US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Today's Executive Orders:

EMPOWERING COMMONSENSE WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE​

Executive Orders
June 12, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Purpose. The devastation of the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires shocked the American people and highlighted the catastrophic consequences when State and local governments are unable to quickly respond to such disasters. In too many cases, including in California, a slow and inadequate response to wildfires is a direct result of reckless mismanagement and lack of preparedness. Wildfires threaten every region, yet many local government entities continue to disregard commonsense preventative measures. Firefighters across the country are forced to rely on outdated technology and face challenges in quickly responding to wildfires because of unnecessary regulation and bureaucracy.
The Federal Government can empower State and local leaders by streamlining Federal wildfire capabilities to improve their effectiveness and promoting commonsense, technology-enabled local strategies for land management and wildfire response and mitigation.

Sec. 2. Streamlining Federal Wildland Fire Governance. Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall, to the maximum degree practicable and consistent with applicable law, consolidate their wildland fire programs to achieve the most efficient and effective use of wildland fire offices, coordinating bodies, programs, budgets, procurement processes, and research and, as necessary, recommend additional measures to advance this objective.

Sec. 3. Encouraging Local Wildfire Preparedness and Response. (a) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall:
(i) expand and strengthen the use of partnerships, agreements, compacts, and mutual aid capabilities that empower Federal, State, local, tribal, and community-driven land management that reduces wildfire risk and improves wildfire response, including on public lands; and
(ii) develop and expand the use of other measures to incentivize responsible land management and wildfire prevention, mitigation, and response measures at the State and local levels.
(b) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) represented at the National Interagency Fire Center, shall:
(i) develop a comprehensive technology roadmap, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), to increase wildfire firefighting capabilities at the State and local levels, including through artificial intelligence, data sharing, innovative modeling and mapping capabilities, and technology to identify wildland fire ignitions and weather forecasts to inform response and evacuation; and
(ii) promote the use of a risk-informed approach, as consistent with Executive Order 14239 of March 18, 2025 (Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness), to develop new policies that remove barriers to preventing and responding to wildfires, including through year-round response readiness, better forest health, and activities outlined in Executive Order 14225 of March 1, 2025 (Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production).

Sec. 4. Strengthening Wildfire Mitigation. Within 90 days of the date of this order:
(a) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall consider modifying or rescinding, as consistent with applicable law, Federal rules or policies that impede the use of appropriate, preventative prescribed fires.
(b) The Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall consider modifying or rescinding, as consistent with applicable law, Federal rules or policies hindering the appropriate use of fire retardant to fight wildfires.
(c) The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall consider promoting, assisting, and facilitating, as consistent with applicable law, innovative uses of woody biomass and forest products to reduce fuel loads in areas at risk of wildfires.
(d) The Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Energy, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall consider initiating rulemaking proceedings to establish, as consistent with applicable law, best practices to reduce the risk of wildfire ignition from the bulk-power system without increasing costs for electric-power end users, including through methods such as vegetation management, the removal of forest-hazardous fuels along transmission lines, improved engineering approaches, and safer operational practices.
(e) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior, shall review pending and proposed wildfire-related litigation involving electrical utility companies to ensure the Department’s positions and proposed resolutions in such matters advance the wildfire prevention and mitigation efforts identified in this order.

Sec. 5. Modernizing Wildfire Prevention and Response.
(a) Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of OSTP, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and the heads of relevant agencies, shall, as appropriate, identify, declassify, and make publicly available historical satellite datasets that will advance wildfire prevention and response and improve wildfire prediction and evaluation models.
(b) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the heads of agencies represented at the National Interagency Fire Center, shall:
(i) Identify rules that impede wildfire prevention, detection, or response and consider eliminating or revising those rules, as consistent with applicable law. This consideration and any resulting rulemaking proceedings shall be reflected in the Fall 2025 Unified Regulatory Agenda.
(ii) Develop performance metrics for wildfire response, including metrics related to average response times, annual fuels treatments, safety and cost effectiveness, and other subjects, as appropriate for inclusion in strategic and annual performance plans.
(c) Within 210 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense shall evaluate and, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, prioritize the sale of excess aircraft and aircraft parts to support wildfire mitigation and response.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Interior in equal shares.



DONALD J. TRUMP



THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 12, 2025.
Source (Archive)

Stopping Radical Environmentalism to Generate Power for the Columbia River Basin​

Presidential Memoranda
June 12, 2025

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY
THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
THE CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SUBJECT: Stopping Radical Environmentalism to Generate Power for the Columbia River Basin

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct:

It is essential to protect Americans’ ability to take full advantage of our vast natural resources to ensure human flourishing across our country. My Administration is committed to protecting the American people from radical green agenda policies that make their lives more expensive, and to maximizing the beneficial uses of our existing energy infrastructure and natural resources to generate energy and lower the cost of living.

The Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023 (Restoring Healthy and Abundant Salmon, Steelhead, and Other Native Fish Populations in the Columbia River Basin), for example, elevates “equitable treatment for fish” and misplaced concerns about climate change above the Nation’s interests in reliable energy resources and the needs of American citizens. Among other things, the actions that the Biden Administration contemplated in furtherance of the policy stated in the Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023, included breaching four dams on the Lower Snake River, eliminating over 3,000 megawatts of secure, reliable, and affordable hydroelectric generating capacity. The negative impacts from these reckless acts, if completed, would be devastating for the region, and there would be no viable approach to replace the low-cost, baseload energy supplied; the critical shipping channels lost; the vital water supply for local farmers reduced; or the recreational opportunities that would no longer be possible as a result of these acts.

To prevent these harmful impacts, I hereby revoke the Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023. Further, within 15 days of the date of this memorandum, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works under the direction of the Secretary of the Army (heads of departments) shall take all appropriate steps to withdraw from the Memorandum of Understanding filed on December 14, 2023, in the Columbia River System litigation, National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 3:01-cv-640-SI (D. Or.), Dkt. 2450-1 (MOU).

The heads of departments shall also rescind the “Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Columbia River System Operations” published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2024. As appropriate, the heads of departments shall develop a schedule to complete the Supplemental Columbia River System Environmental Impact Statement and reissue the Notice of Intent pursuant to that schedule and in alignment with any updated National Environmental Policy Act procedures of the heads of departments. The heads of departments shall submit the schedule to the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Chair shall convene regular meetings among the heads of departments and any additional appropriate Federal stakeholders for updates on the status of the environmental review process.

Within 30 days of the date of this memorandum, the heads of departments shall identify and report to the President through the Chair of CEQ on:

(i) all actions taken pursuant to or consistent with the Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023, including the MOU;

(ii) the status of all Federal commitments made pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023, and the MOU along with an identification of any such commitments that may be consistent with the policies of my Administration;

(iii) any steps that may be taken to rescind or recoup Federal funds obligated to implement the MOU; and

(iv) any actions that have been taken and future steps that must be taken to withdraw from the MOU.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.



DONALD J. TRUMP
Source (Archive)
 
"Our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good workers away... Changes are coming!"
Please explain to me how this means more deportations.
I think a potential way to spin this or make compromises would be to bump the farm slaves to the back of the list (Trump already said criminals are at the front of the list) and give a stern warning that you have x amount of time to replace them with Americans or face the music. But I'm just some retard on a tranny killing website
 
I think a potential way to spin this or make compromises would be to bump the farm slaves to the back of the list (Trump already said criminals are at the front of the list) and give a stern warning that you have x amount of time to replace them with Americans or face the music. But I'm just some retard on a tranny killing website
immigrant workers harm US citizens far, far more than immigrant criminals. even with cartel thugs you have a relatively low chance of being murdered or robbed in the US. but hundreds of thousands of Americans can't get jobs because of immigrant workers.
 
Before autists sperged about computers, they sperged about trains. And before they sperged about trains, they sperged about horses.
View attachment 7490502
Embrace tradition.
Wait a minute what do trains, computers, horses have in common speed (computers for speed of thought) what else do autismos like that goes fast sonic it all makes sense now.
 
Gotta put this here.

And with a possible avatar.
View attachment 7491479

View attachment 7491480

Gotta love the new tack: BUT MEXICO OWNED IT FIRST!

Yeah, for like 20 years.

Their argument is basically "Well, this dude owned your house a 100 years ago, so give it back to his family."
I know I'm behind but this argument they make is perhaps the most retarded argument I have ever heard. Based on their logic the East coast of America should go back to Britain, The center should go back to France, the entirety of central and south America should go back to Spain and Portugal and all of Africa barring Ethiopia needs to go back to the European powers.

It's just another example of the left's "this works for me but doesn't for you" rulebook. When someone says that just laugh in their face.
 
Yeah Im not buying the 'hurr durr, you need manual labor". With AI and modern machinery, we can innovate and drive the cost down.

Manual labor won't go away, but some of the sperging sounds more liking dooming than finding a solution.
or just do less stuff. Oh no there aren't enough hotel workers or dishwashers. Alright, well we don't need as many hotels or restaurants, as there are 30 million fewer people in the country, so it doesn't matter.
 
https://www.axios.com/2025/06/12/israel-strike-iran-us-not-participate

https://archive.is/4YhWF
The Trump administration told the Israeli government the U.S. won't be directly involved in any Israeli military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, two U.S. sources and an Israeli source familiar with those discussions tell Axios.

Why it matters: Officials in the U.S., Israel and Iran are all preparing for a scenario where U.S.-Iran nuclear talks collapse, Israel orders waves of strikes on Iran, and Iran retaliates by attacking Israel and U.S. bases in the region — possibly all within the next week or so.

President Trump confirmed Thursday that Israeli strikes "might very well happen."
Privately, the administration has informed Israel that would be a solo mission, not a joint operation, at least in terms of bombing and other offensive kinetic activity.

The sources did not say whether the U.S. would provide assistance in terms of intelligence or logistics, such as with aerial refueling.
The U.S. would almost certainly help Israel defend itself from Iranian retaliation, as it has during past Iranian attacks.
Zoom in: While Israel could cause significant damage to Iran's nuclear program, an Israeli operation would be more limited than one involving U.S. participation.

Israel's air force doesn't have B-2 or B-52 bombers that can carry the massive bunker buster bombs that would likely be needed to hit Iran's Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility, which is built deep inside a mountain. Israel would likely attempt to repeatedly strike the same targets over the course of multiple days in order to damage Iran's underground sites. Analysts are divided on the likelihood of success.
State of play: Iran has vowed to strike U.S. targets in the region in the event of any attack on its nuclear program.

The U.S. is in the process of withdrawing diplomats and military families who could be in harm's way.
Driving the news: The Pentagon canceled on Thursday a planned visit to Israel this weekend by CENTCOM commander Gen. Erik Kurilla, a U.S. official said.

The cancellation of the visit was another sign that the U.S. doesn't want to be seen as cooperating with an Israeli strike against Iran.
The White House and the Israeli embassy in Washington declined to comment.
What they're saying: Trump told reporters Thursday that he doesn't want to say an Israeli strike "is imminent," but it might happen.

Trump stressed he wants to avoid conflict but said that will require concessions that Iran has been unwilling to make.
He added that so long as there's a chance of a deal, he doesn't want Israel to do anything to "blow it."
Between the lines: Trump's remarks urging Israel not to attack while talks are taking place wasn't coordinated with the Israeli government, according to a U.S. source familiar.

Israel previously assured the White House it wouldn't move unless the talks fail, as Axios reported last week.
State of play: Israeli officials say the Israel Defense Forces are on high alert and preparing to strike Iran quickly if White House envoy Steve Witkoff's diplomacy fails this weekend.

Witkoff will meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday in Oman to discuss Iran's response to the U.S. nuclear deal proposal.
That meeting, and the U.S. assessment of whether there's still a path to a deal, could determine whether diplomacy continues or conflict begins.
 
This is bullshit. Lots of young men in this country would be perfectly happy harvesting crops. Provided they got paid enough to buy their pick up truck, take their girl to a nice dinner, buy some beer and eventually get a house to put the girl in and raise children.

But that is not the economy we have. Because the economy we have is still reliant on slave labor.

Again I reminded of my autistic obsession with the song "battle cry of freedom". There is a very powerful line it.

"We will welcome to our ranks, all the loyal true and brave. Shouting the battle cry of freedom! And although he may be poor, not a man shall be a slave. Shouting the battle cry of Freedom! The Union forever, hurrah boys hurrah! Down with the traitor and up with the star! As we rally 'round the flag boys, rally once again, Shouting the battle cry of freedom!
not every job is going to pay the 50s dreams of a house and family. you couldn't point to a time in us history where being a picker paid anything more than a shed and a hogmaw
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: nigel p poppycock
Crops that actually feed people and animals, things like corn, wheat, etc. are all almost entirely farmed with huge machines and don't need as much immigrant labor.
Fruits are great, and are probably my favorite food group, but I would pay $40 for a box of strawberries if it meant I never had to see a spic or chink in my life ever again.
 
To prevent these harmful impacts, I hereby revoke the Presidential Memorandum of September 27, 2023. Further, within 15 days of the date of this memorandum, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works under the direction of the Secretary of the Army (heads of departments) shall take all appropriate steps to withdraw from the Memorandum of Understanding filed on December 14, 2023, in the Columbia River System litigation, National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 3:01-cv-640-SI (D. Or.), Dkt. 2450-1 (MOU).
This is the big one here folks. The Federal Government has just seized control of the entire watershed of the west coast. Oregon, Washington and California have just been told to shove it. Washington DC is in charge. No more "Understandings" and court settlements.
 
I know I'm behind but this argument they make is perhaps the most retarded argument I have ever heard. Based on their logic the East coast of America should go back to Britain, The center should go back to France, the entirety of central and south America should go back to Spain and Portugal and all of Africa barring Ethiopia needs to go back to the European powers.

It's just another example of the left's "this works for me but doesn't for you" rulebook. When someone says that just laugh in their face.
Ok but who owned France and Britain before? It should go back to them.
 
Back