).

 

[notorietus]

ENF_Lover / GuidronE / raquiel / Guillaume(?)

Hey, it seems you missed something. Don't worry, I fixed it for you. Let's go through this case:
Combis Guillaume / ENF_Lover / GuidronE / raquiel / Guillaume

Twitter (A)

Twitter history:

Alt Twitter (A)

No results.

Patreon (DEAD)

Patreon truth nvked his account on November 22nd, 2023. This is likely because he is a pedophile faggot.

enflovercom@gmail.com

Wow, so now we know his real name is Combis Guillaume. Okay, let's put that in the OSINT tool and see what comes up:

We get another email: guillaumecombis@yahoo.fr, and also from that, we get a phone number: +33 6 17 80 85 70. Firstly, let's get to the breaches of this email:

Okay, now we know his birthdate is 1981-07-17 (or July 17th, 1981).

Age: 33
Birthday: July 17th

This makes the age in the post wrong. The age in this post should be 43, which is a lot worse (and makes it even more horrifying) that this faggot has a child and is showing him porn (Early Porn Introduction).

From the Locus Hong Kong shop, we now have his phone number: +33 6 17 80 85 70. If you remember my reverse email search, you would know that we are missing the middle digits from his PayPal.

Doing +33 6 17 80 85 70 in a reverse phone search confirms that this phone number belongs to enf_lover, (because the 1st digits are en) & not to mention the same PayPal ID from the enflover gmail that we saw before.

Reverse email searching his @yahoo.fr address reveals these accounts:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/43902917@N04/

A domain: guillaume-est-super.com
And his PayPal reveals another phone number:
phone: +33 6 ** ** 85 70,+33 4 ** ** 10 57
email: *************is@ya***.fr <-- This is just his email address again.

Now if you remember the breaches, you would know there's an address here: 114 Av. du Trois Septembre, 06320 Cap-d'Ail, France. This belongs to a company called Mendes Immobilier.

Their website reads: "Mendes Immobilier is an agency specializing in medium and high-end real estate of the neighboring municipalities of Monaco (Beausoleil, Roquebrune Cap Martin, Cap d'Ail and La Turbie). We offer complete sales, rental and rental management services, with the aim of supporting customers in all stages of their real estate project." The address here is likely a rental, so we can assume he lives in an apartment in this address.

Lives somewhere near 161 Rte de Cannes, 06130 Grasse, France according to some of his reviews he left.

54 Rte de la Marigarde, 06130 Grasse, France another possible location because he made a review there.

The addresses here listed are hours away, even days, so it's safe to say it might not be his current address, but these reviews were left here years ago.

Breaches are attached in report-2025-06-08.txt. Also @Colon capital V, include a Nitter proxy alternative as well.

 

[The Foxtrot]

Okay, let's put that in the OSINT tool and see what comes up:

What tool are you using?

 

[notorietus]

What tool are you using?

Breaches are using lolarchiver, the reverse email search is using osint.sx. Both are paid.

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

Never heard of the book but I'm sure it'd be funny lol.

It speaks of the story of the Jews and their two hundred years in the Russian Empire, By Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Only my take is completely silly.

 

[WULULULULU]

Of course its a Frenchie. Nuke France please.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

And no, you shouldn't be able to draw whatever you want. Porn in general shouldn't be drawn and child characters shouldn't be sexualized even if the content isn't explicitly pornographic (with rare exceptions such as Berserk, where Guts was raped as a boy, but you're not intended to get off on that).

OK Clash Schwab. Then why you on this website. It's a very simple question that you don't have an answer to.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

OK Clash Schwab. Then why you on this website. It's a very simple question that you don't have an answer to.

I assume you're alluding to the fact that this website hosts pornography. That doesn't make it a porn website, though I can't think of a valid reason to host it here, but that's not my call. There's lots of stuff I don't want here, like the "post videos of people dying" thread and liberal users, but again, I can't control that.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

I assume you're alluding to the fact that this website hosts pornography. That doesn't make it a porn website, though I can't think of a valid reason to host it here, but that's not my call. There's lots of stuff I don't want here, like the "post videos of people dying" thread and liberal users, but again, I can't control that.

I'm alluding to the fact that the dumb argument you make can be used against Kiwi farms.
There's a famous quote that once you're defending liberty and freedom of speech, you tend to find yourself defending scoundrels. I hate these people more than you do, but I would defend their right to draw whatever the hell they want.

We can actually see an example of these types of laws in action with the take it down act and all those online safety acts. You know, the first websites they went after wasn't read it. wasn't Twitter wasn't Facebook. 0 wait, it was Kiwifarms .

I'm sure these laws would be 100 percent used against all those sites, and not just a way of the government seizing more powerful itself. You remind me of the people who said, either with us or with the terrorists. Same asinine argument. I can find something morally reprehensible, but also. see the danger of empowering the government with sweeping abilities to censor the Internet or websites.

Then again, I've been seeing you lose this argument in threads for the better part of 4 years now, so there's really no point in arguing with you anymore. People explain it to you of a simply, but you don't seem to get it.

I know this must come to a shock, but people who defend the ability of people to draw what they want and do reprehensible things that are protected speech by simply doing it not because they agree with the reprehensible speech or the reprehensible things they're doing is because not doing so would endanger their own liberty.

It's the same reason a lot of the atom waffen guys as well as. Matthew Hare were represented by extremely liberal lawyers who don't like racism because the things they use against them will also be used against people they agree with in the future.

 

[Colon capital V]

 Snip

Mucho Graciàs! I meant to reach out to you shortly after posting this, but got caught up with something there after, so I appreciate you taking the time once again on 'mining people I would very much like to see skinned and flayed alive [legally in minecraft]. Will edit in Nitter links in my post soon shortly.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I'm alluding to the fact that the dumb argument you make can be used against Kiwi farms.
There's a famous quote that once you're defending liberty and freedom of speech, you tend to find yourself defending scoundrels. I hate these people more than you do, but I would defend their right to draw whatever the hell they want.

You can't just say my argument is dumb, you need to actually articulate why it's dumb. Tell me how my argument can be used against Kiwi Farms.

Freedom of speech is not unlimited and liberty is not a permit for licentiousness. My hate is too precious to be wasted on cartoon gooners, I just want their goonfuel banned.

We can actually see an example of these types of laws in action with the take it down act and all those online safety acts. You know, the first websites they went after wasn't read it. wasn't Twitter wasn't Facebook. 0 wait, it was Kiwifarms .

Be more specific, I'm not aware of any law that went after KF. But a porn ban wouldn't effect KF anyway so that's irrelevant too, what little is hosted here could be removed to comply and effect almost nothing.

I'm sure these laws would be 100 percent used against all those sites, and not just a way of the government seizing more powerful itself. You remind me of the people who said, either with us or with the terrorists. Same asinine argument. I can find something morally reprehensible, but also. see the danger of empowering the government with sweeping abilities to censor the Internet or websites.

I don't care, the government will try to encroach upon our rights regardless, may as well do society some good while we're at it.

Then again, I've been seeing you lose this argument in threads for the better part of 4 years now, so there's really no point in arguing with you anymore. People explain it to you of a simply, but you don't seem to get it.

I've never lost a debate on this topic once. I have a perfect record on debating gun rights, porn bans, abortion, and pretty much every other political matter I debate.

You guys just declare victory every time and run away angry, like you're doing now, because you know I'm winning

I know this must come to a shock, but people who defend the ability of people to draw what they want and do reprehensible things that are protected speech by simply doing it not because they agree with the reprehensible speech or the reprehensible things they're doing is because not doing so would endanger their own liberty.

I understand the logic, I just think it's foolish. My liberty is not endangered by any position I hold and there's never been a compelling argument to the contrary.

Imagine porn is banned tomorrow, what's next? Nobody can ever connect the dots between that happening and my liberty being stripped from me. Feel free to try, if you can.

It's the same reason a lot of the atom waffen guys as well as. Matthew Hare were represented by extremely liberal lawyers who don't like racism because the things they use against them will also be used against people they agree with in the future.

No idea what you're talking about, but racism isn't illegal (and shouldn't be). You're allowed to not like other races, being a pornographer shouldn't be allowed.

 

[Oddity]

Some people should've been bullied more.

 

[Clueless]

he deleted his twitter account. there is an archive of the post up on ghostarchive (second one. first one didn't work)

 

[Coberald]

Combis Guillaume / ENF_Lover / GuidronE / raquiel / Guillaume

I found his face on some french social media website (Archive) (Archive 2)

I'm certain its him because a lot of details on the profile match up with what we know, the year of birth is the same, he lists his profession as an "art student", and Roquebrune cap Martin (where he went to school) is extremely close to Cap-d'Ail (Google says its a ~20 minute drive).

Some thing interesting I noticed about this profile is that he lists himself as single so either a) the kid in the photo is his a relative's child or someone he's babysiting, b) he's divorced or c) he hasn't updated this profile since getting into a relationship.

 

[notorietus]

he deleted his twitter account. there is an archive of the post up on ghostarchive (second one. first one didn't work)

Oh shit, he deactivated!