Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
edit: not sure why a few people are rating this "dumb" when it's 100% correct. Just seeing a dumb rating and can't help following the herd like a lemming?
I rated it dumb specifically because I saw you complaining about people rating it dumb. Who the fuck cares about stickers?

Thread Tax: If the Judge actually does his job and dismisses the case, I'll eat my hat. This case is going to go on forever and ever - Calling it.
 
ECF 335 & 336
If the court does what Hardin asks then these issues right here could be the end to the case.

Hardin is bringing the hammer down but it is not guaranteed the judges will go along with it. But there is a reasonable chance. Hardin can smell the blood in the water.
Specifically, we asked for more time because we wanted YOU, fucking judge, to take action. Not only did you NOT take fucking action, you sat around while MORE bullshit got filed that YOU, fucking judge, need to take action on. So much for judicial economy.
I actually think the Judge not ruling on this is incredibly smart and will work to the advantage of Null. Now the Judge has the option to dismiss this case for failing to provide documents and failing to pay the sanction and including that reasoning as well making the dismissal stronger.

And in fact I think the Magistrate Judge did this on purpose specifically so that if he got the chance to rule to dismiss he could include this knowing that he couldn't get the District Judge to rule to dismiss on that issue alone.
 
I rated it dumb specifically because I saw you complaining about people rating it dumb. Who the fuck cares about stickers?
People who are trying to provide accurate information and not have it overlooked as incorrect due to fake dumb ratings, perhaps?

We've had the Dumont address for years. There was no new "doxxing".
 
the horrifying part is porn thing started & happened & i didn't know that was thing in document systems
(ePDF- (thanks : @RodgerDodger ))/ copy paste (embedded issue) .
i am not jinxing it will never happen again or happen before.
:cryblood:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerkstore
If you missed it from this afternoon, Greer filed his Porn embedded in his motion. That is a stack of pictures on th ePDF. If you move the cheesy screenshotted Greemail out of the way you find porn and Insta Thots.
Yeah I saw it later in the thread as I was catching up. I have to say that I really was not expecting russ to file softcore porn with the court or that it would be so sad. Do you think all the screenshots he has are thots he's venmo'd a dollar? Like those are women he has a "relationship" with?

I do worry sometimes about replying to stuff when I'm not fully caught up but if it's from literally earlier today I think that fair game. Plus confirmation of that strange behavior might actually be helpful as opposed to autistic comparisons between this case and hawking radiation.
 
She's not the only one. The last image @IamnottheNSA found and posted, has her website listed. She's a call girl out of San Franscisco, and her rates are not exactly Russ-friendly.

View attachment 7481150
View attachment 7481390View attachment 7481391

She does have a "tour date" in Las Vegas coming up, so maybe Russ is hoping to have a "business meeting" without driving 7 hours.
View attachment 7481394

Edit: this was actually found in an exhibit Hardin included as part of ECF 239. It's from Greer's motion to intervene in Doe vs Lombardo, when he was trying to disbar the Plaintiff's lawyer. It looks like Hardin just downloaded it and included it separately as an exhibit, so it retained Greer's original submission... including the escort screencap underneath his petition exhibit.

This was on July 24, 2024, so I guess Greer was previously interested in Ms Kate's services, perhaps not currently.
What are her rates for the Olive Garden Special? Does she give a discount for the Handicapped? Is she ADA compliant?

Is there any chance Greer gets sanctioned for unwillingly sharing his coomer stash? I'd think it warrants contempt of court charges.
Yes. Even though this is technically his first instance of actual Excusable Neglect. He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah. This is not a good look for the same day you are basically telling the Judge you werent paying attention during the hearing and have not bothered reading any of his actual orders. Lets just say it illustrates a certain inattentiveness to detail that Courts tend to frown on. As an individual event the entire Court will simply point and laugh at the Masturbating retard. But when taken with regards to the totality that is Greeeeeee? The Judges may get a bit pissy. Especially if the Clerks notice this and complain about the retard sending them his personal Fapbank.
 
Last edited:
Even though this is technically his first instance of actual Excusable Neglect. He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah.
Technically Hardin posted the escort, as part of his ECF 239 exhibits. This is inexcusable neglect: a reasonable person should expect every Greer document to be tainted, filthy, and linked to whores.

@Null please instruct your alleged lawyer to refrain from posting hookers to the court docket, it's very inappropriate.
 
I'm going to make a prediction and say Russ will be tardguarded once again; I bet the tardguard is less about protecting Russell and more about hurting Null.

That being said, I'm reasonably confident that, unless he's going against someone with a reputation like Null's, Russell's career as a litigant is finished. Rusty's performance in this case has been appalling, and reveals the frivolous nature of his lawsuits. He will inevitably get himself labeled as a vexatious litigant in Nevada, which will kill his brothel dreams for good. Whether he beats Null or not, Rusty will come out as the loser in the long run.
 
I actually think the Judge not ruling on this is incredibly smart and will work to the advantage of Null. Now the Judge has the option to dismiss this case for failing to provide documents and failing to pay the sanction and including that reasoning as well making the dismissal stronger.

And in fact I think the Magistrate Judge did this on purpose specifically so that if he got the chance to rule to dismiss he could include this knowing that he couldn't get the District Judge to rule to dismiss on that issue alone.
Maybe if we lived in a sane and just world. I do like the idea the judges were giving Greee enough role that he managed to hang himself two times.

Though it is an amazing difference when you compare the judges now from late last year. They were very liberally interpreting Russ's motion for Russ's benefit. To the point where he could piss in the wind and they'd call it rain. And now? He's all but effectively given them no choice but to dump sanction upon sanction on the chosen retard. You could easily tell through the transcript and the audio that the magistrate thinks Russ is a malicious retard at best.

All of his filings since at least May 6th, and undoubtedly further, have just been him being a combative retard over shit that is inconsequential to move the case forward. Off the top of my head, it's just been:

-Multiple plightspergings over producing a document to Hardin. One that he has already been repeatedly and sternly told the time to argue about it has long-since passed.

- Multiple plightspergings over a sanction. One that he's already exhausted all options to combat, told no, and decided maybe his latest motion will work this time.

- Multiple plightspergings over Hardin looking into elements regarding his IFP status, that was only an issue because he was too busy at his brothel meeting to pay attention to the judge. Which also led to additional plightspergings over said IFP status on top of Hardin researching his brothel ventures.

Quite literally, the ONLY thing he's done to move the case forward was his fraudulent attempt to subpoena two John Does, which led to MORE plightspergings because of course it would.

Russ isn't giving the judges anything to work with at this point. I'm sure the judges, whenever they decide to catch up on the 50 ECFs or so, are gonna slap Hardin a bit for implying Russ is a whoremonger, but how can they possibly save Russ here? He's not complying with shit. They've given him multiple, multiple opportunities to rectify. That he must comply and can no longer argue at this point in time, and what does he do? Not only doesn't he rectify, he openly admits he refuses to do so simply because he doesn't want to and then tries to argue it all over again. I'm not sure how any judge, even the 10th circuit, could save Russ from the mess he's in.
He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah. This is not a good look for the same day you are basically telling the Judge you werent paying attention during the hearing and have not bothered reading any of his actual orders. Lets just say it illustrates a certain inattentiveness to detail that Courts tend to frown on.
I mean, Hardin has already stated that Plaintiff Greee doesn't pay attention and "just files things". There was already obvious credence to that based on reality, but now there's factual ebidence. Typos and tard logic are one thing, but him admitting he's responding based off notes he wrote instead of actual orders or transcripts while unintentionally uploading his fap repository in the same motion give Hardin A LOT of string to pull if he were to continue pulling in that direction.
Technically Hardin posted the escort, as part of his ECF 239 exhibits. This is inexcusable neglect: a reasonable person should expect every Greer document to be tainted, filthy, and linked to whores.

@Null please instruct your alleged lawyer to refrain from posting hookers to the court docket, it's very inappropriate.
Jesus, I didn't notice that. Well, I guess that's definitely a good story to tell his lawyer friends. I can only imagine Sean will get a good chuckle out of that one.
 
I mean, Hardin has already stated that Plaintiff Greee doesn't pay attention and "just files things".
Jesus, I didn't notice that. Well, I guess that's definitely a good story to tell his lawyer friends.

No, stalker lawyer, it is actually YOU who is posting whores to the docket! Your pro hac vice is already over. Enjoy sanctions.
 
Final prediction for tomorrow:

Optimistically I see the magistrate cha-cha sliding into his chambers and dropping a pre-written Recommendation for Dismissal to the District Judge based on non-payment and/or non-production of court ordered document.

The district Judge will go "Hmm, yeah" and get around to it after a few weeks in which more furiously plighting than ever seen before occurs.

Hardin will have to pursue monetary sanctions (and vex-lit) post-dismissal while Greer attempts to appeal, appeal, appeal, motions counting sky high past 400 well into the new year.
 
If you find something please say what docket it came from.
Null, we need you to promise us something. We need you to wear a wire and bodycam for when you inform Hardin that Greeee just pasted his fapstash onto the docket. We need to see that audio and video. Not right away. Later, after the case has ended and you and the hardship are serving your long prison sentences as ordered by the 10th Circuit. Please once Attorney Client Privilege is no longer binding. Just let us witness the look on his face and hear the words that he speaks as you told him about Greer sending his digital Whores to the Federal Court.
 
I have checked this with multiple tools and can't find Null's or Hardin's porn :(

Hardin's porn was easy to find.

Mr. Greer has not provided the documents he was ordered to provide at ECF No. 297, ECF No. 283, and ECF No. 227. Instead, Mr. Greer has filed repeated motions for relief from those orders, with the most recent motion being docketed at ECF No. 326. Defendants have opposed Mr. Greer’s most recent request, as they opposed his previous requests, and have pointed out that Mr. Greer’s narrative as to whether he possesses the requested document(s) and whether the material is relevant has shifted considerably over time. ECF No. 327.

He typed and pressed send....
randy.webp
 
Back