- Joined
- May 14, 2024
The statute also says they MUST give the opposing party a chance to respond when granting an objection. And yet...They've already hit the point where Statute says they MUST Dismiss for 2 different Greee fails.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The statute also says they MUST give the opposing party a chance to respond when granting an objection. And yet...They've already hit the point where Statute says they MUST Dismiss for 2 different Greee fails.
I rated it dumb specifically because I saw you complaining about people rating it dumb. Who the fuck cares about stickers?edit: not sure why a few people are rating this "dumb" when it's 100% correct. Just seeing a dumb rating and can't help following the herd like a lemming?
If the court does what Hardin asks then these issues right here could be the end to the case.ECF 335 & 336
I actually think the Judge not ruling on this is incredibly smart and will work to the advantage of Null. Now the Judge has the option to dismiss this case for failing to provide documents and failing to pay the sanction and including that reasoning as well making the dismissal stronger.Specifically, we asked for more time because we wanted YOU, fucking judge, to take action. Not only did you NOT take fucking action, you sat around while MORE bullshit got filed that YOU, fucking judge, need to take action on. So much for judicial economy.
People who are trying to provide accurate information and not have it overlooked as incorrect due to fake dumb ratings, perhaps?I rated it dumb specifically because I saw you complaining about people rating it dumb. Who the fuck cares about stickers?
If you missed it from this afternoon, Greer filed his Porn embedded in his motion. That is a stack of pictures on th ePDF. If you move the cheesy screenshotted Greemail out of the way you find porn and Insta Thots.This also happened to me
It's in the Chantel threadI have checked this with multiple tools and can't find Null's or Hardin's porn![]()
Yeah I saw it later in the thread as I was catching up. I have to say that I really was not expecting russ to file softcore porn with the court or that it would be so sad. Do you think all the screenshots he has are thots he's venmo'd a dollar? Like those are women he has a "relationship" with?If you missed it from this afternoon, Greer filed his Porn embedded in his motion. That is a stack of pictures on th ePDF. If you move the cheesy screenshotted Greemail out of the way you find porn and Insta Thots.
What are her rates for the Olive Garden Special? Does she give a discount for the Handicapped? Is she ADA compliant?She's not the only one. The last image @IamnottheNSA found and posted, has her website listed. She's a call girl out of San Franscisco, and her rates are not exactly Russ-friendly.
View attachment 7481150
View attachment 7481390View attachment 7481391
She does have a "tour date" in Las Vegas coming up, so maybe Russ is hoping to have a "business meeting" without driving 7 hours.
View attachment 7481394
Edit: this was actually found in an exhibit Hardin included as part of ECF 239. It's from Greer's motion to intervene in Doe vs Lombardo, when he was trying to disbar the Plaintiff's lawyer. It looks like Hardin just downloaded it and included it separately as an exhibit, so it retained Greer's original submission... including the escort screencap underneath his petition exhibit.
This was on July 24, 2024, so I guess Greer was previously interested in Ms Kate's services, perhaps not currently.
Yes. Even though this is technically his first instance of actual Excusable Neglect. He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah. This is not a good look for the same day you are basically telling the Judge you werent paying attention during the hearing and have not bothered reading any of his actual orders. Lets just say it illustrates a certain inattentiveness to detail that Courts tend to frown on. As an individual event the entire Court will simply point and laugh at the Masturbating retard. But when taken with regards to the totality that is Greeeeeee? The Judges may get a bit pissy. Especially if the Clerks notice this and complain about the retard sending them his personal Fapbank.Is there any chance Greer gets sanctioned for unwillingly sharing his coomer stash? I'd think it warrants contempt of court charges.
Technically Hardin posted the escort, as part of his ECF 239 exhibits. This is inexcusable neglect: a reasonable person should expect every Greer document to be tainted, filthy, and linked to whores.Even though this is technically his first instance of actual Excusable Neglect. He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah.
Maybe if we lived in a sane and just world. I do like the idea the judges were giving Greee enough role that he managed to hang himself two times.I actually think the Judge not ruling on this is incredibly smart and will work to the advantage of Null. Now the Judge has the option to dismiss this case for failing to provide documents and failing to pay the sanction and including that reasoning as well making the dismissal stronger.
And in fact I think the Magistrate Judge did this on purpose specifically so that if he got the chance to rule to dismiss he could include this knowing that he couldn't get the District Judge to rule to dismiss on that issue alone.
I mean, Hardin has already stated that Plaintiff Greee doesn't pay attention and "just files things". There was already obvious credence to that based on reality, but now there's factual ebidence. Typos and tard logic are one thing, but him admitting he's responding based off notes he wrote instead of actual orders or transcripts while unintentionally uploading his fap repository in the same motion give Hardin A LOT of string to pull if he were to continue pulling in that direction.He did just greemail his porn stash to the Judges Clerks. In Utah. This is not a good look for the same day you are basically telling the Judge you werent paying attention during the hearing and have not bothered reading any of his actual orders. Lets just say it illustrates a certain inattentiveness to detail that Courts tend to frown on.
Jesus, I didn't notice that. Well, I guess that's definitely a good story to tell his lawyer friends. I can only imagine Sean will get a good chuckle out of that one.Technically Hardin posted the escort, as part of his ECF 239 exhibits. This is inexcusable neglect: a reasonable person should expect every Greer document to be tainted, filthy, and linked to whores.
@Null please instruct your alleged lawyer to refrain from posting hookers to the court docket, it's very inappropriate.
I mean, Hardin has already stated that Plaintiff Greee doesn't pay attention and "just files things".
Jesus, I didn't notice that. Well, I guess that's definitely a good story to tell his lawyer friends.
Null, we need you to promise us something. We need you to wear a wire and bodycam for when you inform Hardin that Greeee just pasted his fapstash onto the docket. We need to see that audio and video. Not right away. Later, after the case has ended and you and the hardship are serving your long prison sentences as ordered by the 10th Circuit. Please once Attorney Client Privilege is no longer binding. Just let us witness the look on his face and hear the words that he speaks as you told him about Greer sending his digital Whores to the Federal Court.If you find something please say what docket it came from.
I have checked this with multiple tools and can't find Null's or Hardin's porn![]()
Mr. Greer has not provided the documents he was ordered to provide at ECF No. 297, ECF No. 283, and ECF No. 227. Instead, Mr. Greer has filed repeated motions for relief from those orders, with the most recent motion being docketed at ECF No. 326. Defendants have opposed Mr. Greer’s most recent request, as they opposed his previous requests, and have pointed out that Mr. Greer’s narrative as to whether he possesses the requested document(s) and whether the material is relevant has shifted considerably over time. ECF No. 327.