Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 111 24.2%

  • Total voters
    459
Everything in this filing is correct and I might even be convinced that the rhetoric (and quoting yourself) is justified but I do worry that this started off a bit too strong. Maybe wait until after the first easily disprovable lie so that your readers are on your side because as we know, judge bowtie is not actually keeping up with this case. On the other hand the squeaky wheel gets the grease and I'm not a lawyer much less one of Hardin' caliber.

1749511482629.webp
Then again where's the footnote? Don't get hot headed on me now, Hardin.

Null and Hardin haven't order t-shirts about sanctioning russhole right?
 
Watch Greer try to claim that the transcript is incorrect and/or the transcriber is maliciously in cahoots with Defendant or some shit. Then the judge can play back the whole Zoom hearing from May 6th and tell Greer to ring a bell or something at whatever timestamp the magic words "Discovery stay doesn't include the Does" are spoken, and Greer will say the judge edited the recording because he's bias.



I highlighted this upthread but yes Hardin seriously needs to reply to this motion and in particular draw special attention to this part:
View attachment 7480047

This right here is Greer fucking spitting in the District Judge's face. I really want to see Hardin show this to Barlow and ask Barlow how it tastes.
Its also stupid because Hardin sent Greers witnesses a check just fine.
 
I am no longer kidding, I want the judge to issue that Order. Strictly for the lulz, he should demand Greer show him exactly where in the transcript or docket he said the thing Greer claims.

Nah. Hardin should simply file notice that no payment was received.

Judge then issues contempt of court warrant with body attachment. Drag Russell to jail and then court. Hold him until he pays. Having him explain anything gives too much credence to his argument.
 
ICBW, but I think RG focuses on the hac in pro hac and has the erroneous belief the word equates to the slang definition of hack meaning mediocre
he can now see the whites of Greer's slack jawed teeth.
fucking kek

The inaction by either judge on just about anything in an entire month has cost Null I can't imagine how much money.
He said 1.3 and 1.1 hours for the previous two short filings and is charging 300$ an hour. I'm going to guess the average filing will be a bit more so lets say 1.5 hours or in other words $450/filing. The judges are nowhere to be found so most of the motions in this case are back and forth motions practice. Cut of say 33 for judges orders to get a nice round 300 docket entries and halve that to get the number of motions Hardin has filed. I would ballpark this has cost ~150 motions * ~$450 = $67,500. Rusty is going to be paying for this for a looooooong time if fees get shifted.
 
Last edited:
In Grees mind, if he files last minute the court basically has to give him extra time as they're closed and won't see it for a day or two. He likely thinks this is a genius legal strategy and loophole.
Greee is once again seeking to claim that any requirements to pay are stayed until his latest "Hail Mary Motion to Undo the Thing That Was Done I Strenuously Mean It This Time. Just Because Hardin is a Meany!" is ruled on. He somehow fails to grasp that it already was ruled on the last time he asked for it 2 weeks ago. Unless there is a Check in Hardins hand by close of business today, he's violated the District Judges clear unequivocal Court Order.

There's going to be some fun reading tomorrow.
 
There's going to be some fun reading tomorrow.
It is exceptionally difficult for me to see a world where the judges don't tardguard here. This is exactly the scenario where you'd expect the judges to stand up and act, sure, but they seem allergic to doing so. I do wonder if The Hardship has anything up his sleeve for the forthcoming "Greee didn't pay" memo or whatever.
 
Nah. Hardin should simply file notice that no payment was received.
Tomorrow is also the day that Hardship Hardin is supposed to file a status update on the other thing that Russ excusably neglected to do. As much as I want Hadin to go ham (or Ralph in sektur parlance), I think the best response will be "XYZ not received". The magistrate was already baffled by Russ's inaction on the May 6th hearing and I can't imagine his recent actions are gonna help.

Regarding today's "fuck you, I'm not paying" motions and ignoring the plightsperging, how will the judges likely view it? It's over something that's resulted in either "don't ask me, ask the other judge" or the other judge saying "no", and filed the refusal the day it was due. Are they likely to view it under the lens of 'normal court bullshit' or is it feasible that they'll consider it as a continuation of Russ being willfully, nay carefully, recalcitrant? I mean, what are they gonna do? Sanction him again? LOL, that shit doesn't matter. Russ doesn't care.
 
Tomorrow is also the day that Hardship Hardin is supposed to file a status update on the other thing that Russ excusably neglected to do.

Tomorrow is also also the day Hardin will be filing a new motion for sanctions, having timely served it upon Greer 21 days ago per the rules, regarding Greer's fucky little "emergency motion to reschedule the May 6 hearing" and his accompanying lies to the court. Takedown Tuesday, here we come.
 
Regarding today's "fuck you, I'm not paying" motions and ignoring the plightsperging, how will the judges likely view it? It's over something that's resulted in either "don't ask me, ask the other judge" or the other judge saying "no", and filed the refusal the day it was due. Are they likely to view it under the lens of 'normal court bullshit' or is it feasible that they'll consider it as a continuation of Russ being willfully, nay carefully, recalcitrant? I mean, what are they gonna do? Sanction him again? LOL, that shit doesn't matter. Russ doesn't care.
Absolutely #2. Barlow's response to Greers "Yet Another Motion to Undo the Thing That Was Done For $1000" 2weeks ago was just radiating Judge Be Mad. The Judges Order was The Sanction Will Be Paid by Today. Greer is showing utter contempt for the Court. Greers filing today is complete contempt.

Why would they TardGuard for this? They are well past the point where they can legitimately shield the retard from his own stupidity. Anything further borders on misconduct or clearly reversible error. They've already hit the point where Statute says they MUST Dismiss for 2 different Greee fails. It's getting harder for them to hand wave away those sorts of things. And there is no way either Judge thinks Greer could ever take this to trial in front of a Jury.
 
I doubt the court has the slightest idea that Greee has a paralegal diploma or they wouldn't be nearly so easy on him. I think we are the only ones besides his family who do as he never mentions it in any of his legal pleadings.

Besides he fucks up basic legal things like the rules of discovery that any accredited paralegal would be assumed to know, the court would think he was taking the piss if he claimed he was.
This was mentioned several time in the beginning. It didn't seem to do much so it kinda stopped being brought up. I'm sure judge bowtie has no idea after seeing him be surprised by stuff during the hearing. Maybe it would've been smart to try and work a mention in during the May 6th hearing since that was the only time the judge was paying attention.
 
Now some poor fucker has to run an ANAL-izer on all his shitty screenshot filings and see if he done it before.
COMES NOW Mr. @IamnottheNSA and delivers the contents of Mr. Greer's spank bank!

...is what I'd like to say, but the spankening didn't really happen until now, with one notable exception. Not that there were no other secrets to find.
ECV 3 - Exhibit V, page 5:
3.webp
This one shows up every time Exhibit V is included in a filing (except ECV 209 for some reason). Under our noses the whole time!

I also have to add that there are some filings where Russ scratched some things out, but the scratches are saved as a separate image, so the original image could be extracted without the scratches, such as the following:
ECV 31 - Exhibit B, page 13:
31.webp
ECV 76 - Excibit C, page 13 - this one was hiding a huge chunk of the email, 4 screenshots, with just the last one shown:
76-1.webp76-2.webp76-3.webp76-4.webp
ECV 86 - Exhibit B, page 5 - scratched out data again, this time about the Paralyzed Face Productions:
86.webp
And finally, ECV 239 - Exhibit B, page 17:
239.webp
CONCLUSION:
Well, this was a bit disappointing. Mr. GREEE is still a retarded boomer coomer.
 
This should be a 1 pager for Hardin. "Greer didn't follow your orders and said he never will. Motion to Dismiss x2, fee recovery suit incoming."

I mean Greer was pretty clear about signalling his intent here, wasn't he? "Unless this court finds in my favour, I have no intention of ever abiding by any of its findings."

By insisting on filing further spurious motions in respect of these sanctions, it's just another way of running up null's costs. Greer should be forced to pay any costs for Hardin's responses to this bullshit as well.

Also, does America not have bank transfers? If I want to send somebody money these days, I just do a transfer from my account directly into theirs. Even the oldest and most technologically retarded boomer knows how to do this. You need the person's account number and their bank sort code, but it gives you concrete evidence of when and where the payment was made.
 
Also, does America not have bank transfers? If I want to send somebody money these days, I just do a transfer from my account directly into theirs. Even the oldest and most technologically retarded boomer knows how to do this. You need the person's account number and their bank sort code, but it gives you concrete evidence of when and where the payment was made.
josh is still debanked
 
Back