AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

[linchan]

Based soy woah jacks are an extant form of art, historically consistent with the emergence of DaDaism and surrealism art movements.

You are a wojak artist?

 

[Mad_Dog]

Help me lads

View attachment 7495846

Pope Leo XIV is the AI Revolution Pope. He chose the name Leo because Pope Leo XIII was the Industrial Revolution Pope, and he wrote Rerum Novarum. So there's a 100% chance Pope Leo XIV will drop an encyclical setting guidelines on how to navigate the AI Revolution while maintaining our human dignity.

I would put him smack-dab in the middle of the chart.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

>inpainting
wow, collage
>take the generated image out of the ai and manually alter it
we had that, it’s called photography
>if you’re only willing to work with cave walls and soot, nobody’s going to hire you
cave walls and soot still exists in the form of graffiti and pencils.

look, while I haven’t heard of inpainting before, i did try it. all these tools were already in use in the form of photobashing in professional artistry. hell, david dees was one of the greatest artists of this era and he uses photocollage. no thanks saar

>cars
wow, horses
>planes to cross the oceans
we had that, it's called boats
Do you see how ridiculous this sounds? Especially the last part implying that if you showed up to a modern workplace as a graphic design artist paid by the hour with pencils and some bricks (they're like your very own portable cave!) to scrawl your work on that you wouldn't get fired. Frankly, why should you even use any digital mediums? Isn't digital mostly just a matter of convenience? It's entirely irrelevant and offers nothing new.
Edit: "I haven't heard of inpainting before" bro please at least learn about what you're arguing against before you argue against it.

 

[Ericson]

If you use AI, you're literally hitler.

 

[Runch]

Does this retard not know that people are using AI to make memes mocking Trump or Musk? Do they think ChatGPT refuses to generate content that could be construed as inspiring pushback against an oppressor?

Do they realize that a key aspect of fascism is control and limits over means of expression? Pretty sure people having fun making dumb memes using any tool is one of the things fascism could not tolerate. Look in a mirror.

 

[linchan]

View attachment 7500737
If you use AI, you're literally hitler.

They really need to stop giving cool shit to the right wing.

 

[Kokenami]

View attachment 7500737
If you use AI, you're literally hitler.

"Anyone who disagrees with me on any of my stances about anything is a fascist!"

 

[Inco G. Nito]

View attachment 7500737
If you use AI, you're literally hitler.

Bro I tried to find this original post so I could inspect element it and repost it here but with "AI" replaced with "Digital Art". But it looks like he's deleted it(?) and frankly scrolling through this actual lunatic's posts left me feeling dazed and my ears ringing.

Spoiler: Highlights

AUTOMATED PROBLEM SOLVING is just a shitty gimmick just like 3D TVs and NFTs man. There's not really any use for AUTOMATED. PROBLEM. SOLVING. in the future, you know?

"RFK single-handedly destroyed all of American science" How this sentence is even supposed to make sense I cannot begin to comprehend.

The wheel sure did lead to a lot of bad stuff...

"techno-Christian fascist hellscape" sounds like a fucking awesome setting. Devout priests in space marine ass power armor quoting bible versus and proselytizing as they annihilate heresy. What on Earth this has anything to do with America is anyone's guess.

This image is itself a better example of fascism and fascist propaganda than AI is.

In case you're wondering... I mean, he probably is. There's not much to search on him though unfortunately.

I can't imagine living in this guy's world. He literally has a schizophrenic paranoia of AI. It's incredible.

 

[Colon capital V]

This is what anti-AI arttroons actually believe in:

I shall once again clarify that yes, we still aren't quite at the point of AI being capable of animating like humans, at least not without some creative jerry-rigging of multiple AI tools together, but there will come a point where anyone can make their own animated shows with the help of AI and not having to pay out of pocket for other artists (With the best creative works made by those who actually are creative and know how to put an idea together). And yet anti-AI faggots think this is bad even though whether it was drawn by a human or "drawn" by an AI, in theory the output should be the same, just that one is getting paid in electricity usage and the other isn't.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

at least not without some creative jerry-rigging of multiple AI tools together

@IndigoDownSuperEgoUp This video singlehandedly proves everything we've been saying correct. And it puts a big smile on my face too. So much for "Regular artists will receive no benefits from AI." And this is just the beginning.

 

[linchan]

 

[The Thinking Abacus]

View attachment 7502891

PIRACY BAD! COPYRIGHT GOOD! NO THEFT!!!11

 

[Runch]

There are a lot of situations where suddenly introducing undue burden on the process would kill the industry.

Imagine if the beef industry had to ask cows' permission before slaughtering them, and if they tried to escape the slaughterhouse that indicates denial of consent. The beef industry would die overnight. If your industry relies on violation of a living being's consent, maybe it doesn't deserve to remain an industry.

 

[Trench Raider]

View attachment 7502891

Jeez, You telling me that people from r/piracy of all fucking places is attacking AI cause it scrapes content?
Imagine being so retarded publically without any glimps of self reflecion.


If you ask me 'bout that reddit comment above, I think they're coping with that. Yes AI companies actively profits from it, but still. By not buying product they don't let original producer get money.
If we assume that AI companies are bad cause they use content to profit without premisions, then reddit pirates aren't even better that much, beyond not profiting directly from the content they're not better. But self reflection won't grant you reddit gold after all...

 

[AnOminous]

Imagine if the beef industry had to ask cows' permission before slaughtering them, and if they tried to escape the slaughterhouse that indicates denial of consent. The beef industry would die overnight. If your industry relies on violation of a living being's consent, maybe it doesn't deserve to remain an industry.

[LAUGHS WHILE EATING A HAMBURGER]

 

[The Thinking Abacus]

There are a lot of situations where suddenly introducing undue burden on the process would kill the industry.

Imagine if the beef industry had to ask cows' permission before slaughtering them, and if they tried to escape the slaughterhouse that indicates denial of consent. The beef industry would die overnight. If your industry relies on violation of a living being's consent, maybe it doesn't deserve to remain an industry.

Vegans will unironically use this argument and wonder why other people think they're stupid.

 

[linchan]

Jeez, You telling me that people from r/piracy of all fucking places is attacking AI cause it scrapes content?
Imagine being so retarded publically without any glimps of self reflecion.

View attachment 7503028
If you ask me 'bout that reddit comment above, I think they're coping with that. Yes AI companies actively profits from it, but still. By not buying product they don't let original producer get money.
If we assume that AI companies are bad cause they use content to profit without premisions, then reddit pirates aren't even better that much, beyond not profiting directly from the content they're not better. But self reflection won't grant you reddit gold after all...

I don't buy that "huge difference between individuals and corporations" because frankly literally everyone is getting into AI with no distinction between classes. There are just as many corporations trying to cut into the AI hype as there are tech companies propping up, and AI use is like, exceedingly normie. This dichotomy doesn't make sense.

"An Industry that runs on stealing from people who can barely afford to keep the lights on should've died years ago"
Which is funny because this is exactly what people said during the rise of Napster and Limewire.

 

[IndigoDownSuperEgoUp]

You are a wojak artist?

made a few but the sharty is just downtime R&R for me mostly

>cars
wow, horses
>planes to cross the oceans
we had that, it's called boats
Do you see how ridiculous this sounds? Especially the last part implying that if you showed up to a modern workplace as a graphic design artist paid by the hour with pencils and some bricks (they're like your very own portable cave!) to scrawl your work on that you wouldn't get fired. Frankly, why should you even use any digital mediums? Isn't digital mostly just a matter of convenience? It's entirely irrelevant and offers nothing new.
Edit: "I haven't heard of inpainting before" bro please at least learn about what you're arguing against before you argue against it.

bro you’re dealing with horses that run 200kmph and boats that can outpace planes. you gooning to hypothetical scenario of me being a cavegrug fr fr.
also, about digital, what i can say is new is that you can airbrush without having to breathe toxic gas and get access to every type of paintbrush. always preferred my toxic gas fumes though, digital is out of necessity to make money.
also sybau about learning about your abominable intelligence o algo. haven’t enountered a case of a respected artistic work using this inpainting shit yet. when i see it i’ll join in, haven’t seen it yet though.
EDIT: every pro AI argument ends up in favor of abolishing gatekeeping btw.

 

[mr. testicular torsion]

 

[linchan]

made a few but the sharty is just downtime R&R for me mostly

> "I AM AN EXPERT ON ART AND AI ART HAS NO SOUL"
> What kind of art do you do?
>"Soywojaks"