Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[GayestFurryTrash]

He could not afford the $87 for documents last week. Whatever makes anybody think his $5000 Business money is real?

Because the gimp-faced whoremonger put it in a court filing and submitted it to the court. It doesn’t matter if I think it is real; it matters he admitted to the court it is real.

 

[kcbbq]

He could not afford the $87 for documents last week.

He said he could but said he didnt want to.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

The worst part is, you know Russell's googling right now "How to overturn a judge's order for sanctions when your requests to stay or reconsider, or appeal, have been rejected three times and the judge says any further protests won't result in any more delays and if you fail to pay for the fourth time there WILL be an additional sanction of $500?"

Granted, but that was a payment to the court. The day he submits and pays actual dollars to Hardin/Null, I'll eat a bug

When Russ first asked for the 10% bonded stay pending appeal, Hardin said he should have to pay bond for the full $5,500 it should've been and could still be on appeal, and I think Russ might've actually taken that deal if he could.

Russ is so spiteful and confident he'll win, I really do believe he'd post a $5,500 bond to put off paying $1000 because at least for the time being, Null hasn't gotten a red cent out of him!

"If you do not bring these documnts until 24.6.25 you will be sanctioned by X"

An additional $500 sanction is half of the existing $1000 one, so I hope the further penalties continue to be half of the existing sanctions as the amount multiplies.

Like, if he fails to pay the $1000 and it turns into $1500, he should have to pay that or suffer an additional sanction of $750, and if he fails to pay the resulting $2,250, suffer a sanction of $1,125, and when he fails to pay $3,375 be sanctioned another $1,687.50

 

[HackerX]

I'm looking forward to it going to the 10th again and Null not having to lift a finger before it gets thrown out.

When this happens, it'll be incredible. Last time, he was backed by somewhat competent lawyers who managed to finagle a time-travel appeal. Russ will file a million motions over how the 10th circuit already basically said he won, that they should rule in his favor, but can't even be accepted due to technical reasons. I'm sure Russ will frantically email those lawyers again and I hope the non-replies somehow become exhibits. On top of 15 random whore screenshots ofc.

I’m surprised Russ hasn’t filed anything today, objecting to the ruling. When I saw the judge cite $1000 I had a feeling Russ would immediately file something to clarify that he and Hardin agreed to the deduction.

I'm not sure who's gonna make the first move after the rulings. Who knows if Russ is gonna continue plightsperging over recent motions or find something new.

At worst he will cry to daddy and his father will bail him out.

I'm very curious about that dynamic. I've got no doubt Russ doesn't have any issues groveling to his parents in a dire situation, but he's also terrified about people discovering his antics. Russ surely doesn't truthfully explain what he needs the money for so I wonder how he goes about it

 

[RodgerDodger]

I'm not sure who's gonna make the first move after the rulings. Who knows if Russ is gonna continue plightsperging over recent motions or find something new.

At this point Hardin will likely simply file what the court asked on the schedule they requested. And probably his 2 still outstanding sanctions requests. The only other thing I could see him asking is politely for the Court to Strike Greee's porn stash from the record. Although he may pass on that one as the Judge seems wound up.

Shitlips is completely unpredictable. It's possible that Barlow's smackdown scares him for a few days.

 

[IamnottheNSA]

Greee's excuses made me curious, so I went back and kept track of some of them. All from Greee's filings.

This should sum it up:
View attachment 7484341View attachment 7484137View attachment 7484315
View attachment 7484311View attachment 7484345View attachment 7484312View attachment 7484336View attachment 7484335View attachment 7484332View attachment 7484320View attachment 7484327View attachment 7484322View attachment 7484329View attachment 7484333View attachment 7484325View attachment 7484334View attachment 7484340View attachment 7484328View attachment 7484331View attachment 7484319View attachment 7484339View attachment 7484343View attachment 7484347View attachment 7484348View attachment 7484342View attachment 7484351View attachment 7484308View attachment 7484324View attachment 7484313View attachment 7484344View attachment 7484350View attachment 7484316View attachment 7484338View attachment 7484314View attachment 7484349
View attachment 7484330

View attachment 7488417View attachment 7488413View attachment 7488414View attachment 7488415

If you just read all this in one paragraph, it might just pass as one of Greee's motions.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

At this point Hardin will likely simply file what the court asked on the schedule they requested. And probably his 2 still outstanding sanctions requests.

That seems most likely. I'm fine with the magistrate denying his request for additional time. Even though there are some matters that Hardin would like the court to rule on before submitting his reply at the end of the month, it should be quite obvious from past history that even with a time extension the court would be unlikely to rule on anything that Hardin is waiting on them for, making the extension for time pointless.

I also take this as a good sign that the magistrate judge is going to dismiss the case. On top of all of the other shenanigans, Greer failing for all of these months to do even the most simple thing and produce a document has broken the judge. He just wants to get it over with and knows that the district judge will sign off on that decision. I also think that the district judge won't be reducing any sanctions this next time either. I'm excited to see how much more expensive that $67 restraining order becomes.

The only downside is that unless Greer does something new and unhinged, I can't imagine much happening for the next three weeks. Of course every other time I've thought that recently, Greer has done something so spectacularly stupid that I'm left completely gobsmacked.

 

[ZipDisk]

Where does the delusion that null can't post DMCA notices come from? Russ isn't the only one who thinks they can't be posted.

 

[YouTube Autist]

Where does the delusion that null can't post DMCA notices come from?

Russell thinks that things he personally dislikes should be bannable.

I will say also that quite a lot of people in the US have confident but distorted beliefs about what is and isn't allowed re: privacy.

 

[AnOminous]

Where does the delusion that null can't post DMCA notices come from? Russ isn't the only one who thinks they can't be posted.

The cretins on the Tenth Circuit panel certainly didn't help with this.

 

[sallowhal]

Where does the delusion that null can't post DMCA notices come from? Russ isn't the only one who thinks they can't be posted.

i could've sworn it was something handed down by the 10th circuit. is this a mandela effect or am i just retarded? (i'm just retarded, most likely)

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

i could've sworn it was something handed down by the 10th circuit. is this a mandela effect or am i just retarded? (i'm just retarded, most likely)

It's not illegal to post DMCA, but the 10th says that if you do it, it could encourage copyright infringement in the past.

 

[DavidS877]

i could've sworn it was something handed down by the 10th circuit. is this a mandela effect or am i just retarded? (i'm just retarded, most likely)

Here's what the 10th said.



Document here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66664788/010010936535/1/greer-v-moon/

 

[HackerX]

It's not illegal to post DMCA, but the 10th says that if you do it, it could encourage copyright infringement in the past.

Maybe the 10th circuit did it because they thought it'd be funny to watch Russ's attempt to argue time travel copyright infringement or something? Jokes on them though, Russ didn't take the bait. Instead, he filed pictures of Hitler and hookers. Some would say he just "pops off at the mouth".

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

So much for time travel not being allowed in federal courts...

 

[DavidS877]

So much for time travel not being allowed in federal courts...

I'm hopeful Greer's next appeal allows Ouija boards and seances to be used as evidence. It's obviously discrimination that Steve Taylor can't testify.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I'm hopeful Greer's next appeal allows Ouija boards and seances to be used as evidence. It's obviously discrimination that Steve Taylor can't testify.

"The Ouija Board is trying to spell something... G-I-M-P-F-A-C-E-D-R-E-T-A-R-D... I think it might be a shit post from the great beyond, your honor!"

 

[FatMan]

I also take this as a good sign that the magistrate judge is going to dismiss the case. On top of all of the other shenanigans, Greer failing for all of these months to do even the most simple thing and produce a document has broken the judge.

He basically has to (recommend Barlow dismisses it). At the 5/6 hearing he basically said "I'm giving 14 more days to produce the document, and then we're looking at 37(b) case ending sanctions if he doesn't get around to it". He didn't get around to it even with another extension. Not dismissing it after such a clear warning severely undermines the court's authority.

I'm calling 90+% chance the case is terminated shortly after the reply to the response to the MTD is in, and 50-60% that Josh gets full costs & fees due to all of the fuckery. If the motion to unseal ECF no. 1 is granted and fraud to obtain IFP is proven, I think that also jumps to 90+% as it taints the entire legislation from the get-go and is an enormous abuse of the judicial process.



Imagine greeeee on the hook for like 100k. lol.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm calling 90+% chance the case is terminated shortly after the reply to the response to the MTD is in, and 50-60% that Josh gets full costs & fees due to all of the fuckery. If the motion to unseal ECF no. 1 is granted and fraud to obtain IFP is proven, I think that also jumps to 90+% as it taints the entire legislation from the get-go and is an enormous abuse of the judicial process.

I'm thinking when they finally get around to dismissing it, it will be based on as many discretionary grounds as possible to invoke abuse of discretion review and basically put a stake through its heart and bury it at a crossroads at dawn with garlic sewn in its mouth.

I am hoping that's specifically why they're demanding that response Hardin filed a motion for an extension on (and I do not believe Hardin actually even wanted that granted).

 

[Wherethereisawhip]

Here's what the 10th said.

Where's the time travel part? Was the stuff already all put up before Greer filed up and the court just bought that no totally a few more had been put up?